OECD. Health at a glance 2019: OECD; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/4dd50c09-en.
CIHI. Quick Stats Metadata: Childbirth Indicators by Place of Residence CB1 2017–2018. Ottawa; 2019. https://apps.cihi.ca/mstrapp/asp/Main.aspx? Server=apmstrextprd_i&project=Quick Stats&uid=pce_pub_en&pwd=&evt=2048001&visualizationMode=0&documentID=029DB170438205.
Guise J-M, Denman MA, Emeis C, Marshall N, Walker M, Fu R, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:1267–78 https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2010/06000/Vaginal_Birth_After_Cesarean__New_Insights_on.25.aspx.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Macfarlane A, Blondel B, Mohangoo A, Cuttini M, Nijhuis J, Novak Z, et al. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the euro-Peristat study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123:559–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13284.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Martin J, Hamilton BE, MJK O. Births in the USA: NCHS Data Brief No, vol. 346; 2019. p. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db346.htm.
Google Scholar
Rossignol M, Moutquin JM, Boughrassa F, et al. Preventable obstetrical interventions: how many caesarean sections can be prevented in Canada? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35:434–43.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
ACOG. ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary: Vaginal Birth adter Cesarean Delivery. Ostet Gynecol. 2019;133:393–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. 2010.
Book
Google Scholar
Martel M-J, MacKinnon CJ. No. 155-guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:e195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.01.014.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists A. ACOG practice bulletin no. 205: Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e110–27.
Article
Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth. R Coll Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;45:1–17.
Google Scholar
Fobelets M, Beeckman K, Faron G, Daly D, Begley C, Putman K. Vaginal birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery after one previous caesarean section: a cost-effectiveness analysis in four European countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1720-6.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhao Y, Zhang J, Zamora J, Vogel JP, Souza JP, Jayaratne K, et al. Increases in caesarean delivery rates and change of perinatal outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a hospital-level analysis of two WHO surveys. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017;31:251–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12363.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smithies M, Woolcott CG, Brock J-AK, Maguire B, Allen VM. Factors associated with trial of labour and mode of delivery in Robson Group 5: a select group of women with previous caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:704–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.10.026.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Soltsman S, Perlitz Y, Ben Ami M, Ben SI. Uterine rupture after previous low segment transverse cesarean is rarely catastrophic. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2018;31:708–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1297401.
Article
Google Scholar
Stattmiller S, Lavecchia M, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Spence AR, Abenhaim HA. Trial of labor after cesarean in the low-risk obstetric population: a retrospective nationwide cohort study. J Perinatol. 2016;36:808–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.36.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Flamm B. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:907–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00531-0.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ryan GA, Nicholson SM, Morrison JJ. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: current status and where to from here? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;224:52–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.011.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Scott JR. Avoiding labor problems during vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;40:533–41.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Weinstein D, Benshushan A, Ezra Y, Rojansky N. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: current opinion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996;53:1–10 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8737297.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dy J, DeMeester S, Lipworth H, Barrett J. No. 382-trial of labour after caesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41:992–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.008.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Panda S, Begley C, Daly D. Clinicians’ views of factors influencing decision-making or caesarean section: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0200941. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200941.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, Jackson M, Holmgren C, Esplin S. How do good candidates for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) who undergo elective repeat cesarean differ from those who choose TOLAC? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:458,e1–.e6.
Article
Google Scholar
Black M, Entwistle VA, Bhattacharya S, Gillies K. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women’s accounts of their birth choices. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e008881.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Chen S-W, Hutchinson AM, Nagle C, Bucknall TK. Women’s decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1661-0.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Eden KB, Hashima JN, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Guise J-M. Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: a review of the evidence. Birth. 2004;31:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0274.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kaimal AJ, Kuppermann M. Understanding risk, patient and provider preferences, and obstetrical decision making: approach to delivery after cesarean. Semin Perinatol. 2010;34:331–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2010.05.006.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nilsson C, van Limbeek E, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Lundgren I. Vaginal birth after cesarean. Qual Health Res. 2017;27:325–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315612041.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lundgren I, van Limbeek E, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nilsson C. Clinicians’ views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0629-6.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lundgren I, Healy P, Carroll M, Begley C, Matterne A, Gross MM, et al. Clinicians’ views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:1–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Cox KJ. Providers’ perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-72.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kamal P, Dixon-Woods M, Kurinczuk JJ, Opeenheimer C, Squire P, Waugh J, Kamal P, Dixon-Woods M, Kurinczuk JJ, Oppenheimer C. Squire P WJ. Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians and midwives’ accounts. BJOG. 2005;112:1054–60.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sur S, Murphy KWMI. Delivery after caesarean section: consultant obstetricians’ professional advice and personal preferences. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 2009;29:212–6.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Young CB, Lui S, Muraca GM. Mode of Delivery after previous Cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity. Can Med Assoc J. 2018;190:E556–64.
Article
Google Scholar
Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Tomkinson J, Hearps S, Baradaran N, Brant R, et al. Family physicians who provide intrapartum care and those who do not: very different ways of viewing childbirth. Can Fam Physician. 2011;57:e139–47 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21490345.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Klein MC, Liston R, Fraser WD, Baradaran N, Hearps SJC, Tomkinson J, et al. Attitudes of the new generation of Canadian obstetricians: how do they differ from their predecessors? Birth. 2011;38:129–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00462.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Munro S, Kornelson J, Corbett K, Wilcox E, Bansback N, Janssen P. Do women have a choice? Care providers’ and decision makers perspectives on barriers to access of health services for birth after a previous cesarean. Birth Issues Perinat Care. 2017;44:153–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23:334–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. Table 17-10-0008-01 estimates of the components of demographic growth, annual. 2018. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1710000801.
Google Scholar
BORN. One in a million. BORN Ontario biennial report 2016-2018. Ottawa. p. 2018. https://www.bornontario.ca/en/publications/resources/Documents/BORN-Biennial-Report-Feb-2019.pdf.
Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.
Google Scholar
Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Miles MB, Huberman, AM. An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
QSR. NVivo 10 research software for analysis and insight. www.qsr
international.com. 2014.
Google Scholar
Hewitt-Taylor J. Use of constant comparative analysis in qualitative research. Nurs Stand. 2001;15:39–42.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 2000;39:124–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
Article
Google Scholar
Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:214–22 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2031523.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lalonde AB. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;89:319–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.03.015.
Article
Google Scholar
Public Health Agency of Canada. Family-centred maternity and newborn care: National guidelines. Ottawa; 2018. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/maternity-newborn-care-guidelines.html.
Stirling, D. , Vanbesien, R., McDougall R. Informed decision making in labour and birth. 2017. http://opha.on.ca/getmedia/9657686e-55ee-4222-aaea-3738248a3d9e/Informed-Decision-Making-for-Labour-and-Birth-position-paper-updated-051117.pdf.aspx.
Google Scholar
Stirling D, Vanbesien J, Mcdougall R. Informed decision-making for labour & birth www.opha.on.ca. Accessed 13 Nov 2018.
Bryant J, Porter M, Tracy SK, Sullivan EA. Caesarean birth: consumption, safety, order, and good mothering. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:1192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.025.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Panda S, Daly D, Begley C, Karlström A, Larsson B, Bäck L, et al. Factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section in Sweden – a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:377. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2007-7.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dexter SC, Windsor S, Watkinson SJ. Meeting the challenge of maternal choice in mode of delivery with vaginal birth after caesarean section: a medical, legal and ethical commentary. BJOG. 2014;121:133–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, Guise JM, Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004224.pub3.
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care O. Physician services under the Health Insurance Act. The Schedule of Benefits: Physician Services, Regulation 552 of the Health Insurance Act; 2015. p. 746. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/ohip/sob/physserv/sob_master20181115.pdf. Accessed 15 Jul 2019.
Google Scholar
Gagnon AJ, Van Hulst A, Merry L, George A, Saucier JF, Stanger E, DE Wahoush OS. Cesarean section rate differences by migration indicators. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:633–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mumtaz Z, O’brien B, Higginbottom G, O’Brien B, Higginbottom G. Navigating maternity health care: a survey of the Canadian prairie newcomer experience. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-4.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kalich A, Heinemann LGS. A scoping review of immigrant experience of health care access barriers in Canada. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18:697–709.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Higginbottom G, Bell A, Arsenault J, Pillay J. An integrative review of experiences of maternity services for immigrant women in Canada. Divers Heal Soc Care. 2012;9:253–3266.
Google Scholar
Ministry of Finance O. 2016 Censsus Highlights: Factsheet 8 Immigration. Toronto; 2017. file:///Volumes/NO NAME/Qualitative provider paper/Immigrants in Ontario.pdf.
Bonzon M, Gross MM, Karch A, Grylka-Baeschlin S. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section – an online survey investigating women’s preferences in Western Switzerland. Midwifery. 2017;50:219–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Keedle H, Schmied V, Burns E, Dahlen H. The journey from pain to power: a meta-ethnography on women’s experiences of vaginal birth after caesarean. Women Birth. 2018;30:6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.08.018.
Article
Google Scholar
Lundgren I, Begley C, Gross MM, Bondas T. “Groping through the fog”: a metasynthesis of women’s experiences on VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:85.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dahlen HG, Horner C. Motherbirth or childbirth: a prospective study of vaginal birth after caesarean section blogs. Midwifery. 2013;29:167–73.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Grobman W, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, O’Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Thorp JM, Mercer BM. Development of a nomogram for predicition of vaginal delivery after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:806–12.
Ashwal E, Wertheimer A, Aviram A, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y, Hiersch L. Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2016;29:2265–670. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1099156.
Article
Google Scholar
Fox NS, Namath AG, Ali M, Naqvi M, Gupta S, Rebarber A. Vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery for arrest of descent. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018:1476–4954. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1443069.
Lewkowitz AK, Nakagawa S, Thiet MP, Lewkowitz AK, Nakagawa S, Thiet MP, Rosenstein MG, et al. Effect of stage of initial labor dystocia on vaginal birth after cesarean success. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:861.e1–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Place K, Kruit H, Tekay A, Heinonen S, Rahkonen L. Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:e1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Perez WM, Vricella LK, Gilad GA, Tomlinson TM. 809: validity of the MFMU antenatal VBAC calculator in the contemporary labor management era. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220:S530–1.
Article
Google Scholar
Thornton P. Limitations of vaginal birth after cesarean success prediction. J Midwifery Women’s Heal. 2018;63:115–20.
Article
Google Scholar
Angle P, Kurtz Landy C, Murthy Y, Cino P. Key issues and barriers to obstetrical anesthesia care in Ontario community hospitals, with fewer than 2000 deliveries annually. Can J Anesth. 2009;56:667–77.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, Kingdon C, Gyte GM. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004660.pub3.
Triebwasser JE, Kamder NS, Langen ES, Basu T, Syrjamaki J, Thomason A, Smith RD, Morgan DM. Hospital contribution to variation in rates of vaginal birth after cesarean. J Perinatol. 2019;39:904–10.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Signore C, Spong CY. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights manuscripts from an NIH consensus development conference, march 8-10, 2010. Semin Perinatol. 2010;34:309–10. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2010.05.002.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Barger MK, Dunn JT, Bearman S, DeLain M, Gates E. A survey of access to trial of labor in California hospitals in 2012. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-83.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Keedle H, Schmied V, Burns E, Dahlen HG. Women’s reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2013.08.247.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nilsson C, Lalor J, Begley C, Carroll M, Gross MM, Grylka-Baeschlin S, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean: views of women from countries with low VBAC rates. Women Birth. 2017;30:481–90.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Triebwasser JE, Kamdar NS, Langen ES, Moniz MH, Basu T, Syrjamaki J, et al. Hospital contribution to variation in rates of vaginal birth after cesarean. J Perinatol. 2019;39:904–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0373-2.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schifrin BS, Cohen WR. The effect of malpractice claims on the use of caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:269–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.10.004.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gynecologists AC. Of O and. Practice bulletin no.115: vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:450–63.
Article
Google Scholar
Lyerly AD, Mitchell LM, Armstrong EM, Harris LH, Kukla R, Kuppermann M, Little MO. Risk and the pregnant body. Hast Cent Rep. 2009;39:34–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Fenwick J, Gamble J, Hauck Y. Reframing birth: a consequence of cesarean section. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56:121–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03991_1.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Yee LM, Liu LY, Grobman WA. The relationship between obstetricians’ cognitive and affective traits and delivery outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:e1–6.
Article
Google Scholar