Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Sexual dysfunction and mode of delivery in Chinese primiparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contributed equally
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:408

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1583-2

Received: 24 November 2015

Accepted: 17 November 2017

Published: 6 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Up to now, there is controversy over the effect of delivery mode cesarean delivery and spontaneous vaginal delivery on sexual function. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis in postpartum women to explore the mode of delivery, cesarean delivery, and spontaneous vaginal delivery and differences in postpartum sexual function (short- and long-term) in Chinese primiparous women.

Methods

Comprehensive electronic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Elsevier Science Direct, Cochrane Library, the Chinese Biological Medical Literature database and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database were conducted to identify any study in each database published to August 31, 2017. The primary outcome was the sexual satisfaction and the secondary outcomes were resumed intercourse and sexual pain in the postpartum.

Results

We identified 10 studies with a total population of 2851 in the present meta-analysis. Five and six eligible articles were respectively included for sexual satisfaction in postpartum at 3- and 6 months. Compared with vaginal delivery group, two time points were all not found statistically significance (OR 1.53, 95%CI 0.93–2.49; OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.95–1.39, respectively) in cesarean and spontaneous vaginal delivery group; in resumed intercourse and sexual pain domains, they were all significantly, with an overall OR of 2.05 (95%CI 1.36–3.11) at 3 months, 1.50 (95%CI 1.04–2.16) at 6 months and 0.29 (95%CI 0.24, 0.36) at 3 months, 0.73 (95%CI 0.58, 0.93) at 6 months, respectively. With the passage of time, the gap was closing. Sensitivity analysis was indicated a good stability of the meta-analysis in each domain.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicated that the mode of delivery, cesarean and spontaneous vaginal delivery did not affect postpartum sexual satisfaction (short- and long-term) and appeared to have minimal effect on the long-term resumed intercourse and sexual pain in Chinese primiparous women. Primiparous women should be more cautious to choose cesarean section in order to preserve sexual function.

Keywords

Cesarean deliveryVaginal deliverySexual functionMeta-analysis

Background

There has been concern about progressively increasing rates of caesarean section in many parts of the world, particularly among developing countries such as China [1, 2]. The caesarean section rate was more than 40% in many Chinese hospitals, while in some cases, it was up to 80% [3], which was now higher than the upper limit of 15% recommended by the WHO’s guidelines [4]. Long-term consequences associated with caesarean sections had been reported in many previous studies, including pelvic floor disorders, reduced fertility, placental abnormalities, mental distress, and female sexual dysfunction [57].

Female sexual function was considered a social issue, and pregnancy and delivery are considered contributory factors. Available data suggested that postpartum female sexual dysfunction was common in many countries [810]. The prevalence among postpartum women was as high as 41% to 83% in the first 3 months after delivery [8] and 18–30% of postpartum women still complained experiencing sexual problems at 6 months after delivery [9]. Among all domains of sexual problems, pain during intercourse, sexual dissatisfaction and delay in resuming intercourse were the most prevalent sexual problems for women and were negatively associated with the quality of life after childbirth [1114]. In a study by Declercq and colleagues [12], almost half (48%) of mothers accused experiencing a painful perineum over the first 2 months postpartum, and 2% reported the pain persisting for at least 6 months.

Currently, Chinese women may prefer birth by caesarean section to vaginal delivery because they think it was safer and free from pain and anxiety and also may increase postpartum sexual life quality [15]. Up to now, numerous reports had been engaged with the task of exploring female sexuality in postpartum in Chinese women [1625]. However, there was controversy over the effect of delivery mode cesarean delivery and spontaneous vaginal delivery on sexual function. Several studies had revealed the association between sexual function and delivery mode [18, 22, 23]. In contrary, other studies demonstrated no association between mode of delivery and sexual function [20, 21, 24].

Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis in postpartum women to explore the mode of delivery, cesarean delivery, and spontaneous vaginal delivery and differences in postpartum sexual function (short- and long-term) in Chinese primiparous women.

Methods

This meta-analysis was performed following the guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement (Additional file 1: Table S1) [26].

