Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reference intervals for plasma sulfate and urinary sulfate excretion in pregnancy

  • Paul Anthony Dawson1, 2Email author,
  • Scott Petersen3,
  • Robyn Rodwell4,
  • Phillip Johnson4,
  • Kristen Gibbons2,
  • Avis McWhinney5,
  • Francis Gerard Bowling2, 6 and
  • Harold David McIntyre2, 3, 7
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth201515:96

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0526-z

Received: 9 October 2014

Accepted: 1 April 2015

Published: 17 April 2015

Abstract

Background

Sulfate is important for fetal growth and development. During pregnancy, the fetus relies on sulfate from the maternal circulation. We report reference intervals for maternal plasma sulfate levels and fractional excretion index (FEI) for sulfate in pregnancy, as well as sulfate levels in cord blood from term pregnancies.

Methods

Plasma and urine were collected from 103 pregnant women of 10-20 weeks gestation and 106 pregnant women of 30-37 weeks gestation. Venous cord plasma was collected from 80 healthy term babies. Sulfate levels were measured by ion chromatography. Plasma and urinary creatinine levels were used to calculate FEI sulfate in pregnant women. Analyses provide reference intervals, and explored the relationship between maternal sulfate data with several prenatal factors.

Results

Median maternal plasma sulfate levels were 452 μmol/L and 502 μmol/L at 10-20 and 30-37 weeks gestation, respectively, and inversely correlated with FEI sulfate median values of 0.15 and 0.11. Overall reference intervals were 305-710 and 335-701 μmol/L (2.5th; 97.5th percentile; for 10-20 and 30-37 weeks gestation, respectively) for maternal plasma sulfate, and 0.06-0.31 and 0.05-0.28 for maternal FEI sulfate. Term venous cord plasma sulfate median levels were significantly (p = 0.038) higher in female babies (375 μmol/L) when compared to male babies (342 μmol/L), with an overall reference interval of 175-603 μmol/L.

Conclusions

We provide the first reference intervals for maternal plasma sulfate levels and FEI sulfate, as well as cord plasma sulfate levels. These findings provide reference data for further studies of sulfate levels in both mother and child.

Keywords

Sulfatemia Human gestation Cord blood Maternal sulfate levels

Background

Nutrient sulfate is the fourth most abundant anion in human circulation (approximately 300 μmol/L) and has numerous roles in human physiology [1,2]. Sulfate conjugation (sulfonation) of glycosaminoglycans such as cerebroside sulfate and heparan sulfate, contributes to the normal structure and function of tissues [3,4]. Sulfonation also detoxifies xenobiotics and certain pharmacological drugs such as acetaminophen [5,6], and in most cases inactivates steroids and iodothyronines [7-9]. In addition, sulfate transforms the biological activity of bile acids and catecholamines [10,11].

More than 20 genes involved in maintaining the required biological ratio of sulfonated and unconjugated molecules have been linked to pathophysiologies in humans and animals [12]. For example, genes encoding sulfatases, which mediate the removal of sulfate from proteoglycans or lipids, are linked to several lysosomal storage diseases, including metachromatic leukodystrophy, Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome, Morquio A syndrome, Sanfilippo A and D syndromes and Hunter syndrome [13]. In addition, the SLC26A2 gene which mediates sulfate transport into chondrocytes for the sulfonation of chondroitin proteoglycan, is linked to four types of chondrodysplasias: multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MEM), diastrophic dysplasia (DTD), atelosteogenesis Type II (AO2) and achondrogenesis Type IB (ACG1B) [14].

A sufficient supply of sulfate is required for maintaining intracellular sulfonation capacity. In adults and children, a well-balanced diet contributes approximately one third of body sulfate requirements (2.1-15.8 mmol/day) [15-18]. The remaining two thirds of sulfate requirements are derived from the intra-cellular metabolism of thiol compounds and the sulfur-containing amino acids methionine and cysteine [19,20].

