Volume 15 Supplement 2

Every Woman, Every Newborn

Open Access

Basic newborn care and neonatal resuscitation: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions

  • Christabel Enweronu-Laryea1Email author,
  • Kim E Dickson2,
  • Sarah G Moxon3, 4, 5,
  • Aline Simen-Kapeu2,
  • Christabel Nyange2, 6,
  • Susan Niermeyer7,
  • France Bégin8,
  • Howard L Sobel9,
  • Anne CC Lee10,
  • Severin Ritter von Xylander11 and
  • Joy E Lawn3, 4, 5
BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201515(Suppl 2):S4

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S4

Published: 11 September 2015

Abstract

Background

An estimated two-thirds of the world's 2.7 million newborn deaths could be prevented with quality care at birth and during the postnatal period. Basic Newborn Care (BNC) is part of the solution and includes hygienic birth and newborn care practices including cord care, thermal care, and early and exclusive breastfeeding. Timely provision of resuscitation if needed is also critical to newborn survival. This paper describes health system barriers to BNC and neonatal resuscitation and proposes solutions to scale up evidence-based strategies.

Methods

The maternal and newborn bottleneck analysis tool was applied by 12 countries in Africa and Asia as part of the Every Newborn Action Plan process. Country workshops engaged technical experts to complete the survey tool, which is designed to synthesise and grade health system "bottlenecks" that hinder the scale up of maternal-newborn intervention packages. We used quantitative and qualitative methods to analyse the bottleneck data, combined with literature review, to present priority bottlenecks and actions relevant to different health system building blocks for BNC and neonatal resuscitation.

Results

Eleven of the 12 countries provided grading data. Overall, bottlenecks were graded more severely for resuscitation. The most severely graded bottlenecks for BNC were health workforce (8 of 11 countries), health financing (9 out of 11) and service delivery (7 out of 9); and for neonatal resuscitation, workforce (9 out of 10), essential commodities (9 out of 10) and service delivery (8 out of 10). Country teams from Africa graded bottlenecks overall more severely. Improving workforce performance, availability of essential commodities, and well-integrated health service delivery were the key solutions proposed.

Conclusions

BNC was perceived to have the least health system challenges among the seven maternal and newborn intervention packages assessed. Although neonatal resuscitation bottlenecks were graded more severe than for BNC, similarities particularly in the workforce and service delivery building blocks highlight the inextricable link between the two interventions and the need to equip birth attendants with requisite skills and commodities to assess and care for every newborn. Solutions highlighted by country teams include ensuring more investment to improve workforce performance and distribution, especially numbers of skilled birth attendants, incentives for placement in challenging settings, and skills-based training particularly for neonatal resuscitation.

Keywords

Quality of care bottleneck analysis Africa Asia health system resuscitation basic newborn care

Background

Substantial reductions in childhood deaths have occurred since 1990, but deaths in the first 28 days of life (newborn period) have declined more slowly [1]. Globally, newborn deaths accounted for an estimated 44% of deaths in children under the age of 5 years in 2013 [2, 3]. Sub-Saharan African region now has the greatest neonatal mortality burden as the trend in South Asia shows relatively faster decline. Intrapartum-related hypoxia, infections and prematurity or small size at birth account for 85% of newborn deaths globally [4]. One million of the 2.7 million neonatal deaths in 2013 occurred on the first day of life -the most critical period for survival and prevention of long-term disability [1, 46]. A significant proportion of fresh stillbirths and deaths on the first day are caused by intrapartum-related complications. As many as two-thirds of newborns deaths could be averted with quality care at birth and during the postpartum period [4, 5, 7].

Basic newborn care (BNC) comprises of a set of basic preventive and supportive measures that are needed to ensure the survival, health and development of all newborns (Figure 1). For the purpose of this analysis, BNC focuses especially on cleanliness and cord care, thermal control (including drying, skin-to-skin care, delayed bathing), and support for breastfeeding. In addition, the paper considers neonatal resuscitation - a set of interventions to support the establishment of breathing and circulation for babies who require assistance to breathe at birth [8] - of which the most important is positive pressure ventilation with bag and mask, which is also the focus of this analysis (Figure 1). These low-cost procedures could prevent many newborn deaths around the time of birth and on the first day of life.
Figure 1

Definitions and tracer interventions. Texts in italics are tracer interventions selected for the bottleneck analysis.