Literature search

Identification and selection of relevant studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Elsevier Science Direct, Cochrane Library, the Chinese Biological Medical Literature database (CBM) and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database (CNKI) were searched for articles concerning the postpartum sexual function in Chinese primiparous women with planned/unplanned cesarean or spontaneous vaginal delivery mode. The last search update was on August 31, 2017. Keywords used to identify relevant articles were “mode of delivery”, “cesarean delivery”, “vaginal delivery”, and “sexual”, “sexual function” or “sexual dysfunction”. We used MeSH terms including “Delivery, Obstetric” [Mesh], “Cesarean Section” [Mesh], and “Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological” [Mesh]. Relevant articles in the reference lists were identified to obtain additional published studies.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies meeting the following inclusion criteria were considered for this meta-analysis: (I) Clinical trials and prospective or retrospective studies investigating the correlation of the sexual function with the mode of delivery, planned/unplanned cesarean and spontaneous vaginal delivery, not instrumental delivery, among Chinese primiparous women; (II) Findings providing sufficient information for the estimation of odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals; and (III) the publication was in English or Chinese. Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals were included, data from letters and meetings abstracts were not eligible. Studies were also rejected if they did not meet the inclusion criteria or if they reported duplicated or useless data.

Data extraction

Two authors (DF and SL) independently screened and determined the relevant studies and extracted the relevant data from each study and subsequently assessed the data to estimate reliability. The following information was obtained from the studies: first author, publication year, number of participants, age at time of delivery (mean, median, range), mode of delivery (planned/unplanned cesarean delivery, and spontaneous vaginal delivery), and sexual function outcomes (sexual satisfaction, resumed intercourse and sexual pain) in the first 3 and 6 months postpartum. The primary outcome of interest in this review was the sexual satisfaction in postpartum. And the secondary outcomes were resumed intercourse and sexual pain in postpartum. Any discrepancies were settled through discussion until a consensus was reached. Using Cohen’s kappa statistic, the consistency coefficient was 0.94 in the data extraction.

Risk of bias assessment

Two authors (GT and LL) independently assessed the risk of bias of the selected studies using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement, which consisted of a checklist of 22 items [27]. Each item was classified as “no” (high risk), “yes” (low risk), or “unclear” to facilitate assessing the risk of potential bias in the title and abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and other information sections of articles [27]. In order to report the results in percentages, the total number of “no”, “yes”, or “unclear” was added and divided by the total number of items for each study and multiplied by 100 [28]. A consensus reviewer (SW) resolved any observed discrepancies. The consistency coefficient was 0.96 in the risk of bias assessment.

Statistical analysis

The ORs and 95% CIs were combined to obtain the effective value. A heterogeneity test based on I 2 and Q statistics was performed. The heterogeneity of individual ORs was calculated using Cochran chi-square (χ2) tests and quantified with the I 2 statistic. I 2 less than 25% denoted low heterogeneity, a value from 25 to 50% indicated moderate heterogeneity, and a value greater than 50% indicated substantial heterogeneity [29]. Significant heterogeneity was determined at a p value less than 0.10. The random effects model was used when heterogeneity was observed between primary studies. And the fixed effects model was used for analysis when no heterogeneity was observed. The impact was considered statistically significant when the 95% CI did not overlap with 1. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the stability of the results. Due to the small number of the included studies, publication bias cannot be assessed in this study. Statistical significance was considered for a p-value of less than 0.05 for summary OR. All calculations were performed using Review Manager Version 5.3 (provided by The Cochrane Collaboration, available from www.cc-ims.net/revman) and STATA version 11.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Literature search

A total of 189 citations were retrieved from electronic databases. A flowchart of the study selection was provided in Fig. 1. After removal of duplicates, 122 publications were independently assessed for eligibility. After preliminary screening of titles and abstracts utilizing the aforementioned criteria, 16 articles were identified for full-text review. Of these, 6 were further excluded for various reasons (including 1 review article, 2 relevant outcomes not reported, and 3 accurate data not reported), leaving 10 eligible articles (2851 participants) [1625] and were included in the meta-analysis. The study-level risk of bias results shown in Fig. 2. All of the included studies did not discuss limitations of the studies while nine studies did not give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the studies. Eight of ten studies did not describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias, explain how the study size was arrived at, or report other analyses done. The demographic characteristics of the participants in each study were shown in Table 1.
Fig. 1

