Skip to main content

Lactation challenges of resident physicians- results of a national survey

Abstract

Background

There are unique challenges to parenting in residency and there is limited data to guide policy regarding lactation facilities and support for female physicians-in-training. We aimed to assess issues surrounding breast-feeding during graduate medical training for current residents or recent graduates from United States (US) residency programs.

Methods

A national cross-sectional survey was sent to current and recently graduated (2017 and later) female residents in June 2020. This questionnaire was administered using the Qualtrics Survey tool and was open to each participating woman’s organization for 4 weeks. Summary statistics were used to describe characteristics of all respondents and free-text responses were reviewed to identify common themes regarding avenues for improvement.

Results

Three hundred twelve women responded to the survey, representing a 15.6% response rate. The median duration of providing breastmilk was 9 months (IQR 6–12). 21% of residents reported access to usable lactation rooms within their training hospital, in which 12% reported a computer was present. 60% of lactating residents reported not having a place to store breast milk. 73% reported residency limited their ability to lactate, and 37% stopped prior to their desired goal. 40% reported their faculty and/or co-residents made them feel guilty for their decision to breastfeed, and 56% reported their difficulties with breastfeeding during residency impacted their mental health.

Conclusion

Residents who become mothers during training face significant obstacles to meeting their breastfeeding/pumping needs and goals. With these barriers defined, informed policy change can be instituted to improve the lactation experience for physicians-in-training.

Peer Review reports

Background

The number of women physicians has been rising since the 1990s. Today, women comprise over 50% of graduating medical school classes and more than one third of actively licensed doctors nationally [1, 2]. In the United States (US), 4 years of medical school is followed by 3 to 7 years of specialty specific post-graduate education, termed residency, prior to board certification. For those desiring a family, it is common to have children during residency, which typically constitutes childbearing years; the number of women electing to have children as trainees has increased in recent years [3]. Several studies have assessed perceptions of pregnancy during medical training, the availability of maternity leave, and the impact of motherhood on academic career pursuits [4,5,6]. However, there is little data regarding the support provided to resident physicians upon return to clinical duties after maternity leave, the feasibility of continuing lactation schedules when faced with the logistical rigors of the hospital, and complicating factors of restricted time and access to private rooms for pumping.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends breastmilk as the exclusive form of nutrition for the first 6 months of an infant’s life, followed by continued breastmilk for 1 year or longer, while the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends breastfeeding for 2 years or beyond [7, 8]. For most women, this requires ~ 4–10 feedings and/or pumping sessions per day and pumping typically takes 15 to 30 min, depending on the individual. In previous specialty-specific publications, women physicians reported early cessation of breast-feeding/lactation due to insufficient time and/or privacy as well as inadequate facilities [5, 9], resulting in negative emotions and lower work satisfaction [10]. In a report of faculty/attendings across medical specialties, the lack of lactation facilities and time available for breast pumping after returning to work was the most frequently cited negative experience following childbirth [6]. Although informative, these studies have been small, single-specialty and had varying inclusion of both residents and faculty members.

The unique challenges to parenting in residency stems from the lack of autonomy, inflexibility of schedule, power discrepancy, and fear of perceived laziness or inefficiency by their superiors which may impact their long-term careers. These limit the ability for a resident physician to advocate for themselves and their family’s needs. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recently instituted the requirement of a lactation room in training hospitals [11], but compliance with this policy is currently unknown. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the amount of space is sufficient, and the location of such facilities are usable and convenient for physicians-in-training.

Herein, we report the results of a national survey, which assessed issues surrounding breast-feeding in post-graduate medical training for current residents or recent graduates from United States (US) residency programs.

Methods

This national, cross-sectional anonymous survey of residents was reviewed by the Yale institutional review board (IRB) and determined to be exempt from obtaining consent. Eligible participants included residents and fellows or recent graduates (completing residency between 2017 and 2020) from any specialty. Invitations were sent in June 2020 and were distributed to the membership email lists of several large women’s national organizations with the express permission of those organizations. Participating organizations included the American Medical Women’s Association (AMWA), Association of Women in Psychiatry (AWP), Association of Women in Surgery (AWS), American Association for Women in Radiology (AAWR), and Society of Women in Radiation Oncology (SWRO). From the five participating organizations, the estimate of total eligible participants was 2000.

