Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Changes in the biochemical and immunological components of serum and colostrum of overweight and obese mothers

  • Mahmi Fujimori1,
  • Eduardo L. França2,
  • Vanessa Fiorin3,
  • Tassiane C. Morais1, 2,
  • Adenilda C. Honorio-França2Email author and
  • Luiz C. de Abreu1
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth201515:166

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0574-4

Received: 18 October 2014

Accepted: 28 May 2015

Published: 12 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Obesity in pregnancy is associated with systemic inflammation, immunological changes and adverse maternal-fetal outcomes. Information on the association between maternal obesity and breast milk composition is scarce. This study describes changes and relationships between biochemical and immunological parameters of colostrum and serum of overweight and obese women.

Methods

Colostrum and blood samples were collected from 25 normal weight, 24 overweight and 19 obese women for determination of glucose, total protein, triglycerides, cholesterol, immunoglobulins, complement proteins (C3 and C4), fat and calorie content and C-reactive protein (CRP).

Results

Glucose was higher in colostrum of obese women (p = .002). In normal weight and obese women, total protein content was higher in colostrum than in serum (p = .001). Serum triglycerides (p = .008) and cholesterol (p = .010) concentrations were significantly higher in overweight and obese women than in their normal weight counterparts, but in colostrum their concentrations were similar across the three groups. Secretory IgA (sIgA) in colostrum and IgA in serum concentrations were significantly higher (p = .001) in overweight and obese mothers, whereas IgG and IgM concentrations did not vary among the groups (p = .825). Serum C3 (p = .001) and C4 (p = .040) concentrations were higher in obese women. No differences in colostrum complement proteins were detected among the groups. Calorie content (p = .003) and fat (p = .005) concentrations in colostrum and serum CRP (p = .002) were higher in obese women.

Conclusions

The results corroborate the hypothesis that colostrum of overweight and obese women undergoes biochemical and immunological changes that affect its composition, namely increasing glucose concentrations, calorie content, fat and sIgA concentrations.

Keywords

Colostrum Obesity Antibody Complement protein Fat

Background

Breastfeeding promotion is one of the main strategies for reducing child mortality worldwide [1]. Breast milk contains a balanced content of macro and micronutrients that are essential for infant growth and development, and several immunological components that provide protection to newborns [24]. Antibodies, complement proteins, hormones, immunocompetent cells [3, 59] cytokines [1012] and other milk components appear to play a role in the modulation and development of the immune system and inflammatory responses of newborns.

In recent decades, due to changes in lifestyle the incidence of overweight and obesity are increasing among breastfeeding mothers. Obesity and overweight are common metabolic disorders and their growing frequencies worldwide are a major public health concern [13]. Obesity has been shown to increase the expression and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis alpha factor (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) and raises plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations, leading to the chronic low-grade inflammation that characterizes the disease [14] and appears to play a central role in the development of a variety of metabolic disorders and hormonal dysfunctions [1517]. The fact that obesity affects components of the cellular and humoral immune response may result in a state of immunodeficiency [18]. Epidemiological and clinical findings corroborate this, showing a higher incidence and severity of infectious diseases in the obese [19].

The risks associated with obesity become even more relevant in women of reproductive age [20, 21] because pregnancy is another condition that affects immune response. Moreover, excess weight during pregnancy contributes to increasing perinatal morbidity and mortality, posing risks of long-term consequences for mother and child [22].

Other studies show that chronic inflammation caused by obesity may be related to an exaggerated inflammatory response in the placenta of pregnant women, with an accumulation of macrophages and pro-inflammatory mediators [23]. However, it is unclear whether the effects of obesity in pregnancy are accompanied by changes in colostrum composition in the post partum period.

Changes in maternal metabolism and immunological response may affect the developing immune system of newborns because of the intense interplay between mother and child during pregnancy and breastfeeding. To clarify this issue, the present study investigated the association between maternal weight and immunological, biochemical and nutritional parameters of colostrum.

Methods

This cross-sectional study evaluated 68 mothers (18–36 years of age), divided into three groups according to their prepregnancy body mass index (BMI): normal weight (n = 25); overweight (n = 24) and obese (n = 19). Group definition was based on the World Health Organization [24] criterion, considering normal weight for BMI 18.5–24.9, overweight for BMI 25–29.9, and obesity for BMI of 30 or more. Participants were recruited from the Pregnancy and Obstetric Service of the Maria José dos Santos Stein Hospital, managed by the School of Medicine of ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil. The volunteers signed an informed consent form before entering the study, which was approved by the local ethics committee of the Faculty of Public Health of the University of São Paulo (Protocol Number CAAE: 05269612.7.0000.5421).