The developing human fetus has negligible capacity to generate its own sulfate requirements, and thereby is reliant on sulfate supply from the maternal circulation via the placenta [21]. Sulfate transport through the placenta is mediated by the SLC13A4 sulfate transporter, which is abundantly expressed in the syncytiotrophoblast layer of the human and mouse placentae [22,23]. A related sulfate transporter, SLC13A1, is expressed in the maternal kidneys where it mediates sulfate reabsorption and maintains circulating sulfate levels [24].

During mouse gestation, increased Slc13a1 gene expression in the maternal kidneys leads to increased renal sulfate reabsorption and a two-fold increase in circulating sulfate levels in the pregnant mouse [25]. The increased sulfate level in pregnant female mice is proposed to provide a reservoir of sulfate for supplying the high sulfate demands in the developing fetal tissues [12]. Targeted disruption of the Slc13a1 gene in pregnant female mice leads to maternal renal sulfate wasting and hyposulfatemia, as well as fetal hyposulfatemia and mid-gestational miscarriage [25]. More recently, we have shown that loss of function mutations in the human SLC13A1 gene lead to renal sulfate wasting and hyposulfatemia [26]. In addition, certain physiological conditions (vitamin D depletion, hypokalaemia, metabolic acidosis) and pharmacological drugs (NSAIDS, glucocorticoids) are known to down-regulate SLC13A1 mRNA and protein expression [27]. Furthermore, dietary sulfate intake is correlated to circulating sulfate levels in both humans and rodents [28,29]. Collectively, these studies highlight the genetic, physiological and dietary contributions to modulation of circulating sulfate levels, which have potential clinical relevance to fetal growth and development in human gestation.

Despite its diverse and important roles in human physiology, sulfate is not routinely measured in clinical settings. Previous research studies have measured sulfate levels in biological fluids from relatively small cohorts using a range of methodologies, including barium-based turbidimetric assays, spectrophotometric benzidine precipitation methods and anion chromatography [1]. However, the clinical utility of those approaches for measuring sulfate have not been validated and therefore reference intervals for plasma sulfate and urinary sulfate excretion are not available. Interestingly, some research studies have indicated an increased sulfatemia in pregnant women when compared to non-pregnant women [30]. These earlier human studies, together with more recent animal research linking maternal hyposulfatemia in pregnancy with mid-gestational miscarriage [24,25], led us to establish validated tests for measuring sulfate in human plasma and urine in clinical settings [26], and to further investigate sulfate levels in human gestation.

In this paper we report reference intervals for maternal plasma sulfate levels and FEI sulfate in early and late human gestation, as well as venous cord plasma sulfate levels in term infants. Our data also considers the potential association of sulfate parameters with several prenatal factors, including maternal age, gestational age at recruitment and birth, gravidity, parity, vitamin supplements and gender of the fetus.

Methods

The research protocol was approved by the Mater Health Services Human Research Ethics Committee. All women gave their written informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. The eligibility criteria for our study were pregnant women ≥18 years of age who were attending for routine antenatal care at the Mater Mothers’ Hospital. Exclusion criteria were women with one or more of the following: maternal diabetes, hypertensive disorders, substance use, multi-fetal gestation, major congenital abnormality and fetal death. Gestational age at sample collection was based on best estimate, using menstrual dates corroborated by ultrasound or early gestation ultrasound. Maternal blood and urine sampling was aligned with routine clinical assessment visits within the antenatal clinic. Each spot urine sample (no preservative added) was collected at approximately the same time as a blood sample into a lithium heparin plasma separator tube (PST). Venous cord blood sampling (in K2EDTA) was aligned with routine collection from healthy term (37-41 weeks) deliveries (altruistic cord blood donors) at the Queensland Cord Blood Bank At The Mater.

Plasma and urinary sulfate were measured by ion chromatography with suppressed conductivity detection using a Dionex ICS2000, as previously described [26]. The coefficient of variation for sulfate analysis is <5 % for urine and < 7.5 % for plasma. Creatinine levels were quantitated using a Vitros 5.1 FS chemistry analyzer. Fractional excretion index (FEI) of sulfate was calculated using the formula (plasma creatinine [μmol/L] x urine sulfate [μmol/L]) / (urine creatinine [μmol/L] x plasma sulfate [μmol/L]). All samples were analysed blinded to operator.

