Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Folic acid usage and associated factors in the prevention of neural tube defects among pregnant women in Ethiopia: cross-sectional study

  • Meselech Ambaw Dessie1Email author,
  • Ejigu Gebeye Zeleke2,
  • Shimelash Bitew Workie3 and
  • Ayanaw Worku Berihun1
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:313

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1506-2

Received: 20 April 2017

Accepted: 11 September 2017

Published: 21 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Neural tube defects are among the most common birth defects, contributing to miscarriage, infant mortality, severe congenital abnormalities and serious disabilities. It is burdensome to patients, caregivers, healthcare systems and society. It could be reduced if women consume a folic acid supplement before and during the early weeks of pregnancy. This study assesses folic acid usage and associated factors for the prevention of neural tube defects among pregnant women in Ethiopia.

Methods

Institution based cross-sectional study was conducted on 417 systematically sampled, consented pregnant women that visited Adama hospital medical college for antenatal care during August to November 2014. Pretested interviewer administered questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic, obstetric characteristics and folic acid usage of women.

Result

About 48.4% of women took a folic acid supplement at different period of pregnancy; but, only 1.92% of women took the supplement at a protective period against neural tube defects. Age, the early timing of antenatal registration, was a preconception consulted, previous unsuccessful pregnancies and level of folic acid awareness were significantly associated with folic acid usage for prevention of neural tube defects.

Conclusions

Folic acid usage during the protective period against neural tube defects among women in Ethiopia is very low, so healthcare plan to improve intake of folic acid is required.

Keywords

Neural tube defects Folic acid Pregnancy

Background

Neural tube defects (NTDs) are congenital anomalies that result from failure of the neural tube to close between day 21 to 28 post conception [14]. NTDs are contributing to miscarriage, infant mortality, severe congenital abnormalities and serious disabilities and are the second most common congenital anomaly [3, 5]. NTDs account for 10% of all neonatal mortality, 10% of the burden of all congenital conditions and these defects are responsible annually for 41,000 deaths and 2.3 million disability-adjusted life years [3, 6]. NTDs are affecting 0.5–2 per 1000 pregnancies and occurring in about 2–3% live births worldwide [1, 7, 8]. Because of the lower living standard and low antenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy [9]; the incidence of NTDs in developing countries have been reported to be up to fourfold higher than in developed ones [10]. The lifelong medical and socioeconomic consequences of NTDs in affected children are equally known to be worse in low-resource settings [3]. A study conducted in Ethiopia reported that hydrocephalus (35.5%) and neural tube defects (27.5%) were the major leading causes of admission to hospitals for surgical procedures among children [11].

Neural tube defects have a heterogeneous and multifactorial etiology, including genetic and environmental factors as well as predisposing maternal factors [3, 8, 12]. Among known environmental factors folic acid deficiency is the most common one [1214].

The basic characteristic of embryonic and fetal development is widespread cell division; and folic acid has a major role in DNA and RNA synthesis, for cellular development and division, the metabolism of amino acids and the regulation of homocysteine in the blood [1518]. Folic acid deficiency is a serious problem that affects women worldwide [4]. In Ethiopia, one in every three women had a deficiency of folic acid, suggesting that these women are at a higher risk of giving birth to a baby with NTDs [19].

Folic acid intake is limited by cooking losses and poor bioavailability estimated to be from 50% to 82% [2, 1922]. In addition, during pregnancy, maternal serum and erythrocyte concentrations of folic acid decline for several reasons: increased demand, dilution secondary to increased intravascular volume, increased folate catabolism and clearance, decreased absorption and inadequate intake [1, 6].

Many studies have documented that daily intake of 400 micrograms folic acid at least one month before pregnancy and the entire first trimester of pregnancy could reduce the risk of NTDs by up to 80% [4, 21, 2325]. Because the neural tube closes by the fourth week after conception, it is important that folic acid be consumed on a regular basis before pregnancy [17, 26, 27].

Previous studies internationally shows different level of folic acid usage for prevention of NTDs [1, 21, 23, 25, 2833] and discovered age [1, 21, 25, 2830, 34], parity levels [21, 25, 29, 30], smoking status [25], history of spontaneous abortions [25], planning of pregnancy [21, 23, 28], number of ANC visits [29, 30, 35], timing of ante-natal registration [30], educational status [1, 21, 25, 30, 35], marital status [21, 25, 35], monthly income [21, 25] and number of pregnancy [28] as factors associated with preconception folic acid usage.

