Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Quality of care in the free maternal healthcare era in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of providers’ and managers’ perceptions

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 21, Article number: 220 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Free maternal healthcare financing schemes play an essential role in the quality of services rendered to clients during antenatal care in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, healthcare managers’ and providers’ perceptions of the healthcare financing scheme may influence the quality of care. This scoping review mapped evidence on managers’ and providers’ perspectives of free maternal healthcare and the quality of care in SSA.

Methods

We used Askey and O’Malley’s framework as a guide to conduct this review. To address the research question, we searched PubMed, CINAHL through EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Google Scholar with no date limitation to May 2019 using keywords, Boolean terms, and Medical Subject Heading terms to retrieve relevant articles. Both abstract and full articles screening were conducted independently by two reviewers using the inclusion and exclusion criteria as a guide. All significant data were extracted, organized into themes, and a summary of the findings reported narratively.

Results

In all, 15 out of 390 articles met the inclusion criteria. These 15 studies were conducted in nine countries. That is, Ghana (4), Kenya (3), and Nigeria (2), Burkina Faso (1), Burundi (1), Niger (1), Sierra Leone (1), Tanzania (1), and Uganda (1). Of the 15 included studies, 14 reported poor quality of maternal healthcare from managers’ and providers’ perspectives. Factors contributing to the perception of poor maternal healthcare included: late reimbursement of funds, heavy workload of providers, lack of essential drugs and stock-out of medical supplies, lack of policy definition, out-of-pocket payment, and inequitable distribution of staff.

Conclusion

This study established evidence of existing literature on the quality of care based on healthcare providers’ and managers’ perspectives though very limited. This study indicates healthcare providers and managers perceive the quality of maternal healthcare under the free financing policy as poor. Nonetheless, the free maternal care policy is very much needed towards achieving universal health, and all efforts to sustain and improve the quality of care under it must be encouraged. Therefore, more research is needed to better understand the impact of their perceived poor quality of care on maternal health outcomes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Every country around the globe considers maternal healthcare as one of the top-most importance [1]. It is for this reason that maternal healthcare financing is given much attention in various forms [2]. Member countries in the World Health Organization (WHO) Africa Regions proposed in the 2008 Ouagadougou declaration to achieve better health for all [3] but maternal healthcare is paramount worldwide [4]. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), some countries introduced free maternal healthcare financing policies to curb the pressing complications and challenges associated with maternal healthcare delivery in order to achieve the Millennium Development Goal five (MDG 5) [5]. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.1 (reducing maternal mortality to less than 70 per 100,000 live births) aims to build on the MDG 5 achievement [6,7,8].

Free maternal healthcare financing includes any health financing policy which eliminates all or part of catastrophic healthcare cost for poor pregnant women [9]. It could be in a form of health insurance where a required premium is taken from all subscribers and a prescribed package of service is rendered to each member in the scheme [10]. Sometimes, Lower and Middle-Income countries (LMICs) rely on loans and grants, taxes, and donor support to finance healthcare with major consideration for the vulnerable (women in their reproductive age and children) [11]. Bridging the financial barriers does not only mean removing the maternal healthcare burdens but also ensuring the quality of service delivery and equitable distribution of resources [7]. Quality refers to the standard or expectation that a product or service is required to meet the level of satisfaction for a person or group [4, 11]. Therefore, quality is said to be subjective.

Nonetheless, healthcare managers’ and providers’ perceptions of free maternal healthcare policies may influence the quality of care rendered to beneficiaries [12]. Since research has shown that adequacy and availability of funds, provision of essential drugs and supply, and available human resources facilitate health service quality [13, 14]. Evidence is abundant on how the implementation of free maternal healthcare financing schemes has improved access to maternal health services and outcomes. Nonetheless, there are several reported challenges including a delayed refund of monies to the health facilities in some SSA countries which potentially can affect the quality of care. Despite this, no study has systematically mapped literature for policy decisions or identified literature gaps for future research. Our earlier review focused on women’s perception of the quality of care in the free maternal healthcare era [15]. Therefore, this current scoping review mapped evidence on providers’ and managers’ perceptions of the quality of care in the free maternal healthcare era in SSA.

