Skip to main content

Case report of amniotic fluid embolism coagulopathy following abortion; use of viscoelastic point-of-care analysis



Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare, life threatening obstetric complication, often associated with severe coagulopathy. Induced abortions are extremely safe procedures however complications including AFE can occur.

Case presentation

A 29-year-old previously healthy woman, gravida 1 para 0, presented for a scheduled second trimester induced abortion via dilation and evacuation at 22-weeks gestation. The case was complicated by a suspected AFE with associated profound coagulopathy. Viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analysis was used to successfully and swiftly guide management of her coagulopathy.


AFE can occur in the setting of induced abortion. This case report suggests viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analyzers may aid in the management of pregnancy-related coagulopathy by providing faster coagulation assessment than laboratory testing, and facilitating timely, targeted management of coagulopathy.

Peer Review reports


Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare complication of pregnancy associated with significant morbidity and mortality. AFE involves a complex sequence of abnormal activation of proinflammatory mediators in the setting of disruption of the maternal-fetal interface, typically presenting as sudden cardiorespiratory collapse, followed in the majority of cases by disseminated intravascular coagulopathy [1].

The incidence of AFE in the setting of legal induced abortion is unknown but is likely low given the very low morbidity and mortality associated with legal induced abortion [2]. Analysis of the 2011–2013 Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System attributed 5.5% of maternal deaths in the United States to AFE, with 1 of the 111 reported AFE related maternal deaths occurring following an abortion [3].

We present the case of a second trimester surgical abortion complicated by a suspected AFE, where profound coagulopathy was successfully managed using targeted blood component repletion guided by viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analysis. Thromboelastography (TEG®; Haemonetics Corp, Braintree, MA) and rotational thromboelastography (ROTEM®; Tem International GmbH; Munich; Germany) are real-time, point of care techniques for assessing specific viscoelastic properties of whole blood as it clots under low shear conditions [4]. In comparison to traditional laboratory coagulation tests, viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analyzers provide more rapid results and facilitate targeted blood component therapy [4, 5]. While viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analyzers have been used for years in trauma, cardiac, and liver surgery, their use in management of pregnancy-related coagulopathy is not yet widespread [4].

We present this case to highlight the potential role for ROTEM® viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analysis in directed and timely management of AFE associated coagulopathy, including as a rare complication of legal induced second trimester surgical abortions.

Case presentation

The patient is a 29-year-old previously healthy female, gravida 1 para 0, who presented for a scheduled induced abortion via dilation and evacuation at 22-weeks gestation, in the setting of a pregnancy complicated by a fetus with trisomy 22 confirmed on amniocentesis and multiple fetal anomalies. Workup prior to the procedure included a complete blood count which revealed a hemoglobin of 12.1 g/deciliter and platelets of 134 ×  103/μl. No history of pre-pregnancy thrombocytopenia was noted. The patient’s pre-procedure systolic blood pressures ranged from 80 to 100 s mmHg.

The day prior to the procedure the patient had osmotic cervical dilators placed in the office. On the day of the procedure a singleton fetus with fetal heart tones was confirmed by ultrasound, monitored anesthesia care was administered with fentanyl, midazolam and propofol in an operating room, osmotic cervical dilators were removed, and a paracervical block with 1% lidocaine was performed. The patient then underwent ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation using electric suction curettage and Bierer forceps. All fetal parts and the placenta were accounted for at the end of the case, with an estimated blood loss of 100 ml and no apparent complications. No hypoxia, tachycardia, or hypotension were noted in the operating room at the time of the procedure.

In the post-anesthesia care unit 15 min post-operatively, the patient experienced moderate vaginal bleeding (visually estimated to be 200 ml) with normal vital signs. The leading diagnosis for additional blood loss at this time was uterine atony; methylergonovine 200 micrograms intra-muscular was administered and a 500 ml crystalloid bolus was given. Forty-five minutes after the procedure moderate vaginal bleeding (visually estimated to be additional 200 ml) was noted again. On assessment vital signs were normal, transabdominal ultrasound revealed a thin endometrial stripe and no fluid posterior to the uterus to suggest intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Firm uterine tone was noted on bimanual exam. Rectal misoprostol (800 micrograms) was administered.

Finally, 75 min post-operatively, the patient became acutely hypotensive (54/42 mmHg). Anesthesia and gynecology teams were immediately called to the bedside. An additional crystalloid fluid bolus was initiated and the decision was made to transfer the patient back to the operating room for evaluation, considering a differential diagnosis for bleeding including retained products of conception, uterine atony, cervical laceration, or coagulopathy.