PRISMA flowchart showing the study selection process

Fig. 2

Risk of bias assessment using STROBE statement for each study. The statement consisted of a checklist of 22 items. Each item was classified as “no” (high risk), “yes” (low risk), or “unclear” to facilitate assessing the risk of potential bias in the title and abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and other information sections of articles. In order to report the results in percentages, the total number of “no”, “yes”, or “unclear” was added and divided by the total number of items for each study and multiplied by 100

Table 1

Characteristics of individual studies included in meta-analysis

Author

Year

Number of participants

Age (years)a

Sexual Satisfaction

Resumed Intercourse

Sexual Pain

  

CD

VD

CD

VD

3 months

6 months

3 months

6 months

3 months

6 months

Xu XY

2003

260

142

N

Y

N

N

N

Y

Xing YX

2007

225

256

25.30 ± 2.15

24.6 ± 2.36

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Zhang GP

2009

98

96

20–30

20–30

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Mai XL

2011

206

224

25–29

25–29

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Wang SG

2012

100

140

21–33

21–33

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Liu D

2013

230

170

20–32

20–32

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Yu QY

2014

114

75

26.41 ± 2.25

26.39 ± 2.21

N

N

Y

Y

Y

N

Chen J

2014

100

100

25.90 ± 1.60

26.30 ± 2.10

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

ZULIFEIYA A

2015

115

80

25.50 ± 3.30

26.50 ± 3.50

N

N

Y

Y

N

N

Du ZL

2015

64

56

N

N

Y

N

Y

N

CD cesarean delivery, VD spontaneous vaginal delivery, Y yes, N no; −--, unknown

aAge was shown in mean ± standard deviation or minimum-maximum

Sexual satisfaction

As showed in Table 2, 5 studies (740 participants in cesarean delivery group, 742 participants in spontaneous vaginal delivery group) were included in the meta-analysis for sexual satisfaction at 3 months postpartum. Six studies, including 1011 participants in cesarean delivery group and 901 participants in spontaneous vaginal delivery group, were included at 6 months postpartum. Compared with vaginal delivery group, there were all not found statistically significance in sexual satisfaction between the two groups at the two time points (OR 1.53, 95%CI 0.93–2.49; OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.95–1.39, respectively) (Fig. 3).
Table 2

Meta-analysis of the association between mode of delivery and postpartum sexual function

Variables

 

Eligible

Number

OR (95% CI)

P

Heterogeneity Test

Effect Model

  

Studies

CD

VD

  

P

I 2 (%)

 

Sexual Satisfaction

         

3 month

5

740

742

1.53 (0.93, 2.49)

0.09

0.0007

79

Random

6 month

6

1011

901

1.15 (0.95, 1.39)

0.16

0.99

0

Fixed

Resumed Intercourse

 

3 month

9

1252

1197

2.05 (1.36, 3.11)

0.0007

<0.0001

77

Random

6 month

8

1188

1141

1.50 (1.04, 2.16)

0.03

0.56

0

Fixed

Sexual Pain

 

3 month

7

1010

1022

0.29 (0.24, 0.36)

<0.00001

0.63

0

Fixed

6 month

7

1223

1126

0.73 (0.58, 0.93)

0.01

0.76

0

Fixed

CD cesarean delivery, VD spontaneous vaginal delivery, OR odds ratios, 95%CI 95% confidence interval

Fig. 3

Forest plot of sexual satisfaction and mode of delivery. a within 3 months after delivery; (b) within 6 months after delivery

Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of the meta-analysis. When any single study was deleted, the corresponding pooled ORs were changed slightly (Additional file 2: Table S2; Additional file 3: Figures S1–S2), with the statistically similar results indicating a satisfactory stability of the meta-analysis.