Methods

We used Arksey and O’Malley’s framework as a guide to conduct a scoping review. The protocol of this study was developed and published elsewhere [16]. We followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews checklist to report this study.

Identifying the research questions

The research question for this study was: To date, what evidence exists on healthcare providers’ and managers’ perceptions of the quality of care in the free maternal healthcare era in SSA? Table 1 shows the framework (population, content, and context (PCC)) used to ascertain the suitability of the review question.

Table 1 PCC framework for defining the eligibility of the studies for the primary research question
Full size table

Literature search

We searched five electronic databases (CINAHL through EBSCOhost, PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar) with no date limitation to May 2019 for relevant articles (Supplementary file 1). We used a combination of the following keywords: “free maternal healthcare financing”, “healthcare financing”, “maternal healthcare”, “delivery”, “health service”, “managers”, “healthcare providers”, “quality of service delivery”. Boolean operators and medical subject headings were applicable were included in the search strategy. Limitations on language and study design were removed. We also searched the reference list of the included articles for eligible studies.

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion criterion was that an article had to be written and published in English, involve at least one SSA country, include health providers/managers or both, and focus on a free maternal healthcare financing policy and quality of care. This review was limited to primary study designs (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods study). We excluded articles focused on clients’ perception of the quality of care.

Study selection

The database search and the title screening were conducted by MAM using the eligibility criteria. Then, duplicates were deleted and the clean library was shared with the review team. Abstracts and full articles were screened independently by MAM and FID using tools pilot tested by the review team. The review team members discussed the discrepancies that arise out of the abstract screening between MAM and FID until a consensus was reached, while DK addressed the discrepancies at the full text phase.

Charting the data

We extracted the following: author and publication year, country where the study was conducted, study design type, study setting, study population, and type of free maternal healthcare policy (fully or partially free). We also extracted the findings relevant to answer the review question using a deductive approach. To ensure the accuracy and trustworthiness of this study’s results, MAM and DK independently abstracted the data with BV acting as the arbiter.

Collating and summarizing the results

Thematic analysis was conducted following the data extraction. The data were collated into themes and a summary of the study outcomes reported in narrative form.

Results

Of the 452 eligible articles obtained from the database search, 62 duplicates were removed. Subsequently, 348 and 27 articles were removed from the abstract and full article screening stages respectively (Fig. 1). The reasons for exclusion following the full article screening were: inability to access the full text of three studies [18,19,20]; one was a protocol [21]; one was review paper [14]; fifteen articles did not report on either free or quality of maternal healthcare [5, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35];, and seven had no documentation on either front-line managers’ or providers’ perspective of free maternal healthcare [11, 36,37,38,39,40,41].

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram

Full size image

Characteristics of the included studies

Among the 15 included articles that qualified for this study, the highest 26% (4) reported from Ghana, followed by 19% (3) and 13% (2) from Kenya and Nigeria respectively. The remainder (40%) of the 15 included articles were conducted in Burkina Faso, Burundi, Niger, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, and Uganda with 7% (1) each. Out of the 15 studies, 7 were conducted in health facility-based settings representing 53.3% [40, 42,43,44,45,46,47], 4 in community setting indicating 26.7% [48,49,50,51], whereas 2 (13.3%) were nationwide surveys [52, 53] and 1(6.7%) was a household survey [42]. Of the 15 include studies majority (40.0%) were mixed method studies [43, 46, 49, 51, 53, 54], qualitative studies (33.3%) [42, 45, 47, 48, 52], and cross-sectional studies (26.7%) [2, 40, 44]. The majority 9 (60.3%) were generally conducted among healthcare providers [2, 40, 43, 44, 47,48,49, 54], 1 (6.7%) among health managers [46], 5 (33%) involved both health providers and managers [42, 45, 51, 52, 55].

Study findings

Out of the 15 included studies, only one reported that providers were satisfied with the quality of maternal healthcare [55]. The remaining 14 studies reported different challenges with the free maternal healthcare policy implementation which consequently resulted in a poor quality of maternal care [2, 40, 42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49, 51, 53, 54] (Table 2).

