Skip to main content
Download PDF

Opportunities to improve postpartum care for mothers and infants: design of context-specific packages of postpartum interventions in rural districts in four sub-Saharan African countries

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 15, Article number: 131 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Postpartum maternal and infant mortality is high in sub-Saharan Africa and improving postpartum care as a strategy to enhance maternal and infant health has been neglected. We describe the design and selection of suitable, context-specific interventions that have the potential to improve postpartum care.

Methods

The study is implemented in rural districts in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Malawi and Mozambique.

We used the four steps ‘systems thinking’ approach to design and select interventions: 1) we conducted a stakeholder analysis to identify and convene stakeholders; 2) we organised stakeholders causal analysis workshops in which the local postpartum situation and challenges and possible interventions were discussed; 3) based on comprehensive needs assessment findings, inputs from the stakeholders and existing knowledge regarding good postpartum care, a list of potential interventions was designed, and; 4) the stakeholders selected and agreed upon final context-specific intervention packages to be implemented to improve postpartum care.

Results

Needs assessment findings showed that in all study countries maternal, newborn and child health is a national priority but specific policies for postpartum care are weak and there is very little evidence of effective postpartum care implementation. In the study districts few women received postpartum care during the first week after childbirth (25 % in Burkina Faso, 33 % in Kenya, 41 % in Malawi, 40 % in Mozambique). Based on these findings the interventions selected by stakeholders mainly focused on increasing the availability and provision of postpartum services and improving the quality of postpartum care through strengthening postpartum services and care at facility and community level. This includes the introduction of postpartum home visits, strengthening postpartum outreach services, integration of postpartum services for the mother in child immunisation clinics, distribution of postpartum care guidelines among health workers and upgrading postpartum care knowledge and skills through training.

Conclusion

There are extensive gaps in availability and provision of postpartum care for mothers and infants. Acknowledging these gaps and involving relevant stakeholders are important to design and select sustainable, context-specific packages of interventions to improve postpartum care.

Peer Review reports

Background

Postpartum maternal and infant mortality is high in sub-Saharan Africa [1, 2]. Maternal mortality is highest during the first six weeks after birth but remains high throughout the first year after birth due to issues such as untreated anaemia or repeated pregnancies [3, 4]. In 2013, in sub-Saharan Africa, 17.6 % of all maternal deaths occurred intrapartum and the first 24 h postpartum, 47.8 % occurred 24 h to 42 days postpartum, and 13.1 % 43 days to 1 year postpartum [1]. The same year, infant mortality (0–364 days) accounted for 66.9 % of under-5 mortality (deaths between birth and exactly five years of age) in sub-Saharan Africa, and neonatal mortality (0–28 days) for 34.2 % of under-5 mortality [5]. Sub-Saharan Africa accounted for an estimated 49 % (143,380) of all maternal and 51 % (3.2 million) of all under-5 deaths in 2013 [1, 2], while only 12 % of the total female world population [6] and 22 % of the global under-5 population [7] live in sub-Saharan Africa.

The pattern of postpartum mortality and morbidity is clear, but improvement of postpartum care (PPC) as a strategy to enhance maternal and infant health has been neglected [3, 8, 9]. This is also recognised by the World Health Organisation (WHO) which recently published updated guidelines on PPC for mothers and newborns in resource-limited settings in low- and middle-income countries [9]. The guidelines include recommendations on timing, number and place of postpartum contacts, and on contents of PPC for mothers and babies for the first six weeks after birth [9]. However, an essential package of services to support women throughout the first year after childbirth remains poorly defined, and the optimum service delivery configuration and number of routine visits for these services remain unclear [3, 9–12].

Community involvement in improving maternal and infant health in general [13–16] and postpartum care specifically [17, 18] is important. Particularly the establishment of women’s groups trained for and engaged in participatory learning and action taking methods, and the provision of home visits by community health workers, have shown positive effects on maternal and newborn health [13–16, 18]. The importance of upgrading PPC provided at health facilities is stressed in several studies and reports [19, 20]. A combined package including several interventions, adapted to local needs, has the potential to be most effective in improving maternal and child health outcomes [20]. Integration of mother PPC services in child health clinics, which have generally high coverage, is an opportunity to provide the needed but at present often absent PPC for the mother [3]. Involvement of stakeholders and good knowledge of the health system are recognised to be important when designing and introducing new interventions or strategies to improve care [21, 22].