Resumed intercourse and sexual pain

Nine (2449 participants) and eight (2329 participants) studies were included for resumed intercourse in postpartum at 3 months and 6 months, respectively. Compared with vaginal delivery group, participants were all earlier resumed intercourse in cesarean delivery group at 3 months and 6 months postpartum, with an overall OR of 2.05 (95% CI 1.36–3.11) at 3 months in random model (p < 0.0001, I 2 = 77%) and OR of 1.50 (95% CI 1.04–2.16) at 6 months in fixed model (p < 0.56, I 2 = 0%), respectively (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Forest plot of resumed intercourse and mode of delivery. a within 3 months after delivery; (b) within 6 months after delivery

In the sexual pain domain, there were 2032 (seven articles) and 2349 participants (seven articles) in postpartum at 3 months and 6 months, respectively. Compared with vaginal delivery group, less sexual pain was all observed in cesarean delivery group at 3 months (OR = 0.29, 95%CI 0.24, 0.36) and at 6 months (OR = 0.73, 95%CI 0.58, 0.93), respectively (Fig. 5). Because of the insignificant heterogeneity between studies, they were all determined using the fixed effect method (p < 0.63, I 2 = 0%, p < 0.76, I 2 = 0%; respectively).
Fig. 5

Forest plot of sexual pain and mode of delivery. a within 3 months after delivery; (b) within 6 months after delivery

When any single study was deleted, sensitivity analysis was indicated a good stability of the meta-analysis in each domain (Additional file 2: Table S2; Additional file 3: Figures S3–S6).

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis that examines the results association between postpartum sexual function and the mode of delivery, cesarean and spontaneous vaginal delivery, in Chinese primiparous women. The results indicated that two of the three domains (resumed intercourse and sexual pain) in both short-term (3 months later) and long-term (6 months later) were all better in cesarean delivery group. However, with the passage of time, the gap was closing. The sexual satisfaction was all not found different at short- and long-term postpartum in the two delivery models.

Sexual health is an important aspect of quality of life. Studies [3032] have reported that diseases could affect the sexual function. Many studies have focused on the mode of delivery and postpartum sexual health [3335], however, these results are still inconsistent. In a cross-sectional postal survey study [34], Dean and colleagues showed that sexual satisfaction was significantly less in women with vaginal delivery than the women who had undergone a cesarean section. However, in another similar cross-sectional study of primiparous women [35], Hosseini et al. reported that women in the normal vaginal delivery group and planned cesarean section group had no significant difference in the sexual function, including sexual satisfaction and pain, and he appealed that undergoing planned cesarean section in order to preserve sexual function was not recommended.

In this meta-analysis study, the results indicated that sexual satisfaction was all not found different in the 3 and 6 months postpartum. In the study of 1159 Canadian postpartum women [36], Hannah and colleagues reported that sexual satisfaction from 3 months to 2 years postpartum was similar among women who had undergone a planned cesarean section and planned vaginal birth. Meanwhile, similar results were also showed in other studies [34, 37, 38].

Although other two domains (resumed intercourse and sexual pain) in both short-term (3 months later) and long-term (6 months later) were better in cesarean delivery group, with the passage of time, the gap was closing. In the study by a postal survey conducted on 484 British primiparous women at 6 months after delivery [39], resumption of sexual intercourse did not differ significantly by type of birth. Meanwhile, women who had undergone cesarean sections were significantly less likely to experience sexual dysfunction at 3 months postpartum, but there was no significant difference at 6 months.