Although folic acid usage for prevention of NTDs were well studied internationally, there are no published reports that indicate the usage of folic acid at the recommended time among pregnant women in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to assess folic acid usage and associated factors for the prevention of NTDs among pregnant women in Ethiopia.

Methods

Study settings and period

In Ethiopia pregnant women obtain antenatal care (ANC) in all government health facilities free of charge starting from one month. ANC covers a wide range of services including folic acid and iron supplement. But there is no preconception care. Based on Ethiopian mini Demographic and Health Survey 2011, 76% of urban pregnant women received ANC from a skilled provider, that is, from a doctor, nurse, or midwife. The study was conducted from August to November 2014 in Adama also known as Nazareth. Adama is a city located 99 km southeast of Addis Ababa and was a previous capital of the Oromia region from August to November 2014.

Study design and population

An institution based cross-sectional study was conducted on pregnant women who visited Adama hospital medical college, the former Haile Mariam Mamo memorial hospital, for the ANC. Women in 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancy were included in the study. Women who come repeatedly during the data collection time were excluded.

Sample size determination and sampling procedure

The sample size was determined using a formula for a single population proportion and calculated by Open Epi Info version 3.5.3 statistical software package based on the following assumptions: the target population greater than 10, 000, since the proportion of folic acid usage for NTD prevention in Ethiopia was unknown 50% was used, significant level at 95% confidence interval and margin of tolerable sampling error 5%. After calculating sample size was 383. After adding 10% for non-response the final sample size becomes 422. The study participants were selected by using a systematic random sampling method. After taking informed consent, the participants were interviewed in the waiting room before entering to ANC unit.

Data collection tools and study variables

A pretested interviewer administered questionnaire written in English was prepared. The questionnaire was translated into the local language (Amharic) to the guardians then translated back to English to evaluate its consistency. A detailed history of socio demographic characteristics (age, marital status, educational status, monthly income which was scaled as birr per month, occupation, husband educational status; obstetric characteristics (number of pregnancies, preconception consult which means asking advise from healthcare provider by own initiation, number of antenatal visit, planning of pregnancy, history of unsuccessful pregnancy, previous history of a baby with NTDs) and awareness and use of folic acid were assessed by interviewing the women. The dependent variable was folic acid usage for NTD prevention. The independent variables were socio demographic characteristics, obstetric characteristics and level of information about folic acid. Figure 1 shows the conceptual framework for folic acid usage and associated factors. Folic acid user for NTD prevention was defined in this study as a woman who took folic acid at least one month before pregnancy and continue for three months after pregnancy. Total user of folic acid were women who took folic acid at any time during current pregnancy for at least one month.
Fig. 1

Conceptual framework to assess folic acid usage and associated factors for prevention of NTDs among pregnant women developed from literatures

Data processing and analysis

Data were entered into Epi-Info version 3.5.3 and exported to SPSS version 20 statistical software for analysis. Descriptive statistics were carried out using percentage and presented in tables. Bivariate logistic regression analysis, Chi square and Fisher’s exact test were conducted to assess the association between dependent and independent variables. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval and p-value were used to evaluate the association between the dependent and independent variables. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Ethical considerations

The study was conducted following ethical approval by the University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Medicine Ethical Committee. Permission was taken from the hospital administrators. Informed consent was taken from the study participants. Participation in the study was voluntary and refusal was possible. The study did not involve any harmful procedure. To keep confidentiality codes were used and an unauthorized person did not have access to the data.

Results

A total of 422 pregnant women attending ANC in Adama hospital medical college from August to November 2014 were approached to fill a questioner but 417 women willing to fill it. The response rate was 98.8%. The mean respondent age was 25.3 years, 45.3% of the respondents were aged less than 25 years, 49.4% of the women were aged between 25 and 35 years, and 5.3% were aged 35 and above. The minimum age was 16 and the maximum was 41. Household monthly income was less than 2500ETB in 57.3% of the respondents and greater than or equal to 2500 to 42.7% of the respondents. Table 1 shows the detail socio demographic characteristics of the women.
Table 1

Socio demographic characteristic of women attending ANC in Adama Hospital Medical College 2014 N = 417

Variables

 