The ‘Missed Opportunities in Maternal and Infant Health’ (MOMI) project focuses on the need to upgrade postpartum care. The project aims to improve maternal, newborn and infant health through improving postpartum care and services by designing, implementing and assessing interventions for the first year after birth in selected rural health districts in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Malawi and Mozambique [23]. The primary objective is to assess the gaps in implementation of evidence-based postpartum care as well as the local context at each site and, on the basis of this, determine how postpartum services can best be organised and provided within existing health systems to improve maternal and infant health outcomes. In our study we define the postpartum period as the period that starts immediately after the birth of the baby and extends up to one year after birth, and PPC as the care provided for mother and infant during this period.

This paper describes the process of designing and selecting suitable, context-specific interventions having the potential to improve PPC.

To design and select the interventions we used the ‘systems thinking’ approach as described by de Savigny and Adam [21]. Systems thinking provides a way forward for operating more successfully and effectively in complex, real-world settings. It can open powerful pathways to identifying and resolving health system challenges, and as such is a crucial ingredient for any health system strengthening effort [21]. Regarding intervention design the approach has four steps, being; (1) identify and convene stakeholders, (2) collectively deliberate with stakeholders on proposed interventions and their possible system-wide effects, (3) describe how the proposed interventions will affect health and the health system, and (4) adapt and redesign interventions to optimise positive effects [21].

Methods

Study setting

The study took place in four rural districts: Kaya in Burkina Faso, Kwale in Kenya, Ntchisi in Malawi, and Chiúta in Mozambique. Selection of districts was based on being typical for the country in terms of medical infrastructure, equipment and staffing. All levels of care, from community to referral level, were included in the study. Selected demographic and health system related data of the four districts are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 District demographic and health system related data
Full size table

Research methodology

Following the ‘systems thinking’ approach we carried out the following four steps of intervention design.

For ‘Step 1’ we conducted a stakeholder mapping to identify the main stakeholders within PPC and their importance in improving PPC. Stakeholders included implementers, managers, policy makers and members of the community and civil society.

For ‘Step 2’ a stakeholders causal analysis workshop was organised at each study site in which the local PPC situation and challenges and possible interventions were discussed [24].

In ‘Step 3’, for each study site, a list of potential interventions was developed by the study researchers. These lists were based on the synthesis of the findings from a comprehensive needs assessment conducted at each research site (Table 2), the inputs from the stakeholders received through the causal analysis workshop and on internationally recognised evidence and guidelines on effective PPC [8, 18, 20, 25–30]. Using all this information local and international MOMI project researchers developed for each study site a list of proposed interventions, described for each of these interventions health system challenges, opportunities and preconditions, and assessed the interventions for their suitability against the following criteria: acceptability, evidence-based, feasibility (taking into account financial and human resources and the availability of infrastructure, medical equipment and drugs), effectiveness, sustainability, and the degree to which the suggested intervention is already included in local maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) policies (Table 3). A report of this information was compiled for each site [31–34] including a list of provisional recommended interventions to be used to guide stakeholders to agree upon final context-specific intervention packages and adapt to context as appropriate so that positive effects would be maximised and potentially negative effects would be avoided or minimized. This agreement on and selection of final context-specific intervention packages is ‘Step 4’ of ‘systems thinking’ intervention design.

Table 2 Needs assessment
Full size table
Table 3 Development of list of proposed interventions
Full size table

At each study site, Step 4 was conducted through two stakeholders meetings. In the first meeting, the needs assessment results and proposed interventions described in the country reports were discussed. These meetings took place in October 2012 (in Kenya and Mozambique), November 2012 (in Burkina Faso) and February 2013 (in Malawi). A second round of meetings took place in May 2013 in Burkina Faso and Kenya, in July 2013 in Mozambique and in September 2013 in Malawi. At these meetings the final packages of PPC interventions that should be implemented at each study site were agreed upon. Stakeholders decided on the final intervention packages in cooperation with the local study researchers. Stakeholders were free to adapt and select the interventions they wanted, however they had to take care that it was realistic and feasible to implement the selected interventions in the frame of the MOMI study. No financial resources are provided by the MOMI project to maintain and manage the selected interventions.

Ethics

Written informed consent was obtained from all stakeholders, healthcare providers and community members participating in the in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. To guarantee confidentiality, study tools did not include person identifiers. Ethics clearance was granted by: (1) the Comité d’Ethique pour la Recherche en Santé of the Ministry of Health, Ouagadougou for Burkina Faso; (2) Kenyatta National Hospital, University of Nairobi – Ethics & Research Committee, Nairobi for Kenya; (3) the National Health Science Research Committee, Lilongwe for Malawi; (4) the Comité Nacional de Bioética para a Saude, Maputo for Mozambique; (5) the Ethics Committee ‘Hospital se São João, E.P.E’ Faculdade de Medicina Universidade do Porto for Portugal; (6) the UCL Research Ethics Committee, London, UK; and (7) the Ethics Committee of the University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Results

In this section the needs assessment results are summarised first, followed by the results of the intervention design process in each country.