The results of the sensitivity analysis were not materially altered and did not draw different conclusions, indicating that the initial results were strong. However, some limitations also need to be discussed. First, this meta-analysis was based on data from studies whose results had been published, and some relevant studies could not be included in our analysis. Due to the small number of the included studies, publication bias cannot be assessed. Meanwhile, some items of the STROBE Statement were not reported in the included studies, which could increase the high risk of bias. Second, the meta-analysis was limited to different adjustments for potential confounding variables (age, area, primiparous/multiparous, et al.) in each study. Because of lacking sufficient data, we cannot exclude the possibility that these factors, which may affect the final conclusion of the present study. Third, the results were based on self-created questionnaire among studies, which may result in some misclassification bias. In addition, various outcome measures (resumption of sexual activity, satisfaction or orgasm, sexual sensation, sexual inactivity) assessed the postpartum sexual problems for women. Because most Chinese doctors just focus on the three domains, we cannot assess all of the domains of their postpartum sexual problems.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis indicated that the mode of delivery, cesarean delivery, and vaginal delivery did not affect postpartum sexual satisfaction (short- and long-term) and appeared to have minimal effect on the long-term resumed intercourse and sexual pain in Chinese primiparous women. Postpartum sexual dysfunction may be affected to prepartum sexual function, the partner’s experience, and other social and cultural factors. Those requesting caesarean delivery without conventional medical indications or obstetric indications for foetus or mother, should be advised of these potential results.

It is important to inform pregnant women that the mode of delivery is not a major factor in postpartum sexual dysfunction. Meanwhile, in clinical practice, more attention should be given to the relationship between the mode of delivery and postpartum sexual function, especially primiparous women. Obstetricians, nursing staffs, and all of the health care providers who are engaged in counseling couples during the antepartum period should be told in order to train couples regarding potential postpartum sexual dysfunction to help these couples chose the mode of delivery.

Abbreviations

CBM: 

The Chinese biological medical literature database

CD: 

Cesarean delivery

CI: 

Confidence interval

CNKI: 

The Chinese national knowledge infrastructure database

NOS: 

Newcastle-Ottawa Scale

OR: 

Odds ratio

PRISMA: 

The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis

STROBE: 

The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology

VD: 

Spontaneous vaginal delivery

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the efforts of all the researchers whose articles were included in this study.

Funding

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Availability of data and materials

All data analyzed during this study are presented within the manuscript (Tables 1 and 2).

Authors’ contributions

ZL and XG participated in the design and coordination of the study. DF conceived the study, and drafting the manuscript. SL searched for the studies, collected and analyzed the data. WW participated in the design of this study and edited the manuscript. GT and LL did the data management and analyzed the data. SW conceived the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Foshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan
(2)
Department of Obstetrics, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan
(3)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University
(4)
Chaohu Hospital Affiliated Anhui Medical University
(5)
The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University
(6)
School of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine

References

  1. Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21:98–113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Leone T, Padmadas SS, Matthews Z. Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: an analysis of six countries. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1236–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang BS, Zhou LF, Coulter D, Liang H, Zhong Y, Guo YN, et al. Effects of caesarean section on maternal health in low risk nulliparous women: a prospective matched cohort study in shanghai, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Organization WH. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2:436–7.Google Scholar
  5. Zelop C, Heffner LJ. The downside of cesarean delivery: short- and long-term complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;47:386–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Health Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: cesarean delivery on maternal request march 27-29, 2006. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1386–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan D, Wu S, Wang W, Xin L, Tian G, Liu L, et al. Prevalence of placenta previa among deliveries in mainland China: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e5107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Leader-Cramer A, Kenton K, Dave B, Gossett DR, Mueller M, Lewicky-Gaupp C. Factors associated with timing of return to intercourse after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. J Sex Med. 2016;13:1523–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rogers RG, Borders N, Leeman LM, Albers LL. Does spontaneous genital tract trauma impact postpartum sexual function? J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009;54:98–103.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang H, Fan S, Yip PS. Sexual dysfunction among reproductive-aged Chinese married women in Hong Kong: prevalence, risk factors, and associated consequences. J Sex Med. 2015;12:738–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Postpartum female sexual function. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145:133–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Declercq E, Cunningham DK, Johnson C, Sakala C. Mothers’ reports of postpartum pain associated with vaginal and cesarean deliveries: results of a national survey. Birth. 2008;35:16–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Andreucci CB, Bussadori JC, Pacagnella RC, Chou D, Filippi V, Say L, et al. Sexual life and dysfunction after maternal morbidity: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:307.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Rowlands IJ, Redshaw M. Mode of birth and women's psychological and physical wellbeing in the postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:138.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Feng XL, Xu L, Guo Y, Ronsmans C. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:30–9. 39AView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. ZULIFEIYA A, MIREAYI G. Impact of different methods of delivery on the postpartum sexual function of primipara. The Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality. 2015;24:74–6.Google Scholar
  17. Du ZL. Impact Of different modes of delivery on postpartum sexual function of primiparae. Guide of China. Medicine. 2015;13:172–3.Google Scholar
  18. QY Y, Zhang SZ. Impact of different modes of delivery on postpartum sexual function of primiparae. The Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality. 2014;23:32–6.Google Scholar
  19. Chen J, Qi J, He Y. Impact of natural birth and cesarean section of female postpartum sexual function and living quality. The Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality. 2014;23:62–5.Google Scholar
  20. Liu D. Impact of natural birth and cesarean section of female postpartum sexual function and living quality. Qingdao medical. Journal. 2013;45:263–4.Google Scholar
  21. Wang SG, Chen XY, Zhou LP, Ruan Z, FL H, Chen F, et al. A comparison on the effect of cesarean and vaginal delivery on women's postpartum sexual function. The. Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality. 2012;21:19–21.Google Scholar
  22. Mai XL, Long LS. Impact of different methods of delivery on the postpartum sexual function. National Medical Frontiers of China. 2011;6:51–2.Google Scholar
  23. Zhang GP, Xie CL, Shen X. Impact of different methods of delivery on the postpartum sexual function. TODAY NURSE. 2009:73–4.Google Scholar
  24. Xing YX, Guo JQ, Yang LZ, Hou YL, Li FJ. Women's sexual health after birth between abdominal delivery and vagina delivery. China Journal of Modern Medicine. 2007;17:215–9.Google Scholar
  25. XY X, Yao ZW, Wang HY, Zhou Q, Zhang LW. Women's postpartum sexuality and delivery types. Chin. J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;38:219–22.Google Scholar
  26. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1495–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Umer A, Kelley GA, Cottrell LE, Giacobbi P Jr, Innes KE, Lilly CL. Childhood obesity and adult cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:683.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Fan D, Liu S, Yang T, Wu S, Wang S, Li G, et al. Association between KIR polymorphisms and ankylosing spondylitis in populations: a meta-analysis. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;Google Scholar
  30. Yin R, Xu B, Li L, Fu T, Zhang L, Zhang Q, et al. The impact of systemic lupus erythematosus on women's sexual functioning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e7162.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Fan D, Liu L, Ding N, Liu S, Hu Y, Cai G, et al. Male sexual dysfunction and ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Rheumatol. 2015;42:252–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Q, Zhou C, Chen H, Zhao Q, Li L, Cui Y, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with negatively variable impacts on domains of female sexual function: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Health Med. 2017:1–12.Google Scholar
  33. De Souza A, Dwyer PL, Charity M, Thomas E, Ferreira C, Schierlitz L. The effects of mode delivery on postpartum sexual function: a prospective study. BJOG. 2015;122:1410–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Dean N, Wilson D, Herbison P, Glazener C, Aung T, Macarthur C. Sexual function, delivery mode history, pelvic floor muscle exercises and incontinence: a cross-sectional study six years post-partum. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48:302–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hosseini L, Iran-Pour E, Safarinejad MR. Sexual function of primiparous women after elective cesarean section and normal vaginal delivery. Urol J. 2012;9:498–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized term breech trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:917–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van de Pol G, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH. Which factors determine the sexual function 1 year after childbirth? BJOG. 2006;113:914–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gungor S, Baser I, Ceyhan T, Karasahin E, Kilic S. Does mode of delivery affect sexual functioning of the man partner? J Sex Med. 2008;5:155–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Barrett G, Peacock J, Victor CR, Manyonda I. Cesarean section and postnatal sexual health. Birth. 2005;32:306–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement