Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury increases with maternal age irrespective of parity: a population-based register study

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:306

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1473-7

Received: 19 August 2016

Accepted: 28 August 2017

Published: 15 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a rare but serious outcome of vaginal birth. Based on concerns about the increasing number of women who commence childbearing later than previous generation, this study aimed at investigating age-related risk of OASI in women of different parity.

Methods

A population-based register study including 959,559 live singleton vaginal births recorded in the Swedish Medical Birth Register 1999 to 2011. In each parity group risks of OASI at age 25–29 years, 30–34 years, and ≥35 years compared with age < 25 years were investigated by logistic regression analyses, adjusted for year of birth, education, region of birth, smoking, Body Mass Index, infant birthweight and fetal presentation; and in parous women, history of OASI and cesarean section. Additional analyses also adjusted for mediating factors, such as epidural analgesia, episiotomy, and instrumental delivery, and maternal age-related morbidity.

Results

Rates of OASI were 6.6%, 2.3% and 0.9% in first, second and third births respectively. Age-related risk increased from 25-29 years in first births (Adjusted OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.59–1.72) and second births (Adjusted OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.58–2.01), and from 30-34 years in third births (Adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.00–2.56). In all parity groups the risk was doubled at age ≥ 35 years, compared with the respective reference group of women under 25 years. Adding mediating factors and maternal age-related morbidity only marginally reduced these risk estimates.

Conclusion

Maternal age is an independent risk factor for OASI in first, second and third births. Although age-related risks by parity are relatively similar, more nulliparous than parous women will be exposed to OASI due to the higher baseline rate.

Keywords

Obstetric anal sphincter injury OASI Maternal age Parity

Background

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), which refers to perineal tears that involve the external and/or internal anal sphincter, is a well-known complication of vaginal birth. Three factors have significantly contributed to the increased attention paid to OASI by clinicians and researchers: the severe consequences in terms of anal incontinence [13]; the increasing incidence in many countries, such as the UK [4, 5], Canada [6], Sweden [7], Norway [8] and Finland [9]; and the variation in the reported rates of OASI from less than 2% [10] to 27% in primiparous and 8.5% in multiparous women when assessed by endoanal ultrasonography [11].

In order to understand and reduce the incidence of OASI extensive research has focused on identification of risk factors, many of which are directly or indirectly associated with one another. To simplify, the risk factors can be classified into three clusters related to the infant, the medical procedures and maternal characteristics. An important infant risk factor is high birthweight [4, 7, 9, 1214], but also large head circumference [8, 15, 16], occiput posterior presentation [7, 15, 16], shoulder dystocia [17], and a long second stage [13, 15, 16, 18, 19]. Procedural risk factors are instrumental vaginal birth [4, 7, 8, 13, 14, 16, 18], and midline episiotomy [7, 20]. Also, birth position [15, 19] and preventive measures applied to the perineum may affect the risk of OASI [2124], whereas findings regarding the association between OASI and epidural pain relief are inconclusive [7, 12, 15, 16, 18, 19]. Important maternal risk factors are nulliparity [8, 12, 14, 15], and in parous women cesarean section in the previous birth [8, 12, 18], or a previous vaginal birth with OASI [13]. Asian [4, 7, 8, 12] and African [4, 7, 8] ethnic background and advanced maternal age [2527] are associated with OASI, and age-related morbidity such as diabetes [8, 12] and gestational diabetes [8] have been reported.

The background for the present study was the need to explore in more depth the association between advanced maternal age and the risk of OASI, based on concerns about the increasing number of women who commence childbearing later than previously. Although epidemiological studies cannot ascertain the causes of OASI, they may provide clues about the mechanisms involved. Biological ageing has been the focus of many studies of adverse pregnancy outcomes [28, 29], but less so in studies of OASI. Maternal age has often been treated as a confounding variable and not as the exposure of interest. Comparison groups have been defined differently, resulting in different conclusions. When maternal age was dichotomized, for instance by comparing women younger and older than 35 years, no associations with OASI were found [15, 19, 25], whereas a continuous increase of OASI by maternal age was reported when dividing age into several categories, with the exception of the oldest group of 40 years and over where findings were inconclusive [4, 8, 1214, 18, 26]. Most studies have either included only primiparous women or all parous women combined. We found no study investigating the association between advanced maternal age in women of different parities. Considering maternal age and parity as two interrelated risk factors that may affect OASI in different ways, it is important to study their combined effect.

The principal aim of the present study was to investigate associations between advanced maternal age and risks of OASI in women’s first, second, and third births in a large population-based cohort. Associations between OASI and other factors, which were regarded as confounding or mediating factors, are also presented.

Methods

The study was based on data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register (MBR), which includes more than 98% of all births in Sweden, and is validated annually against the National Population Register, using the mother’s and infant’s unique personal identification numbers [30, 31]. Starting at the first antenatal visit, information is prospectively collected during pregnancy and delivery, using standardized records. We included live singleton vaginal births at term (≥37 weeks of gestation), recorded in the MBR from 1999 to 2011. Consequently, a majority of women contributed with information about all their births, some only provided information about their last birth at the beginning of the study period (1999), and others only provided information about their first birth at the end of the period (2011).

From 1999 to 2011, the total number of births in Sweden was 1,301,134. We excluded parity 4 and above (6.0%), multiple births (2.9%), stillbirths (0.3%), preterm births (<37 weeks: 6.2%), cesarean sections (17.2%), and pregnancies without maternal identification number (0.01%), leaving 956,559 pregnancies in the final sample.

The outcome variable was obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Cases were reported by the midwife or the obstetrician using a checkbox in the case notes and/or the notified ICD-10 code (International Classification of Diseases, version 10) for sphincter injury: O702, O702C, O702D, O702X (grade III, which involves the anal sphincter complex) and O703 (grade IV, which extends to the mucosa).

The exposure variable of interest was maternal age when giving birth to the first, second and third infant. In each parity group, maternal age younger than 25 years was used as the reference, and compared with 25–29 years, 30–34 years, and 35 years and over. The rationale for choosing the youngest women as the reference was the assumption that young age would be the most optimal in terms of the elasticity of perineal tissue, and that many studies have reported the lowest OASI rates in the youngest age group [4, 8, 12, 14, 26].

The principal analyses were adjusted for possible confounding factors, including year of birth, education, region of birth, smoking, BMI, infant birthweight and fetal presentation, and in parous women, also history of OASI and history of cesarean section in the previous birth. Information about smoking (dichotomized as daily smoking vs. non-daily smoking), and maternal height and weight were recorded at the first antenatal visit (commonly at 8–12 weeks of gestation). Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated (weight in kilograms/height in square metres) and categorized according to the World Health Organization as: underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2). Infant birthweight and fetal presentation were recorded shortly after the birth. The Swedish Register of Total Population provided information about the mother’s country of birth (categorized as Sweden, Asia, Africa and Other). Level of education (Elementary school or less, High school, and College or university) was obtained by linkage to the Swedish Education Register. History of OASI and cesarean section was based on information about these outcomes from the previous birth in the dataset.

Additional analyses also included potentially mediating factors, such as epidural analgesia, episiotomy and instrumental vaginal birth (vacuum extraction and forceps), and maternal age-related morbidity (diabetes, gestational diabetes, pregestational hypertension, preeclampsia). Data on maternal diseases were retrieved from the MBR: pregestational diabetes (insulin-dependent or noninsulin-dependent; ICD-9 codes 250 and 648A; ICD-10 codes E10-E14 and O240-O243), gestational diabetes (ICD-9 code 648 W; ICD-10 code O244), pregestational hypertension (self-reported by check box at first antenatal visit or by ICD-9 codes 401–405, 642C and 642H; or by ICD-10 codes 110–115, O10 and O11) and preeclampsia (including eclampsia; ICD-9 codes 642E-642G; ICD-10 codes O14 and O15).

Pregnancies of nulliparous women (1st births), para 1 (2nd births), and para 2 (3rd births) were analyzed separately. Rates of OASI were calculated for each age category and parity group, and also for each of the potentially confounding and mediating factors. The associations between maternal age and OASI were investigated in logistic regression analyses. First, analyses were adjusted for year of birth (Model 1). The principal analyses in Model 2 were also adjusted for mother’s education, region of birth, smoking, BMI, infant birthweight and fetal presentation; and in parous women, also for OASI and cesarean section in the previous pregnancy. Finally, the potentially mediating factors and age-related morbidity were added (Model 3).

In the total sample, missing data were low except for BMI (11.3%) and history of previous OASI and cesarean section (11.1% in second births and 11.7% in third births) (Table 1). Missing data on BMI (maternal weight and height) was substantially explained by the time-point when this information was included in the Medical Birth Register. Missing data on history of previous OASI and cesarean section were related to how the study sample was defined; with information missing in parous women who had their previous birth prior to the onset of the data collection in 1999. We therefore assessed that the missing values in these three variables were likely to be nearly at random (MAR) and thus meeting the criteria for multiple imputation [32]. Imputations were conducted in SPSS Version 22, in three separate datasets including first, second and third births respectively. The SPSS “Automatic” imputation method was used (Type of imputation model: Logistic Regression), and 15 imputations were performed. The imputed variable in the dataset of first births was BMI, in the dataset of second births, BMI and history of OASI and cesarean section in the first birth, and in the dataset of third births, BMI and history of OASI and cesarean section in the second birth. The variables used in the imputation procedure included the outcome variable (OASI), and all the exposure variables listed in Table 1 (except parity). A comparison between the principal findings in Model 2 (based on imputation of missing data on BMI, and history of OASI and cesarean section) and corresponding findings based on complete case analyses are presented in a (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Table 1

Variables analyzed, and rates of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in each variable category: singleton, live, term, vaginal 1st, 2nd and 3rd births, Sweden 1999–2011

Variables

1st births

2nd births

3rd births

Prevalence of variables

Rates of OASI

Prevalence of variables

Rates of OASI

Prevalence of variables

Rates of OASI

n (436670)

%

(%)

n (379787)

%

(%)

n (140102)

%

(%)

Maternal age (years)

  < 25

111,828

25.6

4.1

38,677

10.2

1.0

5232

3.7

0.4

 25–29

163,471

37.4

6.9

117,498

30.9

2.0

29,102

20.8

0.6

 30–34

121,833

27.9

8.0

153,263

40.4

2.7

57,036

40.7

0.8

  ≥ 35

39,538

9.1

7.8

70,349

18.5

3.0

48,732

34.8

1.1

Year of birth

 1999–2004

185,654

42.5

7.0

161,407

42.5

2.5

62,560

44.7

1.0

 2005–2011

251,016

57.5

6.3

218,380

57.5

2.2

77,542

55.3

0.8

Education

 Elementary: ≤ 9 years

43,820

10.0

4.2

35,170

9.3

1.6

19,189

13.7

0.7

 High school

175,631

40.2

6.0

163,317

43.0

2.2

63,376

45.2

0.8

 College or university

205,730

47.1

7.6

174,711

46.0

2.6

54,505

38.9

1.0

 Missing

11,489

2.6

 

6589

1.7

 

3032

2.2

 

Country/region of birth

 Sweden

357,730

81.9

6.6

309,967

81.6

2.4

107,752

76.9

0.9

 Asia

33,177

7.6

7.4

28,907

7.6

2.3

14,270

10.2

0.9

 Africa

7163

1.6

9.0

7171

1.9

3.1

4807

3.4

1.2

 Other

38,600

8.8

5.6

33,742

8.9

1.9

13,273

9.5

0.7

Smoking in early pregnancy

 No

381,092

87.3

6.8

335,534

88.3

2.4

119,673

85.4

0.9

 Yes

33,734

7.7

3.9

25,689

6.8

1.4

13,573

9.7

0.6

 Missing

21,844

5.0

 

18,564

4.9

 

6856

4.9

 

BMI

 Low: <18.5

12,152

2.8

6.4

7824

2.1

2.1

2015

1.4

0.4

 Normal weight: 18.5–24.9

260,128

59.6

6.5

210,403

55.4

2.2

71,198

50.8

0.9

 Overweight: 25–29.9

83,185

19.0

6.8

84,411

22.2

2.5

34,887

24.9

0.9

 Obese: ≥ 30

31,333

7.2

6.2

35,013

9.2

2.6

15,749

11.2

0.8

 Missing

49,872

11.4

 

42,136

11.1

 

16,253

11.6

 

Infant birthweight (g)

  < 3000

52,966

12.1

2.7

26,046

6.9

0.9

9447

6.7

0.3

 3000–3499

163,269

37.4

4.5

111,404

29.3

1.3

38,161

27.2

0.4

 3500–3999

157,192

36.0

7.5

150,736

39.7

2.3

54,542

38.9

0.8

 4000–4499

53,342

12.2

11.9

73,289

19.3

3.7

29,503

21.1

1.3

  ≥ 4500

8818

2.0

18.0

17,538

4.6

5.9

8168

5.8

2.6

 Missing

1083

0.2

 

774

0.2

 

281

0.2

 

Presentation

 Occiput anterior

407,784

93.4

6.4

354,776

93.4

2.3

130,554

93.2

0.8

 Occiput posterior

14,355

3.3

10.8

12,375

3.3

4.0

4645

3.3

1.5

 Breech

1405

0.3

4.3

978

0.3

1.6

327

0.2

0.6

 Other

13,126

3.0

6.9

11,658

3.1

2.6

4576

3.3

1.3

Diabetes

 No

435,364

99.7

6.6

378,146

99.6

2.3

139,359

99.5

0.9

 Yes

1306

0.3

8.7

1641

0.4

5.0

743

0.5

1.5

Gestational diabetes

 No

433,683

99.3

6.6

376,826

99.2

2.3

138,580

98.9

0.9

 Yes

2987

0.7

8.1

2961

0.8

3.3

1522

1.1

1.0

Pregestational hypertension

 No

434,666

99.5

6.6

377,874

99.5

2.3

139,239

99.4

0.9

 Yes

2004

0.5

7.0

1913

0.5

2.1

863

0.6

0.9

Preeclampsia

 No

423,794

97.1

6.6

375,404

98.8

2.3

138,380

98.8

0.9

 Yes

12,876

2.9

6.2

4383

1.2

2.3

1722

1.2

0.9

Epidural analgesia

 No

234,246

53.6

6.1

308,153

81.1

2.0

121,796

86.9

0.8

 Yes

202,424

46.4

7.1

71,634

18.9

3.6

18,306

13.1

1.1

Episiotomy

 No

376,486

86.2

6.2

363,439

95.7

2.2

137,265

98.0

0.8

 Yes

60,184

13.8

8.6

16,348

4.3

5.6

2837

2.0

2.5

Vacum extraction or forceps

 No

362,249

83.0

5.0

364,529

96.0

2.0

136,860

97.7

0.8

 Yes

74,421

17.0

14.4

15,258

4.0

10.6

3242

2.3

4.3

Second births only

History of OASI in 1st pregnancy

 No

   

320,913

84.5

2.0

   

 Yes

   

16,531

4.4

7.3

   

 Missing

   

42,343

11.1

    

History of cesarean section 1st pregnancy

 No

   

312,869

82.4

1.6

   

 Yes

   

24,575

6.5

10.3

   

 Missing

   

42,343

11.1

    

Third births only

History of OASI in 2nd pregnancy

 No

      

121,980

87.1

0.7

 Yes

      

1688

1.2

7.6

 Missing

      

16,434

11.7

 

History of cesarean section 2nd pregnancy

 No

      

121,305

86.6

0.7

 Yes

      

2363

1.7

2.4

 Missing

      

16,434

11.7

 

Results

The rates of OASI in live singleton vaginal births at term were 6.6% in first births, 2.3% in second births, and 0.9% in third births, and increased by maternal age in all parity groups (Table 1). The one exception was in the oldest nulliparae who had about the same rate of OASI as the previous age group of 30–34 years. The incidence of OASI decreased from the first to the second half of the observation period. Table 1 also shows differences in maternal characteristics between the parity groups, which is most obvious in third births where low education, being born in Africa or Asia, smoking, and overweight/obesity were more common than in first and second births. These characteristics were most pronounced in women who had their third birth at young age, that is in the reference group of 25 years and younger (elementary school or less 55%; not born in Sweden 45%; smoking 22%, overweight/obesity 44%). The mediating factors epidural analgesia, episiotomy and instrumental vaginal delivery also differed significantly between the parity groups, with the highest rates in first births and the lowest in third births.

The risk of OASI, expressed as adjusted Odds Ratios, increased almost continuously by maternal age, from the youngest to the oldest, irrespective of parity (Table 2: Model 2). Exceptions were the oldest women (≥35 years) with a first birth, who were at similar risk as the 30–34 year olds, and the 25–29 year olds with a third birth who were at the same risk as the younger reference group. The principal findings in Table 2 (Model 2) are also illustrated in Fig. 1. The associations between maternal age and OASI were very similar to those obtained when data were analysed by complete cases (Additional file 1: Table S1: Model 2 analysed by imputed and complete cases).
Table 2

Risk of OASI in first, second and third live, singleton, vaginal births at term

Variables

 

1st births1

  

2nd births2

  

3rd births2

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

n = 436,670

(n = 412,442)

(n = 412,442)

n = 379,787

(n = 350,986)

(n = 350,982)

(n = 140,102)

(n = 128,668)

(n = 128,668)

Adj OR (95% CI)

Adj OR (95% CI)

Adj OR (95% CI)

Adj OR (95% CI)

Adj OR (95% CI)

Adj OR (95% CI)

Adj OR (95% CI)

Adj OR (95% CI)

Adj OR (95% CI)

Maternal age (years)

  < 25

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 25–29

1.75 (1.69–1.82)

1.66 (1.59–1.72)

1.56 (1.50–1.62)

2.05 (1.83–2.29)

1.78 (1.58–2.01)

1.73 (1.53–1.95)

1.29 (0.83–1.99)

1.09 (0.67–1.77)

1.07 (0.66–1.73)

 30–34

2.05 (1.98–2.13)

1.94 (1.86–2.02)

1.74 (1.67–1.81)

2.84 (2.55–3.16)

2.30 (2.04–2.59)

2.18 (1.93–2.46)

1.90 (1.25–2.89)

1.60 (1.00–2.56)

1.51 (0.94–2.42)

  ≥ 35

2.01 (1.92–2.11)

1.95 (1.85–2.05)

1.64 (1.56–1.73)

3.18 (2.84–3.55)

2.54 (2.24–2.87)

2.32 (2.05–2.63)

2.64 (1.74–4.01)

2.16 (1.34–3.46)

1.97 (1.23–3.16)

Year of delivery

 1999–2004

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

 2005–2011

0.88 (0.86–0.90)

0.89 (0.87–0.91)

0.88 (0.86–0.90)

0.88 (0.84–0.91)

0.85 (0.82–0.89)

0.85 (0.81–0.89)

0.77 (0.68–0.86)

0.79 (0.70–0.89)

0.80 (0.71–0.90)

Education

 Elementary: 9 ≤ years

 

0.83 (0.78–0.87)

0.84 (0.79–0.89)

 

0.92 (0.83–1.02)

0.92 (0.84–1.02)

 

1.02 (0.83–1.26)

1.01 (0.82–1.25)

 High school

 

1

1

 

1

1

 

1

1

 College or university

 

1.08 (1.05–1.12)

1.10 (1.07–1.13)

 

1.01 (0.96–1.06)