The methodology for determination of the reference intervals for plasma sulfate and FEI sulfate has been based on the recommendations from the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry [31]. All primary reference ranges have been calculated using more than 40 samples, allowing for reliable estimates of the 2.5th and 97.5th centiles. A non-parametric calculation has been used for calculation of ranges due to non-normally distributed data, and the difficulty in interpreting log-transformed values.

A two-way Kruskal Wallis analysis of variance has been used to determine if there are significant differences in maternal plasma sulfate and FEI sulfate between both gender of the baby (males versus females) and gestational age at recruitment (10-20 weeks versus 30-37 weeks). Further analyses (Mann-Whitney U test) have been carried out to determine if within each gestational time period (10-20 weeks and 30-37 weeks) plasma sulfate and FEI sulfate differs for gender of the baby.

To determine if there are significant differences in maternal plasma sulfate and FEI sulfate within each gestational age (10-20 weeks and 30-37 weeks) with selected clinical parameters, various statistical approaches have been employed. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used for gestational age at recruitment, gestational age at birth, birth weight, birth weight z-score (adjusted for gestational age and gender [32]), parity (grouped to 0, 1, 2, 3+) and gravidity (grouped to 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5+) while a two-way Kruskal-Wallis test was used for prenatal vitamin supplements that contain ferrous sulfate. In addition, Spearman’s correlation coefficients were used to determine if there are significant differences in cord plasma sulfate levels with maternal age and gestational age at birth.

All analyses have been carried out in StataSE version 10.1 (StataCorp Pty Ltd, College Station, Texas), except for two-way Kruskal Wallis that was performed in SPSS version 15 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York). Statistical significance is based on a two-tailed level of 0.05.

Results

In this study, we recruited two cohorts of 120 pregnant women in early (10-20 weeks) and late (30-37 weeks) gestation. The sample sizes were reduced to 103 and 106, respectively, following exclusion criteria or withdrawal of consent that occurred post recruitment. For FEI sulfate calculations, the lack of urine sampling further reduced the sample sizes to 101 (early gestation) and 105 (late gestation). For cord plasma analyses, a sample size of 80 was reached following exclusion criteria or insufficient plasma volume for sulfate measurements. A summary of participant numbers in each sampling group stratified according to gender of baby, gestational age at birth, gravidity and parity, is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Summary of participant numbers from the two maternal gestational age groups and the cord plasma group stratified according to gender of baby, gestational age at birth, gravity and parity

 

Maternal plasma and urine

Cord plasma

Gestational age at sampling

 

10-20 wk

30-37wk

37-41 wk

Gender of baby

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Gestational age at birth a

30wk + 0d

36wk + 6d

2

2

7

3

-

-

37wk + 0d

37wk + 6d

6

3

4

4

4

0

38wk + 0d

38wk + 6d

10

12

8

10

17

26

39wk + 0d

39wk + 6d

13

16

15

10

9

14

40wk + 0d

43wk + 6d

21

18

24

21

4

6

Gravidity b

G1

21

19

13

11

-

-

 

G2

17

11

20

10

-

-

 

G3

4

9

12

11

-

-

 

G4

4

5

5

9

-

-

 

G5+

6

7

8

7

-

-

Parity b

P0

28

23

20

16

-

-

 

P1

11

13

23

18

-

-

 

P2

7

10

9

9

-

-

 

P3+

6

5

6

5

-

-

aThe gestational age at birth is shown as a range of weeks (wk) and days (d).

bGravidity (G) and parity (P) was obtained only from participants in the 2 cohorts contributing maternal plasma and urine samples at 10-20 and 30-37 weeks gestation.