Frequency

Percent

Age

<25 years

189

45.3

25–34 years

206

49.4

= > 35 years

22

5.3

Marital status

Not married

20

4.8

Married

337

95.2

Educational status

Illiterate

38

9.1

Primary education

156

37.4

Secondary education

146

35.0

College diploma and degrees

77

18.5

Monthly income

<2500 ETB

239

57.3

>2500 ETB

178

42.7

Occupation

Housewife

242

58

Working women

175

42

Paternal educational status

Illiterate

26

6.2

Primary education

110

26.4

Secondary education

151

36.2

College diploma, degree

130

31.2

About 46.3% the women were primigravidae while 49.2% had 2–4 pregnancies and 4.6% had 5 or more pregnancies. The number of pregnancies ranges from 1 to 10 (2 ± 1.3). The mean gestational age at the time of interview was 29.2 weeks with the minimum 13 week and maximum 40. About 11.3% of the women consulted a healthcare provider when they plan to become pregnant. Among those who consulted healthcare providers 93.6% could mention what was done by a healthcare provider when they consult them. Advice was reported by 4.5%, general check up by 72.7% and general checkup plus folic acid supplement by 18.2%.

Of al1 9.7% of women comes for the first visit while 63.3% comes for the 2nd to 4th visit and 17.0% comes for 5th and more visits at the time of interview. The month of first ANC visit ranges from one month to nine months (mean = 3.8, median = 4, mode = 4). 42.2% of the women made their first ANC visit in the first trimester, 53.5% in the second trimester and 4.3% in the third trimester of pregnancy. 19.4% had a history of unsuccessful pregnancy in a lifetime and 1.7% of the women had a history of a baby with other birth defects.

The current pregnancy was planned by 71% of the women. Among women who planned pregnancy 48% stopped using contraceptive without consulting healthcare provider, 21% consulted care giver before stopping birth control and 31.1% did not use birth control. Table 2 shows the detail obstetric history of the women.
Table 2

Obstetric history of women attending ANC in Adama hospital medical college 2014 N = 417

Variable

Frequency(n)

Percent

Number of pregnancy

Primigravida

193

46.3

2–4

205

49.2

> = 5

19

4.6

Preconception consult

Yes

47

11.3

No

370

88.3

What has been done during consultation (N = 44)

Advice

2

4.5

General check up

32

72.7

General checkup & folic acid supplement

8

18

Remove birth control

2

4.5

Month of first ANC Visit

First trimester

176

42.2

Second trimester

223

53.5

Third trimester

18

4.3

Number of ANC visit

first visit

82

19.7

2nd -4th

264

63.3

More than 4th

71

17.0

History of unsuccessful pregnancy in life time

No

345

80.6

Yes

81

19.4

Type of unsuccessful pregnancy in life time

Spontaneous abortion

63

15.1

NTD

3

0.7

Other(still birth, congenital anomaly)

15

3.6

History of a baby with birth defect

No

410

98.3

Yes

7

1.7

Diagnosed Diabetes mellitus

No

409

98.08

Yes

8

1.92

Planning of pregnancy

Yes

296

71

No

121

29

Action when plans to become pregnant (N = 296)

I stopped without consulting healthcare provider

142

48

I consulted healthcare provider before stopping BC

62

21

I did not use birth control

92

31.1

Folic acid was prescribed for 54.9% of the women for the current pregnancy. Of those women, 77.3% took folic acid daily, 10.9% forgot 1–2 times per week, 6.6% interrupted, and 5.2% never took the supplement. Among 217 women who took folic acid during current pregnancy 6.9% used less than one month, 182 (83.9%) used for one to three months, 15 (6.9%) used for four to six months and 5 (2.3%) for seven months and above. Among the prescribed women, 3.5% started to take folic acid supplements before pregnancy and 11.6% started in the first trimester. The remaining 51.1% and 33% of the women started taking the supplement at their second and third trimester of pregnancy respectively. The overall users of folic acid supplement become 48.4% (202/417). But only 8 of the users took folic acid at a protective period against NTD. This makes the total user of folic acid supplement for NTD prevention 1.92% (Table 3).
Table 3

Folic acid usage and associated factors for NTD prevention among women attending ANC in Adama Hospital Medical College 2014

Variable

Category

Frequency

Percent

Prescribed for folic acid supplement for current pregnancy (N = 417)