In the operating room, a complete blood count, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and International Normalized Ratio (INR) were obtained. Monitored anesthesia care was again administered. A 1 × 2 cm piece of clot was removed from the endometrial canal on bimanual exam. Firm uterine tone was noted. Gritty texture and no ongoing bleeding was noted with repeated curettage with a suction cannula. No cervical lacerations were noted, however, hemostatic agents were applied to two site of oozing on the external os. Blood loss was estimated to be 750 ml total at this time.

The patient was transferred back to the post-anesthesia care unit, where an additional dose of intramusclular methylergonovine 200 micrograms was administered given continued moderate bleeding while awaiting lab results. Intra-operative lab results returned showing mild anemia, worsened thrombocytopenia, and abnormal elevation of INR and aPTT (Table 1, Lab 1). Clinical suspicion at this time was for possible AFE, given an episode of significant hypotension and coagulopathy out of proportion to blood loss. STAT repeat labs including a fibrinogen level were ordered, in addition to a ROTEM®.

Table 1 Timeline of laboratory results, ROTEM® results, and interventions in order of time when intervention or testing was initiated

ROTEM® results (Fig. 1) showed very low amplitude fibrinogen, reflected in the low amplitude at 10 min (A10) in the FIBTEM channel, and prolonged clotting time (CT) (359 s) and reduced clot amplitude A10 in the EXTEM (16 mm) channel. Concentrated fibrinogen and transfusion of fresh frozen plasma and platelets were initiated immediately. Additional blood products were ordered from the blood bank. Fifty minutes after the initial ROTEM®, a repeat ROTEM® and repeat STAT labs were sent; at this time the full results were not yet available from the previous labs sent for analysis. More than 2 h after the first infusion of concentrated fibrinogen was initiated based on the first ROTEM® results, the first STAT fibrinogen level resulted as less than 25 mg/deciliter (Table 1, Lab 2). By the time these labs resulted, a second ROTEM® had been run and continued to show severe hypofibrinogemia, as shown in the FIBTEM A10 value (2 mm), and improvement in EXTEM CT (187 s) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1

ROTEM® 1: ROTEM® results show very low amplitude fibrinogen; FIBTEM A10 is undetectable. EXTEM results show prolonged CT (359 s) and low clot A10 in the EXTEM (16 mm)

Fig. 2

ROTEM® 2: ROTEM® results continue to show severe hypofibrinogemia; FIBTEM A10 value of 2 mm. EXTEM results suggest some improvement in CT (187 s) and A10 (20 mm)

Concurrently, the patient developed hypoxia, was placed on a non-rebreather mask and the surgical intensivist team was consulted. Labs sent at the time of the second ROTEM® confirmed ongoing coagulopathy (Table 1, Lab 3). After receiving 4 g concentrated fibrinogen, 2 units of cryoprecipitate, 4 units of fresh frozen plasma, 2 × 5-pack platelets, and 2 g of tranexamic acid, repeat labs were obtained; one unit cryoprecipitate and 2 units of packed red blood cells were given between obtaining the labs and receiving the results. Upon arrival to the surgical intensive care unit, labs showed worsened anemia (not yet reflecting the 2 units of packed red blood cells given after the labs were obtained), improving thrombocytopenia, normalization of aPTT and INR, and normalization of fibrinogen (Table 1, Lab 4). Repeat ROTEM® showed normalization of fibrinogen levels (FIBTEM A10 = 13 mm), CT (60 s), and EXTEM A10 (45 mm) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

ROTEM® 3: ROTEM® show normalization of fibrinogen levels; FIBTEM A10 of 13 mm. EXTEM results show normalization of CT (60 s), and A10 (45 mm)

After transfer to the surgical intensive care unit, a chest radiograph showed diffuse hazy opacification predominant in the peri-hilar regions and lower lungs. The patient received heated high flow nasal cannula secondary to desaturations and 2 × 5-pack platelets for thrombocytopenia. She remained hemodynamically stable, her hypoxia resolved, and she was discharged on room air on post-operative day two. She was doing well and asymptomatic at her two-week post-operative appointment.


This case demonstrates the potential advantages of the use of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analyzers for the management of coagulopathy in the setting of a suspected AFE. While legal induced abortions are safe procedures which can be performed in an outpatient setting in most cases, our case also serves as a reminder to clinicians that rare pregnancy-related complications including AFE can occur [2].

When confronted with pregnancy-related cardiovascular collapse and profound coagulopathy, AFE should be considered in the differential diagnosis, along with pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, anesthetic complication, anaphylaxis, and acute massive blood loss [6]. When coagulopathy is associated with cardiovascular dysfunction, and massive blood loss has been ruled out, as in our case, AFE should be suspected. Classically a clinical triad of hypoxia, hypotension, and coagulopathy is seen in AFEs, with common symptoms including dyspnea, cyanosis, and loss of consciousness [7]. However, this triad is not universally present [7]. The diagnosis of AFE is a diagnosis of exclusion that relies on clinical presentation, as no reliable gold standard laboratory testing to confirm AFE currently exists. There is growing interest in biomarkers, such as insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, in aiding in diagnosis [8].

While most often occurring in the setting of labor and delivery [1], AFE have been reported with legal medical and surgical abortions [9, 10], spontaneous abortions [11], and obstetric procedures including amniocentesis [12] and amnioinfusions [13]. If an AFE is suspected while caring for a patient at an outpatient facility, prompt transfer to a hospital should be arranged, with attention to adequately oxygenating and ventilating the patient, and monitoring for signs of hemorrhage and coagulopathy while awaiting transfer. Fluid overload should be avoided as AFE are associated with acute cor pulmonale (severely dilated hypokinetic right ventricle), followed by left ventricular failure with risk of cardiogenic pulmonary edema [6].

In this case, coagulopathy was suspected based on ongoing post-procedure vaginal bleeding without evidence of an alternative etiology of hemorrhage, disproportionate oozing from minor trauma to the cervix, lack of clotted blood in the vagina or on perineal-pads in the setting of ongoing vaginal bleeding, and acute hypotension and hypoxia, with clinical concern for an AFE. If there is concern for coagulopathy, the potential for progression to disseminated intravascular coagulopathy should be considered. Traditional laboratory measurements of the coagulation profile were used as the initial evaluation for coagulopathy. Unfortunately, formal laboratory assessments of coagulopathy are time consuming, and in the setting of brisk hemorrhage it is often not appropriate to delay treatment while awaiting results given risk of worsening coagulopathy and blood loss [6, 14]. Moreover, the rapidly evolving coagulation profiles can complicate clinical assessment of laboratory results [4]. For a faster, low-cost bedside assessment of coagulation status, clinicians may use the Lee-White whole-blood clotting test (i.e. “red-top-tube test) [15]. A clotting time longer than 10 min at room temperature is indicative of coagulopathy, while lysis of clot within 1 h suggests fibrinolysis [14]. While useful as an adjuvant to laboratory assessment in quickly determining the presence of coagulopathy, whole-blood clotting tests fail to provide factor-specific guidance. In the setting of clinical evidence of coagulopathy or severe hemorrhage, early initiation of a massive transfusion protocol with 1:1:1 ratios of red blood cells, fresh-frozen plasma, and platelets is recommended without awaiting laboratory assessments [6]. Coordination and close communication with anesthesia colleagues additionally plays a critical role in responding to severe coagulopathy.

While the use of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analysis is not widespread in obstetrics, in part due to cost and expertise limitations, there is growing recognition of its usefulness in pregnancy-related coagulopathy management [5, 16, 17]. Our report of coagulopathy in the setting of a suspected AFE following induced abortion adds to several recent case reports highlight the potential utility of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analyzers in managing AFE associated coagulopathy at the time of term deliveries [16, 18, 19]. When available, viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analysis allows for a more efficient and targeted assessment of coagulation compared to traditional laboratory testing or the whole-blood clotting tests [4]. Viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analysis has different analysis channels that generates a graphical and quantitative representation of whole blood coagulation from clot initiation to lysis, including strength and stability clot assessments. The FIBTEM channel, correlates with plasma fibrinogen levels and clot strength, and indicates whether cryoprecipitate/fibrinogen concentrate therapy should be started [20]. The EXTEM channel tests the extrinsic coagulation pathway: the EXTEM CT correlates with prothrombin time, and therefore informs the clinician as to whether fresh frozen plasma should be given, the EXTEM curve A10 correlates with platelet count and function [20]. The APTEM channel, when compared to the EXTEM channel, gives information as to whether fibrinolysis is ongoing and an antifibrinolytic drug should be administered; if the APTEM and EXTEM graphs look similar, there is not significant fibrinolysis [20].

Viscoelastic point-of-care graphical depictions can be analyzed in real-time, allowing clinicians to gain critical information within minutes of test initiation; A10 results can be visualized 10 min after test initiation as the name implies. In our case, hypofibrinogenemia, which is independently associated with worsened postpartum hemorrhage [5], was diagnosed less than 5 min after ROTEM® initiation, allowing swift administration of fibrinogen repletion before laboratory assessments resulted. Profound hypofibrinogenemia was similarly seen, and correction targeted, in other cases of suspected AFE managed with viscoelastic point-of-care analyzers [16, 18, 19]. Rather than initiating a standard massive-transfusion protocol and awaiting laboratory assessments, when available, viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analysis use should be considered for tailoring response to pregnancy-related coagulopathy.