1.03 (0.98–1.08)

 

0.97 (0.85–1.11)

0.97 (0.85–1.11)

Country/Region of birth

 Sweden

 

1

1

 

1

1

 

1

1

 Asia

 

1.66 (1.58–1.74)

1.58 (1.50–1.65)

 

1.40 (1.28–1.54)

1.36 (1.24–1.49)

 

1.43 (1.15–1.78)

1.40 (1.13–1.74)

 Africa

 

2.01 (1.85–2.20)

1.96 (1.79–2.14)

 

1.76 (1.50–2.06)

1.71 (1.45–2.00)

 

2.14 (1.58–2.88)

2.05 (1.52–2.77)

 Other

 

0.93 (0.89–0.97)

0.93 (0.88–0.97)

 

0.95 (0.87–1.03)

0.95 (0.87–1.04)

 

0.92 (0.73–1.17)

0.94 (0.74–1.18)

Smoking in early pregnancy

 No

 

1

1

 

1

1

 

1

1

 Yes

 

0.81 (0.76–0.86)

0.81 (0.76–0.86)

 

0.88 (0.78–0.98)

0.87 (0.77–0.97)

 

0.96 (0.75–1.22)

0.93 (0.73–1.18)

BMI

 Low: <18.5

 

1.23 (1.14–1.33)

1.22 (1.13–1.31)

 

1.28 (1.08–1.52)

1.28 (1.08–1.51)

 

0.71 (0.35–1.43)

0.71 (0.35–1.44)

 Normal weight: 18.5–24.9

1

1

 

1

1

 

1

1

 Overweight: 25–29.9

 

0.96 (0.93–0.99)

0.95 (0.92–0.99)

 

1.00 (0.94–1.05)

0.99 (0.94–1.05)

 

0.92 (0.80–1.06)

0.92 (0.80–1.06)

 Obese: ≥ 30

 

0.90 (0.85–0.94)

0.90 (0.86–0.95)

 

0.96 (0.89–1.03)

0.96 (0.89–1.04)

 

0.79 (0.65–0.97)

0.79 (0.64–0.97)

Infant birthweight (g)

  < 3000

 

1

1

 

1

1

 

1

1

 3000–3499

 

1.70 (1.61–1.81)

1.69 (1.60–1.80)

 

1.45 (1.25–1.67)

1.44 (1.25–1.67)

 

1.02 (0.68–1.53)

1.02 (0.68–1.54)

 3500–3999

 

2.98 (2.81–3.16)

2.88 (2.72–3.05)

 

2.53 (2.20–2.91)

2.50 (2.17–2.87)

 

2.40 (1.64–3.51)

2.38 (1.62–3.48)

 4000–4499

 

5.08 (4.78–5.40)

4.69 (4.41–4.98)

 

4.25 (3.69–4.90)

4.09 (3.55–4.72)

 

3.97 (2.70–5.83)

3.84 (2.61–5.65)

  ≥ 4500

 

8.51 (7.86–9.20)

7.62 (7.04–8.25)

 

7.39 (6.34–8.61)

7.01 (6.01–8.17)

 

8.17 (5.48–12.16)

7.70 (5.16–11.49)

Presentation

 Occiput anterior

 

1

1

 

1

1

 

1

1

 Occiput posterior

 

1.89 (1.78–2.00)

1.43 (1.35–1.51)

 

1.92 (1.74–2.12)

1.59 (1.44–1.76)

 

2.00 (1.55–2.59)

1.58 (1.22–2.06)

 Breech

 

0.87 (0.76–0.99)

1.06 (0.93–1.22)

 

1.20 (0.72–2.02)

1.26 (0.75–2.12)

 

1.34 (0.33–5.40)

1.34 (0.33–5.42)

 Other

 

1.11 (1.04–1.18)

1.03 (0.97–1.11)

 

1.24 (1.09–1.41)

1.22 (1.07–1.38)

 

1.72 (1.30–2.28)

1.70 (1.29–2.25)

History of OASI in 1st pregnancy3

 No

    

1

1

   

 Yes

    

4.38 (4.08–4.70)

4.38 (4.09–4.70)

   

History of cesarean section 1st pregnancy3

 No

    

1

1

   

 Yes

    

7.14 (6.77–7.53)

5.46 (5.14–5.80)

   

History of OASI in 2nd pregnancy4

 No

       

1

1

 Yes

       

8.92 (7.28–10.90)

8.62 (7.01–10.61)

History of cesarean section 2nd pregnancy4

 No

       

1

1

 Yes

       

3.29 (2.45–4.41)

2.93 (2.18–3.95)

Diabetes

 No

  

1

  

1

  

1

 Yes

  

0.98 (0.79–1.21)

  

1.35 (1.04–1.73)

  

0.98 (0.48–2.02)

Epidural analgesia

 No

  

1

  

1

  

1

 Yes

  

0.93 (0.90–0.95)

  

1.09 (1.03–1.15)

  

1.10 (0.93–1.29)

Episiotomy

 No

  

1

  

1

  

1

 Yes

  

0.89 (0.87–0.92)

  

1.04 (0.96–1.13)

  

1.34 (1.01–1.77)

Vacuum extraction or forceps

 No

  

1

  

1

  

1

 Yes

  

2.87 (2.80–2.95)

  

2.82 (2.63–3.02)

  

4.07 (3.33–4.99)

Adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) in three different models: all variables included in the respective model presented

1Multiple imputation of missing values in BMI

2Multiple imputation of missing values in BMI, OASI in previous birth, and cesarean section in previous birth

3Only second births

4Only third births

The following factors included in Model 3 were not statistically significant in any of the three parity groups, and are not shown in the table: pregestational hypertension, gestational diabetes and preeclampsia

Fig. 1

Risk of OASI by maternal age in first, second and third births. Adjusted Odds Ratio with 95% Confidence Interval (CI): Reference 1= < 25 years. Logistic regression analyses adjusted for year of birth, education, country/region of birth, smoking, BMI, infant birthweight, fetal presentation, and in second and third births history of OASI and history of cesarean section in the previous birth

When the mediating factors (epidural analgesia, episiotomy, instrumental delivery) and maternal age-related morbidity (diabetes, pregestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia) were added in Model 3, only minor reductions of the risk estimates were found, and these did not alter the general findings.

Table 2 also shows the independent effect of other risk factors for OASI, the strongest of which were infant birth weight of ≥4000 g, history of OASI, and history of cesarean section. Factors that increased the risk in a similar way in all three parity groups were, besides infant birth weight, occiput posterior presentation, African and Asian region of birth, and instrumental vaginal delivery.

Discussion

This study showed that the risk of OASI in live singleton vaginal births at term increased by maternal age in first, second and third births. The association between increasing maternal age and OASI is supported by studies in which the age distribution is divided into four categories or more [4, 1214, 16, 26], whereas only two age categories may have concealed the effect [15, 19, 25]. The rates of OASI differed between first, second and third births, indicating that information about parity is important, not only when comparing incidences of OASI in different settings, but also when discussing the effect of maternal age in individual cases. Even though the aged-related risk of OASI was approximately doubled at age 30 and older in both first and second births, compared with the respective reference group aged <25 years, the proportion of women who experienced an OASI was greater in first births due to the higher prevalence at baseline (4.1% and 1.0% at age < 25 years in first and second births respectively, Table 1).

We further explored the finding that risk of OASI at age 35 and older in first births did not continue to increase but was the same as in the previous age category (Fig. 1). Several other studies have reported that the risk of OASI in first births did not increase in the oldest women, mostly defined as 40 years and older [4, 14, 18, 26]. We speculate that one explanation could be that the oldest nulliparae who had a vaginal birth were more low-risk, compared with the oldest women having their second or third vaginal birth, because many having a first birth in this age category were delivered by cesarean section (CS rates at age ≥ 35 years were 30% in 1st births, 21% in 2nd births, and 17% in 3rd births). Infant birthweight of ≥4000 g was a strong risk factor for OASI, and this factor was less prevalent in the oldest nulliparae with a vaginal birth compared with those delivered by CS (birth weight ≥ 4000 g in vaginal birth versus CS at age ≥ 35: 1st births 14% vs. 23%; 2nd births 24% vs. 24%; 3rd births 27% vs. 20%). Although analyses were adjusted for infant birthweight, this outcome could have been associated with other unmeasured confounding, such as prolonged labour.

In third births, the age-related risk of OASI commenced at higher age than in first and second births, and we cannot exclude that this finding was also related to unmeasured confounding. The reference group, with which all other age groups were compared, included only 3.7% of third births, and constituted a very selected group of women with high rates of low education, non-Swedish background, smoking and high BMI. This selection of women may be explained by the fact that having a third child before the age of 25 years is uncommon in Sweden where two children has long been the norm [33, 34]. However, since the end of the 1990s it has become more popular to have a third child, and this trend has primarily involved highly educated women and high income earners [35]. Consequently, third births included a more heterogeneous group of women in terms of socioeconomic background and lifestyle, both factors associated with OASI.

The physiological mechanism explaining why rates of OASI are much lower in multiparous than primiparous women may primarily be related to more resilient anatomical structures, after having been stretched during the first birth. The selection of women who have more than one child may also be a consideration, since OASI in the first birth may be a reason for not having more children. This makes multiparous women more low risk in relation to OASI, which was illustrated in the present study with a history of OASI being least common in third births.

The physiological mechanisms explaining the independent effect of maternal age on the risk of OASI seem more complex. Although we know that ageing occurs in all of the body’s cells, tissues and organs from an early age, the physiological effect of ageing on the connective and muscular tissues in the perineal region during childbirth is poorly researched. One effect of ageing which could possibly affect blood circulation in the perineum is the early onset of sclerotic lesions [36]. Of all the measures taken to reduce rates of OASI, such as manual support to reduce pressure on the perineum [37, 38], injection of hyaluronidase to affect perineal connective tissue [39, 40], application of oil [41] and antenatal massage [42, 43] to increase elasticity in the perineum, only application of warm packs to increase blood circulation in the perineum [44] has been effective. Whether perineal warm packs are more effective at advanced age has not, however, been investigated. Our finding that smoking decreased the risk of OASI was confusing, considering that smoking has been described as an ageing accelerator, which exhausts cellular defense and repair functions [45]. Norwegian [8] and Finnish [18] cohort studies have also reported a lower risk of OASI in smokers, and Räisänen and colleagues suggested that “smoking may interfere with collagen synthesis and connective tissue properties, and thus modify the OASI risk by an, as yet, unknown mechanism.” (page7).

This study shows that giving birth for the first time at a young age could reduce the risk of OASI, with maternal age under 25 years being most optimal. However, to change the current trend in modern societies of parenthood often starting after the age of 30, is probably not the most effective or feasible way of achieving a reduction in the incidence of OASI at a population level. The most important step is to decrease the adverse effects of OASI by effective diagnosis, followed by effective treatment. Faltin and colleagues [46] showed in a randomized controlled trial of primiparous women without a clinically evident anal sphincter tear that endoanal ultrasound examination of the perineum after childbirth increased the detection rate of OASI to 5.6%, and that immediate repair decreased the risk of severe fecal incontinence 3 months after birth from 8.7% in the control group to 3.3% in the intervention group. A systematic review of seven observational studies reported a reduction of OASI after the introduction of a manual support technique originating from Finland [24]. The level of evidence in the included studies was, however, too low to recommend implementation in clinical settings.

The strengths of this study include the high quality of data in the Swedish Medical Birth Register, with a low percentage of missing cases (<2%), and the possibility of taking important confounding factors into account. Including history of OASI and cesarean section in the analyses of second and third births was particularly important considering the strong associations between these variables and OASI. Still, residual confounding may be a problem, and information was not available on important confounders, such as length of second stage labour, inter-delivery interval and female genital mutilation. Another limitation was that the proportion of missing values was relatively high in relation to BMI and history of OASI and cesarean section. The missing values in these variables were assumed to be close to random which justified multiple imputation. The findings presented in this study differed little from those obtained by complete case analyses, and none of the conclusions was altered.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that advanced maternal age is an independent risk factor for OASI irrespective of parity. When discussing young people’s life plans, this information could be added to other information about the potential risks associated with postponing parenthood to age 30 and later. For the clinician who assists women during labour, increased attention should be paid to older women, especially nulliparae, in order to ascertain the status of the perineum and optimise prompt treatment when OASI is diagnosed.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the women, midwives and obstetricians who provided data for this study by completing the antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum records on which the Swedish National Medical Birth Register is based.

Funding

No extra external funding was sought for this study. It was undertaken within the remit of our academic appointments.

Availability of data and materials

Access to the data in this study is regulated by regulations of The National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden as indicated below.

Authors’ contributions

UW (guarantor of the manuscript) initiated the study, conducted the analyses and wrote the first draft of the paper. CE contributed to the concept and design of the study, interpretation of data, and revision of the manuscript. The authors approved the final version of the manuscript, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board in Stockholm, Stockholm (2013/731–31/1). This is a register study based on data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register (MBR). The National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden, which is responsible for the MBR, assesses the researchers’ application after ethical approval has been obtained from the Regional Ethics Review Board, and then delivers the anonymous data to the researchers.

Consent for publication

Individual consent is not required since data is anonymised when delivered to the researchers.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Division of Reproductive Health, Karolinska Institutet
(2)

References

  1. LaCross A, Groff M, Smaldone A. Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anal incontinence following vaginal birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Midwifery Wom Heal. 2015;60:37–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Evers EC, Blomquist JL, McDermott KC, Handa VL. Obstetrical anal sphincter laceration and anal incontinence 5-10 years after childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:425. e1-6View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Pollack J, Nordenstam J, Brismar S, Lopez A, Altman D, Zetterstrom J. Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a five-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1397–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013;120:1516–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ismail SI, Puyk B. The rise of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): 11-year trend analysis using Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW) data. J Inst Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34:495–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. McLeod NL, Gilmour DT, Joseph KS, Farrell SA, Luther ER. Trends in major risk factors for anal sphincter lacerations: a 10-year study. JOGC. 2003;25:586–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ekeus C, Nilsson E, Gottvall K. Increasing incidence of anal sphincter tears among primiparas in Sweden: a population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:564–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baghestan E, Irgens LM, Bordahl PE, Rasmussen S. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:25–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Raisanen S, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. The increased incidence of obstetric anal sphincter rupture--an emerging trend in Finland. Prev Med. 2009;49:535–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Laine K, Gissler M, Pirhonen J. Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146:71–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD. Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Brit J Surg. 2003;90:1333–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ampt AJ, Ford JB, Roberts CL, Morris JM. Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and associated risk factors for vaginal singleton term births in New South Wales 2001-2009. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;53:9–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Spydslaug A, Trogstad LI, Skrondal A, Eskild A. Recurrent risk of anal sphincter laceration among women with vaginal deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:307–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Elfaghi I, Johansson-Ernste B, Rydhstroem H. Rupture of the sphincter ani: the recurrence rate in second delivery. BJOG. 2004;111:1361–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Elvander C, Ahlberg M, Thies-Lagergren L, Cnattingius S, Stephansson O. Birth position and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a population-based study of 113 000 spontaneous births. BMC Preg Child. 2015;15:252.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Raisanen SH, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:1365–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gauthaman N, Walters S, Tribe IA, Goldsmith L, Doumouchtsis SK. Shoulder dystocia and associated manoeuvres as risk factors for perineal trauma. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:571–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Raisanen S, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. Smoking during pregnancy is associated with a decreased incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41014.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gottvall K, Allebeck P, Ekeus C. Risk factors for anal sphincter tears: the importance of maternal position at birth. BJOG. 2007;114:1266–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. RCOG. The mangement of third and fourth degree perineal tears, Green-top Guideline No. 29. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2007.Google Scholar
  21. Aasheim V, Nilsen AB, Lukasse M, Reinar LM. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD006672. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub2.
  22. Krissi H, Aviram A, Hiersch L, Ashwal E, Eitan R, Peled Y. Structured hands-on workshop decreases the over-detection rate of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Int J Colorect Dis. 2016;31:45–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Laine K, Skjeldestad FE, Sandvik L, Staff AC. Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:1001649.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Poulsen MO, Madsen ML, Skriver-Moller AC, Overgaard C. Does the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008346.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Dahl C, Kjolhede P. Obstetric anal sphincter rupture in older primiparous women: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:1252–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Blomberg M, Birch Tyrberg R, Kjolhede P. Impact of maternal age on obstetric and neonatal outcome with emphasis on primiparous adolescents and older women: a Swedish Medical Birth Register Study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005840.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Omih EE, Lindow S. Impact of maternal age on delivery outcomes following spontaneous labour at term. J Perinat Med. 2016;144:773–7.Google Scholar
  28. Bewley SLW, Nikolaou D. Reproductive ageing. London: RCOG Press; 2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Waldenstrom U, Cnattingius S, Norman M, Schytt E. Advanced Maternal Age and Stillbirth Risk in Nulliparous and Parous Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:355–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Källén B, Källén K. The Swedish Medical Birth Registry: A summary of content and quality. Research report from EpC. Centre for Epidemiologi. Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare; 2014.Google Scholar
  31. Cnattingius S, Ericson A, Gunnarskog J, Kallen B. A quality study of a medical birth registry. Scand J Soc Med. 1990;18:143–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Andersson G. Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries. Demogr Res. 2009;20:313–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sweden S. Having children or not? Results from a questionnaire survey about women's and men's attitudes towards having children. Statistcs Sweden: Stockholm; 2009.Google Scholar
  35. Having a third child - a new trend? Demographic Reports 2011:1, Statistics Sweden, 2011.Google Scholar
  36. Naeye RL. Maternal age, obstetric complications, and the outcome of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:210–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayerhofer K, Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Rabl M, Kaider A, Wagenbichler P, et al. Traditional care of the perineum during birth. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study of 1,076 women. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:477–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jonsson ER, Elfaghi I, Rydhstrom H, Herbst A. Modified Ritgen's maneuver for anal sphincter injury at delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:212–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Colacioppo PM, Gonzalez Riesco ML, Koiffman MD. Use of hyaluronidase to prevent perineal trauma during spontaneous births: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial. J Midwifery Wom Heal. 2011;56:436–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Scarabotto LB, Riesco ML. Use of hyaluronidase to prevent perineal trauma during spontaneous delivery: a pilot study. J Midwifery Wom Heal. 2008;53:353–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Harlev A, Pariente G, Kessous R, Aricha-Tamir B, Weintraub AY, Eshkoli T, et al. Can we find the perfect oil to protect the perineum? A randomized-controlled double-blind trial. J Matern Fetal Neo M. 2013;26:1328–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Labrecque M, Eason E, Marcoux S, Lemieux F, Pinault JJ, Feldman P, et al. Randomized controlled trial of prevention of perineal trauma by perineal massage during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:593–600.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mei-dan E, Walfisch A, Raz I, Levy A, Hallak M. Perineal massage during pregnancy: a prospective controlled trial. IMAJ. 2008;10:499–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Dahlen HG, Homer CS, Cooke M, Upton AM, Nunn R, Brodrick B. Perineal outcomes and maternal comfort related to the application of perineal warm packs in the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2007;34:282–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bernhard D, Moser C, Backovic A, Wick G. Cigarette smoke--an aging accelerator? Exp Geront. 2007;42:160–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Faltin DL, Boulvain M, Floris LA, Irion O. Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears to prevent fecal incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:6–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017