Yes

229

54.9

No

188

45.1

Do you take as recommended(N = 229)

yes I took as recommended

177

77.3

sometimes I forgot

25

10.9

Interrupted

15

6.6

I never took FA

12

5.2

When do you start to take folic acid (N = 229)

before I become pregnant

8

3.5

first trimester

26

11.5

Second trimester

118

51.1

Third trimester

77

33.9

Total month of folic acid intake(N = 217)

Less than 1 month

15

6.9

1–3 month

181

83.9

4–6 month

16

6.9

7 month and above

5

2.3

Level of folic acid awareness

Uninformed

328

78.7

Somewhat informed

39

9.4

Informed

50

12

Total user of folic acid

Yes

202

48.7

No

214

51.3

Folic acid user for NTD prevention

Yes

8

1.9

No

409

98.1

Folic acid usage for NTD prevention was significantly associated with advanced age (p value =0.02 and OR = 9.4 with 95% CI 1.14–76.8), early antenatal registration (p value =0.03 and OR = 0.974 with 95% CI 0.96–0.99), number of ANC visit (p value = 0.04), consultation during preconception period (p value = 0.000 and OR = 0.063 with 95% CI 0.15 to 0.275), previous history of unsuccessful pregnancies (p value = 0.04 and OR = 4.3 with 95% CI 1.1 to 17) and level of folic acid awareness (p value = 0.00).

There was no significant correlation between folic acid usage and the women’s educational status, occupation, monthly household income, number of pregnancy and partner’s educational status.

The variables planning of pregnancy, having a history of a baby with a birth defects and experiencing illness during current pregnancy did not reach a significant level. But all of these had correlation with folic acid usage for NTD prevention. Table 4 shows the detail of folic acid usage and associated factors for NTDs prevention.
Table 4

Statical Analysis of Folic Acid Usage and Its Dependent Variables

Covariates

Folic acid user

OR(95% CI)

P-value

No

Yes

Number of pregnancy

Primigravida

190(98.4%)

3(1.6%)

1.45(0.341–6.13)

0.426

Other

219(97.8%)

5 (2.2%)

Preconception consult

Yes

39(83%)

8(17%)

0.83(0.729–0.944)

0.000

No

370(100%)

0(0.0%)

Have ANC visit for current pregnancy

Yes

327(97.6%)

8(2.4%)

0.98(0.96–0.993)

0.171

No it is first

82(100%)

0(0.0%)

Month of first visit of ANC

First trimester

305(97.4%)

8(2.6%))

0.97(0.96–0.99)

0.032

Other

103(100%)

0(0.0%)

Number of ANC visits

1st visit

82(100%)

0(0.0%)

Not applicable

.046

2nd to 4th visit

260(98.5%)

4(1.5%)

>4th visit

67(94.4%)

4(5.6%)

History of unsuccessful pregnancy in life time

No

332(98.8%)

4(1.2%)

4.31(1.056–17.62)

0.04

Yes

77(95.1%)

4(4.9%)

History of a baby with birth defect

No

403(98.3%)

7(1.7%)

9.6(1.016–17.62)

0.128

Yes

6(85.7%)

1(14.3%)

Planning of pregnancy

Planned

288(97.3%)

8(2.7%)

0.97(0.95–0.992)

0.063

Unplanned

121

0(0.0%)

Level of folic acid awareness

Uninformed

328(100%)

0(0.0%)

Not applicable

0.000

Somewhat informed

39(100%)

0(0.0%)

Informed

42(84%)

8(16%)

Discussions

Intake of folic acid at least one month before pregnancy and the entire first trimester is highly recommended to decrease birth defects, particularly NTDs [10, 17, 36]. But, the prevalence of folic acid usage at the recommended time in Adama, Ethiopia was found to be 1.92%. Ethiopia is one of the developing countries where the incidence of NTDs is highly prevalent and where 1/3 of women were affected by folate deficiency [10, 19].

In the present study, pregnancy was planned by 71% of the interviewed women, which was consistent with the planning of pregnancy in Croatia [21]. It was higher than usual reports of 50% of pregnancies, being unplanned [7, 16, 34].

Of those women who planned pregnancy 69% used contraceptive and 30.4% inform the healthcare provider before ceasing the contraceptive. As compared to survey in Europe, where 18% of the women were consulted healthcare provider prior to stopping contraceptive, the finding in this study was higher [24]. About 11.3% of the women consulted healthcare providers, particularly about their pregnancy when they plan to become pregnant. Despite all these convenient conditions to give a folic acid supplement only 2.7% of the planning women were prescribed for folic acid during the protective period against NTD, which was very low as compared with 21% usage in Croatia that had similar levels of planned pregnancy [21].

Even though the number of women who consulted healthcare providers prior to stopping contraceptive in the present study was higher than surveyed women in Europe, usage in Ethiopian women was extremely low as compared to usage by 28% plan to become pregnant and 55% pregnant women in Europe [24].

In this study, 1.92% of the women were diabetic, 0.7% women had previous history of NTD pregnancies, both of which are high risk factors for occurrence and recurrence of NTD [3]. However, none of them were user of folic acid at the recommended time. This finding was in contrast to the study done in Nigeria, where 40% of women with a previous history of NTD pregnancy were the user at protective period [1].This difference may be because of the difference in health policy, i.e. there is preconception care in Nigeria but not in Ethiopia [37].

The occurrence of NTDs among spontaneously aborted fetuses is 10-fold higher than the rate of NTDs at birth [17]. In this study, 15.1% of the study subject had at least one spontaneous abortion in their lifetime. So those women are at high risk for having a baby affected by NTDs.

Women whose age were above 25 were 9.4 fold user of folic acid at protective period than women age 25 and below which was consistent with other studies in USA [27, 34], Croatia [21], Lebanon [25], and Tanzania [29]. This finding was in contrast to the other study in Lebanese where young women were more user [28].

Early timing of antenatal registration and number of ANC visits also positively associated with folic acid usage for NTD prevention as other studies done in Tanzania, India, Honduras [29, 30, 35].The study findings were consistent with other studies who have reported that the level of folic acid awareness predicts folic acid usage at protective period.

In this study, women who consulted healthcare providers when they plan to become pregnant were 6.3 times more likely to take folic acid at protective period than who did not consult. Similar to studies in Lebanon and Nigeria previous history of unsuccessful pregnancies was positively associated with intake of folic acid at protective period against NTDs [1, 25].

Data reported during the last 7 years from USA, Australia, Lebanon, Iran, United Arab Emirate and Nigeria shows folic acid usage at protective period against an NTDs range from 2.5% to 76% [1, 5, 10, 15, 25, 31, 36, 38]. The prevalence of folic acid users in this study is even lower than the least range. However, it is higher than a study done among Honduran women in 2007 which was 0.2% [10].

In Ethiopia, there are health facilities distributed in every city and villages in which healthcare providers deliver different medical and health need of the society including the ANC. However, folic acid usage is very low.

The poor intake of folic acid among Ethiopian women could be a result of low recommendation from policy makers, less prescription, and recommendations by healthcare providers and lack of awareness about folic acid supplements, its importance and the recommended time among women. The other one may be failures of healthcare providers to prescribe folic acid at protective time and lack of preconception care.

The study is a hospital based study on women who seek routine ANC. The result may only reflect usage among women who might have high health service seeking behavior. Another limitation of the study was it is conducted in one region, relatively a big city. So the finding of this study may not be generalized to other regions of the country, especially rural areas and small towns. Despite those limitations, the present study provides some insight into the practice of women for usage of folic acid for prevention of neural tube defects.

Conclusions

Even though preconception folic acid intake is simple measures to prevent many severe birth defects, particularly NTDs; in Ethiopia it is unnoticed by policy makers, less prescribed at the protective period by healthcare providers, underused by pregnant women and/or women planning pregnancy.

The folic acid intake rate for NTD prevention in the present study indicates special intervention plans should be developed by health policy makers. This intervention could be screening childbearing-age women for folic acid use and providing information on the benefits of folic acid supplementation, as well as training healthcare providers on NTD and other birth defect prevention mechanisms, providing education for the whole community even early in high school level using media and other methods.

The other most important intervention that could be done by policy makers and other stakeholders is starting preconception care for women who plan to become pregnant. This action might improve folic acid usage for preventing NTDs and other birth defect and also early ANC registration.

Folic acid rate of intake in this study also indicates urgent action is required from healthcare providers to improve usage at protective period against NTDs and other congenital anomalies. So further effort is required and it is necessary to have health education on NTDs and folic acid usage during premarital health examination, when providing family planning services and during other contact with the community.