Maternal plasma sulfate levels and FEI sulfate in pregnancy

The 95% reference intervals for maternal plasma sulfate and FEI sulfate are shown in Table 2. Median plasma sulfate levels were significantly increased at 30-37 weeks gestation (502 μmol/L, p = 0.006) when compared to levels at 10-20 weeks gestation (452 μmol/L) (Figure 1A-B, Tables 3 and 4). Maternal plasma sulfate levels were similar when carrying a male or female fetus (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 2

Reference intervals for maternal and cord plasma sulfate parameters

Gender baby

N

Lower bounda(90% CI)b

Upper bounda(90% CI)b

Maternal plasma sulfate (μmol/L) 10-20 weeks gestation

All

103

305 (220, 327)

710 (651, 743)

Male

52

244 (220, 313)

695 (615, 716)

Female

51

316 (310, 336)

732 (661, 743)

Maternal plasma sulfate (μmol/L) 30-37 weeks gestation

All

106

335 (325, 344)

701 (667, 811)

Male

58

328 (325, 367)

699 (637, 721)

Female

48

338 (337, 344)

784 (672, 811)

Maternal FEI sulfate 10-20 weeks gestation

All

101

0.06 (0.05, 0.07)

0.31 (0.27, 0.39)

Male

51

0.06 (0.06, 0.07)

0.30 (0.26, 0.31)

Female

50

0.06 (0.05, 0.09)

0.37 (0.27, 0.39)

Maternal FEI sulfate 30-37 weeks gestation

All

105

0.05 (0.03, 0.05)

0.28 (0.22, 0.40)

Male

58

0.04 (0.03, 0.06)

0.38 (0.20, 0.40)

Female

47

0.04 (0.04, 0.05)

0.23 (0.20, 0.23)

Cord plasma sulfate (μmol/L) 37-41 weeks gestation

All

80

175 (159, 216)

603 (553, 683)

Male

34

159 (159, 216)

598 (505, 598)

Female

46

186 (180, 243)

669 (538, 683)

N: Sample size.

aLower and Upper bounds represent the 95% reference intervals.

b90% confidence intervals around each lower and upper bound are shown in parentheses.

Figure 1

Plasma sulfate and FEI sulfate levels in pregnant women. (A-B) Plasma sulfate levels and (C-D) FEI sulfate levels in (A, C) early (10-20 weeks) and (B, D) late (30-37 weeks) gestation. Individual data and median (bar). (E-F) Maternal plasma sulfate levels inversely correlate to FEI sulfate. Individual data and trend line for (E) early gestation, rho = -0.335, p < 0.001 and (F) late gestation, rho = -0.281, p = 0.004.

Table 3

Descriptive statistics for maternal and cord plasma sulfate parameters

Gender baby

N

Range

Median

IQR (25th–75th)

All

103

220-743

452

166 (381-547)

Male

52

220-716

457

173 (364-537)

Female

51

310-743

452

183 (403-586)

Maternal plasma sulfate (μmol/L) 30-37 weeks gestation

All

106

325-811

502

126 (439-565)

Male

58

325-721

490

101 (449-550)

Female

48

337-811

533

198 (407-605)

Maternal FEI sulfate 10-20 weeks gestation

All

101

0.05-0.39

0.15

0.08 (0.12-0.20)

Male

51

0.06-0.31

0.14

0.09 (0.11-0.20)

Female

50

0.05-0.39

0.16

0.09 (0.12-0.21)

Maternal FEI sulfate 30-37 weeks gestation

All

105

0.03-0.40

0.11

0.06 (0.09-0.15)

Male

58

0.03-0.40

0.13

0.07 (0.09-0.16)

Female

47

0.04-0.23

0.10

0.06 (0.08-0.14)

Cord plasma sulfate (μmol/L) 37-41 weeks gestation

All

80

159-683

357

131 (292-423)

Male

34

159-258

342

133 (258-391)

Female

46

180-683

375

128 (322-450)

N: Sample size; IQR: interquartile range, with lower (first) and upper (third) quartile shown in parentheses.

