Skip to main content

The causes of maternal mortality in adolescents in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of the literature



While the main causes of maternal mortality in low and middle income countries are well understood, less is known about whether patterns for causes of maternal deaths among adolescents are the same as for older women. This study systematically reviews the literature on cause of maternal death in adolescence. Where possible we compare the main causes for adolescents with those for older women to ascertain differences and similarity in mortality patterns.


An initial search for papers and grey literature in English, Spanish and Portuguese was carried out using a number of electronic databases based on a pre-determined search strategy. The outcome of interest was the proportion of maternal deaths amongst adolescents by cause of death. A total of 15 papers met the inclusion criteria established in the study protocol.


The main causes of maternal mortality in adolescents are similar to those of older women: hypertensive disorders, haemorrhage, abortion and sepsis. However some studies indicated country or regional differences in the relative magnitudes of specific causes of adolescent maternal mortality. When compared with causes of death for older women, hypertensive disorders were found to be a more important cause of mortality for adolescents in a number of studies in a range of settings. In terms of indirect causes of death, there are indications that malaria is a particularly important cause of adolescent maternal mortality in some countries.


The main causes of maternal mortality in adolescents are broadly similar to those for older women, although the findings suggest some heterogeneity between countries and regions. However there is evidence that the relative importance of specific causes may differ for this younger age group compared to women over the age of 20 years. In particular hypertensive conditions make up a larger share of maternal deaths in adolescents than older women. Further, large scale studies are needed to investigate this question further.

Peer Review reports


While adolescent fertility has declined steadily over the last few decades, every year an estimated 16 million adolescents still give birth between the ages of 15 and 19 [1], and as many as one million become mothers before the age of 15 years [2]. The potential health risks as well as social and economic disadvantage faced by these young women and their infants is widely recognised, as evidenced by the inclusion of adolescent fertility as a key indicator for reproductive health in the recently concluded Millennium Development Goals [3].

While recent studies suggest the increased risk of maternal mortality faced by adolescents is not as great as previously believed [4, 5], pregnancy-related conditions are still a major cause of death among adolescent girls and young women, with an estimated 15 % of all deaths globally in women aged 10–25 years being a result of maternal causes [6]. In addition children of adolescent mothers are more likely to experience adverse outcomes such as perinatal or neonatal death, and their infants are more likely to be born prematurely or have low birth weight (e.g. [7, 8]). There is some evidence that these disadvantages are particularly concentrated among younger adolescents [7], but others suggest the risk persists through to older adolescence [9].

The main causes of maternal mortality for women of all ages are well documented. A recent systematic review [10] suggests that around three quarters of all maternal deaths globally are a result of direct obstetric causes: haemorrhage is the leading global cause of maternal death (27 % of all maternal deaths) followed by hypertensive disorders (14 %) and sepsis (10 %). Other important direct causes are abortion (8 %) and embolism (3 %). While the main causes of maternal death for women of all ages were similar across all regions, the study found significant regional variation for the proportion each cause contributes to total maternal mortality. Around 27 % of maternal deaths for all ages are from indirect causes, but less is known about the specific conditions that contribute to this figure [11].

Much less is known about whether causes of mortality are different for adolescent girls than for older women: adolescents have important physiological differences due to their relative physical immaturity, as well as demographic and socio-economic characteristics that may place them at greater risk from particular causes of death. This systematic review aims to ascertain the main causes of maternal death in young women under the age of 20 years, and examine whether they differ from causes of maternal death in older women.


Our study was designed to comply with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [12], and in order to make our study replicable, we developed and followed a clearly defined protocol. We initially searched the following datasets for papers in English, Spanish and Portuguese published since 1974 to February 2015: Pubmed (which includes Medline), Embase, CINAHL, POPLINE, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database (LILACS), and the Index Medicus for the World Health Organization’s Africa, South East Asia and Eastern Mediterranean regions (there were no comparable resources for other WHO regions). We also searched the Cochrane library and the WHO Reproductive Health Library. A summary of search terms used (which were adapted somewhat for different databases) is included in the Appendix. Other types of literature (grey) were sought through search engines such as Google and through websites of relevant organisations. We also searched the references of relevant articles for further papers.

Only studies from low and middle income countries (as defined by the World Bank [13]) were included. No particular methodologies were specified in the inclusion criteria, and we included both published and unpublished studies where relevant. The outcome of interest was the proportion of adolescent maternal deaths due to each cause, and therefore studies presenting their findings as comparative risks were excluded. “Adolescent” was defined as below the age of 20, but no lower age limit was set. Studies with fewer than 10 deaths among those aged under 20 years were excluded as it was not deemed that these could provide useful information on the distribution of causes.

One team (SM and SN) carried out the review of the English language papers, and a separate team (AVC and FS) reviewed the Spanish and Portuguese literature. One review author from each team performed the search and the initial screening of the titles and abstracts. Studies judged to be potentially eligible for inclusion and studies of uncertain but possible relevance were retrieved in full. These were then reviewed by two authors independently to apply the eligibility criteria outlined above. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion. Data extracted were entered into a predesigned data extraction form based on the criteria proposed by the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement [14] and the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs (TREND) statement [15]. The key information included: country/region, study design/methodology, sampling, data source, number of deaths reported (including the number of adolescent maternal deaths), description of the population studied and the study setting (context) and results – i.e. cause of death. Where available, we also extracted data on cause of death in older age groups for comparative purposes.

Maternal death was defined as “the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or incidental causesFootnote 1” [16]. If papers included incidental causes these were removed, and the proportions recalculated. Two papers contained numbers of cases for each cause of maternal death, along with an estimate of numbers for all maternal deaths in the sample but did not report the data in a form which fulfilled our criteria i.e. mortality from all causes [17] or proportion in each age group classed as having died from each cause [18] was presented. In these cases proportions were recalculated. One paper [19] included age- and cause-specific maternal mortality ratio (MMR), along with number of births by age group. Numbers were derived from the MMR, and the proportions calculated using these numbers.

The authors made an assessment of the quality of each paper and risk of bias based on a checklist tool which drew on existing literature on the evaluation of cross-sectional and observational studies [20, 21]. Criteria included: sample size, description of the study population and sampling criteria, methods of analysis, data collection tools and methods, and level of missing data. The studies were rated as low, medium or high quality by two assessors, and any differences were managed by discussion.

Studies of causes of maternal mortality overall suggest geographical variation [10], so findings were grouped by region. We used WHO regions for this, slightly adapted by the use of “sub-Saharan Africa”, rather than “Africa”, because no studies from North African countries were identified during the review. Because the groupings of causes were not consistent across the studies, and we expected heterogeneity between regions, meta-analysis was not appropriate so the results are written up and presented as a narrative synthesis.

The search of the databases yielded 1735 English language abstracts and 187 Spanish and Portuguese language abstracts. Following their assessment 51 English and 36 Spanish and Portuguese full texts were requested of which three were unobtainable (see Fig. 1 for PRISMA Flow Chart). Of the final 15 papers included (12 in English, two in Spanish and one in Portuguese), nine were from sub-Saharan Africa, two from the South East Asia region and four from the Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO) region (see Table 1 for full details of the papers). Of the 69 full text papers examined and not included in the final group, 62 were excluded as they did not contain the outcome of interest as defined in the protocol (proportion of adolescent maternal deaths due to each cause), and the remaining seven were excluded as there were fewer than 10 deaths in the study. Two studies used the same data [18, 22] but both were included as they presented slightly different findings and results. Seven studies were based on retrospective analysis of institutional records, two were prospective hospital-based studies, one was based on official national statistics, three studies (including two based on the same data source) used retrospective community-based survey data, one was based on community surveillance data, and one used both official statistics and hospital records.

Based on the criteria outlined in the methodology section, five papers were judged to be moderate quality, one of high quality with the rest being judged as low quality. The main problems identified were small sample size, lack of clarity or limited explanation of data collection or classification methods, lack of description of study population, lack of representativeness of sample (in particular many studies were based in tertiary facilities) and lack of measures of variability. More details can be found on these limitations in the discussion.

Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram


A summary of the findings from each paper can be found in the evidence grid in Table 1. The majority of the adolescent maternal deaths were from direct causes (between 54 % and 88 % in studies that distinguished between direct and indirect causes) i.e. resulting from a complication of pregnancy, delivery, or management of these events. In particular, the most commonly cited causes were haemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, sepsis, abortion and obstructed labour. See Table 2 for a summary of findings by main direct causes.

Table 1 Evidence grid based on included papers
Table 2 Range of estimates of % maternal deaths in adolescents attributable to five main direct causes


Maternal haemorrhage is excessive bleeding from the genital tract and is the main cause of maternal death globally. It can occur during pregnancy (antepartum), during childbirth (intrapartum) or after childbirth (postpartum), but in general the studies did not differentiate. Overall, the systematic review found that although haemorrhage contributed to a fair proportion of maternal deaths amongst adolescents, it was not the leading cause of death amongst them. If we examine the sub-Saharan African countries, in Mali [23] 46 % of the 54 adolescent maternal deaths were as a result of haemorrhage. However, most of the other studies found markedly lower percentages of deaths assigned to this cause: in Ghana 11 and 12 % of deaths [18, 22] and in Mozambique [24] 4 % of deaths in adolescents were attributed to this cause. The three Nigerian studies found that deaths due to haemorrhage contributed 8 % [25] 12 % [26] and 4 % [27] respectively to the total adolescent maternal deaths. The remaining two sub-Saharan African studies are somewhat more difficult to interpret: Nkata et al. [28] attributed 9 % of deaths to haemorrhage in the Zambian study, but these were specifically linked to ectopic pregnancy and caesarean section. In Malawi, Lema et al. [29] attributed 10 % of deaths to post-abortal haemorrhage, but gave no figure for haemorrhage with other underlying causes. Most of these estimates are low compared to the estimate of 25 % for Sub Saharan African reported by Say et al. [10]. There is also some evidence that the proportion of deaths due to haemorrhage is lower amongst adolescents than in older women. Even in the Mallé et al.’s study [23], where nearly 50 % of adolescent maternal deaths in Mali were due to haemorrhage; this is lower than the estimate for older women (60 % for 20–35 year olds and 71 % for women over 35 years).

Two studies in Bangladesh estimated that 10 % [17] and 18 % [30] of the adolescent maternal deaths were due to haemorrhage. Again this is markedly lower than the 30 % assigned by Say et al. [10] but figures for older women are broadly comparable across these studies. In Latin America, Souza et al.’s study [31] found that 16 % of adolescent deaths in Brazil were caused by haemorrhage, whereas de Sequeira et al.’s (1986) study, also in Brazil [32], which had a larger sample size estimated this to be 8 %. Studies in Peru [33] and Chile [19] attributed 13 and 8 % respectively to this cause. Again, this is markedly lower than the figure assigned by Say et al. [10] for this region.

Hypertensive disorders, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia

Pre–eclampsia is defined as hypertension in pregnancy with onset after 20 weeks gestation with proteinurea, whereas eclampsia is defined as convulsions in a woman with signs of pre-eclampsia [34]. Hypertensive disorders (which include eclampsia and pre-eclampsia as well as the pre-existing hypertension) are amongst the most common morbidities to occur during pregnancy. Hypertensive disorders were also found to be a major cause of death in a number of studies for the adolescent age group, and the data suggest it may make up a greater percentage of deaths among this group than for the older ages.

The three Nigerian studies found that 46 % [27], 20 % [25] and 38 % [26] of adolescent maternal deaths could be attributed to eclampsia. Okusanya et al. [26] provides a comparable estimate of 19 % for the entire sample aged 15–45 years. In Mali [23] 30 % of adolescents died of pre-eclampsia as opposed to 12 % in women aged 14–49 years and in Mozambique [24] eclampsia caused 21 % of the adolescent maternal deaths: a significantly greater proportion than for older women (9 %). These proportions were seen to be low in only two studies: a study in Zambia found that 3 % of adolescent deaths were attributable to eclampsia [28] and in Malawi only 2 % were due to this cause [29]. These figures are generally markedly higher than the 16 % suggested for eclampsia in sub-Saharan Africa by Say et al. [10].

The two Bangladeshi studies found that 22 % [30] and 47 % [17] of adolescent maternal deaths were attributable to pre-eclampsia or eclampsia. These estimates were markedly higher in adolescents than for older age groups in both studies. With the exception of Acosta Chavez’s study [33] in Peru, hypertensive disorders were the leading cause of death for adolescents across the various studies from Latin America, ranging from 29 % [31] to 47 % [32], and these are markedly higher than comparative figures (22 %) given by Say et al. [10] for Latin America.

Maternal peripartum sepsis

Peripartum or puerperal sepsis can be defined as a bacterial infection of the genital tract occurring between the onset of rupture of membranes or labour and the 42nd day postpartum [35]. Our review shows this to be another important cause of death among adolescents, but estimates varied widely. In Zambia Nkata [28] found over 50 % of adolescent maternal deaths were due to sepsis, but these included sepsis resulting from obstructed labour (with or without uterine rupture) which might be categorised differently in other studies. The three Nigerian studies found that 20 % [26], 13 % [27] and 4 % [28] of adolescent maternal deaths were a result of sepsis. Research in Mali [23] found 17 % of all adolescent maternal deaths were from this cause, with similar findings of 15 % in Mozambique [24]. An estimate of 21 % was presented from the Malawian study [29] but were lower in the Ghanaian studies [18, 22]. In Bangladesh sepsis was not recorded as a cause of any maternal deaths in Yusuf et al.’s study [17], but made up 6 % of adolescent maternal deaths in Fauveau et al.’s paper [30]. Where estimates were also available from other age groups, no discernible patterns were evident: whilst in some studies the estimates for adolescents were somewhat higher [23, 24], in others they were lower [29] and in some they were very similar [18, 26, 30]. Three of the Latin American studies had very similar estimates of 16 or 17 %, whereas the fourth was much lower at 3 % [19].

Obstructed labour and ruptured uterus

Labour is classed as obstructed when the presenting part of the fetus cannot progress into the pelvis despite strong contractions [36]. Evidence from the studies was somewhat confusing on this, partly because of the way the cause of death was defined (e.g. the causes were variously categorised as obstructed labour, ruptured uterus, sepsis resulting from obstructed labour/ruptured uterus), and a number of studies did not report this cause at all [19, 2325, 29, 3133].

One Nigerian study suggests 30 % of maternal deaths were due to “prolonged obstructed labour” [27] with a further 7 % due to ruptured uterus, while another [26] suggests a much lower estimate of 13 %. The Zambian study shows 45 % of adolescent maternal deaths were due to sepsis caused as a result of obstructed labour with or without uterine rupture [28]. Asamoah et al. [18] show that 5 % of adolescent maternal deaths result from this cause in Ghana, and the Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) estimates this at 3 % [22]. In Bangladesh, Yusuf et al. [17] and Fauveau et al. [30] found that 9 and 7 % of deaths respectively were due to obstructed labour (with Yusuf assigning a further 4 % to “other obstructed causes”). Only four studies provide comparisons with older age groups: in three [18, 22, 30] the proportion of deaths assigned to this cause is the same or very similar, but in one [23] it is higher in adolescents. However, most estimates were larger than Say et al.’s [10] estimates for sub Saharan Africa and Southern Asia, which were less than 3 %. None of the studies from Latin America provided specific data on obstructed labour.

Abortion-related death

The term abortion refers to expulsion of the products of conception from the uterus before the fetus is viable [37], and can be either spontaneous or induced. Induced abortion can be either ‘safe’ or ‘unsafe’ based on how it is conducted. An abortion is considered ‘unsafe’ if the procedure for terminating an unwanted pregnancy is conducted either by persons lacking the necessary skills or in an environment lacking minimal medical standards or both. The overwhelming majority of deaths in such situations result from complications of unsafe abortion.

Few studies, in this review, differentiated the data for abortion by type, and in those that did, the numbers were extremely small for spontaneous abortion so we aggregated them. The data on abortion as a cause of death show very marked differences between the studies. Of the three studies from Nigeria, one reported it to be 4 % [27], while in the second this was 28 % [25], and in the third [26] abortion was not cited as a cause at all. In the Malawian study this was very high, with an estimated 36 % of deaths caused by post-abortal sepsis and a further 10 % from post-abortal haemorrhage [29]. The proportion was also very high in both studies from Ghana [18, 22]. In Mozambique and Zambia the figure was much lower at 10 and 9 % respectively [24, 28]. Figures for the two Bangladeshi studies were 20 % [30] and 12 % [17]. In several studies the proportion of deaths assigned to abortion was markedly higher for adolescents than for older women [18, 29], whereas for others it was similar [24, 30]. Many of the figures are much higher than the 10 % for sub-Saharan Africa and 6 % for Southern Asia suggested by Say et al. [10]. In Latin America estimates were very high in the Mexican study (33 %) [33], and also high in Donoso and Carvajal’s Chilean study at 18 % [19], which is somewhat greater than the 11 % assigned to the total sample group. Both estimates are higher than Say et al.’s [10] estimate of 10 % for Latin America. De Siqueira et al. [33] suggest a lower estimate for Brazil of 6 %.

Indirect causes

Indirect maternal deaths are those resulting from previously existing diseases, or from diseases developed during pregnancy that were not due to direct obstetric causes but aggravated by the physiological effects of pregnancy.

Where estimates were possible from the data, estimates of the proportion of adolescent maternal deaths due to indirect causes varied widely from 11 % [17] to 47 % [24]. Causes varied by study as well, but for a number of sub-Saharan African studies, infectious diseases were particularly important. Two studies found malaria a particularly important indirect cause of maternal mortality in adolescents. In Mozambique, 27 % of deaths in adolescents were from malaria [24], where it was the highest cause of death, compared to only 12 % in women aged 20 and over. In Zambia malaria was responsible for 18 % of deaths in adolescents [28]. Other indirect causes mentioned included other infectious diseases such as meningitis and tuberculosis, as well as anaemia.

In some countries, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection rates are particularly high among sexually active adolescent girls [38]. However, in the papers included in this review the only study that provides a figure specifically for HIV is from Zambia, which estimated 6 % of adolescent maternal deaths were attributable to this condition [28]. One other study highlighted that it may be difficult to attribute HIV as a cause of death and it may be recorded as another condition [25]. It is also worth noting that some of the studies are very old and data would be from before the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa became established.


Unsurprisingly, in general the major causes of direct maternal deaths in adolescents are the same as for older women: eclampsia, peripartum sepsis, haemorrhage and abortion. Some studies also show obstructed labour and malaria as important causes of death. However, the contribution of each of these causes differs markedly between studies, which may reflect country or regional differences, although some caution needs to be exercised as it may reflect issues related to definitions or data quality, which are discussed later in this section. In addition some studies show that the main cause or causes of death differ between adolescents and older women.

Because of the limitations of the studies included, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions about how adolescent causes of death may differ from older women. However, there does appear to be reasonable evidence that eclampsia is a more important cause of death in adolescents than in older women. Some studies have confirmed that adolescents are at greater risk of developing pre-eclampia or eclampsia [7] although the physiological pathway is unclear. In addition a very high proportion of adolescent births will be first births, which also carries an increased risk of eclampsia. These findings point to the importance of ensuring adequate antenatal care for the detection and treatment of this condition in adolescents.

Additionally, based on these studies, haemorrhage seems to be a less important cause of death in adolescents than in older women. Aside from eclampsia and haemorrhage, however, findings for most other major causes (e.g. sepsis and abortion) tended to be inconclusive and inconsistent. The data on abortion are extremely heterogeneous and are likely to be prone to a number of limitations and biases that are discussed in the next section. However, several studies indicated unsafe abortion was an important cause of adolescent maternal death. It has been estimated that around 15 % of unsafe abortions are among adolescents [39], but this can vary by context. Many adolescents experience particular barriers in accessing contraception [40, 41], and a focus on providing youth friendly family planning services is therefore an essential component in reducing the burden of adolescent maternal mortality.

It might have been expected that obstructed labour would be a more important cause due to the commonly cited claim that adolescents are at a greater risk of this condition [42]. However, while most estimates from these papers were higher than regional estimates for all age groups by Say et al. [10], we were able to find little comparative evidence from the papers. In addition it is worth noting that obstructed labour may be an important cause of increased morbidity among adolescents, and there is evidence that the risk of fistula is greater among this younger group [43]. Lack of mortality from this condition, particularly in the Latin American studies, may reflect improvements in health services and access to caesarean section.

Some studies suggested very high proportions of deaths from malaria in adolescents, which is concerning. While there is evidence that adolescents are more likely to have malaria infection during pregnancy than older women [44], a study in Uganda highlighted that pregnant adolescent girls tend not to recognise the risks posed by malaria during this time [45]. This again emphasises the need for access to quality antenatal care for adolescents including, where appropriate, intermittent presumptive treatment of malaria.

Limitations and data quality

Our review is somewhat limited by both the quantity the quality of available studies. Most of the studies have relatively small numbers of adolescent deaths, which obviously makes the analysis of causes problematic due to sampling error. Only one of the studies provided confidence intervals or some other measures of variability for estimates, but we can assume that for most of these studies these would be large, making interpretation difficult. This may partially explain some of the variation, and larger scale studies should be developed in order to address this issue more conclusively. Further potential problems could arise from the method of determining cause of death. The majority of studies obtained cause of death from medical records (often retrospectively) which relies heavily on the skills of available medical staff, and (particularly in cases where the window between admission and death is short) diagnosis may be inaccurate or incomplete. Community based studies used verbal autopsy, which also has been found to provide inconsistent data on cause of maternal deaths [46, 47].

Bias could also be introduced through the fact that the majority of studies were facility based, and mostly took place in large hospitals in major cities. In many countries many births and a proportion of maternal deaths occur at home, so conditions that cause death more rapidly (e.g. haemorrhage) may be under-reported due to many women never reaching a health facility. As adolescent mothers are more likely to be poor and live in rural areas [48, 49], which are also the population groups that are least likely to access health care, or in some contexts may be less likely to seek care [50] this source of bias may differentially affect them. Large scale community based studies overcome this problem, but may carry other potential sources of bias. However, it was not possible to identify any clear differences in major causes between community or hospital based studies in the papers included.

A further problem was lack of consistency between the studies as to how the causes of maternal deaths were categorised: only six of the fifteen studies [1719, 3133] attempted to draw on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system when grouping causes of death. A recent study [51] demonstrated the feasibility of applying the most recent WHO maternal mortality ICD developed in 2012 [52] to retrospective classification of causes of maternal mortality, and found it a feasible tool for use with existing datasets of maternal death reviews. It has an additional advantage of also allowing underlying and contributing factors to be recorded and analysed separately. Greater consistency among studies would enable more accurate comparisons across studies.

The findings on abortion as a cause of death show great variation not only between countries (which might be expected, particularly in the light of differing laws on obtaining safe abortion) but also within countries where more than one study is available. This is likely to result from a number of causes: in many countries there are marked geographical differences in access to safe abortion services, and ethnic and socio-cultural differences between populations may influence young women’s perceived need to seek an unsafe abortion [53, 54]. However much of the variance is likely to reflect data collection issues or issues of clarification. In the few community-based surveys which rely on information from relatives or community workers, informants may be unwilling to provide the information needed to assign abortion as cause of death. For the hospital-based studies, accuracy and representativeness of data on how the death is classified will depend on whether women are willing or able to attend the hospital when post-abortion complications become evident. There is evidence that abortion deaths are more likely to be classified as “unknown” than other obstetric causes, particularly in contexts where staff may be sanctioned for providing care to women who have sought abortion [55].

This study highlights the paucity of evidence on causes of adolescent maternal death, and emphasises the need for greater efforts to collate and analyse data on age-specific causes of maternal mortality. These data need to be large-scale and based on community surveys using standardised definitions in order to reduce bias and ensure comparability. Data from high-income countries, including those which capture mortality data relating to disadvantaged or marginalised groups, would also be valuable in ascertaining how cause of maternal death among adolescents differs from that among older women.


The direct causes of adolescent maternal death are broadly similar to those in older women, although their relative importance differs between settings. Furthermore this study provides evidence that the relative importance of the main causes may be different for adolescents than for older women: in particular there is a strong indication that eclampsia and pregnancy induced hypertension may make up a larger proportion of deaths overall than for older women. This demonstrates the needs for all adolescents to access the entire continuum of care during pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, childbirth and the post-partum period. It also emphasises the need for a particular focus on targeted preventative measures aimed at conditions which account for a relatively high proportion of mortality in this group. Further community based studies in a range of countries using large sample sizes and rigorous identification and classification of cause of death are needed to provide more robust evidence on this topic.


  1. 1.

    Incidental or accidental deaths are those that are not related to the pregnancy e.g. road accident or violence



Human immunodeficiency virus


International Classification of Diseases


Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database


Maternal mortality ratio


Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology


Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomized Designs


World Health Organization


  1. 1.

    WHO 2014 Adolescent pregnancy factsheet. Accessed 23rd October 2015.

  2. 2.

    Neal S, Matthews Z, Frost M, Fogstad H, Camacho AV, Laski L. Childbearing in adolescents aged 12–15 in developing countries: a neglected issue. New estimates from demographic and household surveys in 42 countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:1114–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    WHO | MDG 5: improve maternal health [Internet]. WHO. 2010. Available from:

  4. 4.

    Nove A, Matthews Z, Neal S, Camacho AV. Maternal mortality in adolescents compared with women of other ages: evidence from 144 countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(3):e155–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Blanc A, Winfrey W, Ross J. New findings for maternal mortality age patterns: aggregated results for 38 countries. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59864.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    World Health Organisation.  Global Health Estimates 2013 Summary tables: DALYs, YLLs and YLDs by cause, age and sex by WHO regional group and World Bank income classification, 2000–2012 (provisional estimates). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

  7. 7.

    Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM, Lammers C. Maternal-perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with adolescent pregnancy in Latin America: cross-sectional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):342–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ganchimeg T, Ota E, Morisaki N, Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, et al. Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes among adolescent mothers: a World Health Organization multicountry study. BJOG. 2014;121 Suppl 1:40–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fraser a M, Brockert JE, Ward RH. Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(17):1113–7.

  10. 10.

    Say L, Chou D, Gemmill AT, OMoller AB, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Storm F, Agampodi S, Eddleson M, Sorenson JB, Flemming K, Rheinlander T. Indirect causes of maternal death. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    World Bank Country groupings. Accessed Oct 2014.

  14. 14.

    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:361–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2010. 2014.

  17. 17.

    Yusuf HR, Akhter HH, Chowdhury ME, Rochat RW. Causes of death among women aged 10–50 years in Bangladesh, 1996–1997. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25(3):302.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Asamoah B, Moussa K, Stafstrom M, Musinguzi G. Distribution of causes of maternal mortality amongst different socio-demographic groups in Ghana: a descriptive study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Donoso ES, Carvajal C. El cambio del perfil epidemiológico de la mortalidad materna en Chile dificultará el cumplimiento del 5° objetivo del Milenio. Rev Med Chil. 2012;140(10):1253–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wong WC, Cheung CS, Hart GJ. Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2008;5:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:666–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), and Macro International. Ghana Maternal Health Survey 2007. Calverton: GSS, GHS, and Macro International; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mallé D, Ross DA, Campbell O, Huttly S. Institutional maternal mortality in Mali. IJOG. 1994;46:19–26.

  24. 24.

    Granja ACL, Machungo F, Gomez A, Bergstrom S. Adolescent maternal mortality in Mozambique. J Adolesc Health. 2001;28:303–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ujah I, Aisien O, Muthihir J, Vanderjagt DJ, Glew RH, Uguru VE. Maternal mortality among adolescent women in Jos, North-Central, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25(1):3–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Okusanya B, Algere E, Abe A, Ibrahim H, Salawu R. Maternal deaths: initial report of an on-going monitoring of maternal deaths at the Ferderal Medical Centre Katsina, Northwest Nigeria. J Matern Fetal Med. 2013;26(9):885–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Airede LR, Ekele BA. Adolescent maternal mortality in Sokoto, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23(2):163–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nkata M. Maternal deaths in teenage mothers. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;17(4):34–345.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lema VM, Changole J, Kanyighe C, Malunga EV. Maternal mortality at the Queen Elizabeth Central Teaching Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi. East Afr Med J. 2005;82(1):3–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fauveau V, Koenig MA, Chakraborty J, et al. Causes of maternal mortality in rural Bangladesh, 1976–85. Bull World Health Organ. 1988;66(5):643–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Souza ML, Burgardt D, Ferreira LAP, Bub MBC, Monticelli M, Lentz HE. Girls from Santa Catarina: losing your life to become a mother. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2010;44(2):317–22.

  32. 32.

    de Siqueira AAF, Tanaka ACd'A. Mortalidade na adolescencia com especial referencia a mortalidade materna, Brasil, 1980. Rev Saude Publi S Paulo. 1986;20(4):274–9.

  33. 33.

    Acosta Chávez M. Mortalidad materna en adolescents. Horiz Méd. 2003;3(1/2):48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre eclampsia and eclampsia. Geneva: World Heal Organ; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    WHO. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of maternal peripartum infections. Geneva: WHO; 2015.

  36. 36.

    Dolea C, Abouzahr C. Global burden of obstructed labour in the year 2000. Geneva: WHO. 2003. p. 1–17.

  37. 37.

    2016 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes O03: Abortion. [cited 2016 Jul 25]. Available from:

  38. 38.

    Glynn JR, Caraël M, Auvert B, Kahindo M, Chege J, Musonda R, et al. Why do young women have a much higher prevalence of HIV than young men? A study in Kisumu, Kenya and Ndola, Zambia. AIDS. 2001;15:S51–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shah I, Ahman E. Unsafe abortion differentials in 2008 by age and developing country region: High burden among young women. Reprod Health Matters. 2012;20(39):169–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bankole A, Malarcher S. Removing barriers to adolescents’ access to contraceptive information and services. Stud Fam Plann. 2010;41(2):117–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chandra-Mouli V, McCarraher D, Phillips S, Williamson N, Hainsworth H. Contraception for adolescents in low and middle income countries; needs, barriers and access. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Neilson JP, Lavender T, Quenby S, Wray S. Obstructed labour. Br Med Bull. 2003;67:191–204.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Tebeu PM, Fomulu JN, Khaddaj S, De Bernis L, Delvaux T, Rochat CH. Risk factors for obstetric fistula: a clinical review. Int Urogynecol J [Internet]. 2011;23(4):387–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Orish VN, Onyeabor O, Boampong J, Aforakwah R, Nwaefuna E, Iriemenam N. Adolescent pregnancy and the risk of plasmodium falciparum malaria and anaemia-a pilot study from Sekondi-Takoradi metropolis, Ghana. Acta Trop. 2012;123(30):244–48.

  45. 45.

    Mbonye A, Neema S, Magnussen P. Malaria in pregnancy, risk perceptions and care seeking practices among adolescents in Mukono district Uganda. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2006;18:561–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ronsmans C, Vanneste AM, Chakraborty J, Van Ginneken J. A comparison of three verbal autopsy methods to ascertain levels and causes of maternal deaths in Matlab, Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(4):660–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sloan NL, Langer A, Hernandez B, Romero M, Winikoff B. The etiology of maternal mortality in developing countries: what do verbal autopsies tell us? Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:805–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Rani M, Lule E. Exploring the socioeconomic dimension of adolescent reproductive health: a multicountry analysis. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2004;30(3):110–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    UNFPA. Giving girls today and tomorrow: breaking the cycle of adolescent pregnancy. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Reynolds H, et al. Adolescent’s use of maternal and child health services in developing countries. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006;32(1):6–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Agampodi S, Wickramage K, Agampodi T, Thennakoon U, Jayathilaka N, et al. Maternal mortality revisited: the application of the new ICD-MM classification system in reference to maternal deaths in Sri Lanka. Reprod Health. 2014;11:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    World Health Organization. The WHO Application of ICD-10 to Deaths During Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Puerperium: ICD-MM. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. p. 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Sousa A, Lozano R, Gakidou E. Exploring the determinants of unsafe abortion: improving the evidence base in Mexico. Health Policy Plan. 2010;25:300–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Bernabe Ortiz A, White PJ, Carcamo CP, Hughes JP, Gonzeles MA, Garcia PJ, Garnett GP, Holmes KK. Clandestine induced abortion: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors among women in a Latin American country. CMAJ. 2009;180(3):298–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Gerdts C, Vohra D, Ahern J. Measuring unsafe abortion-related mortality: a systematic review of the existing methods. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e53346.

Download references


SN was funded by ESRC grant ES/H038485/1 as well as a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship.

This review was commissioned by the World Health Organization. However the views expressed are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Health Organization or those of its Member States.

Authors’ contributions

SN contributed to the development of the protocol, co-ordinated the review of the literature, jointly reviewed the English language literature and wrote the first draft. SM led on the development of the protocol, jointly reviewed the English language literature and contributed to drafts. KB jointly conceived the original research idea and contributed to the development of the protocol. AVC jointly conceived the original research idea and contributed to the development of the protocol jointly reviewed the Spanish and Portuguese language literature and contributed to drafts. FS jointly reviewed the Spanish and Portuguese language literature. MM Reviewed and commented on drafts. AN contributed to the development of the protocol and commented on drafts. ZM jointly conceived the original research idea, contributed to the development of the protocol and commented on drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Neal.



Table 3 Search Strategy (adapted for different search engines)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neal, S., Mahendra, S., Bose, K. et al. The causes of maternal mortality in adolescents in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 16, 352 (2016).

Download citation


  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus
  • Malaria
  • Maternal Mortality
  • Maternal Death
  • Eclampsia