A number of variables were controlled in both groups. These patients were characterized by the age, gestational age at delivery, smoking status, hypertension, body mass indexes before pregnancy, diabetes prior to pregnancy and gestational diabetes.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) women with breasts without nipple fissures or mastitis; (b) who were exclusively breastfeeding their babies; and (c) signed a Consent Form. Women with multiple pregnancies, fetal malformations and deliveries before the 37th week of gestation were excluded.

Colostrum sampling

About 48–72 h post-partum, 10 mL colostrum was collected from the volunteers. Supernatant was obtained by colostrum centrifugation at 160 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The upper fat layer was discarded, and the aqueous supernatant was stored at −80 °C for later biochemical and immunological analyses.

Blood sampling

Samples of 10 mL of blood were collected prior to the beginning of labor from each mother in tubes without anticoagulant and the blood samples were centrifuged at 160 × g for 15 min, until serum separation. Serum samples were stored individually at −80 °C for further glucose, enzyme and protein determination.

Glucose determination

Glucose concentrations of colostrum supernatant and maternal serum were determined by the enzymatic system [25]. Samples of 20 μL colostrum, serum and standard of 100 mg/dL (BioTécnica®, Ref 10.008.00, Brazil) were placed in 2.0 mL phosphate buffer solution (0.05 M, pH7.45, with aminoantipyrine 0.03 mM, 15 mM sodium p-hydroxybenzoate, 12 kU/L glucose oxidase and 0.8 kU/L peroxidase). The suspensions were mixed and incubated for 5 min at 37 °C. The reactions were read on a spectrophotometer at 510 nm.

Total protein determination

Total protein of colostrum supernatant and maternal serum was determined by the Biuret colorimetric method [25]. Samples of 20 μL of colostrum, serum and standard of 4 g/dL (BioTécnica®, Ref 10.009.00, Brazil) were placed in 1.0 mL Biuret reagent (ions of copper in alkaline medium). The suspensions were mixed and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. The reactions were read on a spectrophotometer at 545 nm.

Cholesterol determination

Cholesterol concentrations of colostrum supernatant and maternal serum were determined by enzymatic colorimetric method [26]. Samples of 10 μL colostrum/serum and standard of 200 mg/dL BioTécnica®, Ref 10.004.00, Brazil), were placed in 1 mL of buffer solution (100 mmol/L, pH 7.0; Sodium cholate 8 mmol/L; cholesterol esterase 750 U/L; Cholesterol oxidase/200 U/L; Peroxidase > 2000 U/L; 4-aminoantipyrine 0.6 mmol; phenol 20 mmol /L; Sodium azide 0.05 % v/v). The suspensions were mixed and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. The reactions were read on a spectrophotometer at 505 nm.

Triglycerides determination

Triglycerides concentrations in colostrum supernatant and maternal serum were determined by the enzymatic colorimetric method [26]. Samples of 10 μL of colostrum/serum, standard of 200 mg/dL (BioTécnica®, Ref 10.010.00, Brazil), were placed in 1.0 mL of buffer solution (50 mmol/L pH 7.2 Glicerol kinase/1000 U/L; Peroxidase/1000 U/L; Lipoprotein lipase/2000 U/Ll; Glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase/5000 U/L; 4-chlorophenol 2.7 mmol/L; 4-aminoantipyrine 0.3 mmol/L; ATP - adenosine triphosphate 2.0 mmol/L; Sodium azide 0.01 % v/v). The suspensions were mixed and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. The reactions were read on a spectrophotometer at 505 nm.

Immunoglobulin, C3 and C4 complement determination

The immunoglobulin (Ig), complement protein (C) 3 and 4 concentrations in colostrum and serum were determined by turbidimetric method [11].

For sIgA in colostrum and IgA in serum determinations, the samples were diluted at 1:5 (v/v) with saline solution (9 g/L), for IgM at 1:11 (v/v) and for IgG at 1:15 (v/v), and the antibody concentrations were determined using IgA (Bioclin®, Brazil, Ref K061), IgM (Bioclin®, Brazil, Ref K063) and IgG antiserum (Bioclin®, Brazil, Ref K062) diluted at 1:12 (v/v). A calibration curve obtained by the Multical (Bioclin®, Brazil, Ref K064) calibrator was used to determine the standard curve for each immunoglobulin. Samples of colostrum, serum, standards, positive and negative control sera were placed in 500 μL of buffer solution (sodium chloride 0.15 moL/L, Tris 50 mmol/L, 6.0000 PEG 50 g/L, sodium azide 15.38 nmol/L). The suspensions were mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. The reactions were read on a spectrophotometer at 340 nm.

For C3 and C4 concentration determination the samples (colostrum and serum) were diluted at 1:12 (v/v) with saline solution (9 g/L), and the C3 and C4 concentrations in sample supernatants were determined using C3 and C4 antiserum (Bioclin®, Brazil) diluted at 1:12 (v/v). A calibration curve obtained by the Multical (Bioclin®, Brazil), Ref K064) calibrator was used to determine the standard curve. Ten microliter samples of colostrum, serum, standards, positive and negative control sera were placed in 500 μL of buffer solution (sodium chloride 0:15 mol/L, Tris 50 mmol/L, 6.0000 PEG 50 g/L, sodium azide 15:38 nmol/L). The suspensions were mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. The reactions were read on a spectrophotometer at 340 nm.

Creamatocrit analysis

Colostrum samples were water-bath-heated at 40 °C for 15 min and subjected to vortex mixing. Capillary tubes (2 μL) were filled to approximately three quarters with the samples, sealed with sealing wax and centrifuged for 15 min. Centrifugation separated the samples into cream and serum [2]. The cream column and the total column were measured, and fat and Kcal content calculated using the following formulae:
$$ \mathrm{Fat}\ \mathrm{content}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \%\mathrm{cream}\kern0.5em -\kern0.5em 0.59/1.46,\ \mathrm{where}\ \mathrm{the}\ \%\ \mathrm{cream}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \mathrm{cream}\ \mathrm{column}\ \left(\mathrm{mm}\right)\kern0.5em \times \kern0.5em 100\ /\mathrm{total}\ \mathrm{column}\ \left(\mathrm{mm}\right); $$
$$ \mathrm{Kcal}/\mathrm{L}\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \left(68.8\times \%\mathrm{cream}\right)\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 290 $$

C-Reactive Protein assay

C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentrations in human colostrum and serum were measured using the PCR Turbilatex Kit (BioTécnica®, Brazil, Catalog 20.015.00) by turbidimetric method [26]. Samples of 5 μL of colostrum, serum and standard were placed in 1000 μL of solution (phosphate Buffer 40 mmol, sodium azide 0.95 g/L, suspension of latex particles sensitized with goat IgG anti Human C-reactive protein). The suspensions were mixed and placed at 37 °C and the reactions were measured immediately and at 120 s. The reactions were read on a spectrophotometer at 540 nm.

Statistical analysis

Two-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with calculation of F statistic and Tukey’s multiple comparison test were used to evaluate glucose, total protein, cholesterol, triglycerides, antibody concentration, complement protein, CRP, calories and fat considering the BMI status as one factor and the biological materials (colostrum or serum) as the other. Statistical significance was considered when the p-value was less than .05.

Results

Clinical characteristics from all groups are shown in Table 1. Maternal age, gestational age at birth and height before pregnancy were similar among groups. The cesarean birth percentage was higher in overweight and obese groups. Neonates from the groups studied (normal weight, overweight and obese) exhibited similar somatometry at birth (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of woman included in the study according to pregestacional BMI group (normal, overweight and obese)

Variables

Normal weight (n = 25)

Overweight (n = 24)

Obese (n = 18)

  Mothers

   

 Age (year)

25.0 (18–37)

24.1 (18–37)

26.8 (21–38)

 height before pregnancy (cm)

161.0 (150.0-171.0)

162.8 (150.0-172.0)

160.4 (144.0-189.0)

 Weight before pregnancy (kg)

56.2 (43.0-68.5)

71.2 (56.5-82.0)

87.3 (66.0-110.0)

 BMI before pregnancy (kg/m2)

21.4 (18.4-24.4)

26.6 (25.2-28.6)

34.7 (30.1-47.9)

 Cesarean (%)

6/25 (24.0 %)

11/24 (45.8 %)

10/18 (55.5 %)

 Gestational age at delivery (week)

39.7 (37.0-41.3)

39.5 (37.6-41.0)

39.5 (37.0-40.7)

 Primipara (%)

13/25 (52.0 %)

11/24 (45.8 %)

8/18 (44.4 %)

 Diabetes

0/25 (0.0 %)

0/24 (0.0 %)

0/18 (0.0 %)

 Gestational diabetes

0/25 (0.0 %)

0/24 (0.0 %)

2/18 (11.0 %)

 Hypertension

1/25 (4.0 %)

1/24 (4.0 %)

2/18 (11.0 %)

 Smoking status

4/25 (16.0 %)

2/24 (8.0 %)

2/18 (11.0 %)

  Infants

   

 Infant gender (% female)

12/25 (48.8 %)

10/24 (41.6 %)

8/18 (44.4 %)

 Weight (kg)

3.6 (2.40-4.20)

3.2 (2.54-3.91)

3.4 (2.54-4.34)

 Height (cm)

48.1 (44.0-52.0)

48.2 (44.5-53.0)

49.2 (46–52)

Data for all mothers included are shown as median, minimum and maximum values or number and percentages (%)

We evaluated biochemical (Table 2) and immunological (Table 3) parameters in the blood and colostrum of mothers with different body mass index (BMI).
Table 2

Biochemical parameters in colostrum and serum from normal weight, overweight and obese mothers

Parameter

 

Normal weight

Overweight

Obese

Statistical

Glucose concentrations (mmol/L)

Colostrum

1.9 (0.7–2.9) 3

2.6 (2.1–3.1) 1,3

3.2 (2.0–4.5) 1,2,3

F = 5.94; p = .002 (comparing the groups)

Serum

4.3 (4.2–5.1)

4.4 (3.7–5.4)

4.3 (3.7–5.7)

F = 139.15; p = .001 (comparing the colostrum and serum)

Total Protein (g/L)

Colostrum

101.0 (91.0–115.0) 3

89.0 (76.0–127.0)

86.0 (61.0–157.0) 3

F = 0.25; p = .758 (comparing the groups)

Serum

59.0 (57.0–67.0)

62.5 (58.0–83.0)

66.5 (54.0–76.0)

F = 47.53; p = .001 (comparing the colostrum and serum)

Triglyceride concentrations (mmol/L)

Colostrum

5.3 (2.5–6.6) 3

5.1 (2.5–6.3) 3

4.6 (2.6–8.0) 3

F = 10.59; p = .008 (comparing the groups)

Serum

1.6 (0.8–2.2)

1.9 (0.9–3.3)

2.9 (2.0–5.5) 1

F = 57.47; p = .001 (comparing the colostrum and serum)

Cholesterol concentrations (mmol/L)

Colostrum

4.3 (2.1–6.2)

4.1 (2.7–5.9)

5.2 (2.9–8.2) 3

F = 5.05; p = .010 (comparing the groups)

Serum

5.1 (4.7–5.4)

5.4 (4.6–5.9)

6.0 (5.2–12.3) 1

F = 11.08; p = .002 (comparing the colostrum and serum)

CRP concentrations (mg/L)

Colostrum

4.0 (0.0–8.0)

5.0 (0.0–11.0)

6.0 (0.0–12.0)

F = 12.30; p = .002 (comparing the groups)

Serum

9.0 (5.0–28.0)

16.0 (0.0–26.0) 3

85.0 (17.0–201.0) 1,2,3

F = 20.71; p = .001 (comparing the colostrum and serum)

Fat (%)

Colostrum

3.3 (0.4–6.7)

3.6 (1.2–9.4)

5.6 (2.0–11.9) 1

F = 7.27; p = .005 (comparing the groups)

Calories (Kcal)

Colostrum

537.9 (396.7–764.3)

543.6 (396.7–944.6)

688.2 (450.3–1111.6) 1

F = 6.90; p = .003 (comparing the groups)

Data presented as media, minimum and maximum values

1Statistically significant differences in relation to the normal weight category, considering the same sample (colostrum or serum)

2Statistically significant differences in relation to the overweight category, considering the same sample (colostrum or serum)

3Statistically significant differences between colostrum and serum, considering the same group (normal weight, overweight and obese)

Table 3

Immunoglobulins and complement protein concentrations in colostrum and serum from normal weight, overweight and obese mothers

Parameter

 

Normal weight

Overweight

Obese

Statistical

IgA (g/L)

Colostrum

3.3 (2.3-5.5) 3

3.8 (2.1-5.0)

5.1 (3.3-9.6) 1,2,3

F = 12.44; p = .001 (comparing the groups)

 

Serum

2.2 (1.6-3.1)

2.7 (2.2-3.5)

3.9 (2.1-4.7) 1

F = 21.69; p = .002 (comparing the colostrum and serum)

IgM (g/L)

Colostrum

1.3 (0.85-2.2)

1.2 (0.8-2.1)

1.4 (1.0-3.4)

F = 0.19; p = .825 (comparing the groups)

 

Serum

1.3 (1.1-1.8)

1.4 (0.8-2.4)

1.0 (0.8-2.0)

F = 1.84; p = .177 (comparing the colostrum and serum)

IgG (g/L)

Colostrum

0.4 (0.1-0.6) 3

0.3 (0.2-0.5) 3

0.4 (0.2-0.6) 3

F = 0.05; p = .947 (comparing the groups)

 

Serum

11.3 (9.2-14.2)

9.3 (8.5-16.7)

10.8 (7.6-18.4)

F = 495.8; p = .001 (comparing the colostrum and serum)

C3 (mg/dL)

Colostrum

91.7 (50.5-110.2) 3

90.3 (44.1-97.9) 3

95.7 (41.3-130.9) 3

F = 14.98; p = .001 (comparing the groups)

 

Serum

121.1 (109.5-139.3)

152.4 (90.6-250.0)

249.8 (119.1-312.9) 1,2

F = 117.30; p = .001 (comparing the colostrum and serum)

C4 (mg/dL)

Colostrum

30.1 (15.6-34.8) 3

24.2 (19.6-40.7) 3

28.8 (17.7-40.2)

F = 5.91; p = .040 (comparing the groups)

 

Serum

16.4 (9.9-25.6)

17.2 (7.1-25.8)

22.9 (13.3-37.1) 1,2

F = 20.68; p = .001 (comparing the colostrum and serum)

Data presented as median, minimum and maximum values (within parentheses)

1Statistically significant differences in relation to the normal weight category, considering the same sample (colostrum or blood)

2Statistically significant differences in relation to the overweight category, considering the same sample (colostrum or blood)

3Statistically significant differences between colostrum and serum, considering the same group (normal weight, overweight and obese)

Colostrum glucose concentrations were higher in obese (p = .002) than in overweight and normal weight groups. Serum glucose concentrations were higher (p = .001) than colostrum glucose concentrations in overweight mothers (Table 2). Total protein concentrations were similar (p = .758) across the groups. In normal weight and obese groups, total protein concentrations were higher in colostrum (p = .001) than in maternal serum (Table 2).

Intergroup colostrum triglyceride concentrations were similar, but in serum they were significantly higher (p = .008) in the obese group. Irrespective of the BMI, triglyceride concentrations were higher (p = .001) in colostrum than in serum (Table 2). No statistical intergroup differences (p > 0.05) in cholesterol concentrations were detected in colostrum. However, obese women exhibited higher cholesterol concentrations in serum (p = .010) than normal weight individuals. In the obese group, cholesterol concentrations were higher in serum (p = .001) than in colostrum (Table 2).

As shown in Fig. 1 and Table 2, fat (p = .005) and calorie (p = .003) content of colostrum was higher in the obese group. Colostrum CRP concentrations were similar among the groups, but in serum, they were significantly higher in the obese group (p = .002) than in the other groups. The highest concentrations of CRP (p = .001) were found in serum (Fig. 2 and Table 2).
Fig. 1

Fat a and calories b in the colostrum of normal, overweight and obese mothers. Data presented as mean ± standard error (SE). F(A) = 7.27; p = .005; F(B) = 6.90; p = .003. *Statistically significant differences between normal and obese groups. †Statistically significant differences between overweight and obese groups

Fig. 2

CRP concentrations in the colostrum a and serum b of normal, overweight and obese mothers. Data presented as mean ± standard error (SE). F = 12.30; p = .002 comparing the groups; F = 20.71; p = .001 comparing the samples (colostrum and serum). * Statistically significant differences between normal and obese groups. †Statistically significant differences between overweight and obese groups

The obese group showed significantly higher (p = .001) colostrum sIgA and serum IgA concentrations than normal weight women. IgM concentrations did not vary (p = .825) among the groups and between serum and colostrum samples (p = .177). IgG concentrations were significantly higher in serum (p = .001) than in colostrum (Table 3).

In serum, the concentrations of complement proteins C3 (p = .001) and C4 (p = .040) were significantly higher (p = .010) in the obese group than in normal weight and overweight groups, but in colostrum did not differ among the groups. Irrespective of weight status, C3 concentrations were significantly higher in serum (p = .001) than in colostrum, and in normal weight and overweight groups, C4 concentrations were significantly higher in serum (p = .001) than in colostrum samples (Table 3).

Discussion

The immune protection that breast milk provides and its nutritional importance has been widely described, and the composition of this secretion is known to undergo inter-and intra-individual variations [27]. These variations in breast milk can be affected by several factors, such as maternal diet, nutritional status, smoking, parity and period of the day [2, 28, 29].

Other studies report that maternal anemia, hypertension and diabetes can change nutritional and immunological features of breast milk [11, 3032]. The present study shows that although serum cholesterol, triglycerides, CRP, C3 and C4 protein concentrations were higher in obese women, their concentrations in colostrum were similar across the groups. On the other hand, although glucose and IgA concentrations were similar among serum samples of the different groups, in colostrum samples sIgA concentrations were significantly higher in obese mothers. An increase in glucose concentrations in the breast milk of diabetic women are associated with long-term consequences for their children, such as an increase in weight gain and metabolic changes [33, 34]. This suggests that infants born to and breastfed by women with high prepregnancy BMI may be heavier and predisposed to develop obesity and related disorders in adulthood. Other studies should investigate the effects of maternal weight on the glucose content of breast milk and its impact on infant weight gain and metabolism.

The association between maternal obesity and dyslipidemia has been extensively described [3537], and it likely contributes to vascular diseases including preeclampsia and the development of macrosomia [38]. The present study also found increased of dyslipidemia markers in higher BMI groups in colostrum samples, given that in obese and overweight groups this secretion contained higher fat and calorie content compared to normal weight women. The effects of maternal BMI on the energy content of breast milk are controversial, with studies showing that fat content in the milk of obese women does not differ from that of other weight classes [39], whereas others report lower fat content in milk from overweight mothers [28].

The immaturity of the immune system of newborns makes it susceptible to infections by viruses and bacteria. Accordingly, the transfer of antibodies via placenta during uterine life and then via colostrum and breast milk after birth is important in reducing this deficiency [30]. In the present study, overweight and obese mothers exhibited higher IgA concentrations in serum and sIgA concentrations in colostrum than normal weight women. Earlier studies report that obesity increases serum IgA concentrations in both sexes [40]. The present study is the first to evaluate the concentrations of antibodies and complement proteins in colostrum of overweight pregnant women. The increase in sIgA concentrations in colostrum might be associated with conditions determined by the metabolic syndrome, including hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia and abdominal obesity. The mechanisms by which obesity increases sIgA concentrations are not known, but they are possibly associated with chronic low-grade inflammation, characterized by elevated concentrations of serum pro-inflammatory marker IL-6 [40]. IL-6 is one of the main cytokines in human milk, and its content has been shown to correlate with sIgA concentrations in colostrum in other studies [41, 42].

Unlike IgG, which is transferred transplacentally, the action of immunoprotective components of colostrum and milk is usually local, in the newborn’s intestinal mucosa [3]. sIgA is able to inhibit bacterial adhesion and neutralize virus infection in the intestinal mucosa, preventing tissue damage and loss of energy [43] through a non-inflammatory process called immune exclusion [44]. The IgG antibodies activate the complement system and granulocytes and induce cytokine production, which results in inflammation. sIgA can also act as opsonin, signaling the presence of antigens to phagocytes by binding to the surface of bacteria and facilitating aggregation. The opsonizing activity of sIgA is of great biological significance, and given that colostrum is the secretion containing the highest concentration of this antibody class, it provides a complete micro-environment where components found in both its soluble portion and cells act together [3, 44].

The increased serum C3 concentrations in overweight and obese women and serum C4 in the obese group was not accompanied by an increase in these concentrations in colostrum. It was previously reported that obese individuals exhibit higher concentrations of circulating C3 [45, 46] and C4 [47]. The complement system consists of proteins that interact to provide many of the effector functions of humoral immunity and inflammation [45]. C3 and C4, the central components of the complement pathway of the immune system, are synthesized by stimulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines [46]. The C3 and C4 proteins are mainly produced in the liver, but they can also be synthesized and expressed in other tissues such as the adipose [47]. It has been suggested that diagnosis of chronic low-grade inflammation, which characterizes obesity, is responsible for activation of the complement system, which, in turn, would cause the associated metabolic complications [48].

Obese mothers exhibited higher concentrations of serum CRP, but not in colostrum. CRP secretion by the liver is stimulated by several inflammatory cytokines, which are released in response to trauma, infection and inflammation, and this protein rapidly reduces the resolution of these conditions [49]. Another study found an association between serum CRP concentrations and prepregnancy BMI [50]. High CRP concentrations in the amniotic fluid of obese mothers expose the fetus to high amounts of inflammatory mediators, which may contribute to fetal programming, account for various complications during pregnancy and impact health condition in adulthood [51].

It should be considered that these data were evaluated in one period of collection and only one milk maturation stage that may be considered a limitation of this study. It is necessary to continue investigations focusing on other factors that may be involved during breastfeeding of the mothers with BMI alterations.

Conclusions

The data obtained in the present study support the hypothesis that metabolic changes promoted by obesity can change the biochemical and immunological parameters of breast milk. Nevertheless, we did not observe any changes that could cast doubt on the protection that breastfeeding provides to newborns or that could reflect the inflammatory state observed in maternal serum, because the only immunological component that increased in serum the obese women was IgA, which is known to be a non-inflammatory antibody. However, the increased calorie and fat content and glucose concentrations detected in colostrum from obese women deserve further attention.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa de São Paulo (FAPESP-No 2012-17843-8; No 2012-16662-0) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq-No 308702/2013-1; No 475238/2013-3).

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo
(2)
Institute of Biological and Health Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso
(3)
Laboratory of Scientific Writing, Department of Morphology and Physiology, School of Medicine of ABC

References

  1. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation, World Health Organization Technical Report Series. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. França EL, Nicomedes TR, Calderon IMP, Honório-França AC. Time-dependent alterations of soluble and cellular components in human milk. Biol Rhythm Res. 2010;41:333–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. França EL, Bitencourt RV, Fujimori M, Morais TC, Calderon IMP, et al. Human colostral phagocytes eliminate enterotoxigenic Eschechia coli opsonized by colostrum supernatant. J Microbiol Immunol Infec. 2011;44:1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Newburg DS. Innate immunity and human milk. J Nutr. 2005;135:1308–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Morceli G, Honorio-França AC, Fagundes DLG, Calderon IMP, França EL. Antioxidant effect of melatonin on the functional activity of colostral phagocytes in diabetic women. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56915.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Fagundes DLG, França EL, Hara CCP, Honorio-França AC. Immunomodulatory effects of poly (ethylene glycol) microspheres adsorbed with cortisol on activity of colostrum phagocytes. Int J Pharmacol. 2012;8:510–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Islam SK, Ahmed L, Khan MN, Huque S, Begum A, Yunus AB. Immune components (IgA, IgM, IgG immune cells) of colostrum of Bangladeshi mothers. Pediatr Int. 2006;48:543–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Honorio-França AC, Hara CCP, Ormonde JVJ, Triches GN, França EL. Human colostrum melatonin exhibits a day-night variation and modulates the activity of colostral phagocytes. J Appl Biomed. 2013;11:153–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Richani K, Soto E, Romero R, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Nien JK, et al. Normal pregnancy is characterized by systemic activation of the complement system. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17:239–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Fagundes DLG, França EL, Morceli G, Rudge MVC, Calderon IMP, Honório-França AC. The role of cytokines in the functional activity of phagocytes in blood and colostrum of diabetic mothers. Clin Develop Immunol. 2013;2013:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Massmann PF, França EL, Souza EG, Souza MS, Brune MFSS, Honorio-França AC. Maternal hypertension induces alterations in immunological factors of colostrum and human milk. Front Life Sci. 2013;7:155–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kverka M, Burianova J, Lodinova-Zadnikova R, Kocourkova I, Cinova J, Tuckova L, et al. Cytokine profiling in human colostrum and milk by protein array. Clin Chem. 2007;53:955–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight. Fact Sheet#311. 2013. (updated March 2013). [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/].
  14. Womack J, Tien PC, Feldman J, Shin JH, Fennie K, Anastos K, et al. Obesity and immune cell counts in women. Metabolism. 2007;56:998–1004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmatz M, Madan J, Marino T, Davis J. Maternal obesity: the interplay between inflammation, mother and fetus. J Perinatol. 2010;30:441–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kopelman P. Health risks associated with overweight and obesity. Obes Rev. 2007;8:13–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Andreasen KR, Andersen ML, Schantz AL. Obesity and pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:1022–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Karlsson EA, Beck MA. The burden of obesity on infectious disease. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010;235:1412–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Falagas ME, Kompoti M. Obesity and infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:438–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Guelinckx I, Devlieger R, Beckers K, Vansant A. Maternal obesity: pregnancy complication, gestational weight gain and nutrition. Obes Rev. 2008;9:140–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Poston L, Harthoorn LF, Van der Beek EM. Obesity in pregnancy: implications for the mother and lifelong health of the child. A consensus statement. Pediatr Res. 2011;69:175–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Thornton CA, Jones RH, Doekhie A, Bryant AH, Beynon AL, Davies JS. Inflammation, obesity, and neuromodulation in pregnancy and fetal development. Adv Neuroimmune Biol. 2011;1:193–203.Google Scholar
  23. Challier JC, Basu S, Bintein T, Minium J, Hotmire K, Catalano PM, et al. Obesity in pregnancy stimulates macrophage accumulation and inflammation in the placenta. Placenta. 2008;29:274–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of athropometry, World Health Organization Technical Report Series 854. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1995.Google Scholar
  25. Morceli G, França EL, Magalhães VB, Damasceno DC, Calderon IMP, Honorio França AC. Diabetes induced immunological and biochemical changes in human colostrum. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100:550–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Young DS. Effects of drugs on clinical laboratory tests 2. 5th ed. Washington DC: AACC Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  27. Hassiotou F, Hepworth AR, Williams TM, Twigger AJ, Perrella S, Lai CT, et al. Breastmilk cell and fat contents respond similarly to removal of breastmilk by the infant. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78232.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Ali MA, Strandvik B, Palme-Kilander C, Yngve A. Lower polyamine levels in breast milk of obese mothers compared to mothers with normal body weight. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013;26:164–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bachour P, Yafawi R, Jaber F, Choueiri E, Abdel-Razzak Z. Effects of smoking, mother’s age, body mass index, and parity number on lipid, protein, and secretory immunoglobulin A concentrations of human milk. Breastfeed Med. 2012;7:179–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. França EL, Silva VA, Volpato RM, Silva PA, Brune MF, Honorio-França AC. Maternal anemia induces changes in immunological and nutritional components of breast milk. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1223–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. França EL, Calderon IMP, Vieira EL, Morceli G, Honorio-França AC. Transfer of maternal immunity to newborns of diabetic mothers. Clin Develop Immunol. 2012;2012:928187.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. França EL, Morceli G, Fagundes DLG, Rudge MVC, Calderon IMP, Honorio França AC. Secretory IgA Fcα receptor interaction modulating phagocytosis and microbicidal activity by phagocytes in human colostrum of diabetics. APMIS. 2011;119:710–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ahuja S, Boylan M, Hart LS, Román-Shriver C, Spallholz JE, Pence BC, et al. Glucose and insulin levels are increased in obese and overweight mothers’ breast-milk. J Nutr Food Sci. 2011;2:201–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Plagemann A, Harder T, Franke K, Kohlhoff R. Long-term impact of neonatal breast-feeding on body weight and glucose tolerance in children of diabetic mothers. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:16–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer BJ, Stewart FM, Brown EA, Cooney J, Nilsson S, Olivecrona G, et al. Maternal obesity is associated with the formation of small dense LDL and hypoadiponectinemia in the third trimester. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:643–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanchez-Vera I, Bonet B, Viana M, Quintanar A, Martin MD, Blanco P, et al. Changes in plasma lipids and increased low-density lipoprotein susceptibility to oxidation in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes: consequences of obesity. Metab Clin Exp. 2007;56:1527–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramsay JE, Ferrell WR, Crawford L, Wallace AM, Greer IA, Sattar N. Maternal obesity is associated with dysregulation of metabolic, vascular, and inflammatory pathways. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:4231–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Knopp RH, Magee MS, Walden CE, Bonet B, Benedetti TJ. Prediction of infant birth weight by GDM screening tests. Importance of plasma triglyceride. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:1605–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ray J, Diamond P, Singh G, Bell C. Brief overview of maternal triglycerides as a risk factor for pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2006;113:379–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Marín MC, Sanjurjo A, Rodrigo MA, de Alaniz MJ. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in breast milk in La Plata, Argentina: relationship with maternal nutritional status. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2005;73:355–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Gonzalez-Quintela A, Alende R, Gude F, Campos J, Rey J, Meijide LM, et al. Serum levels of mmunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) in a general adult population and their relationship with alcohol consumption, smoking and common metabolic abnormalities. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;151:42–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Fujihashi K, McGhee JR, Lue C, Beagley KW, Taga T, Hirano T, et al. Human appendix B cells naturally express receptors for and respond to interleukin 6 with selective IgA1 and IgA2 synthesis. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:248–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Honorio-França AC, Launay P, Carneiro-Sampaio MMS, Monteiro RC. Colostral neutrophils express IgA Fc receptors (CD89) lacking y chain association that mediate non-inflammatory properties of secretory IgA. J Leuk Biol. 2001;69:289–96.Google Scholar
  44. Honorio-França AC, Carvalho MP, Isaac L, Trabulsi LR, Carneiro-Sampaio MM. Colostral mononuclear phagocytes are able to kill enteropathogenic Escherichia coli opsonized with colostral IgA. Scand J Immunol. 1997;46:59–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Hernández-Mijares A, Jarabo-Bueno MM, López-Ruiz A, Solá-Izquierdo E, Morillas-Ariño C, Martínez-Triguero ML. Levels of C3 in patients with severe, morbid and extreme obesity: its relationship to insulin resistance and different cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007;31:927–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Ritchie RF, Palomaki GE, Neveux LM, Navolotskaia O, Ledue TB, Craig WY. Reference distributions for complement proteins C3 and C4: a practical, simple and clinically relevant approach in a large cohort. J Clin Lab Anal. 2004;18:1–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Gabrielsson BG, Johansson JM, Lönn M, Jernås M, Olbers T, Peltonen M, et al. High expression of complement components in omental adipose tissue in obese men. Obes Res. 2003;11:699–708.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Andrews E, Feldhoff P, Feldhoff R, Lassiter H. Comparative effects of cytokines and cytokine combinations on complement component C3 secretion by HepG2 cells. Cytokine. 2003;23:164–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Das UN. Is obesity an inflammatory condition? Nutrition. 2001;17:953–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Stewart FM, Freeman DJ, Ramsay JE, Greer IA, Caslake M, Ferrell WR. Longitudinal assessment of maternal endothelial function and markers of inflammation and placental function throughout pregnancy in lean and obese mothers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:969–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Bugatto F, Fernández-Deudero A, Bailén A, Fernández-Macías R, Hervías-Vivancos B, Bartha JL. Second-trimester amniotic fluid proinflammatory cytokine levels in normal and overweight women. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:127–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fujimori et al. 2015

Advertisement