Table 4

Comparison of plasma sulfate levels and FEI sulfate between gender and gestational age at recruitment

Parameter

Factor

*p-Value

Plasma sulfate

Gender

-

 

Time (10-20 versus 30-37 weeks)

0.006

 

Interaction

-

FEI sulfate

Gender

-

 

Time (10-20 versus 30-37 weeks)

<0.001

 

Interaction

0.038

Comparison of gender, gestational age of maternal plasma and urine sampling (Time), and both Gender and Time (Interaction) for plasma sulfate levels and FEI sulfate. FEI: Fractional Excretion index. *Only values <0.05 are shown.

Median FEI sulfate values were significantly lower at 30-37 weeks gestation (0.11, p < 0.001) when compared to values at 10-20 weeks gestation (0.15) (Figure 1C-D, Tables 3 and 4), and were inversely correlated to plasma sulfate levels at 10-20 weeks gestation (rho = -0.335, p < 0.001) and 30-37 weeks gestation (rho = -0.281, p = 0.004), respectively (Figures 1E-F). There was a significant interaction of gender and FEI sulfate when comparing 10-20 and 30-37 weeks gestation (p = 0.038) (Table 4, Additional file 1: Figure S1), indicating a marked decline in maternal FEI sulfate as pregnancy progressed when the fetus is female.

Investigation of maternal plasma and urinary sulfate data and prenatal factors

We performed analyses on the maternal plasma sulfate and FEI sulfate data with several prenatal factors (Table 5). No significant association was found for gestation at recruitment or birth, birth weight, birth weight z-score and prenatal multi-vitamin supplements. Maternal FEI sulfate values at 30-37 weeks gestation correlated negatively with gravidity (rho = -0.289, p = 0.003) and parity (rho = -0.281, p = 0.004).
Table 5

Analysis of maternal sulfate data and clinical parameters

Clinical parameter

Rhob

*p-Value

Maternal plasma sulfate 10-20 weeks gestation

Gestational age at recruitment

0.004

-

Gestational age at birth

0.016

-

Birth weight

0.156

-

Birth weight z-scorea

0.103

-

Gravidity

0.019

-

Parity

0.041

-

Vitamin supplement

-

-

Maternal plasma sulfate 30-37 weeks gestation

Gestational age at recruitment

0.140

-

Gestational age at birth

0.147

-

Birth weight

-0.047

-

Birth weight z-scorea

-0.126

-

Gravidity

0.097

-

Parity

0.151

-

Vitamin supplement

-

-

Maternal FEI sulfate 10-20 weeks gestation

  

Gestational age at recruitment

-0.082

-

Gestational age at birth

0.012

-

Birth weight

-0.088

-

Birth weight z-scorea

-0.043

 

Gravidity

-0.094

-

Parity

-0.013

-

Vitamin supplement

-

-

Maternal FEI sulfate 30-37 weeks gestation

Gestational age at recruitment

-0.037

-

Gestational age at birth

0.115

-

Birth weight

0.090

-

Birth weight z-scorea

0.003

-

Gravidity

-0.289

0.003

Parity

-0.281

0.004

Vitamin supplement

-

-

aAdjusted for gestational age and gender.

bRho: Spearman’s correlation coefficient.

*Only values <0.05 are shown.

Term cord plasma sulfate levels

Reference intervals for term cord plasma sulfate are shown in Table 2. Analysis of 80 samples showed a median plasma sulfate level of 357 μmol/L (Table 3), with no significant correlation to maternal age (range 24-42 years) or gestational age (range 37-41 weeks) (Table 6). However, median plasma sulfate levels were significantly (p = 0.038) higher for female babies (375 μmol/L, n = 46) when compared to male babies (342 μmol/L, n = 34) (Tables 3 and 6).
Table 6

Analysis of cord plasma sulfate data and clinical parameters

Clinical parameter

Rhoa

*p-Value

Cord plasma sulfate 37-41 weeks gestation

  

Maternal age

-0.010

-

Gestational age at birth

-0.107

-

Gender of baby

-

0.038

aRho: Spearman’s correlation coefficient.

*Only values <0.05 are shown.