Needs assessment results

A detailed description of the needs assessment results is given in two project reports [29, 30]. We summarise the findings to show how these supported the design and selection of context-specific PPC interventions.

Results showed that while maternal, infant, and child health is a national priority in all four study countries, specific PPC policy, particularly for maternal health, is weak. All countries use a problem-driven approach to PPC; neither preventive care nor strategies that improve early identification of complications are prioritised. In the four countries, there is very little evidence that interventions known to be effective are implemented [30]. Dissemination of guidance at provincial and district levels is poor in all sites. Awareness of PPC guidelines and policies by healthcare workers is poor and while a minority of women (25 % in Kaya district - Burkina Faso, 33 % in Kwale district - Kenya, 41 % in Ntchisi district - Malawi, 40 % in Chiúta district - Mozambique) receive PPC during the first week after childbirth, at least 70 % of infants attended the health facility for BCG and 85 % for measles vaccination. Involvement of the community and community health workers in PPC is poor. At health facility level, although most facilities provide immediate PPC, women were often discharged before 24 h and provision of the WHO recommended [8, 9] postpartum visits at 72 h and seven days are the exception. Care provision at six weeks was more commonly offered but rarely afterwards, and care in the postpartum period is poorly integrated with other services, such as child immunisation services, family planning clinics and HIV clinics [29, 30].

Little attention was given to the opportunities presented in the postpartum period for effective family planning (FP) at any of the sites, though FP utilisation was highlighted as a priority in all study countries [29, 30]. All facilities except one in Kaya, Burkina Faso, reported offering FP services. In most of these health facilities several FP methods were available, with pills, injectables and male condoms being the most commonly available methods [29]. Despite the availability of these services, demographic and health survey (DHS) data show that the uptake of FP among women of child-bearing age in the respective study districts was low. Following contraception use is reported by the respective DHS: in Burkina Faso’s Central Northern region, in which Kaya district is located, among women aged 15–49 and currently married, 9.5 % use any method of contraception and 9.3 % use a modern method of contraception; in Kenya’s Coast province, in which Kwale district is located, these figures are 34.3 % and 29.7 % respectively; in Malawi 46.1 % and 42.2 %; and in Tete province, Mozambique, in which Chiúta district is located, 15.3 % and 15.1 % [35–38].

Poor organisation of services and quality of care, lack of knowledge in the community, and traditional beliefs and practices further delay or inhibit PPC. Stakeholders and health workers reported understaffing, high staff turnover, poor motivation and lack of staff knowledge and skills on PPC during the causal analysis workshops and the semi-structured interviews. These factors were identified as hampering the provision of good quality PPC [29, 30].

Selected and agreed upon packages of interventions

At all four sites the intervention packages chosen include interventions to upgrade the PPC provided at the health facilities and the introduction or upgrading of community-based PPC (Table 4).

Table 4 Selected interventions in each study district
Full size table

Kaya district, Burkina Faso

In Kaya district three interventions were chosen: (1) upgrading immediate PPC provided at the health facilities with a focus on detection and management of postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis and immediate postpartum FP, (2) supporting mother and infant during the PP period by female community health workers (CHWs) and (3) integration of PPC in the child vaccination clinics. In order to implement the interventions, all facility health workers involved in providing maternal and child care and all female CHWs will be provided with training backed-up by the provision of guidelines and checklists (written for facility health workers and a picture book for CHWs) on PP care and services. The picture book also serves to provide health education at PPC clients and in the community. To deal with the high staff turnover, yearly refresher training will be organised. To support the implementation quarterly supervision visits of facility and community health workers will be organized in cooperation with the district health team. Information meetings with community leaders and male CHWs will take place to inform them on the project and discuss with them cultural issues and beliefs regarding PPC and FP.

Kwale district, Kenya

In Kwale district the final selected package of interventions included two interventions: (1) strengthening immediate postpartum care for mother and newborn by upgrading knowledge and skills of facility and community health workers and (2) increasing knowledge on and uptake of postpartum FP during the first year after childbirth. As in Burkina Faso training, distribution of PPC guidelines and regular supervision were chosen as methods of delivering the interventions. To increase postpartum FP uptake, health education sessions using the community dialogue model will be established [39]. Pictures to be used during these sessions will be developed and distributed.