Abbreviations

ANC: 

Ante natal care

CI: 

Confidence interval

ETB: 

Ethiopian birr

NTD: 

Neural tube defect

Declarations

Acknowledgments

I sincerely appreciate Adama hospital medical college administration and hospital staffs for their kind cooperation during the data collection time. Also, I would like to extend my appreciation to the University of Gondar, college of medicine and health science for funding me.

Funding

This research has been funded by University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. The university gives a grant in order to conduct the study but have no any role in study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing the report; and the decision to submit the report for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The corresponding author can provide information described in the manuscript, including all relevant raw data, to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes, without breaching participant confidentiality.

Authors’ contributions

MA conceive the study, develop the proposal, collected data, analyze and interpret data, wrote the draft of the manuscript. EG revise the draft of the proposal, interpreted data and revise the manuscript. SB analyze and interpret data, revise the draft of the manuscript along with MA. AW supervised the collection of data, interpret data, revised the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted following ethical approval by the University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Medicine Ethical Committee. Permission was taken from the hospital administrators. Informed consent was taken from the study participants. Participation in the study was voluntary and refusal was possible. The study did not involve any harmful procedure. To keep confidentiality codes were used and unauthorized person did not have access to the data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Collage of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar
(2)
Department of Biostatic and Epidemiology, Institute of public health, Collage of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar
(3)
Department of Biostatic and Epidemiology, school of public health, Wolaita Sodo University