Survey instrument

The survey instrument (Supplementary Figure 1) was created through an interative process via collaboration with current residents and recent graduates and informed by prior validated questionnaires [12,13,14]. The survey was interactive with alternative survey paths based on participant responses (i.e., respondents without children were not exposed to the same number and scope of questions as those with children). Domains of interest included demographics, childbearing (include adoption and/or surrogacy) status, access to maternity leave, breastfeeding plans and goals, available types of resources and support upon returning to work, how lactation support (or lack thereof) impacted womens’ decision or duration of lactation, general views and opinions of pregnancy and parenthood during residency, and the health of the respondent as well as their child during the first year postpartum. The complete survey is available in supplemental material.

This questionnaire was administered using the Qualtrics Survey tool (Qualtrics, Provo, UT). The survey was open to each organization for 4 weeks.

Data analysis

Inclusion criteria for response analysis was female gender and currently in residency in the US, or graduated from US residency since 2017, and sufficient completion of the survey. Responses from women who had graduated residency in 2016 or earlier were excluded along with respondents with incomplete demographic information and/or childbearing status. Summary statistics were used to describe characteristics of all respondents in regard to maternity leave experience and desires to breastfeed. The analysis of lactation and breastfeeding/pumping duration, availability of usable lactation facilities, and barriers to attaining lactation goals was performed for childbearing respondents. All analysis was conducted using the statistical software package SPSS, Version 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA). For the qualitative analysis, free-text responses were reviewed by the authors and common themes were identified regarding avenues for improvement in the breastfeeding experience.

Results

Three hundred women responded to the survey, representing a 15.6% response rate. In total, 255 of these responses were eligible for analysis (n = 57 met exclusion criteria), and 147 of them had children during their training. Respondent characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and included a wide range of specialties, region and level of training levels, and childbearing status.

Table 1 Survey Respondent Characteristics

Of the women who became parents during training, 98.6% (145/147) took some form of maternity leave for a median of 6 weeks (IQR 6–9) with various combinations of FMLA, research/elective, and vacation time. Ten women (6.8%) reported having to extend residency due to maternity leave.

Lactation goals

All women who had children during residency reported intending to breastfeed during maternity leave and 97% (138/142) intended to continue providing breast milk through pumping upon return to clinical duty. Eighty-seven percent (123/142) and 27% (52/142) intended to breastfeed past six and 12 months, respectively. The median total time of breastfeeding and pumping was 9 months (IQR 6–12 months), with 74% of respondents continuing after 6 months, and 13% continuing past 12 months. After excluding sixteen women who were currently still breastfeeding, the median total lactation period was 11 months, IQR 6–12.

Lactation facilities

Ninety-one percent of residents (124/136) reported the presence of lactation rooms in their training hospital. However, only 21% (33/124) reported the rooms to be usable with the remainder being inaccessible due to location or always being occupied when needed. Thirty-eight percent (51/126) of residents reported lactation rooms within their home departments, and of these, 51% (26/51) were reported to be accessible. When present, dedicated lactation rooms commonly had power outlets and comfortable seating (80 and 67%, respectively), but less than half provided a sink (43%) or refrigerator (33%), and only 12% had a computer. (Fig. 1) Sixty percent of residents reported not having a place to store breastmilk. Other locations used by residents for pumping are shown in Fig. 2. The majority of responding residents reported it typically took them 10–15 min to find a place to pump.

Fig. 1
figure1

Resources available in dedicated lactation rooms displayed in frequency. One hundred forty seven residents responded to this question by selecting all resources available in dedicated lactation rooms at their institution. Multiple selections were allowed

Fig. 2
figure2

Locations utilized for breastmilk expression displayed in frequency. One hundred forty seven residents responded to this question by selecting all places they used as lactation rooms. Multiple selections were allowed

Barriers to lactation

Seventy-three percent of respondents (98/134) reported residency limited their ability to lactate; 61% noted diminished supply due to insufficient time/locations to pump, and stress. Other limiting factors included lack of support from program (16%) and co-residents (10.5%). Ninety-nine percent of respondents (126/127) experienced complications from inadequate pumping, including 64% with diminished supply, 26% with clogged ducts, and 16% mastitis. Overall, 37% (50/136) stopped pumping prior to their desired goal, and 56% (74/133) reported their inability to breastfeed during residency impacted their mental health. Forty-eight percent of lactating residents (62/132) reported their faculty and program leadership made them feel guilty for pumping, predominantly due to the time spent out of clinic or procedures and perceived accommodations. Forty percent (53/132) reported their co-residents made them feel guilty for the same reasons.

Steps for improvement

Respondents were asked what may have improved their lactation experience during residency, and 50% (127/255) provided optional free text responses.

The most common theme, identified 55 times, included having more dedicated lactation rooms which were clean, private and fully equipped (including computers, sinks, outlets and breast milk storage) in accessible locations. On this topic, one respondent stated that it would help if the “designated lactation room (was) in my place of work- i.e. the clinic building- rather than across the street in the basement of the hospital.” Another respondent said that there were only “7 lactation rooms for all general staff in the entire hospital- approximately 300 lactating women. Completely insufficient resources, also no place to store pumped milk.” Several women also mentioned receiving complaints or criticism when pumping in shared workspaces. One woman stated “(one) faculty told me I was gone too much from the reading room and (another) telling me that pumping at my workstation while on call was “disgusting”.

A theme mentioned 40 times was the need for more dedicated time, scheduled breaks, and flexibility within their clinical schedule. One respondent recommended “15 minutes free every four hours”, another recommended “protected and designated time twice a day to pump”, and another recommended “automatically adding in 20-minute breaks in the clinic schedule”. Convenient space and sufficient time were of particular concern to women in surgical residencies as lactation spaces, when available, were often not close enough to the operating room. One woman said it would help to have the “availability of time; it was hard to do it in between surgical cases, while peeing, eating, drinking enough water and getting the next patient ready.

Another common suggestion was clear policies and expectations guiding attendings and co-residents of the complications and difficulties which are associated with inadequate pumping, mentioned 49 times. One woman recommended “having a written policy for the department”. Another mentioned that it would help to have “clear, mandatory expectations for my all-male, childless, less-than-happy about my ‘family needs’ faculty”. One woman eloquently offered advice to programs to support lactation: “breastfeeding is evidenced based. It should be mandatory that programs and faculty not only support this practice but expect it and therefore plan for it. No woman should ever be made to feel that she is not allowed to provide food for her child.

Many expressed regrets for not advocating for themselves more and asking for help in clinic, on call or in the operating room. Finally, several women mentioned what would help most would be to “normalize breastfeeding” and have more female leaders, attendings and colleagues to set a greater precedent. Additionally, several women mentioned that having increased paid maternity leave would help lactation success. One woman mentioned “maternity leave policies are atrocious in the US especially in surgical programs and need to be reformed at the ABMS [American Board of Medical Specialties] and ACGME levels”.

Discussion

In this national survey study of current residents and recent graduates, we found that women who become mothers during residency training face many obstacles to meeting their breastfeeding and pumping goals upon returning to clinical duty. Most commonly cited challenges included the lack of convenient, accessible space for pumping breastmilk. There was much perceived pressure from program leadership, attendings, and co-residents due to the time and accommodations required to pump. Nearly all surveyed residents reported experiencing at least one lactation complication thought to be due to inadequate pumping. Despite these obstacles, nearly three quarters were able to provide breastmilk to their infant for more than 6 months.

Prior specialty-specific publications on physician lactation while comparatively small or focused predominantly on attending physicians, also demonstrate an approximate 40% rate of early breast-feeding/lactation cessation, with 15–25% continuing to provide breastmilk past 1 year [5, 9, 10]. A majority of women reported insufficient lactation facilities [5, 6, 15], and a quarter experienced workplace discrimination [6]. In these studies, early cessation of breastfeeding was associated with negative emotions and poor work satisfaction [9, 10]. According to the 2020 US National Healthy People objectives, the CDC aims for 36% of mothers to provide breastmilk past 1 year, which is nearly three times the current rate attained by female US resident physicians [16]. In Canada, half of lactating residents felt unsupported by their academic institutions and/or residency association regarding labor rights or pumping needs, and 30% felt penalized and/or criticized. Similar to our analysis, a third of residents did not meet personal breastfeeding goals with the majority reporting inadequate time and space. Using the same definition for lactation-related complications, approximately half of lactating residents experienced a complication, compared to 99% in our sample [13].

As part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA), employers are mandated to provide an on-site private space, other than a bathroom, shielded from view and free from intrusion in addition to “a reasonable amount” of breaktime for mothers to express breast milk, continuing 1 year after the child’s birth [17] for employees subject to overtime pay;, however, resident physicians are not included in this group. As of 2018, the ACGME added lactation facilities to their list of common program requirements, stipulating presence of a clean and private lactation room within the sponsoring institution with refrigeration capability and “proximity appropriate to patient care.” [11] While the advantage of access to a computer for continued work while pumping is recognized in the document, its presence is not mandatory. Notably, this does not guide the number of rooms, is vague regarding appropriate proximity, is not department-specific, and references the sponsoring institution alone. This is particularly problematic for residents in outpatient facilities, those rotating at satellite hospitals, and those in surgical specialties.

Resident physicians face additional barriers to breastfeeding compared to their attending counterparts [18], and are uniquely limited in their ability to advocate for themselves due to lack of autonomy and significant power discrepancy. Embedded within the universally identified hierarchy of medicine is the threat of resident intimidation, humiliation, and influence on one’s future career prospects. For these reasons, barriers must be defined and addressed with specific interventions.

To combat the obstacles noted above, the ACGME minimally acceptable provisions for lactating residents need to be expanded. This should include mandating multiple dedicated resident-only lactation rooms based on an institution’s number of potentially lactating resident physicians. These must be dispersed throughout the primary training institution and at any site residents will be rotating, with facilities specifically present near operating/procedure rooms, and within outpatient centers. The stipulation of providing refrigeration for breast milk within lactation rooms needs to be mandated and computer access added as a requirement. A clear ACGME policy regarding a minimum frequency of protected time for lactating women may lessen the burden residents feel when asking their attendings to be excused for pumping; for example, 20 to 30-min breaks every 3 h plus transit time [19]. In response to the commonly shared stigma inciting feelings of guilt, institutions should consider adding mandatory education for all faculty and residents regarding the medical necessity for lactating women to be provided adequate time to express breast milk in order to avoid health complications. This also aligns with the Surgeon General’s call to action for improving breastfeeding in the US [20].

While our analysis is unique in both its scope and depth, there are some limitations. Not all medical specialties were evenly represented. Although investigators endeavored to include more specialty organizations, lack of resident and/or early career female physician only listserves prohibited this. While survey questions were carefully worded to allow for interpretation of residency impact on decision to stop lactating prior to initially intended timeframe, the cross-sectional nature of the study prevents establishment of direct causation. Our survey is at risk for non-response bias, with a survey completion rate of ~ 15.6%. However, it is likely that our denominator of 2000 eligible participants is an overestimation as the five organizational list-serves were heterogeneous in their makeup, including some medical students and graduates prior to 2017.

Conclusion

Our data show that resident physicians who become mothers during training are resilient and resourceful, but their relative success in lactation comes at the expense of their emotional well-being, undue stress, and frequently, medical complications. Systemic changes are necessary, and we encourage national GME policy change while recognizing this will take time. In the interim, we encourage program directors (PDs) and institutional GME offices to move forward by anticipating the challenges faced by resident physicians, providing pre-partum mentorship, and planning for necessary space/resource allocation. Proactive identification of these facilities and resources for use and planning for the transition period will promote a sense of support and autonomy. PDs should also develop and disseminate a minimum frequency of protected time to be excused for pumping to decrease the burden of resident requests/explanation for these sessions.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available out of respect for survey respondent privacy and the sensitive/personal nature of survey questions, but anonymous data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AAP:

American Academy of Pediatrics

WHO:

World Health Organization

ACGME:

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

AMWA:

American Medical Women’s Association

AWP:

American Women in Psychiatry

AWS:

Association of Women in Surgery

AAWR:

American Association of Women in Radiology

SWRO:

Society of Women in Radiation Oncology

IQR:

Interquartile range

FMLA:

Family and Medical Leave Act

US:

United States

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control

ACA:

Affordable Care Act

PD:

Program Director

GME:

Graduate Medical Education

References

  1. 1.

    AAMC. FACTS: Aplicants and Matriculants data; 2019. 2019–2020 [cited 2019 12/30/2019]; Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/interactive-data/2019-facts-applicants-and-matriculants-data.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Young A, et al. A census of actively licensed physicians in the United States, 2014. J Med Regul. 2015;101(2):7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Turner PL, et al. Pregnancy among women surgeons: trends over time. Arch Surg. 2012;147(5):474–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mulcahey MK, et al. The perception of pregnancy and parenthood among female orthopaedic surgery residents. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(14):527–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Holliday EB, et al. Pregnancy and parenthood in radiation oncology, views and experiences survey (PROVES): results of a blinded prospective trainee parenting and career development assessment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92(3):516–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Juengst SB, et al. Family leave and return-to-work experiences of physician mothers. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(10):e1913054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Section on Breastfeeding. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012;129(3):e827–41.

  8. 8.

    Organization, W.H. Infant and young child feeding; 2020. April 1, 2020 [cited 2020 July 22]; Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dixit A, Feldman-Winter L, Szucs KA. "frustrated," "depressed," and "devastated" pediatric trainees: US academic medical centers fail to provide adequate workplace breastfeeding support. J Hum Lact. 2015;31(2):240–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hutchinson AM, et al. Pregnancy and childbirth during family medicine residency training. Fam Med. 2011;43(3):160–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    ACGME. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in radiation oncology; 2019. July 13, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rangel EL, et al. Pregnancy and motherhood during surgical training. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(7):644–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Setareh Z. ADVOCACY UPDATE: results of CWIM’s survey on breastfeeding accommodations in medical residency programs; 2020. Canadian Women in Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Magee C, et al. Tracing the steps of survey design: a graduate medical education research example. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gracey LE, et al. Program director and resident perspectives on new parent leave in dermatology residency. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(10):1222–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    CDC. Nationwide Breastfeeding Goals. Breastfeeding Facts December 28, 2019 July 19, 2020]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/facts.html.

  17. 17.

    Labor, U.S.D.o. Section 7(r) of the fair labor standards act – break time for nursing mothers provision; 2010. [cited 2020 July 30]; Available from: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/nursing-mothers/law.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cantu R, et al. Barriers to breastfeeding in female physicians. Breastfeed Med. 2018;13(5):341–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gracey LE, Mathes EF, Shinkai K. Supporting breastfeeding mothers during dermatology residency—challenges and best practices. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(2):117–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Office of the Surgeon, G, et al. Publications and reports of the surgeon general. In: The surgeon General's call to action to support breastfeeding. Rockville: Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to recognize Melissa Young, MD PhD Yale School of Medicine; Virginia Osborn, MD Mount Sinai; Ashley Albert, MD Arizona Center for Cancer Care; and Anna-Maria De Costa, MD PhD Pueblo Radiation Oncology for their feedback and vetting of the administered survey. This study would not have been possible without the collaboration of the women’s organizations SWRO, AWS, AAWR, AWP, AMWA and we thank them for their participation.

Funding

There were no sources of funding for this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GWP conceived of the study, wrote the survey, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript as primary author. AH-K contributed to survey writing and manuscript drafting. EBH contributed to survey writing and manuscript drafting. LP contributed to survey writing and manuscript drafting as well as mentorship throughout the project’s duration. The authors have read and approved this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma B. Holliday.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Prior to initiating this survey study, approval was obtained by the Yale Institutional Review Board. The Yale Institutional Review Board waived the need for verbal or written consent for participation in this study given that no identifying data were collected.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests related to this work. Dr. Holliday receives salary support and research funding from Merck for an unrelated project.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peters, G.W., Kuczmarska-Haas, A., Holliday, E.B. et al. Lactation challenges of resident physicians- results of a national survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 762 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03436-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Graduate medical education
  • Lactation
  • Support
  • Pumping
  • Maternity