Table 2 Study findings
Full size table

Providers’ perspectives of the quality of maternal care

One of the most challenging problems faced by providers was a delay in reimbursement and/inadequacy of funds for free maternal healthcare policy. Two (2) studies, one in Kenya: Wamalwa, 2015, and another in Nigeria: Okonofua et al., 2011, stated the inadequacy of provision of funds for providers to render good quality care to women [44, 53] Moreover, Kuwawenaruwa et al., 2019 study in Tanzania also reported poor quality of care due to delays in reimbursement [54]. Nabyonga-Orem et al., 2008 wrote that in Uganda, an inadequate supply of essential drugs was persistent relative to Koroma et al., 2017 study from Sierra Leone. According to Wamalwa 2015, Nabyonga-Orem et al., 2008, and Kuwawenaruwa et al., 2019 studies in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania respectively, health providers never enjoyed any form of motivation [44, 49, 54]. In Ghana, Witter et al. 2013, and Ganle et al. 2014 reported that workload increased tremendously as a result of high utilization and shortage of staff in most facilities [47, 48]. Ganle et al., 2014, wrote that there was a shortage of staff in most facilities [48]. Due to the high utilization of care by pregnant women, the workload of providers increased greatly which affected the quality of care negatively [46]. In Kenya, Wamalma 2015, reported a heavy workload of providers as a result of high uptake of service with no additional staff to cope with the increasing rate of service utilization [44].

Health managers’ perspectives on the quality of maternal care

Nimpagaritse and Bertone study in Burundi indicated that as a result of the complexity involved in recouping funds, out-of-pocket payment existed at the expense of the poor pregnant women [46]. This study further added that the quality of care was low because there was no clear definition of free maternal care policy [46]. Again, the study was emphatic on administrative staff shortage, and providers combining some administrative work which consequently render providers’ duties more burdensome [46].

Quality of maternal care from both healthcare managers and providers viewpoint

Belaid and Ridde study in Burkina Faso showed that healthcare providers and managers had a good perception of the quality of maternal healthcare [55]. Factors contributing to the good quality of care and increasing facility-based deliveries were attributed to leadership, strengthening relationships of trust with communities, users’ positive perceptions of quality of care, and the introduction of female professional staff [55]. Aside from this commendation, all other included studies involving the managers, and providers or both ranked the quality of service as low [2, 40, 42, 44,45,46, 48, 49, 51,52,53,54,55,56]. Pyone et al., Lang’at and Mwanri, and Dalinjong and Laar in their respective studies reported delay of reimbursement with the advent of free maternal healthcare implementation affecting service delivery [2, 42, 45]. Another problem affecting the quality of care was the provision of essential drugs. In Ghana, Dalinjong et al. observed a stockout of essential drugs due to the introduction of free maternal healthcare [51]. Similarly, Lang’at and Mwanri reported an irregular supply of essential drugs in Kenya [42]. Moreover, few of the included studies reported that there was no staff motivation/allowances despite the increased workload as a result of the high utilization of care by mothers [42, 44, 45, 49, 54]. Dalinjong et al. also observed there was no motivation for providers and managers in Ghana.

In Nigeria, Ogboubor and Onwujekwe observed that Health Facility Committees were not involved in the fund generation, management, and tracking of expenditure [52]. Dailinjong and Laar observed that the increased workload of providers caused much negative influence on the insured pregnant women [2]. Due to stress and fatigue on the side of providers, pregnant women suffered verbal abuse [2]. Notwithstanding, pregnant women prefer the older midwives to the newly trained which consequently resulted in staff overstretched [2]. Lang’at et al., remarked that out of the overwhelmed workload, complications sometimes occur despite early reports by mothers [42]. Pyone et al. indicated that resource management was burdensome due to the busy schedules of health providers [45].

Discussion

Our study was conducted to describe existing literature on free maternal healthcare and the quality of care based on healthcare managers’ and providers’ perspectives in SSA. We found 15 studies from 9 out of the 46 countries in SSA. The study result revealed that the majority (93.3%) of the included studies indicate the quality of maternal healthcare was poor under the free financing policy era [2, 40, 42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49, 51,52,53,54]. We found limited studies reporting on managers’ and providers’ perceptions of the quality of maternal care offered to mothers under the free financing policy. Healthcare managers and providers are key stakeholders in the healthcare industry and their perspectives on any healthcare policy are vital to ensure the provision of quality care. Therefore, primary research involving them focusing on the quality of maternal care is needed. Moreover, to achieve the SDG 3.1 target, there is the need to dive into the quality of care as expected by healthcare managers and providers since they have an overwhelming influence on policy decision-making and improvement in maternal health. Among the 46 countries in SSA, evidence was found in the following countries: Ghana, Nigeria, Niger, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Sierra Leone, Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. The literature suggests that free maternal health services exist in 19 SSA countries in different forms [56,57,58,59]. Based on this study’s inclusion criteria, we found evidence from only seven countries representing about 37% of those 19 countries. Managers and providers perceived that delay in reimbursement, inequitable distribution of health facilities, unclear definition of free maternal healthcare policy, inadequate provision of essential drugs and supplies, and limited training of providers ranked the quality of care as poor. Notwithstanding, the governments in SSA’s ability to solve these major challenges could improve maternal healthcare quality.

Implication for practice

This study’s findings suggest that the majority of healthcare managers’ and providers’ perspectives of quality of care in the included studies were not up to standard. The increased workload on providers might have contributed to long waiting times for clients and providers’ ill-attitudes due to stress. This problem may cause a decrease in utilization and loss of trust for the providers. Moreover, delays in reimbursement and lack of essential drugs would have several implications such as service ineffectiveness, OOP payment, and low quality of care. The persistence of such problems can also lead to decrease service utilisation. Perhaps, a lack of an explicit policy definition could have accounted for the lack of provision of other services that could enhance service quality. Therefore, this study recommends practical solutions to address the challenges facing the implementation of a free maternal healthcare policy towards achieving SDG 3.1.

Implication for research

This study suggests limited primary research evaluating health providers’ and managers’ perceptions of the free maternal healthcare policy and the quality of maternal care in SSA. The sustainability of a free maternal healthcare policy is key to removing financial barriers to maternal health services. We, therefore, recommend more primary research involving all stakeholders that aim at understanding their perceptions of the free maternal healthcare policy and their impact on the quality of care in those SSA countries where the policy exists. This study also recommends more research to understand the implementation challenges of free maternal healthcare as well as recommend evidence-based solutions to address them in those SSA countries the policy exists.

Strengths and limitations

A scoping review permits the inclusion of different study designs. Our chosen study method allowed us to systematically searched for and selected relevant literature to describe the evidence on the quality of care in the free maternal healthcare era in SSA focusing on the perspectives of healthcare providers and managers. This study design further allowed to establish literature gaps useful to inform future research. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to scope literature focusing on healthcare providers and managers and their perception of the quality of maternal healthcare in the free financing era. Notwithstanding these strengths, this study’s limitations are many. These limitations are published elsewhere [15]. Also, we possibly did not capture some relevant articles since we search fewer databases. Moreover, the study was limited to healthcare managers’ and providers’ perspectives of free maternal healthcare and quality of care even though there are other stakeholders where important information could have been retrieved. The use of “free maternal healthcare” as a keyword potentially excluded some articles. Despite all these limitations, we the evidence provided by this review is useful to guide future research.

Conclusion

This study established evidence of existing literature on the quality of care based on Healthcare providers’ and managers’ perspectives though very limited. This study indicates healthcare providers and managers perceive the quality of maternal healthcare under the free financing policy is poor. They expected early reimbursement of funds, a clear definition of policy, equitable distribution of health facilities and health workforce, availability of essential drugs and logistics, and risk allowances in order to rank service quality as good. More research is needed to better understand the impact of their perceived poor quality of care on maternal health outcomes. Nonetheless, the free maternal care policy is very much needed towards achieving universal health, and all efforts to sustain and improve the quality of care under it, must be encouraged.

Availability of data and materials

All materials and data used for this study have been provided in the reference list.

Abbreviations

LMIC:

Low-and-Middle Income Countries

HFC:

Health Facility Committee

MDG:

Millennium Development Goal

MMAT:

Mixed Method Quality Appraisal Tool

MMR:

Maternal Mortality Rate

OOP:

Out-of-Pocket

PCC:

Population, Content and Context

PRISMA-ScR:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses modified for Scoping Reviews

SDGs:

Sustainable Development Goals

SSA:

Sub-Saharan African

TBAs:

Traditional Birth Attendants

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Shankwaya S. Study to explore barriers to utilization of maternal delivery services in kazunguala district; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dalinjong PA, Laar AS. The national health insurance scheme: perceptions and experiences of health care providers and clients in two districts of Ghana. Health Econ Rev. 2012;2(1):13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. WHO Regional Office for Africa. Ouagadougou declaration on primary health care and health systems in Africa: achieving better health for africa in the new millennium Ouagadougou declaration a declaration by the Members States of the WHO African Region; 2008. p. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mwangi J. The effect of free maternal health care services on perceived quality of service delivery at Nakuru provincial general hospital. Strat Bus Sch Strat Univ. 2016;11074(2474):1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Twum P, Qi J, Aurelie KK, Xu L. Effectiveness of a free maternal healthcare programme under the National Health Insurance Scheme on skilled care: evidence from a cross-sectional study in two districts in Ghana. BMJ Open. 2018;8(11):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chou D, Daelmans B, Jolivet RR, Kinney M, Say L. Ending preventable maternal and newborn mortality and stillbirths. Women Children’s Adolesc Health. 2015;351:19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alba M. National development plan. Philipp J Nurs. 2011;50:1–444.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sachs JD. From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. Viewpoint. 2012;379:2206.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Onwujekwe O, Hanson K, Ichoku H, Uzochukwu B. Financing incidence analysis of household out-of-pocket spending for healthcare: getting more health for money in Nigeria? Int J Health Plann Manag. 2014;29(2):174–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Addae-Korankye A. Challenges of financing health care in Ghana: the case of National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). Int J Asian Soc Sci. 2013;3(2):511–22.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahamoud KJ. Assessment of the quality and satisfaction of maternity health care services among post-Natal mothers, Tanga Regional and Referral Hospital, Tanzania; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lodenstein E, Dieleman M, Gerretsen B, Broerse JEW. Health provider responsiveness to social accountability initiatives in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(1):125–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pearson L, Gandhi M, Admasu K, Keyes EB. International journal of gynecology and obstetrics user fees and maternity services in Ethiopia. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;115:310–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatt LE, Makinen M, Madhavan S, Conlon CM. Effects of user fee exemptions on the provision and use of maternal health services: a review of literature. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013;31(4 Suppl 2):S67.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ansu-mensah M, Danquah FI, Bawontuo V, Ansu-mensah P, Kuupiel D. Maternal perceptions of the quality of care in the free maternal care policy in sub- Sahara Africa : a systematic scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;9:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ansu-Mensah M, Mohammed T, Udoh RH, Bawontuo V, Kuupiel D. Mapping evidence of free maternal healthcare financing and quality of care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic scoping review protocol. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mrisho M, Obrist B, Schellenberg JA, Haws RA, Mushi AK, Mshinda H, et al. The use of antenatal and postnatal care: perspectives and experiences of women and health care providers in rural southern Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Green A. Experts sceptical about Nigeria’s free health-care plans Nigeria’s government has promised to provide health coverage to millions of citizens. But experts. Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lang E, Mwanri L, Temmerman M. Effects of free maternity service policy in Kenya : an interrupted time series analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:S21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yates R. Universal health care and the removal of user fees. Lancet. 2009;373(9680):2078–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Borghi J, Ramsey K, Kuwawenaruwa A, Baraka J, Patouillard E, Bellows B, et al. Protocol for the evaluation of a free health insurance card scheme for poor pregnant women in Mbeya region in Tanzania: a controlled-before and after study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. El-khoury M, Hatt L, Gandaho T. User fee exemptions and equity in access to caesarean sections : an analysis of patient survey data in Mali. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11(49):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Meessen B, Hercot D, Noirhomme M, Ridde V, Tibouti A, Tashobya CK, et al. Removing user fees in the health sector: a review of policy processes in six sub-Saharan African countries. Health Policy Plan. 2011;26(suppl_2):ii16–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Duku SKO, Nketiah-Amponsah E, Janssens W, Pradhan M. Perceptions of healthcare quality in Ghana: does health insurance status matter? PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190911.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sweeney R, Mulou N. Fee or free? Trading equity for quality of care for primary health care in Papua New Guinea. Int Health. 2012;4(4):283–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Tunçalp Ö, Fawole B, Titiloye MA, Olutayo AO, et al. Mistreatment of women during childbirth in Abuja, Nigeria: a qualitative study on perceptions and experiences of women and healthcare providers. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jütting JP. Do community-based health insurance schemes improve poor people’s access to health care? Evidence from rural Senegal. World Dev. 2004;32(2):273–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson FA, Frempong-ainguah F, Padmadas SS. Two decades of maternity care fee exemption policies in Ghana : have they benefited the poor? Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(April 2015):46–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Allegri M, Tiendrebéogo J, Müller O, Yé M, Jahn A, Ridde V. Understanding home delivery in a context of user fee reduction : a cross-sectional mixed methods study in rural Burkina Faso. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(330):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Asundep NN, Carson AP, Archer C, Tameru B, Agidi AT, Zhang K, et al. Determinants of access to antenatal care and birth outcomes in Kumasi, Ghana. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2013;3(4):279–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Babalola S, Fatusi A. BMC pregnancy and childbirth beyond individual and household factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9(43):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ezugwu EC, Onah H, Iyoke CA, Ezugwu FO. Obstetric outcome following free maternal care at Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Parklane, Enugu, South-Eastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(5):409–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Witter S, Arhinful DK, Kusi A, Zakariah-Akoto S. The experience of Ghana in implementing a user fee exemption policy to provide free delivery care. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(30):61–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Witter S, Dieng T, Mbengue D, Moreira I, De Brouwere V. The national free delivery and caesarean policy in Senegal: evaluating process and outcomes. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25(5):384–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Weimann E, Stuttaford MC. Consumers’ perspectives on national health insurance in South Africa : using a mobile health approach corresponding author. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2014;2(4):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dennis ML, Benova L, Abuya T, Quartagno M, Bellows B, Campbell OMR. Initiation and continuity of maternal healthcare: examining the role of vouchers and user-fee removal on maternal health service use in Kenya. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(2):120–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Gitobu CM, Gichangi PB, Mwanda WO. Satisfaction with delivery services offered under the free maternal healthcare policy in Kenyan public health facilities. J Environ Public Health. 2018;2018:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Philibert A, Ridde V, Bado A, Fournier P. No effect of user fee exemption on perceived quality of delivery care in Burkina Faso : a case-control study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(120):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Amo-Adjei J, Anku PJ, Amo HF, Effah MO. Perception of quality of health delivery and health insurance subscription in Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):317.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Koroma MM, Kamara SS, Bangura EA, Kamara MA, Lokossou V. The quality of free antenatal and delivery services in Northern Sierra Leone. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(Suppl 1):13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Owiti A, Oyugi J, Essink D. Utilization of Kenya’s free maternal health services among women living in Kibera slums: a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;8688:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lang’at E, Mwanri L. Healthcare service providers’ and facility administrators’ perspectives of the free maternal healthcare services policy in Malindi District, Kenya: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ridde V, Diarra A. A process evaluation of user fees abolition for pregnant women and children under five years in two districts in Niger (West Africa). BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(1):89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wamalwa EW. Implementation challenges of free maternity services policy in Kenya: the health workers’ perspective. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;22(375):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pyone T, Smith H, van den Broek N. Implementation of the free maternity services policy and its implications for health system governance in Kenya. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(4):e000249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Nimpagaritse M, Bertone MP. The sudden removal of user fees: the perspective of a frontline manager in Burundi. Health Policy Plan. 2011;26(suppl_2):ii63–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Witter S, Garshong B, Ridde V. An exploratory study of the policy process and early implementation of the free NHIS coverage for pregnant women in Ghana. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12(1):16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ganle JK, Parker M, Fitzpatrick R, Otupiri E. A qualitative study of health system barriers to accessibility and utilization of maternal and newborn healthcare services in Ghana after user-fee abolition. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;14(425):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nabyonga-Orem J, Karamagi H, Atuyambe L, Bagenda F, Okuonzi SA, Walker O. Maintaining quality of health services after abolition of user fees: a Uganda case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8(1):102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Belaid L, Ridde V. An implementation evaluation of a policy aiming to improve financial access to maternal health care in Djibo district, Burkina Faso. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12(1):143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Dalinjong PA, Wang AY, Homer CSE. The implementation of the free maternal health policy in rural northern Ghana : synthesised results and lessons learnt. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(341):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ogbuabor DC, Onwujekwe OE. The community is just a small circle : citizen participation in the free maternal and child healthcare programme of Enugu State, Nigeria and child healthcare programme of Enugu State, Nigeria. Glob Health Action. 2018;11(01):1421002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Okonofua F, Lambo E, Okeibunor J, Agholor K. Advocacy for free maternal and child health care in Nigeria—results and outcomes. Health Policy. 2011;99(2):131–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kuwawenaruwa A, Ramsey K, Binyaruka P, Baraka J, Manzi F, Borghi J. Social science & medicine implementation and effectiveness of free health insurance for the poor pregnant women in Tanzania : a mixed methods evaluation. Soc Sci Med. 2019;225(June 2018):17–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Belaid L. Contextual factors as a key to understanding the heterogeneity of effects of a maternal health policy in Burkina Faso ? Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(March 2014):309–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Richard F, Antony M, Witter S, Kelley A, Sieleunou I, Kafando Y, et al. Fee exemption for maternal care in sub-Saharan Africa: a review of 11 countries and lessons for the region; 2013. p. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dugle G, Rutherford S. Coping with the supply-side effects of free maternal healthcare policies in seven sub-Saharan African Countries : a systematic review. 2019;23(March):46–54.

  58. McKinnon B, Harper S, Kaufman JS, Bergevin Y. Removing user fees for facility-based delivery services: a difference-in-differences evaluation from ten sub-Saharan African countries. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(4):432–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Panel AP, Brief P. Maternal health : investing in the lifeline of healthy societies & economics. 2010;(September):1–47.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staff of the Faculty of Health and Allied Sciences of the Catholic University College of Ghana, and the Department of Public Health Medicine for their diverse support.

Funding

No external funding obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Allied Sciences, Catholic University College of Ghana, Fiapre, Sunyani, Ghana

    Monica Ansu-Mensah, Frederick Inkum Danquah, Vitalis Bawontuo, Tahiru Mohammed & Roseline H. Udoh

  2. The University Clinic, Sunyani Technical University, Sunyani, Ghana

    Monica Ansu-Mensah

  3. Department of Global Health, Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Cape Town, 7530, South Africa

    Vitalis Bawontuo & Desmond Kuupiel

  4. Department of Secretaryship and Management Studies, Sunyani Technical University, Sunyani, Ghana

    Peter Ansu-Mensah

  5. Research for Sustainable Development Consult, Sunyani, Ghana

    Desmond Kuupiel

Authors
  1. Monica Ansu-Mensah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frederick Inkum Danquah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vitalis Bawontuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Ansu-Mensah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tahiru Mohammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Roseline H. Udoh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Desmond Kuupiel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MAM and DK conceptualized and designed this study. MAM and FID contributed to the databases search and articles screening. MAM and DK contributed to the design and data extraction, as well as the data synthesis. MAM wrote the manuscript. RHU and TM contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Critical review and revisions were made by PAM, BV, and DK. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desmond Kuupiel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics and approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary file 1

. Electronic databases search and title screening results

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ansu-Mensah, M., Danquah, F.I., Bawontuo, V. et al. Quality of care in the free maternal healthcare era in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of providers’ and managers’ perceptions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 220 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03701-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03701-z

Keywords

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us