This rare case of suspected AFE and severe coagulopathy following a second trimester surgical abortion highlights the potential advantages of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analysis, both in terms of timeliness of intervention and targeting of blood component therapy, in managing coagulopathies resulting from obstetric complications. More research is needed to determine the impact of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation analysis on patient outcomes in the setting of pregnancy-related coagulopathy.

Availability of data and materials

The data referred to in this case report was obtained from review of the patient’s medical record and is not publicly available.



clot amplitude at 10 min


Amniotic fluid embolism


activated partial thromboplastin time


complete blood count


clotting time


fresh frozen plasma


International Normalized Ratio


mean clot firmness


rotational thromboelastography


tranexamic acid


  1. 1.

    Clark SL, Hankins GD, Dudley DA, Dildy GA, Porter TF. Amniotic fluid embolism: analysis of the national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172(4):1158–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zane S, Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Pazol K, Suchdev DB, Jamieson DJ, et al. Abortion-related mortality in the United States: 1998–2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(2):258–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011–2013. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):366–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ganter MT, Hofer CK. Coagulation monitoring: current techniques and clinical use of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation devices. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(5):1366–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Huissoud C, Carrabin N, Audibert F, Levrat A, Massignon D, Berland M, et al. Bedside assessment of fibrinogen level in postpartum haemorrhage by thrombelastometry: fibrinogen assessment in postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116(8):1097–102.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pacheco LD, Saade G, Hankins GD, Clark SL. Medicine (SMFM S for M-F, others). Amniotic fluid embolism: diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):B16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Clark SL. Amniotic fluid embolism. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(2, PART 1):337–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Legrand M, Rossignol M, Dreux S, Luton D, Ventré C, Barranger E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 for amniotic fluid embolism*. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(7):2059–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kaaniche FM, Chaari A, Zekri M, Bahloul M, Chelly H, Bouaziz M. Embolie amniotique compliquant une interruption médicale de la grossesse. Can J Anesth. 2016;63(7):871–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lawson HW, Atrash HK, Franks AL. Fatal pulmonary embolism during legal induced abortion in the United States from 1972 to 1985. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(4):986–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wallace F, Clayton R, Davies S, Saleh S. Successful resuscitation following amniotic fluid embolism in a patient undergoing induction of labour for late miscarriage. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21(2):202–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Maher JE, Wenstrom KD, Hauth JC, Meis PJ. Amniotic fluid embolism after saline amnioinfusion: two cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;85(5 Pt 2):851–4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shojai R, Chau C, Boubli L, d’Ercole C. Amniotic fluid embolism during late term termination of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23(11):950–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Barbieri RL. Act fast when confronted by a coagulopathy postpartum. OBG Manage. 2012;24(3):3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lee R, White P. A clinical study of the coagulation time of blood. Am J Med Sci. 1913;145:495–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Annecke T, Geisenberger T, Kürzl R, Penning R, Heindl B. Algorithm-based coagulation management of catastrophic amniotic fluid embolism. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2010;21(1):95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Butwick AJ, Goodnough LT. Transfusion and coagulation management in major obstetric hemorrhage. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28(3):275–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pujolle E, Mercier FJ, Le Gouez A. Rotational thromboelastometry as a tool in the diagnosis and management of amniotic fluid embolism. Int J Obstet Anesth [Internet]. 2019 Feb [cited 2019 Mar 25]; Available from

  19. 19.

    Loughran JA, Kitchen TL, Sindhakar S, Ashraf M, Awad M, Kealaher EJ. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®)-guided diagnosis and management of amniotic fluid embolism. Int J Obstet Anesth [Internet]. 2018 Sep [cited 2019 Mar 25]; Available from

  20. 20.

    Solomon C, Collis RE, Collins PW. Haemostatic monitoring during postpartum haemorrhage and implications for management. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(6):851–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We appreciate the support of the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Anesthesiology at the University of Michigan.



Author information




JB HC and CL conceived of the idea for the case report. JB, HC, and CL were involved in the care of the patient described. HC performed a detailed chart review and literature search. CP provided background information and interpretation of ROTEM results. HC wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. JB, CL, and CP provided substantial edits and additions to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

Written consent was obtained from the patient whose care is described in this case report. Documentation of written consent will be provided to the journal if requested.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Halley P. Crissman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This case report is deemed IRB exempt because of its case report status.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crissman, H.P., Loder, C., Pancaro, C. et al. Case report of amniotic fluid embolism coagulopathy following abortion; use of viscoelastic point-of-care analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20, 9 (2020).

Download citation


  • Abortion
  • Amniotic fluid embolism
  • Viscoelastic point-of-care analysis
  • Thromboelastography
  • Coagulopathy
  • Case report