Skip to main content

Enlarged uterine fibroid forming uterine diverticulum during pregnancy: a case report



Although uterine fibroids are a common gynecologic neoplasm, uterine diverticulum accompanied by a uterine fibroid is unique. In addition, pregnancy complicated with uterine diverticulum is extremely rare. We experienced a case of a uterine fibroid that was associated with a uterine diverticulum that enlarged during pregnancy and puerperium.

Case presentation

A 25-year-old nulligravida woman had an abnormal uterine cavity surrounded by myomatous mass. After natural conception, the mass and pouch had enlarged during pregnancy. Six months after elective cesarean delivery, she underwent laparotomy because of abdominal pain caused by the myomatous mass and the fluid inside. The tumor was connected to the midline of the posterior wall of the normal uterus. The resected tumor was pathologically diagnosed as leiomyoma and diverticulum.


Pregnancy can stimulate uterine fibroids to form uterine diverticula. Resection of the diverticulum and fibroid is a useful option for symptomatic patients with desired future fertility.

Peer Review reports


Fibroid is the most common benign tumor that arises from the female genital tract, affecting 70–80% of women. Although uterine fibroids can cause several clinical symptoms, including severe menstrual bleeding, painful menstruation, bowel dysfunction, infertility, and miscarriage, most cases are asymptomatic [1]. Moreover, various sized fibroids can distort and elongate the shape of the uterus. Fibroids are considered estrogen/progesterone-dependent and pregnancy may influence their size, which tends to enlarge, especially during the first trimester [2]. We experienced a unique case of a uterine fibroid that was associated with a uterine diverticulum that enlarged during pregnancy and puerperium.

Case presentation

A 25-year-old Japanese nulligravida woman was referred to our hospital to evaluate the abnormal structure of her uterus from a nearby clinic. She had no history of gynecological diseases, procedures, or uterine trauma. Her menstrual cycle was regular without any symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a myomatous mass with homogenous intensity present on the posterior uterine wall close to the internal ostium of the uterus, which shaped the inner pouch structure that was filled with a small amount of fluid (Fig. 1a). Upon initial examination, it appeared to be a rudimentary uterine horn; however, hysterosalpingography showed the patency of bilateral fallopian tubes connected with the fundus of the anterior uterus.

Fig. 1

T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the uterus. MRI shows a myomatous mass with homogenous intensity from the normal uterine posterior wall close to the internal ostium of the uterus, which shaped the inner pouch structure (a). The myomatous mass increases at gestational week 32 (b). Post-cesarean section, the myomatous mass is as large as that observed during pregnancy, with an increase in the inner fluid (c)

Although the pregnancy was uneventful after natural conception, the myomatous mass and the pouch had become enlarged (Fig. 1b). At 38 + 4 gestational weeks, the patient underwent an elective cesarean delivery because the enlarged mass interfered with a vaginal delivery. Although involution of the uterus was uneventful and her menstruation did not occur during the four months after delivery, she presented at our department again with lower abdominal pain. The normal uterus was empty and about 7 cm in size. MRI showed that the myomatous mass was just as large as it was during pregnancy, and the fluid inside the myomatous mass had increased (Fig. 1c).

To improve her abdominal symptoms, she underwent laparotomy six months after delivery. During laparotomy, the uterus was completely normal with normal fallopian tubes and ovaries. A hard mass was found behind the uterus covered by thin serosa (Fig. 2a) and connected to the posterior uterine wall in the mid-line (Fig. 2b). The root of the tumor was about 3 cm in diameter. The tumor was taken out after incision of the root. The resected mass was about 18 cm in diameter and weighed approximately 1100 g. Macroscopically, the mass was a homogenous white pink hard tumor. The microscopic histological diagnosis was leiomyoma. The inner pouch space was covered with inner cervical mucosa, with inner cervical glands filled with a brownish mucosal fluid (Fig. 3). The final diagnosis was uterine fibroid and diverticulum. After surgery, her abdominal symptoms resolved, and her regular menstruation resumed for six months.

Fig. 2

Intraperitoneal findings during surgery. The tumor is located behind the uterus, covered with thin serosa (a), and connected with the midline of the uterus (before (b) and after (c) resection of the tumor)

Fig. 3

Histological findings of the resected diverticulum and tumor. Hematoxylin–eosin staining images detect leiomyoma (right). The inner pouch space is covered with inner cervical mucosa accompanied with inner cervical glands (left)

Discussion and conclusions

This report presented a unique uterine diverticulum case with enlarged uterine fibroid during pregnancy and puerperium. A uterine diverticulum is a rare occurrence and is divided into congenital and secondary diverticula. Secondary uterine diverticula can occur after uterine instrumentation or trauma, including cesarean section, which can cause iatrogenic diverticula to occur on the weak site of the uterus. On the other hand, true congenital uterine diverticula, which occurs at a weak site of the uterine wall during development [3], is an extremely rare anomaly [4]. 21 cases of congenital uterine diverticulum were previously reported [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Our case was suspected to be a congenital uterine cavity worsened by a uterine fibroid and pregnancy because of several reasons. (1) The presence of the diverticulum in the midline around the uterine isthmus which is the weak site of the two fused Mullerian ducts [14]. Most of the previous reports confirmed the presence of the congenital diverticulum in the midline around the uterine isthmus [3,4,5]. (2) The studied woman with the nulli-para had no history of gynecological procedures or uterine trauma, which is often the cause of secondary diverticulum. (3) Usually, the congenital diverticulum pouch is covered by epithelial cells connected to the uterine cavity (the surgically excised diverticulum of the studied case was connected to the uterine cavity and was covered by cervical mucosa) [3].

Several factors stimulate the weak myometrium site of the uterus to form a diverticulum. Some reports showed that dilation of the cavity can occur during pregnancy and labor [4]. A similar case of uterine diverticulum with diffuse fibroid in a nulligravida women was reported recently [5]. In the studied case, we supposed that pregnancy and uterine fibroid cooperatively stimulated uterine wall and facilitated the enlargement of the congenital uterine diverticulum. The uterine muscle tried to expel the large fibroid from its anatomical locus even when not pregnant. Especially during pregnancy, the muscle contractions necessary for uterine growth promoted the function. As a result, the fibroid was dragged out of the uterine muscular axis, which led to the formation of a muscular hernia dragged into part of the endometrial mucosa of the uterus. Like these conditions, the results of ruptured degenerated fibroid or surface vessel cause hematoperitoneum even during pregnancy[15,16,17].

Uterine diverticulum causes infertility. Seound et al. described the mechanisms of diverticulum-associated infertility as storage of motile spermatozoa at the diverticulum and the adverse function of old blood in the diverticulum to spermatozoa and normal endocervical gland [6]. In this case, fortunately, the patient conceived naturally despite these obstacles. In addition, the diverticulum also causes pregnancy complications. It was reported that a uterine diverticulum can cause the rupturing of a uterus [18, 19] and might play a partial role in the premature rupturing of the membrane [4]. In the studied case, there was no perinatal complication related to the diverticulum. This explained by the presence of the large fibroid, which prevents entrapment of fetal parts, membranes in the diverticulum and prevents uterine rupture. The delivery mood is another controversial topic in uterine diverticulum cases, because of the diverticulum size and position. Nonetheless, cesarean section should be performed in cases of large uterine diverticulum regardless of the presence of an associated uterine fibroid.

Because of the rare nature of uterine diverticulum, there is no consensus treatment. Hysterectomy is a treatment option for symptomatic patients with no desired future fertility; otherwise, diverticulectomy is a useful treatment option for patients with few symptoms who desire future fertility. Women managed by divertculectomy should be counseled about possible risks of uterine rupture in future pregnancy. Surgical resection is one of the treatment options for the management of a large diverticulum.

In conclusion, we present a rare case of uterine diverticulum complicated with a uterine fibroid during pregnancy. Uterine diverticulum should be considered in the differential diagnosis of abnormal uterine cavity, and resection of diverticulum is a useful treatment option for women who desire future fertility.

Availability of data and materials

All data analyzed during this study are included in this report.



Magnetic resonance imaging


  1. 1.

    Stewart EA. Clinical practice. Uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1646–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vitagliano A, Noventa M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, Gizzo S, Borgato S, et al. Uterine fibroid size modifications during pregnancy and puerperium: evidence from the first systematic review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297:823–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Umezaki I, Takagi K, Aiba M, Ohta H. Uterine cervical diverticulum resembling a degenerated leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:1130–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rajiah P, Eastwood KL, Gunn ML, Dighe M. Uterine diverticulum. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:525–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Noguchi M, Kitajima M, Abe S, Murakami N, Kitajima Y, Miura K, et al. Huge uterine fibroid arising from primary uterine cervical diverticulum: a case report and review of the literatures. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39:1186–7.

  6. 6.

    Seoud M, Awwad J, Adra A, Usta I, Khalil A, Nassar A. Primary infertility associated with isolated cervical collecting diverticulum. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:179–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Engel G, Rushovich AM. True uterine diverticulum. A partial müllerian duct duplication? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1984;108:734–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Schmidt AP, Glitz CL, Passos EP, Arbo E, Cunha-Filho JS. Hysteroscopy and three-dimensional ultrasonography in uterine diverticulum diagnosis: a case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:561–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Coronado PJ, Fasero M, Vidart JA. Cervical diverticulum: an unusual cause of chronic menometrorrhagia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;137:126–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sun X, Xue M, Xiao S, Wan Y, Wang B. Uterine diverticulum complicating pregnancy diagnosed by ultrasound and uteroscopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109:247–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bai J, Zheng G, Yang B, Lei L, Ren Q. Uterine cervical diverticulum containing a blood clot. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;111:269–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chufal S, Thapliyal N, Gupta M, Pangtey N. Huge uterine-cervical diverticulum mimicking as a cyst. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2012;55:372–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tanaka K, Shiga N, Kuno T, Watanabe Z, Tachibana M, Yaegashi N. Successful pregnancy and vaginal delivery after laparoscopic excision of a congenital uterine cervical diverticulum: A case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46:1460–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cramer SF, Oshri A, Heller DS. A Study of Myometrial Growth and Development. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28:387–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Swarray-Deen A, Mensah-Brown SA, Coleman J. Rare complication of fibroids in pregnancy: Spontaneous fibroid rupture. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43:1485–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Peng CR, Chen CP, Wang KG, Wang LK, Chen YY, Chen CY. Spontaneous rupture and massive hemoperitoneum from uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis in a nongravid and unscarred uterus. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;54:198–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mistry M, Bhatt M, Haque L, Owens O, Maharajan P. Degenerated uterine fibroid with rupture of the surface leading to haemoperitoneum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;211:216–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chandrasekaran N, Yudin MH, Berger H. Uterine Diverticulum With Fetal Leg Entrapment: A Case Report. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017;39:894–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hassim AM. Rupture of a diverticulum of the uterus. Hassim AM. Rupture of a. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968;101:1132–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors wish to thank Kumiko Suzuki, Kanna Ogi, Kunihiko Yoshida, Makoto Chihara, Kazufumi Haino, Masayuki Yamaguchi, Nobumichi Nishikawa, and Masayuki Sekine for their clinical support. They report no conflicts of interest.


There is no source of financial support or funding.

Author information




Conception and design, E.A., T.I., Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript, E.A. and T.I. Collect the clinical data, E.A., T.I., T.N., and A.K. Study supervision, K.T. and T.E. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuya Ishiguro.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors obtained written informed consent to publish the clinical information and any accompanying images from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akashi, E., Ishiguro, T., Nonaka, T. et al. Enlarged uterine fibroid forming uterine diverticulum during pregnancy: a case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 34 (2021).

Download citation


  • Uterine fibroid
  • Uterine diverticulum
  • Pregnancy