References

  1. Anzaku AS. Assessing folic acid awareness and its usage for the prevention of neural tube defects among pregnant women in Jos, Nigeria. J Basic Clin Reprod Sci. 2013;2(1):13–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Pitkin RM. Folate and neural tube defects. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(suppl):285S–8S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nelson AL. Folates for reduction of risk of neural tube defects: using oral contraceptives as a source of Folate. Open Access J Contracept. 2011;2:137–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke B, Daniel KL, Latimer A, Mersereau P, Moran K, Mulinare J, et al. Preventing neural tube birth defects. A Prevention Model and Resource Guide [Internet]. 2009;2014:CS202063.Google Scholar
  5. Nosrat SB, Sedehi M, Golalipour MJ. Knowledge and practice of urban Iranian pregnant women towards folic acid intake for neural tube defect prevention. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62(8):785–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Safi J, Joyeux L, Chalouhi GE. Periconceptional Folate Deficiency and Implications in Neural Tube Defects. J Pregnancy 2012;2012. Article ID 295083. p. 9. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ip/2012/295083/.
  7. Rofail D, Colligs A, Abetz L, Lindemann M, Maguire L. Factors contributing to the success of folic acid public health campaigns. J Public Health. 2011;34(1):90–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Greene NDE, Stanier P, Copp AJ. Genetics of human neural tube defects. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(2):113–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Uba AF, Isamade ES, Chirdan LB, Edino ST, Ogbe ME, Igun GO. Epidemiology of neural tube defects in north Central Nigeria. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2004;1(1):16–9.Google Scholar
  10. Lawal TA, Adeleye AO. Determinants of folic acid intake during preconception and in early pregnancy by mothers in Ibadan, Nigeria. Pan Afri Med J. 2014;19:113.Google Scholar
  11. Tadesse L, Tafesse F, Hamamy H. Communities and community genetics in Ethiopia. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;18:115.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Ashley-Koch A, Gregory S, Worley G, Enterline D, Cope H. Neural Tube Defects (NTDs). Center for Human Disease Modeling. Duke University; 2012.Google Scholar
  13. World Health Organization. Prevention of Neural Tube Defects. Department of Making Pregnancy Safer. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006.Google Scholar
  14. Milla GR, Flores AL, Umaña E, Mayes I, Rosenthal J. Postpartum women in the Honduran health system: folic acid knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Pan Am J Public Health. 2007;22(5):340–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Mashayekhi SO, Dilmaghanizadeh M, Sattari MR. A survey on the consumption, knowledge and attitude of pregnant women toward the effects of folic acid on pregnancy outcome in Tabriz. Iran J Child Neurol. 2011;5(1):35–42.Google Scholar
  16. Cellebroersstraat. Fortify Grains to Prevent Neural Tube Defects in Africa Advocacy Toolkit. Brussels: International Federation for Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus; 2010.Google Scholar
  17. Scholl TO, Johnson WG. Folic acid: influence on the outcome of pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(suppl):1295S–303S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. De-Regil L, Fernández-Gaxiola A, Dowswell T, Peña-Rosas J. Effects and Safety of Periconceptional Folate Supplementation for Preventing Birth Defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10(CD007950). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007950.pub2.
  19. Haidar J, Melaku U, Pobocik R. Folate deficiency in women of reproductive age in nine administrative regions of Ethiopia: emerging public health problem. S Afr J Clin Nutr. 2010;23(3):132–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Deepti K, Anila H, Arup C, Vinohar B. Determinants of knowledge regarding folic acid in Periconceptional use among pregnant mothers in southern India. J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS). 2013;4(3):25–9.Google Scholar
  21. Vitale K, Mujki A, Todorovi G, Tulchinsky TH. Is level of knowledge, attitude and use of folic acid among pregnant women in Croatia a call for public health action? Period Biol. 2009;111(3):329–35.Google Scholar
  22. Pagan K, Jinrong H, Goldenberg R, Cliver S, Tamura T. Effect of smoking on serum concentrations of Total Homocysteine and B vitamins in mid-pregnancy. Clin Chim Acta. 2001;306:103–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tekkesin N, Taser F. Folic acid usage and awareness in pregnant women in Istanbul, Turkey. J Hosp Adm. 2012;1(1):9–14.Google Scholar
  24. Bitzer J, Von Stenglin A, Bannemerschult R. Women’s Awareness and Periconceptional use of folic acid: data from a large European survey. Int J Women’s Health. 2013;5:201–13.Google Scholar
  25. Tamim H, Harrison G, Atoui M, Mumtaz G, El-Kak F, Seoud M, et al. Preconceptional folic acid supplement use in Lebanon. Public Health Nutr. 2008;10:1–6.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer RE, Hayes AG, Morgan AJ, Devine JE, Powers KE. Knowledge and Use of Folic Acid among North Carolina Women. State Cent Health Stat. 2001;126(Folic Acid Use).Google Scholar
  27. Cleves MA, Hobbs CA, Collins HB, Andrews N, Smith LN, Robbins JM. Folic acid use by women receiving routine gynecologic care. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(4):748.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hage CN, Jallou M, Sabbah M, Adib SM. Awareness and intake of folic acid for the prevention of neural tube defects among Lebanese women of childbearing age. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(1):258–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ogundipe O, Hoyo C, stbye T, Oneko O, Manongi R, Lie RT, et al. Factors associated with prenatal folic acid and iron supplementation among 21,889 pregnant women in northern Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:481.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Roy MP, Mohan U, Singh SK, Singh VK, Srivastava AK. Socio-economic determinants of adherence to iron and folic acid tablets among rural ante-Natal mothers in Lucknow, India. Natl J Community Med. 2013;4(3):386–91.Google Scholar
  31. El-mani, Souad Faraj. Knowledge, Behavior and Practices of Pregnant Women in Wollongong Regarding Folic Acid and Iodine Nutrition after the Introduction of Mandatory Fortification Program, Master of Sceince - Research Thesis, Faculty of Health and Behavioral Science. University of Wollongong. 2013. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4112.
  32. Wu DY, Brat G, Milla G, Kima J. Knowledge and use of folic acid for prevention of birth defects amongst Honduran women. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;2007(23):600–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Maina-Gathigi L, Omolo J, Wanzala P, Lindan C, Makokha A. Utilization of folic acid and iron supplementation services by pregnant women attending an antenatal Clinic at a Regional Referral Hospital in Kenya. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(7):1236–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gallup. Improving preconception health: Women’s knowledge and use of folic acid. USA: March of Dimes Foundation; 2008.Google Scholar
  35. Popa AD, Niţă O, Graur LI, Popescu RM, Botnariu GE, Mihalach L. Nutritional knowledge as a determinant of vitamin and mineral supplementation during pregnancy. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Canfield AM, Przybyla MS, Case AP, Ramadhani T, Suarez U, Dyer J. Folic acid awareness and supplementation among Texas women of childbearing age. Prev Med. 2006;43:27–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ezegwui HU, Dim C, Dim N, Ikeme AC. Preconception care in south eastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28:8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Al-Hossani H, Abouzeid H, Salah MM, Farag HM, Fawzy E. Knowledge and practices of pregnant women about folic acid in pregnancy in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(4):402–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017