Ntchisi district, Malawi

In Ntchisi district three interventions were included in final intervention package: (1) strengthening clinical management of postpartum care during the postpartum period in the health facilities, (2) increasing utilization of postpartum FP, and (3) strengthening community PPC management. Unlike the other research sites, in Malawi they chose a system of on-the-job mentorship and training to upgrade PPC knowledge and skills (including knowledge on postpartum FP) of the facility health workers combined with, similar to the other sites, distribution of PPC guidelines and regular supervision visits. To further enhance postpartum FP utilisation, health education sessions with a special focus on involving males will be organised at health facility and community level. Three villages will be selected for implementation of the PPC community intervention. In these villages volunteers will be identified and community women, men and youth groups established. Volunteers will be trained to perform PPC home visits and facilitate community women, men and youth groups. In these groups PPC problems and local feasible solutions for these problems will be identified and discussed.

Chiúta district, Mozambique

In Chiúta district the final selected package of interventions included three interventions: (1) upgrading mother, newborn and infant postpartum risk assessment and management at community and facility level, (2) increasing access to and use of FP through making immediate PP intrauterine device (IUD) insertion available, and (3) improving access to and use of maternal PPC and services by integrating PPC in child clinics and by organising outreach activities. Training, supervision and the use of specially designed checklists to be completed by the facility or community health worker during each PPC consultation will be used to upgrade PP risk assessment and management. A training session, including skills training, will be organised on PP IUD insertion and availability of IUDs and equipment needed for the insertion will be provided by the authorities. During training and supervision sessions, integration of services will be discussed, monitored and adjusted if needed.

CHWs will not receive a financial incentive at any of the study sites through the project, although non-financial incentives (among others bicycles, T-shirts and gowns, bags) will be used to motivate CHWs and support their work.

Discussion

The selected interventions are quite similar for the different sites as needs assessment findings were also quite similar for these sites. Overall the interventions proposed focused mainly on increasing the availability and provision of postpartum services and improving the quality of PPC provided through strengthening postpartum services and care at facility as well as community level.

Despite the availability of PPC services in almost all health facilities, similar to other studies in developing countries, including sub-Saharan African countries, in our study sites less than half of the women received PPC within seven days after childbirth [40–42]. Availability of services thus does not guarantee that care is offered. Health workers should also know what kind of care they have to provide, when and why, be skilled and receive the necessary support to enable them to provide this care [43–45]. Like the provision of antenatal care, postpartum care should be offered as a preventive service and not only as a curative service as was found in our study to be often the case.

Our findings of differences between PPC and vaccination coverage are also reported in other studies [41, 46]. The high immunisation coverage may be explained by the fact that immunization schedules are globally fairly well established and therefore conducted more consistently across the sites. Another explanation could be the high level of engagement of different cadres of health care workers in immunization programmes compared to their engagement in PPC services. As found in other studies [47, 48] FP use is low at our study sites, mainly due to persistent social-cultural barriers and limited access to good quality contraception services.

The importance of stakeholders engagement in design and selection of interventions is also highlighted in other studies [49–51]. Similar to these studies we found the investment in long-term and extensive stakeholders involvement very appropriate for the design and selection of interventions as it enhanced ownership, which is crucial for successful and sustainable integration of the intervention in the system [24, 49, 52, 53]. However, the approach considerably slowed the process of finalising the design of the interventions and planning for their implementation. The limited availability of stakeholders and the relatively high turn-over of stakeholders were the main reasons for slowing down the process. We will review the extent to which a sense of ownership of the interventions is maintained by stakeholders throughout the implementation of the interventions.

Compared to the list of provisionally recommended interventions the final packages of interventions selected by the stakeholders included fewer interventions but interventions the stakeholders identified as very needed (based on gaps identified in the needs assessment) and deemed more realistic to implement. Their choice for the final intervention package was largely determined by the fact that interventions had to be implementable within the local available health system and supplies and available financial and human resources. For example, the use of community groups to upgrade PPC when community groups were not already established in the district and setting up outreach PPC services from scratch with implications for financial and human resources to run them, were not selected. The most popular interventions selected were those to improve PPC by upgrading the knowledge and skills of existing cadres (being facility or community health workers) through training and supportive tools such as printed guidelines (text and pictures) or risk assessment checklists and by establishing regular supportive supervision. This selection procedure reasserts the need to take account of local stakeholder knowledge in planning and designing optimum strategies so that service improvements are seen to be practicable and achievable within the local health system context.

As stated above, all the study sites selected interventions to upgrade PPC by involving community health workers. Working with community health workers who do not receive additional financial incentives through the project is challenging. However, as stated by Bhattacharyya et al., contrary to financial incentives, non-financial incentives are critical to the success of any community health workers program [54].

The interventions included in the final context-specific packages are in line with the recommendations on provision and contents of PPC given in the most recently published WHO guidelines [9] and with the national PPC policies of the countries in which the study sites are located [30]. Although in these guidelines and policies, provision of care and the definition of the postpartum period is limited to six weeks after childbirth, other studies address the importance of and opportunities for extending postpartum care for mother and infant beyond six weeks after birth especially for further monitoring of the mother regarding nutrition, anaemia and mental conditions and for enhancing postpartum FP utilisation [3, 4, 55, 56]. The high attendance rates at facilities for newborn and child vaccination highlighted in the needs assessment suggested that integrating maternal and child health services could lead to an increase in PPC and FP provision [57–59]. However, as stated in these studies, to have successful integration of services several preconditions seem to be required including regular technical support, adequate basic working conditions including enough and skilled staff and no drug stock-outs. Service integration could be encouraged through international and national policy drives.

As in other studies [55, 56] the need to increase postpartum FP utilisation to prevent unintended and closely spaced pregnancies was recognised in all study sites as very important but poorly addressed and therefore interventions to increase postpartum FP uptake were selected at all sites.

The process used in our study to design and select context-specific packages of interventions is complex and time consuming but this comprehensive approach is important to enhance the chances of successful intervention implementation [49]. However, additional evaluation of the impact of the selected and implemented interventions on the health of mothers and infants is needed and will be conducted at each study site at the end of the project (from June to September 2015). The effectiveness of the interventions will be evaluated and variables determining effectiveness will be studied. Sustainability and replicability of the selected interventions will also be assessed. This end-of-project evaluation will include qualitative and quantitative research methods.

Although the process described in this paper is complex and time consuming we have shown that it leads to the selection of well-designed, evidence-based and realistic packages of interventions addressing locally identified gaps in PPC.

Study limitations

The study has some limitations. First, the study is conducted in only one rural district in each country; the PPC situation might differ from other rural districts and from urban areas. Second, because routinely collected and available data on MNCH was used for the needs assessment, not all aspects of PPC could be assessed and at some of the research sites the routinely collected data was of poor quality. Third, limited availability and high turnover of stakeholders meant that the same stakeholders did not always participate throughout the whole intervention design and selection process.

Conclusion

Strengthening PPC in sub-Saharan Africa is essential to reduce the still unacceptably high postpartum maternal and infant mortality and morbidity in this region. Extensive gaps remain in the availability and provision of PPC for mothers and infants. Acknowledging these gaps and strongly involving relevant stakeholders are important to design and select sustainable, context-specific packages of interventions to improve PPC.

References

  1. Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9947):980–1004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang H, Liddell CA, Coates MM, Mooney MD, Levitz CE, Schumacher AE, et al. Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9947):957–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chersich MF, Kley N, Luchters SM, Njeru C, Yard E, Othigo MJ, et al. Maternal morbidity in the first year after childbirth in Mombasa Kenya; a needs assessment. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2009;9:51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoj L, da Silva D, Hedegaard K, Sandstrom A, Aaby P. Maternal mortality: only 42 days? Bjog. 2003;110(11):995–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. UNICEF, WHO, The World Bank, United Nations. Levels & Trends in Child Mortality - Report 2014. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  6. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs - Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision - Data file: Total Population - Female. [http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Excel-Data/population.htm]

  7. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs - Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision - Data file: Population by Age Groups - Both. Sexes [http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Excel-Data/population.htm]

  8. WHO. WHO Technical consultation on postpartum and postnatal care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. WHO. WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn, 2013. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Levitt C, Shaw E, Wong S, Kaczorowski J, Springate R, Sellors J, et al. Systematic review of the literature on postpartum care: methodology and literature search results. Birth. 2004;31(3):196–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Medhanyie A, Spigt M, Kifle Y, Schaay N, Sanders D, Blanco R, et al. The role of health extension workers in improving utilization of maternal health services in rural areas in Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC health services research. 2012;12:352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rawlins BJ, Kim YM, Rozario AM, Bazant E, Rashidi T, Bandazi SN, et al. Reproductive health services in Malawi: an evaluation of a quality improvement intervention. Midwifery. 2013;29(1):53–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewycka S, Mwansambo C, Rosato M, Kazembe P, Phiri T, Mganga A, et al. Effect of women’s groups and volunteer peer counselling on rates of mortality, morbidity, and health behaviours in mothers and children in rural Malawi (MaiMwana): a factorial, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9879):1721–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nair N, Tripathy P, Costello A, Prost A. Mobilizing women’s groups for improved maternal and newborn health: evidence for impact, and challenges for sustainability and scale up. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119 Suppl 1:S22–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prost A, Colbourn T, Seward N, Azad K, Coomarasamy A, Copas A, et al. Women’s groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9879):1736–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosato M, Laverack G, Grabman LH, Tripathy P, Nair N, Mwansambo C, et al. Community participation: lessons for maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet. 2008;372(9642):962–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhutta ZA, Soofi S, Cousens S, Mohammad S, Memon ZA, Ali I, et al. Improvement of perinatal and newborn care in rural Pakistan through community-based strategies: a cluster-randomised effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9763):403-412

  18. Koblinsky M. Community-based Postpartum Care: an urgent unmet need. Washington DC, USA: USAID, The CATALYST Consortium; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bhutta ZA, Ali S, Cousens S, Ali TM, Haider BA, Rizvi A, et al. Alma-Ata: rebirth and revision 6 interventions to address maternal, newborn, and child survival: what difference can integrated primary health care strategies make? Lancet. 2008;372(9642):972–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. PMNCH. Essential interventions, commodities and guidelines for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Geneva, Switzerland: Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. de Savigny D, Adam T. Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. Geneva, Switzerland: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grodos D, Mercenier P. Health systems research: a clearer methodology for a more effective action, in Studies in Health Service Organisation and Policy. Antwerp, Belgium: Institute of Tropical Medicine; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. MOMI website. [http://www.momiproject.eu/]

  24. Lefevre P, Kolsteren P, De Wael MP, Byekwaso F, Beghin I. Comprehensive participatory planning and evaluation. Antwerp, Belgium: Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nutrition Unit; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  25. NICE. Postnatal care overview. Manchester, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. NICE. Infant feeding and maternal nutrition in postnatal care. Manchester, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  27. NICE. Health problems in women and babies in postnatal care. Manchester, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  28. WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, The World Bank. Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and newborn care: a guide for essential practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Barros H, Lopes SC. Cross-country situation analysis of maternal and newborn care in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Malawi and Mozambique. Porto, Portugal: Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mann S. Cross-country analysis of maternal, newborn and child health policies in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Malawi and Mozambique. London, UK: Institute for Global Health, University College London; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Duysburgh E, Kerstens B. Burkina Faso country report - baseline assessment results and suggested interventions for improving postpartum care in Kaya district - working document to be used by stakeholders and policy advisory board members. Gent, Belgium: MOMI Consortium; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Duysburgh E, Kerstens B. Kenya country report - baseline assessment results and suggested interventions for improving postpartum care in kwale district - working document to be used by stakeholders and policy advisory board members. MOMI Consortium: Gent, Belgium; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Duysburgh E, Kerstens B. Malawi country report - baseline assessment results and suggested interventions for improving postpartum care in ntchisi district - working document to be used by stakeholders and policy advisory board members. Gent, Belgium: MOMI Consortium; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Duysburgh E, Kerstens B. Mozambique Country Report - Baseline Assessment Results and Suggested Interventions for Improving Postpartum Care in Chiúta district - Working document to be used by Stakeholders and Policy Advisory Board Members. Gent, Belgium: MOMI Consortium; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie (INSD), ICF International. Enquête Démographique et de Santé et à Indicateurs Multiples du Burkina Faso 2010. Calverton, Maryland, USA: INSD et ICF International; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), ICF Macro. Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2008–09. Calverton, Maryland, USA: KNBS and ICF Macro; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  37. National Statistical Office (NSO), ICF Macro. Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2010. Zomba, Malawi, and Calverton, Maryland, USA: NSO and ICF Macro; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ministerio da Saude (MISAU), Instituto Nacional de Estatística (INE), ICF International (ICFI). Moçambique Inquérito Demográfico e de Saúde 2011. Calverton, Maryland, USA: MISAU INE e ICFI; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Figueroa ME, Kincaid DL, Rani M, Lewis G. Communication for social change: an integrated model for measuring the process and its outcomes. New York, USA: The Rockefeller Foundation; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dhakal S, Chapman GN, Simkhada PP, van Teijlingen ER, Stephens J, Raja AE. Utilisation of postnatal care among rural women in Nepal. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7:19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Fort AL, Kothari MT, Abderrahim N. Postpartum care: levels and determinants in developing countries. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Macro International Inc.; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  42. PMNCH. Opportunities for Africa’s newborns: practical data, policy and programmatic support for newborn care in Africa. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO on behalf of The Partnership for Maternal Newborn and Child Health; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Baker U, Tomson G, Some M, Kouyate B, Williams J, Mpembeni R, et al. ‘How to know what you need to do’: a cross-country comparison of maternal health guidelines in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania. Implementation science. 2012;7:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Maestad O, Torsvik G, Aakvik A. Overworked? On the relationship between workload and health worker performance. Journal of health economics. 2010;29(5):686–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bayley O, Colbourn T, Nambiar B, Costello A, Kachale F, Meguid T, et al. Knowledge and perceptions of quality of obstetric and newborn care of local health providers: a cross-sectional study in three districts in Malawi. Malawi medical journal. 2013;25(4):105–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. WHO, UNICEF. Countdown to 2015, maternal, newborn & child survival - fulfilling the health agenda for women and children: the 2014 report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1810–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Cleland JG, Ndugwa RP, Zulu EM. Family planning in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation? Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(2):137–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. de Savigny D, Webster J, Agyepong IA, Mwita A, Bart-Plange C, Baffoe-Wilmot A, et al. Introducing vouchers for malaria prevention in Ghana and Tanzania: context and adoption of innovation in health systems. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27 Suppl 4:iv32–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lowes L, Robling MR, Bennert K, Crawley C, Hambly H, Hawthorne K, et al. Involving lay and professional stakeholders in the development of a research intervention for the DEPICTED study. Health expectations. 2011;14(3):250–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Namazzi G, KS N, Peter W, John B, Olico O, AK A, et al. Stakeholder analysis for a maternal and newborn health project in Eastern Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hofmeyer A, Scott C, Lagendyk L. Researcher-decision-maker partnerships in health services research: practical challenges, guiding principles. BMC health services research. 2012;12:280.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Hyder AA, Bloom G, Leach M, Syed SB, Peters DH, Future Health Systems, et al. Exploring health systems research and its influence on policy processes in low income countries. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Bhattacharyya K, Winch P, LeBan K, Tien M. Community health worker incentives and disincentives: how they affect motivation, retention, and sustainability. Arlington, Virginia: Basic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival Project (BASICS II) for the United States Agency for International Development; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ross JA, Winfrey WL. Contraceptive Use, intention to Use and unmet need during the extended postpartum period. International Family Planning Perspectives. 2001;27(1):20–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. WHO, USAID, MCHIP. Programming strategies for postpartum family planning. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Geelhoed D, Lafort Y, Chissale E, Candrinho B, Degomme O. Integrated maternal and child health services in Mozambique: structural health system limitations overshadow its effect on follow-up of HIV-exposed infants. BMC health services research. 2013;13:207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ryman TK, Briere EC, Cartwright E, Schlanger K, Wannemuehler KA, Russo ET, et al. Integration of routine vaccination and hygiene interventions: a comparison of 2 strategies in Kenya. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2012;205 Suppl 1:S65–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ryman TK, Wallace A, Mihigo R, Richards P, Schlanger K, Cappelier K, et al. Community and health worker perceptions and preferences regarding integration of other health services with routine vaccinations: four case studies. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2012;205 Suppl 1:S49–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This paper is an output from the project ‘Missed Opportunities in Maternal and Infant health: reducing maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity in the year after childbirth through combined facility and community-based interventions – MOMI’. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007-2013] under grant agreement n° 265448. MOMI is a collaborative project between International Centre for Reproductive Health - Ghent University (Belgium), Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (Burkina Faso), International Centre for Reproductive Health (Kenya), Parent and Child Health Initiative Trust (Malawi), International Centre for Reproductive Health (Mozambique), Eduardo Mondlane University (Mozambique), Medical Faculty of the University of Porto (Portugal) and University College London (United Kingdom).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of uro-gynaecology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185 P3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Els Duysburgh, Birgit Kerstens & Marleen Temmerman

  2. Institut de Recherche en Sciences et de la Santé, P.O. Box 7192, Ouagadougou, 03, Burkina Faso

    Seni Kouanda, Charles Paulin Kaboré & Danielle Belemsaga Yugbare

  3. International Centre of Reproductive Health Kenya, Obote Avenue - Tudor Estate, P.O. Box 91109, 80103, Mombasa, Kenya

    Peter Gichangi

  4. Parent and Child Health Initiative Trust, P.O. Box 31686, Lilongwe, 3, Malawi

    Gibson Masache

  5. International Centre of Reproductive Health Mozambique, Av. Maquiguana, Praceta 1607, Prédio 100, 1 Andar, Maputo, Mozambique

    Beatrice Crahay & Gilda Gondola Sitefane

  6. Eduardo Mondlane University, Faculdade de Medicina, Av. Salvador Allende 702, Maputo, Mozambique

    Nafissa Bique Osman & Severiano Foia

  7. Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal

    Henrique Barros & Sofia Castro Lopes

  8. Institute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK

    Susan Mann, Bejoy Nambiar & Tim Colbourn

  9. Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organisation, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, 27, Switzerland

    Marleen Temmerman

Authors
  1. Els Duysburgh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Birgit Kerstens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seni Kouanda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Charles Paulin Kaboré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Danielle Belemsaga Yugbare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peter Gichangi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gibson Masache
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Beatrice Crahay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gilda Gondola Sitefane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nafissa Bique Osman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Severiano Foia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Henrique Barros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Sofia Castro Lopes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Susan Mann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Bejoy Nambiar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Tim Colbourn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Marleen Temmerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Els Duysburgh.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ED is the overall MOMI consortium scientific coordinator. She also coordinated the process of developing and selecting final site-specific packages of PPC interventions. She coordinated the writing of this paper. BK contributed to the individual country and comparative reports which were used for the preliminary identification of potential PPC interventions. She has seen and approved the final version of the paper. CK coordinated the collection of maternal and child health demographic and health system data in Kaya district and contributed to the analysis of these data. He participated in the process of selection of the packages of intervention. He contributed to the writing of this paper by giving inputs on the general context of the paper. DB coordinated the data collection for the MCH policy review in Burkina Faso and she analysed these data. She participated in the process of selection of the packages of intervention and contributed to the writing of this paper by giving inputs on the general context of the paper. SK is the project coordinator of the MOMI research at the Burkina Faso study site. He contributed to the analysed and interpreted of the data from Kaya district. He participated in the process of selection of the packages of intervention and contributed to the writing of this paper by giving inputs on the general context of the paper. PG is the project coordinator of the MOMI research in Kenya. He coordinated the development of the MOMI interventions at the Kenya study site. He contributed to the writing of this paper by giving inputs on the general context of the paper. GM is the project coordinator of the MOMI research at the Malawi study site. He coordinated the data collection for the MNCH policy review and situation analysis. He coordinated the organisation of the stakeholders causal analysis workshops in each study site. He coordinated the process of selection of the packages of intervention in Malawi. He contributed to the writing of this paper and has seen and approved the final version of the paper. BC contribute to the design and selection of the PPC interventions in Mozambique. She provided inputs on the general context of the paper and approved the final version. GG is the project coordinator of the MOMI research at the Mozambique study site. She coordinated and conducted the data collection for the policy review in Mozambique and analysed the data. She provided inputs on the general context of the paper and approved the final version. NO contribute to the design and selection of the PPC interventions in Mozambique. She provided inputs on the general context of the paper and approved the final version. SF coordinated the data collection for the situation analysis in Mozambique. He approved the final version of the paper. HB was responsible for the qualitative situation analysis in the four study countries. He provided inputs on the general context of the paper and approved the final version. SL coordinated the qualitative situation analysis in the four study countries including the development of research protocols, analysis of the data and dissemination of the situation analysis results. SM coordinated the critical review of the maternal, newborn and child health policies in the four study countries including the development of research protocols for this review, analysis of the data and dissemination of the policy review results (report). She helped revise the paper, contributing intellectual content, and has seen and approved the final version of the paper. BN contributed to the baseline assessment data collection and analysis in Malawi and contributed to the process of defining intervention packages, especially in Malawi. He helped revise the paper, contributing intellectual content, and has seen and approved the final version of the paper. TC contributed to the process of defining intervention packages, especially in Malawi, helped revise the paper, contributing intellectual content, and has seen and approved the final version of the paper. MT is the MOMI consortium scientific representative. She gave inputs to and supported the paper writing and reviewed the final draft. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duysburgh, E., Kerstens, B., Kouanda, S. et al. Opportunities to improve postpartum care for mothers and infants: design of context-specific packages of postpartum interventions in rural districts in four sub-Saharan African countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15, 131 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0562-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0562-8

Keywords

  • Postpartum
  • Maternal health
  • Infant
  • Newborn
  • Maternal mortality
  • Health system research
  • Sub-Saharan Africa

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us