Discussion

In this study, we report the first set of reference intervals for plasma sulfate and FEI sulfate using a validated sulfate test and provide new evidence on the physiological regulation of sulfate in pregnancy. Our data extend previous research findings that show human plasma sulfate levels are increased in early pregnancy compared to healthy males and non-pregnant females with peak values occurring at 30-37 weeks gestation [1,30]. In a previous study, we reported similar findings in mice [25]. In addition, we noted a negative correlation of FEI sulfate (i.e. increasing renal sulfate reabsorption) with gravidity and parity at 30-37 weeks gestation, with a steeper decline occurring in female babies when compared to male babies. Our data suggest that the gender of the fetus can influence sulfate levels in cord blood as well as reabsorption of sulfate in the maternal kidneys.

Several earlier studies using ion chromatography reported plasma sulfate median levels of approximately 300 μmol/L in adult males and non-pregnant females [1]. In the present study, we found an approximate 1.5-fold increase (452 μmol/L) at 10-20 weeks gestation when compared to published data on non-pregnant women, with median levels peaking (502 μmol/L) at 30-37 weeks gestation. This increased sulfatemia in pregnant women is remarkable and suggests active up-regulation of plasma sulfate levels, as many circulating analytes usually decrease slightly during gestation as a result of changes in extracellular fluid volume and renal function [33,34].

Similar increases in circulating sulfate levels have been reported for pregnant mice, with a two-fold increase and levels peaking in late gestation [25]. The increased sulfatemia in pregnant mice is due to increased expression of the renal Slc13a1 sulfate transporter, which mediates sulfate reabsorption in the maternal kidneys [25]. Disruption of the Slc13a1 gene in pregnant mice leads to maternal and fetal hyposulfatemia, as well as late gestational miscarriage [25]. These findings highlight the importance of Slc13a1 for maintaining high maternal sulfatemia, which supplies the high fetal demands for sulfate throughout pregnancy.

We have linked loss of function mutations (R12X and N174S) in the human SLC13A1 gene with renal sulfate wasting and hyposulfatemia [26]. The nonsense R12X variant led to complete loss of SLC13A1 function and has an allelic frequency of 0.36% in the general population, whereas the N174S variant led to partial loss of function (60% decrease) and has an allelic frequency of 26.99% [35]. Genetic screening for these two variants was not performed in the current study. However, the relatively high frequency of N174S may be relevant to the varying plasma sulfate levels and FEI sulfate found in our two cohorts of pregnant women. Nonetheless, our findings of increasing sulfatemia in pregnancy is most likely due to enhanced SLC13A1-mediated sulfate reabsorption in the maternal kidneys, as suggested by the negative correlation between maternal plasma sulfate levels and fractional urinary sulfate excretion.

Of great interest is the slightly higher cord venous plasma sulfate level in female babies when compared to males. Cord venous blood flows from the placenta to the fetus and therefore its composition reflects the supply of analytes derived from the maternal circulation. Accordingly, our data reflects a higher net sulfate transport through the maternal-fetal barrier for female babies when compared to males. The SLC13A4 sulfate transporter is localised to the syncytiotrophoblast layer of human placenta where it is proposed to be mediating sulfate supply from mother to fetus [23]. Male and female babies have similar placental SLC13A4 levels [23], suggesting that SLC13A4 is unlikely to be the cause of higher plasma sulfate levels in female babies. In a previous study, we reported that another placental sulfate transporter, SLC26A2, is more abundant in cytotrophoblasts of male babies when compared to female babies [23]. This gender difference for placental SLC26A2 expression suggests a higher sulfate requirement in cytotrophoblasts of male babies, which may potentially limit sulfate supply to the male fetus. In addition, the present study also shows a more rapid decline in maternal FEI sulfate (i.e. increasing renal sulfate reabsorption) during pregnancy when the fetus is female. This latter finding may suggest a maternal contribution to the increased cord plasma sulfate levels for female babies.

Interestingly, we show a negative correlation for FEI sulfate with gravidity and parity in the cohort of women at 30-37 weeks gestation. This finding suggests that increased sulfate reabsorption in late gestation (i.e. lower FEI sulfate values) is more prevalent for those women with the highest number of previous pregnancies and births. This finding may be relevant to our animal studies that showed increased renal sulfate reabsorption in late gestation is important for maintaining normal pregnancy and high fecundity [25]. Since the present study excluded data from women when major congenital abnormality and fetal death occurred, we are unable to determine whether high FEI sulfate and low plasma sulfate levels lead to perturbed fetal development and/or fetal loss. However, that will be the next phase of our work.

Further studies are warranted to explore the physiological roles of sulfate in pregnancy; the differences observed in FEI sulfate levels at 30-37 weeks gestation in mothers with increasing gravidity and parity and female infants; the gender differences noted in cord plasma sulfate levels; and whether low maternal sulfate levels lead to perturbed fetal development.

Conclusions

We provide the first set of reference intervals for maternal plasma sulfate and FEI sulfate in early and late gestation, and for term venous cord plasma sulfate, using a validated sulfate test. Our findings show increased maternal plasma sulfate levels in pregnancy with levels peaking within 30-37 weeks gestation. This increased sulfatemia is inversely correlated to fractional urinary sulfate excretion, indicating the contribution of the maternal kidneys to maintaining high circulating sulfate levels in human gestation. Our data also show higher term venous cord plasma sulfate levels for female babies when compared to male babies. Collectively, this study provides reference data for future clinical studies of sulfate levels in human gestation, and warrants investigation into the consequences of abnormal plasma sulfate levels in mother and child.

Abbreviations

FEI: 

Fractional Excretion Index

MEM: 

Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia

DTD: 

Diastrophic dysplasia

AO2: 

Atelosteogenesis Type II

ACG1B: 

Achondrogenesis Type IB

NSAIDS: 

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

IQR: 

Interquartile range

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Mater Medical Research Institute, Mater Foundation, and a Mater Foundation Golden Casket Research Seeding grant to PAD and HDM.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Mater Research Institute University of Queensland, TRI, Woolloongabba QLD
(2)
Mater Research, South Brisbane QLD
(3)
Mater Mothers’ Hospital, Mater Health Services
(4)
Queensland Cord Blood Bank At The Mater, Mater Health Services, South Brisbane QLD
(5)
Pathology Department, Mater Health Services, South Brisbane QLD
(6)
Mater Children’s Hospital, Mater Health Services, South Brisbane QLD
(7)
Mater Clinical School, University of Queensland, South Brisbane QLD

References

  1. Cole DE, Evrovski J. The clinical chemistry of inorganic sulfate. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2000;37(4):299–344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Murer H, Manganel M, Roch-Ramel F. Tubular transport of monocarboxylates, Krebs cycle intermediates and inorganic sulphate. In: Winhager E editors. Handbook of Physiology, vol. 2. Oxford University Press; 1992. p 2165-88.Google Scholar
  3. Habuchi H, Habuchi O, Kimata K. Sulfation pattern in glycosaminoglycan: does it have a code? Glycoconj J. 2004;21(1-2):47–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Klüppel M. The roles of chondroitin-4-sulfotransferase-1 in development and disease. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2010;93:113–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Coughtrie MW, Bamforth KJ, Sharp S, Jones AL, Borthwick EB, Barker EV, et al. Sulfation of endogenous compounds and xenobiotics–interactions and function in health and disease. Chem Biol Interact. 1994;92(1-3):247–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nelson SD, Gordon WP. Mammalian drug metabolism. J Nat Prod. 1983;46(1):71–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Darras VM, Hume R, Visser TJ. Regulation of thyroid hormone metabolism during fetal development. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1999;151(1-2):37–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hill M, Pařízek A, Cibula D, Kancheva R, Jirásek JE, Jirkovská M, et al. Steroid metabolome in fetal and maternal body fluids in human late pregnancy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;122(4):114–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Richard K, Hume R, Kaptein E, Stanley EL, Visser TJ, Coughtrie MW. Sulfation of thyroid hormone and dopamine during human development: ontogeny of phenol sulfotransferases and arylsulfatase in liver, lung, and brain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(6):2734–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Alnouti Y. Bile acid sulfation: a pathway of bile acid elimination and detoxification. Toxicol Sci. 2009;108(2):225–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Coughtrie MW. Catecholamine sulfation in health and disease. Adv Pharmacol. 1998;42:339–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawson PA. Role of sulphate in development. Reproduction. 2013;146(3):R81–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Diez-Roux G, Ballabio A. Sulfatases and human disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2005;6:355–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawson PA, Markovich D. Pathogenetics of the human SLC26 transporters. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12(4):385–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Allen HE, Halley-Henderson MA, Hass CN. Chemical composition of bottled mineral water. Arch Environ Health. 1989;44(2):102–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Florin T, Neale G, Gibson GR, Christl SU, Cummings JH. Metabolism of dietary sulphate: absorption and excretion in humans. Gut. 1991;32:766–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Florin THJ, Neale G, Goretski S, Cummings JH. The sulfate content of foods and beverages. J Food Compos Anal. 1993;6:140–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. National Research Council. Sulfate. In: Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005. p. 424–48.Google Scholar
  19. Mulder GJ. Sulfate availability in vivo. In: Mulder GJ, editor. Sulfation of Drugs and Related Compounds. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 1981. p. 32–52.Google Scholar
  20. Turner JM, Humayun MA, Elango R, Rafii M, Langos V, Ball RO, et al. Total sulfur amino acid requirement of healthy school-age children as determined by indicator amino acid oxidation technique. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(3):619–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dawson PA. Sulfate in fetal development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2011;22(6):653–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dawson PA, Rakoczy J, Simmons DG. Placental, Renal, and Ileal Sulfate Transporter Gene Expression in Mouse Gestation. Biol Reprod. 2012;87(2(43)):1–9.Google Scholar
  23. Simmons DG, Rakoczy J, Jefferis J, Lourie R, McIntyre HD, Dawson PA. Human placental sulfate transporter mRNA profiling identifies abundant SLC13A4 in syncytiotrophoblasts and SLC26A2 in cytotrophoblasts. Placenta. 2013;34:381–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dawson PA, Beck L, Markovich D. Hyposulfatemia, growth retardation, reduced fertility and seizures in mice lacking a functional NaSi-1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(23):13704–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Dawson PA, Sim P, Simmons DG, Markovich D. Fetal loss and hyposulfataemia in pregnant NaS1 transporter null mice. J Reprod Dev. 2011;57(4):444–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bowling FG, Heussler HS, McWhinney A, Dawson PA. Plasma and urinary sulfate determination in a cohort with autism. Biochem Genet. 2012;51(1-2):147–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dawson PA, Markovich D. Transcriptional regulation of the sodium-sulfate cotransporter NaS(i)-1 gene. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2002;36(2-3):175–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hindmarsh KW, Mayers DJ, Wallace SM, Danilkewich A, Ernst A. Increased serum sulfate concentrations in man due to environmental factors: effects on acetaminophen metabolism. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1991;33(5):441–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. McGarry PC, Roe DA. Development of sulfur depletion in pregnant and fetal rats: interaction of protein restriction and indole or salicylamide administration. J Nutr. 1973;103(9):1279–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cole DE, Baldwin LS, Stirk LJ. Increased serum sulfate in pregnancy: relationship to gestational age. Clin Chem. 1985;31(6):866–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Solberg HE. Approved recommendation (1987) on the theory of reference values. Part 5. Statistical treatment of collected reference values. Determination of reference limits. Clin Chim Acta. 1987;170:S13–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Roberts CL, Lancaster PAL. Australian national birthweight percentiles by gestational age. MedJAust. 1999;170(3):114–8.Google Scholar
  33. Lind T. Clinical chemistry of pregnancy. Adv Clin Chem. 1980;21:1–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. von Versen-Hoeynck FM, Powers RW. Maternal-fetal metabolism in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Front Biosci. 2007;12:2457–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee S, Dawson PA, Hewavitharana AK, Shaw PN, Markovich D. Disruption of NaS1 sulfate transport function in mice leads to enhanced acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Hepatology. 2006;43(6):1241–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Dawson et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement