Skip to main content

Walking in pregnancy and prevention of insomnia in third trimester using pedometers: study protocol of Walking_Preg project (WPP). A randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background

Previous studies in pregnancy have not focused in evaluating the effect of walking during pregnancy and prevention of insomnia. Our general objective is to determine the effect of a walking program in preventing the appearance of insomnia in the third trimester of pregnancy, increasing sleep quality and improving quality of life throughout pregnancy.

Methods

Randomized Controlled trial in parallel in healthy sedentary pregnant women (n = 265), Walking_Preg Project (WPP), from university hospital in Granada, Spain. At 12th gestational week (GW), they will be invited to participate and randomly assigned to one of the three arms of study: the intervention group I1 (pedometer, goal of 11,000 steps/day), intervention group I2 (pedometer, no goal) and control (no pedometer). Duration of intervention: 13–32 GW. At 12th, 19th and 31st GW the average steps/day will be measured in groups I1 and I2. At 13th, 20th and 32nd GW, Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Adherence to Mediterranean Diet (AMD), physical activity (short IPAQ), quality of life (PSI), and consumption of toxic substances (caffeine, illegal drugs, alcohol and tobacco) will be collected. Student t test or Mann-Whitney U will be used to compare 19th and 31st GW mean of daily steps between I1 and I2 groups. To compare differences between groups in terms of frequency of insomnia/quality of life for each trimester of pregnancy, Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test will be used. To determine differences in hours of sleep and quality of sleep throughout each trimester of pregnancy, analysis of variance or Friedman test will be used. McNemar-Bowker test will be used to assess differences in life quality in pre-post analyses in the 3 arms. We will use Stata 15 statistical software.

Discussion

promoting walking in second half of pregnancy through use of pedometer and health pre-registration of a goal to be achieved –'10,000–11,000 steps a day’– should prevent appearance of insomnia in third trimester, will increase sleep quality and quality of life in pregnant women.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03735381. Registered 8th November, 2018.

Peer Review reports

Background

The prevalence of insomnia at the beginning of pregnancy is around 40%, reaching over 60% in the third trimester of pregnancy [1,2,3,4]. Insomnia is associated with an increase of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), depression in pregnancy and postpartum, arterial hypertension and preeclampsia as a result of the increase in cytokine levels derived from sleep deprivation [5]. Insomnia is also involved in unplanned caesarean sections, prolonged labour, premature placental abruption, delayed intrauterine growth and prematurity [6].

It has been documented that practice of physical activity (PA) prevents the onset of insomnia in adults [7], postmenopausal women [8] and pregnant women [9]. In addition, the practice of regular PA (> 150 min/week) also increases the quality of sleep in adults [10] and in pregnancy [11]. However, only 20.3–30% of pregnant women are active [12, 13]. In fact, pregnant women spend more than 50% of their time in sedentary activities [14]. To make an objective assessment of this, a woman who counts less than 5000 steps/day on average could be considered sedentary [15].

Walking is one of the recommended activities in the guidelines of PA in pregnant women in Canada, Japan, Norway and Spain and the most carried out during pregnancy [16, 17]. However, the number of steps/days counted in the first trimester of pregnancy does not exceed 5000 steps [18], which is half of those recommended (10,000-11,000) [19] and decreases as the gestation progresses [18]. Walking during pregnancy regulates, prevents or delays the increase in blood pressure and cholesterol in healthy women [20], decreases the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus [21] and improves glycaemic control of pregnant women with GDM [22]. Moreover, improves cardiorespiratory capacity [23], decreases stress and anxiety and improves sleep quality [24], increases quality of life [25] and reduces weight gain during pregnancy [26].

The pedometer is a cost-effective tool that increases the motivation to walk and increase the number of steps per day by 2000 to 2500 [27] compared to those who do not use it. The effectiveness of the pedometer is greater when establishing a goal to achieve [28]. Different studies carried out in pregnant women show that when all the participants of the study use a pedometer, the establishment of a goal of steps to be reached per day (10,000-11,000) increases the mood and number of steps walked by the person receiving such information [26, 29,30,31,32,33].

Some effects evaluated with the use of pedometers in pregnant women are the increase of mood [34], the decrease in weight gain in obese pregnant women [26, 30], the decrease in the incidence of preeclampsia [35] and the reduction of back pain [36]. However, there are no previous studies that analyse whether an intervention aimed at promoting PA in pregnant women, based on walking, helps to prevent insomnia that appears towards the end of pregnancy and how it could have an impact on the quality of life related to health and sleep quality as pregnancy progresses.

Our hypothesis is that a program to promote walking in the first half of pregnancy through the use of a pedometer and through the health pre-registration of a goal to be achieved –'10,000–11,000 steps a day’– prevents the appearance of insomnia in the third trimester of pregnancy, increases the quality of sleep and improves the quality of life of pregnant women.

Aim

The main objective of this RCT is to determine the effect of a program aimed at promoting physical activity in pregnant women based on walking during pregnancy in the prevention of sleep hygiene disorders and improvement of the quality of life in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Methods and design

The Walking_Preg Project, WPP study protocol follows the SPIRIT guidelines and the SPIRIT flow diagram is shown in Fig. 1. Walking_Preg Project (WPP) Consort Flow Diagram is presented in Fig. 2. This is a Randomized Controlled Trial with three groups in parallel: maximum intervention group (I1): with pedometer, information and objective of 10,000 steps/day to be achieved, minimum intervention group (I2), with pedometer and information but without goal of steps to be achieved, and control group (C), without pedometer but with information on physical activity recommendations and their benefits.

Fig. 1
figure1

Walking_Preg Project (WPP) schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments

Fig. 2
figure2

Walking_Preg Project (WPP) Consort Flow Diagram

Arms and interventions

The three groups will receive information about the recommendation of physical activity during pregnancy, according to ACOG guidelines [19].

Arm 1

Intervention 1 (I1), maximum intervention: pedometer + goal + reminds (maximum intervention women receive information about the goal of steps/day to be reached: 10,000-11,000. They will receive messages on the mobile phone remembering the goal to achieve and a notification that the researching staff will proceed to collect the average count of steps/day of the week prior to 20th and 32nd GW. Women will get recommendations on physical activity during pregnancy.

Arm 2

Intervention 2 (I2), minimum intervention: use of pedometer watch from 12th to 32nd GW (10 weeks). They will not receive goal information nor reminds to collect information from the pedometer. Women will be given recommendations on physical activity during pregnancy.

Arm 3

No Intervention, control group: without pedometer. Women will receive recommendations on physical activity during pregnancy.

Selection criteria for eligibility

Inclusion Criteria: 1) Pregnant women with a minimum of 18 and maximum of 49 years of age; 2) Low medical risk pregnancies that will be attending in the Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, in a public third level Maternity Hospital in Granada (Spain); 3) Sedentary women (< 5 days/week of moderate-vigorous physical activity at least > 30 min.; equivalent to < 7000 steps/day); 4) With mobile phone and e-mail; 5) Without intellectual deficits or difficulty to understand the language.

Exclusion Criteria: 1) Chronic disease: diabetes, high-pressure, cardiac or respiratory disease, liver or kidney disease or mobility problems; 2) Women with relative or absolute repose needed; 3) Active women (> 5 days/week of moderate-vigorous physical activity at least > 30 min.; equivalent to > 7000 steps/day); 3) Insomnia at beginning of pregnancy or having drugs for sleep problems.

The study sample will consist of women who, meeting the inclusion criteria, agree to participate, upon request for voluntary collaboration and signing of two documents: 1) Informed consent approved by the Provincial Ethics Committee of Granada and 2) Pedometer loan certificate.

Location and data collection

The collection of the study sample began in June 2019 in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, where the first uterine ultrasound is performed at 12th GW. The Service Management Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Maternal and Child Hospital –Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital Complex, in Granada– is the centre of care reference in the northern area of Granada, a third level hospital that serves a reference population of 439,035 corresponding to a sector of the Granada Metropolitan District and the Basic Health Zone of Alcalá la Real, Jaén. It has been a reference of the Northeast Health Management Area of Granada.

Walking_Preg Project (WPP) schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments is shown in Fig. 1. The health staff will inform each woman of the study by referring them to an adjoining consultation enabled for a member of the research team at the hospital. All women who meet the inclusion criteria and sign the informed consent and loan certificate will be invited to participate in the study to reach target sample size. During the pregnancy, three interviews will be conducted by training staff (12th, 20th and 32nd GW), collecting the information in an access database. The period of recruitment of pregnant women will end in December 2020. We have stopped the recruitment from March to August 2020, because of Covid-19. The period of follow-up of women in the study will take place from the time of recruitment of women (12th GW) until delivery.

Sample size

First, we have carried out the theoretical calculation of the sample size for the definitive study (n = 265), based on the following premises: 1) Three study arms: maximum intervention group, pedometer + goal + recall (I1): minimum absolute reduction in the prevalence of low compliance with recommendations that are statistically significant to be detected, that it is 15% with respect to I1; minimum intervention group, pedometer (I2): minimum absolute reduction in the prevalence of low compliance with recommendations that are statistically significant to be detected, that is 30% with respect to C; and control group (C), with an estimated prevalence of low compliance with physical activity recommendations of 50% [12, 13]. 2) Alpha error: 5%; 3) Power of the study: 80%; 4) Comparison of I1 vs I2: from the previous premises, 120 women would be needed in each arm; Comparison of I1 vs C: from the previous premises, and taking as reference the 120 women of the I1 arm required for the previous comparison, 25 women in the C arm would be required.

A pilot of the previous design was carried out with 72 women not included in this study: 24 women in each arm of the study, interviewed twice (12th and 20th GW), during the months of February to May 2018. The recruitment period was 3 months. To select a total of 265 women, 1 year and 7 months would be required (considering holiday periods and Covid-19). We estimate 20–30% of losses in second and third interviews (due to neonatal loss or abandonment of the study).

Randomization of participants and concealment

The Stata Ralloc program will generate a randomization sequence by blocks of n = 9 and 3 arms per block (A, B and C). In this way, each block of nine pregnant women treated consecutively will be assigned, in a random order, to the arms C (control), I1 (Intervention 1) and I2 (Intervention 2): C I1 I1 I1 I1 I2 I2 I2 I2, up to complete the assignment of the 265 pregnant women. The sequence will be generated by the data analysts and kept in the monitoring centre, remaining at all times hidden to those clinicians responsible for the enrolment of pregnant women. Allocation sequence will be concealed until women are assigned to interventions by the research staff/interviewer. This way, the follow-up centre will be contacted each time the interviewer has a pregnant woman, so that they are informed of the arm to which she will be assigned.

There will be concealment for the people in charge of carrying out the evaluation and analysis of the data because they will manage the database without personal women information or knowledge about the group intervention, where women will be allocated. Due to the nature of the study, neither the participants nor the professionals who indicate the intervention can be blinded. Participants will know they will be selected for either a pedometer group or a non-pedometer group. They will not know if the intervention is minimum (pedometer only) or maximum (pedometer and a goal of 11,000 steps/day).

Instruments

These are the main sources of information:

1) Structured interview that will be conducted in person at 13th, 20th and 32nd GW. The duration of the interviews will take approximately 35–40 min, which includes: the Athens Insomnia Scale (in English, AIS-8) [37], the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Questionnaire [38], the Symptom Inventory in pregnancy [39, 40], short IPAQ [41], Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, with Predimed questionnaire without wine [42]; 2) Record of the average steps/day of weeks 19 and 31 of gestation (information downloaded from the pedometer) and quantification of average hours of sleep at 19th and 31st GW (information downloaded from the Xiaomi Mi Band 2™ pedometer) (Fig. 1); 3) Clinical history: to collect the variables related to birth (tertiary outcome variables) and 4) Subsequent telephone contact if necessary (correction of missing data).

Baseline variables collected

Variables collected only in the first interview (13th GW) will be: Sociodemographic variables –age, number of previous children, number of children under 3 years, number of previous abortions, Spanish or foreign nationality, stable couple, level of studies, occupation of woman and partner (from these last two variables and taking into account the highest value, social class was calculated, with five categories in descending order I, II, III, IV and V, according to the Spanish Society of Epidemiology [43]); Anthropometric variables: height and pre-pregnancy weight.

Variables collected in all interviews

- Diagnosis of pathologies in pregnancy: gestational diabetes, high blood pressure induced by pregnancy or preeclampsia and eclampsia.

- Drug use:

1) Consumption of illegal drugs: use of opiates, cocaine, cannabis and other drugs (specifying which) is recorded and if so, if the consumption is daily (number of times), weekly, monthly or occasional (number of days of consumption per week, per month or occasional and number of times per day of consumption); 2) Consumption of medication and supplements prescribed or not by a physician, reason and duration; 3) Smoking habit: 1. Active daily smoker; 2. Occasional smoker; 3. Recent former smoker (< 6 months); 4. Former smoker (> 6 months); 5. Never smoked [44]. Active smoker: average number of cigarettes per day; age of onset of consumption; Former smoker: How long ago did you stop smoking? Years or months. Passive tobacco: does your partner regularly smoke at home? If so: cigarettes/day; 4) Alcohol: number of drinks consumed daily, weekly, monthly or occasionally (wine or cava, beer with alcohol or cider, high-grade alcohol) [44] and 5) Caffeine consumption: number of cups (or bottles) that are consumed daily, weekly, monthly or occasionally of each of the following beverages: coffee, decaffeinated coffee, tea, cola, energy drinks and chocolates (milk or non-milk chocolate tablet).

- Physical activity: short IPAQ questionnaire [41], which includes the weekly frequency and minutes of completion of intense, moderate and walking physical activity. It allows the study sample to be classified into three categories according to their activity per week: low level or inactive (category I), moderate (category II) and active (category III).

- Diet: Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet pattern questionnaire, without wine [42]; 13-item questionnaire (olive oil, vegetables, fruits, red meat, chicken, fish, legumes, butter/margarine, carbonated drinks, industrial pastries, nuts, stir-fry) that are part of the Mediterranean diet. The higher the score obtained on the scale, the greater the adherence to the Mediterranean diet and is valued as acceptable adherence from 8 points.

Outcome measures

Primary outcome measures in the three arms:

1) Prevalence of insomnia in third trimester of pregnancy (time frame: 32nd GW) will be evaluated with the Insomnia Athens Scale (IAS) [37], an eight-item scale that assesses the quantity and quality of sleep (first five items) and the diurnal repercussion of insomnia (daytime sleepiness, physical and mental functioning and well-being during the day). Each of the items scores from 0 to 3 (affectation of the item from light to severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 24 points, considering insomnia from a score equal to or greater than 6 points (Sensitivity = 93% and Specificity = 85%) or equal to or greater than 7 points (Sensitivity = 84% and Specificity = 90%).

2) Change in mean steps/day after intervention in the arms using pedometer register (time frame: 19th and 32nd GW).

Secondary outcome measures in the three arms (time frame: 12th, 19th and 32nd GW): Quality of sleep of pregnant women measure with the Pittsburgh Questionnaire (PSQI) [38], it assesses the quality of the individual’s sleep during the previous month. It consists of 19 items grouped into seven components: quality, latency, duration, efficiency and sleep disturbances, use of medication for sleep and diurnal dysfunction; each component is scored from 0 to 3, according to a Likert scale in which zero is the absence of the symptom and 3 is its maximum presence. This will result in a score that ranges from 0 to 21 points (the higher score, the worse sleep quality): a PSQI score of > 5 indicates poor sleep quality, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.5%.

Other pre-specified outcome measures in the three arms:

1. Quality of life of women through pregnancy (time frame: 12th, 19th and 32nd GW), measure with the Pregnancy Symptom Inventory (PSI) [39, 40]: 41-item Likert scale developed from a group of experts and focus groups. It registers the range of symptoms that appears in the last month (Likert scale from 0 to 4: never, rarely, sometimes, often) and its impact on quality of life, by affecting the activities of daily life (scale Likert from 0 to 3: it does not limit me, it limits me a little, it limits me a lot). It has been adapted to Spanish pregnant women and is reliable (Kappa coefficient range = 0.6–0.9) [40]; 2. Women weight gain in kilograms (time frame: 12th and 32nd GW), measured with the hospital scale; 3. Weight of the new-born (time frame: delivery) collected from the clinical history of the women; 4. Gestational week at delivery (time frame: delivery) collected from the clinical history of the women.

Data analysis

A descriptive analysis of the variables collected in the study will be carried out. Measures of central tendency and dispersion will be calculated for the numerical variables and absolute and relative frequencies for the qualitative ones. The normality of the variables will be checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, in order to determine whether parametric or non-parametric tests will be carried out later. 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be obtained for both means and proportions.

For the contrast of the hypothesis of equality between the group of patients I1 and the group of patients I2, in terms of the number of daily steps and for each GW (19th and 31st), the Student t test will be used for independent samples or Mann-Whitney U, as appropriate. Subsequently, to assess whether there are differences between the groups with respect to the frequency of insomnia/quality of life for each trimester of pregnancy, the Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test will be used when necessary.

On the other hand, to determine if differences are found between the quantitative variables (hours of sleep, quality of sleep) throughout the study period (first, second and third trimester) among the participants, the analysis of variance will be used for measurements repeated in the parametric case. In the case of having to use a non-parametric test, the Friedman test will be used. Subsequently, to assess the differences in the quality of life, for each of the groups, before starting the walking program and after finishing it (pre-post), the McNemar-Bowker test will be used.

For the contrast of the hypothesis of equality between the three groups of patients, regarding the weight gained during pregnancy (until 34 st GW), the weight of the newborn and the gestational week, an analysis of the variance or the test of Kruskall-Wallis will be used, as appropriate. In case of statistical significance, multiple comparisons will be obtained using the Student’s parametric test or the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test applying Bonferroni correction.

Finally, a bivariate mixed-effects logistic regression model will be carried out to determine which variables influence the greater frequency of insomnia, considering the latter quantitatively. To delimit the extent to which the associations that appear are explainable by the effect of the rest of the variables included in the study, a multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression model will be constructed. 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be obtained. All contrasts will be bilateral and statistical significance will be considered when the p value is ≤0.05. The data analysis will be carried out by intention to process and by protocol, using the Stata / SE v15.0 statistical package.

Discussion

Currently, about 60% of pregnant women have insomnia towards the end of pregnancy [1,2,3,4]. This study aims to reduce the prevalence of insomnia in the third trimester of pregnancy by 33% in the pedometer + goal group (maximum intervention) and, on the other hand, to reduce the prevalence of insomnia by 16.6% in the pedometer-only group (minimum intervention), compared to the control group (usual advice without pedometer).

Women in the maximum intervention group are expected to have 33% less insomnia in the third trimester of gestation compared to pregnant women in the control group. Furthermore, in the intervention groups, sleep quality will improve (Pittsburgh score < 5) [38], the frequency of symptoms associated with pregnancy (asthenia, anxiety, cramps) will decrease and the performance of daily life activities (measured with the PSI questionnaire) will improve, compared to the control group.

The intervention requires health professional to explain the use of the pedometer and establish a therapeutic alliance with the pregnant woman to reach a goal. The benefits are expected to be obtained during the project and after its completion: 1) During the project, since the participating women will increase their motivation to walk, due to the use of the pedometer, and will benefit from the inclusion of PA in their daily life, such as decreased sedentary lifestyle and weight control in pregnancy. This will even encourage the practice of walking from their closest social or family bond: 2) In the short term, we will know if the expected potential change has managed to reduce the prevalence of insomnia in the third trimester of pregnancy, by at least 33%.

Direct and indirect costs are expected to be saved: 1) Direct cost in pregnant women enrolled in the study —decreasing sleep-related disorders, increasing quality of sleep, quality of life and general well-being; 2) Indirect costs for the Andalusian Health Service: reduction in the number of visits in Primary Health Care derived from the direct consequences of walking during pregnancy, cost reduction in drugs related to the discomfort of pregnancy. Depression, pregnancy weight control, pregnancy-induced high blood pressure, or back pain will be mitigated by promoting pregnancy walking.

This study will set support for the elaboration of health promotion protocols in pregnant women through walking. The findings of the beneficial effect derived from the research can be incorporated into the usual advice of clinical practice. The results should be echoed among health professionals involved in the care process of pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium, as well as the scientific community.

Finally, this study will encourage walking in pregnancy. In return, the participants will increase their general well-being by improving their quality of life and sleep.

Availability of data and materials

No results or data are available to share.

Abbreviations

WPP:

Walking_Preg Project

GW:

Gestational Weight

AIS:

Athens Insomnia Scale

PSQI:

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

AMD:

Adherence to Mediterranean Diet

IPAQ:

International Physical Activity Questionnaire

PSI:

Pregnancy Symptom Inventory

GDM:

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

PA:

Physical Activity

RCT:

Randomized Controlled Trial

ACOG:

American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

References

  1. 1.

    Facco FL, Kramer J, Ho KH, Zee PC, Grobman WA. Sleep disturbances in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(1):77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dorheim SK, Bjorvatn B, Eberhard-Gran M. Insomnia and depressive symptoms in late pregnancy: a population-based study. Behav Sleep Med. 2012;10(3):152–66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sivertsen B, Hysing M, Dørheim SK, Eberhard-Gran M. Trajectories of maternal sleep problems before and after childbirth: a longitudinal population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:129.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fernández-Alonso AM, Trabalón-Pastor M, Chedraui P, Pérez-López FR. Factors related to insomnia and sleepiness in the late third trimester of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(1):55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nodine PM, Matthews EE. Common sleep disorders: management strategies and pregnancy outcomes. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013;58(4):368–77.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sharma SK, Nehra A, Sinha S, Soneja M, Sunesh K, Sreenivas V, et al. Sleep disorders in pregnancy and their association with pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study. Sleep Breath. 2016;20(1):87–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tsunoda K, Kitano N, Kai Y, Uchida K, Kuchiki T, Okura T, Nagamatsu T. Prospective study of physical activity and sleep in middle-aged and older adults. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(6):662–73.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Abedi P, Nikkhah P, Najar S. Effect of pedometer-based walking on depression, anxiety and insomnia among postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2015;18(6):841–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kolu P, Raitanen J, Luoto R. Physical activity and health-related quality of life during pregnancy: a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomised trial. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(9):2098–105.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kredlow MA, Capozzoli MC, Hearon BA, Calkins AW, Otto MW. The effects of physical activity on sleep: a meta-analytic review. J Behav Med. 2015.

  11. 11.

    Loprinzi PD, Loprinzi KL, Cardinal BJ. The relationship between physical activity and sleep among pregnant women. Ment Health Phys Act. 2012;5:22–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Amezcua-Prieto C, Lardelli-Claret P, Olmedo-Requena R, Mozas-Moreno J, Bueno-Cavanillas A, Jiménez-Moleón JJ. Compliance with leisure-time physical activity recommendations in pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(3):245–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Broberg L, Ersbøll AS, Backhausen MG, Damm P, Tabor A, Hegaard HK. Compliance with national recommendations for exercise during early pregnancy in a Danish cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:317.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fazzi C, Saunders DH, Linton K, Norman JE, Reynolds RM. Sedentary behaviours during pregnancy: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jiang H, Qian X, Li M, Lynn H, Fan Y, Jiang H, et al. Can physical activity reduce excessive gestational weight gain? Findings from a Chinese urban pregnant women cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Doran FM, Buckley NA. Walking patterns in pregnancy. Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(3):213–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Evenson KR, Barakat R, Brown WJ, Dargent-Molina P, Haruna M, Mikkelsen EM, Mottola MF, Owe KM, Rousham EK, Yeo S. Guidelines for physical activity during pregnancy: comparisons from around the world. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2014;8(2):102–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kim Y, Chung E. Descriptive epidemiology of objectively measured walking among US pregnant women: National Health and nutrition examination survey, 2005–2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:150437.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Committee Opinion No ACOG. 650: physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(6):135–42.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    OMS. Notas descriptivas, actividad física, datos y cifras 2016. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs385/es/. Accessed 20 Feb 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Brekke HK, Bertz F, Rasmussen KM, Bosaeus I, Ellegard L, Winkvist A. Diet and exercise interventions among overweight and obese lactating women: randomized trial of effects on cardiovascular risk factors. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88250.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bain E, Crane M, Tieu J, Han S, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Diet and exercise interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(4):Cd010443.

  23. 23.

    Ruchat SM, Davenport MH, Giroux I, Hillier M, Batada A, Sopper MM, et al. Walking program of low or vigorous intensity during pregnancy confers an aerobic benefit. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(8):661–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hollenbach D, Broker R, Herlehy S, Stuber K. Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep quality and insomnia during pregnancy: a systematic review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2013;57(3):260–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Elliott-Sale KJ, Barnett CT, Sale C. Exercise interventions for weight management during pregnancy and up to 1 year postpartum among normal weight, overweight and obese women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(20):1336–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Renault KM, Norgaard K, Nilas L, Carlsen EM, Cortes D, Pryds O, et al. The Treatment of Obese Pregnant Women (TOP) study: a randomized controlled trial of the effect of physical activity intervention assessed by pedometer with or without dietary intervention in obese pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(2):134.e1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kang M, Marshall SJ, Barreira TV, Lee JO. Effect of pedometer-based physical activity interventions: a meta-analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009;80(3):648–55.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Moon DH, Yun J, McNamee J. The effects of goal variation on adult physical activity behaviour. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(19):1816–21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Maturi MS, Afshary P, Abedi P. Effect of physical activity intervention based on a pedometer on physical activity level and anthropometric measures after childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11(1):103.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Peacock AS, Bogossian FE, Wilkinson SA, Gibbons KS, Kim C, McIntyre HD. A randomised controlled trial to delay or prevent type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: walking for exercise and nutrition to prevent diabetes for you. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:423717.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Polgreen LA, Anthony C, Carr L, Simmering JE, Evans NJ, Foster ED, Segre AM, Cremer JF, Polgreen PM. The effect of automated text messaging and goal setting on pedometer adherence and physical activity in patients with diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0195797.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Vetrovsky T, Cupka J, Dudek M, Kuthanova B, Vetrovska K, Capek V, Bunc V. A pedometer-based walking intervention with and without email counseling in general practice: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):635.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Renault K, Nørgaard K, Secher NJ, Andreasen KR, Baldur-Felskov B, Nilas L. Physical activity during pregnancy in normal-weight and obese women: compliance using pedometer assessment. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32(5):430–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Taniguchi C, Sato C. Home-based walking during pregnancy affects mood and birth outcomes among sedentary women: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2016;22(5):420–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yeo S. Adherence to walking or stretching, and risk of preeclampsia in sedentary pregnant women. Res Nurs Health. 2009;32(4):379–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Morino S, Kajiwara Y, Ishihara M, Nishiguchi S, Fukutani N, Tashiro Y, Yamada M, Yamashita M, Aoyama T. The relationship between the daily step counts and low back pain during pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2016;43(2):192–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gomez-Benito J, Ruiz C, Guilera G. A Spanish version of the Athens insomnia scale. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(6):931–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Oviedo-Caro MA, Bueno-Antequera J, Munguía-Izquierdo D. Spanish version of pregnancy symptoms inventory: transcultural adaptation and reliability. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;17:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Foxcroft KF, Callaway LK, Byrne NM, Webster J. Development and validation of a pregnancy symptoms inventory. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sanda B, Vistad I, Haakstad LAH, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form among pregnant women. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2017;9:7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gesteiro E, Rodríguez Bernal B, Bastida S, Sánchez-Muniz FJ. Maternal diets with low healthy eating index or Mediterranean diet adherence scores are associated with high cord-blood insulin levels and insulin resistance markers at birth. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(9):1008–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Elisa C-R, Carlos Á-D, Antonia D-S. Utilización de las propuestas españolas de medición de la clase social en salud (Use of Spanish proposals for measuring social class in health sciences). Gac Sanit. 2012;26(6):566–9.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Encuesta Nacional de Salud Española (ENSE 2011-2012) https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/encuestaNacional/encuesta2011.htm. Accessed 20 Sep 2018.

  45. 45.

    General Assembly of the World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81(3):14–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

For their support of the study, we would like to thank the clinicians collaborating with sample recruitment and those pregnant women taking part on this Walking_Preg Project (WPP).

Funding

The WPP data study collection and publication expenses will be funded (PI-0350-2018) by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación Biosanitaria (FIBAO - IBS).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CAP, ROR, RBR, JJJM, JLGV, made significant contributions in the study protocol, identifying the research questions and designing the Randomized Controlled Trial. The manuscript was drafted by CAP, ROR, RBR, SM, JMM, while MNF and JLGV provided critical revision of the paper in terms of important intellectual content. All authors (CAP, ROR, RBR, MNF, NAJ, IVZ, SM, JMM, JJJM, JLGV) have read and approved the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Amezcua-Prieto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [45]. Ethical approval for the planned study was obtained from Research Ethics Committee,

in February 2019 (Peiba 1644-N-18). Compliance with the Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5, on the Protection of Personal Data and guarantee of digital rights and Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 27, 2016, are guaranteed.

Written informed consent is requested from the participant women to: a) be included in any of the study groups b) conduct personal interviews to complete the questionnaires used; c) consultation of their clinical history; d) telephone contact in the future; e) review of their data by other researchers, anonymously.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amezcua-Prieto, C., Naveiro-Fuentes, M., Arco-Jiménez, N. et al. Walking in pregnancy and prevention of insomnia in third trimester using pedometers: study protocol of Walking_Preg project (WPP). A randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 521 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03225-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pedometer watch
  • Walking
  • Pregnancy
  • Insomnia