Providing quality intrapartum care and resuscitation is a vital opportunity to ensure a good start in life for all newborns, and skilled birth attendants hold the key to quality survival of every newborn. Clean birth processes reduce the risk of intrapartum-acquired neonatal infections [9, 10]; and provision of external source of warmth, including skin-to-skin, enables normal transition from fetal life and reduces deaths from hypothermia [11, 12]. Early initiation of breastfeeding in the first hour of life is associated with a lower risk of neonatal mortality [13]. Hygienic newborn practices including cord care prevents postnatal infections [14], a major cause of neonatal deaths, and in specific settings the application of antiseptics to the cord have additional benefit [14, 15]. Skilled care and assessment during the early postnatal period, especially on the first day of life provides an opportunity to detect and manage complications that may result in early neonatal death [4, 16]. Providing resuscitation, when needed, could avert approximately 30% of term newborn deaths and 10% of preterm deaths in the first month of life [17]. Nevertheless, these low-cost quality services are not being implemented at scale in settings where they are likely to have the most impact [1820].

BNC processes are simple, essential and implementable by everyone in every setting where births occur (Figure 2). In contrast, resuscitation involves relatively more complex processes and the use of bag and mask equipment is generally restricted to skilled or trained birth attendants [21]. Facility-based clinical interventions provided by educated, trained, licensed, and regulated midwifery personnel (midwives, nurses or doctors) confers the best outcomes for mothers and newborns [20, 2224]. However, in low-resource countries, only an estimated 50% of births take place in health facilities, and these interventions and services have the greatest gaps in coverage, quality and equity in communities that need them most [20, 25, 26]. Consequently, strategies that strengthen the health system to improve access may increase community utilisation of facility care and improve newborn survival. The substantial impact of improved basic services around the time of birth for women and children has been estimated by the United Nations Commission on Life-Saving Commodities and Lancet Newborn series 2014 [7, 27].
Figure 2

Basic newborn care and basic neonatal resuscitation, showing health system requirements by level of care. Hospital level image source: Christena Dowsett/Save the Children. Primary facility image source: Karen Kasmauski/MCSP. Home birth/community level image source: Michael Bisceglie/Save the Children.

Increasing coverage and improving quality of neonatal interventions, especially BNC and resuscitation, are crucial for achieving the goals of the Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) [4]. Until recently, many low- and middle- income countries (LMIC) lacked appropriate policies and guidelines for providing quality health care to newborns [2830]. Renewed commitments by governments and partners to the UN Secretary-General's Global Strategy for Women's and Children's Health and to Every Woman, Every Child initiative have led to development of policies and strategies to guide implementation of effective interventions at scale. Also, there is increasing consensus on the content of basic newborn care and resuscitation at and around the time of birth at all levels of health service delivery [8, 22, 31]. We now need concerted effort to address health system bottlenecks to achieving the goals of ENAP including accelerating universal coverage of quality BNC to all newborns and effective resuscitation to newborns who are unable to initiate breathing at birth.

The objectives of the paper are to:
  1. 1.

    Use a 12-country analysis to explore health system bottlenecks affecting the scale up of basic newborn care and resuscitation

     
  2. 2.

    Present strategies to overcome the most significant bottlenecks including learning from the 12-country analyses, literature review and programme experience

     
  3. 3.

    Discuss policy and programmatic implications and propose priority actions for programme scale up.

     

Methods

The study used quantitative and qualitative research methods to collect information, assess health system bottlenecks and identify solutions to scale up of maternal and newborn care interventions in 12 countries: Afghanistan, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Uganda, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Vietnam.

Data collection

The maternal-newborn bottleneck analysis tool was developed to assist countries in the identification of bottlenecks to the provision and scale up of maternal and newborn health interventions across the seven health system building blocks as described previously [22, 30]. The tool was utilised during a series of national consultations supported by the global Every Newborn Steering Group between July 1st and December 31st, 2013 (Additional file 1). The workshops for each country included participants from national ministries of health, UN agencies, the private sector, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), professional bodies, academia, bilateral agencies and other stakeholders. For each workshop, a facilitator oriented on the tool coordinated the process and guided groups to reach consensus on the specific bottlenecks for each health system building block. This paper, fourth in the series, focuses on the provision of basic newborn care and resuscitation both delivered at and around the time of birth.

For the purpose of this bottleneck analysis, tracer interventions were selected for their impact on neonatal outcomes. BNC tracer interventions were cleanliness and cord care, thermal care and support for breastfeeding (Additional file 1). Cleanliness includes sterile birth procedures and hygienic newborn care practices, specifically cord care [10]. Thermal care includes maintaining a warm chain at and around the time of birth to prevent hypothermia, an invisible cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in premature and low birth weight babies [12, 32]. Early initiation and exclusivity of breastfeeding is protective to the mother and newborn [33, 34]. Establishing effective resuscitation for newborns who need assistance to breathe at birth requires competent work force and commodities; therefore, the tracer intervention selected for basic resuscitation was ventilation by bag and mask (Additional file 1). Effective resuscitation saves lives and reduces long-term disability [17, 35]. Other essential preventive interventions (Figure 1) were not the focus of this analysis.

Data analysis methods

Bottlenecks for each health system building block were graded using one of the following options: not a bottleneck (=1), minor bottleneck (=2), significant bottleneck (=3), or very major bottleneck (=4). Data received from each country were analysed and the graded health system building blocks were converted into heat maps. Countries that categorised health system bottlenecks as significant or very major were grouped by mortality contexts (Neonatal Mortality Rate (NMR) <30 deaths per 1000 live births and NMR ≥30 deaths per 1000 live births) and region (countries in Africa and countries in Asia).

The context specific solutions from the countries were categorised into thematic areas linked to specific bottlenecks (Tables S1, S2, S3 and S4, additional file 2; Table 1). We undertook a literature review to identify further case studies, evidence for proposed solutions, and other evidence-based strategies for each tracer intervention. For more detailed analysis of the steps taken to analyse the intervention-specific bottlenecks, please refer to the overview paper [30].

Results

All country workshop teams (Afghanistan, Cameroon, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Uganda, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, India and Vietnam) except Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) submitted quantitative data on the grading of health system building blocks (Figures 3 and 4). A country was not included in the quantitative analysis of a health system building block if it did not provide grading data, however, the perceived bottlenecks and solutions were included in the qualitative analysis. Therefore, although workshop participants from DRC did not record any grading of their bottlenecks their qualitative data was included in the analysis along with the other 11 countries (Tables S1, S2, S3 and S4, additional file 2).
Figure 3

Very major or significant health system bottlenecks for basic newborn care and neonatal resuscitation. NMR: Neonatal Mortality Rate. *Cameroon, Kenya, Malawi, Uganda, Bangladesh, Nepal, Vietnam. **Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Afghanistan, India, Pakistan. See additional file 2 for more details. Part A: Grading according to very major or significant health system bottlenecks for basic newborn care as reported by eleven countries combined. Part B: Grading according to very major or significant health system bottlenecks for neonatal resuscitation as reported by eleven countries combined.

Figure 4

Individual country grading of health system bottlenecks for basic newborn care and neonatal resuscitation. DRC: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Part A: Heat map showing individual country grading of health system bottlenecks for basic newborn care and table showing total number of countries grading significant or major bottleneck for calculating priority building blocks. Part B: Heat map showing individual country grading of health system bottlenecks for neonatal resuscitation and table showing total number of countries grading significant or major bottleneck for calculating priority building blocks.

Of the eleven country workshop teams that graded the bottlenecks, Afghanistan, Cameroon, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Uganda, Bangladesh, Nepal and Vietnam returned national level responses. Pakistan provided subnational data from all provinces - complete data was received from Gilgit-Baltisan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Khayber Pakhtun, Baluchistan, and Punjab but incomplete data was received from Sindh (Figures S1 and S2, additional file 2). India returned subnational data from three states: Andhra Pradesh, Odisha and Rajasthan (Figures S1 and S2, additional file 2). Three country teams (Malawi, Nepal, and Vietnam) provided incomplete data for BNC (Figure 4a), and 2 teams (Malawi and Nepal) provided incomplete data for neonatal resuscitation (Figure 4b).

Overall, bottlenecks for BNC (Figures 3a and 4a) were graded less severely than for neonatal resuscitation (Figures 3b and 4b). Country workshop participants in Africa reported more significant or very major BNC and resuscitation bottlenecks than participants in Asia. The health system building blocks frequently graded as very major or significant were financing, service delivery and workforce for BNC. For neonatal resuscitation the workforce, essential medical products and technologies (also referred to as commodities), and service delivery were most frequently graded as significant or very major. Higher burden country workshop participants (Nigeria, Afghanistan and Pakistan but not India) tended to grade their bottlenecks more severely. Among the 12 countries, the India country team graded the bottlenecks in their health system least severely for both BNC and neonatal resuscitation.

Bag and mask ventilation had the most bottlenecks of the four tracer interventions in this analysis. Country teams provided more solutions for BNC tracer interventions than for neonatal resuscitation. A summary (Table 1) and details (Tables S1, S2, S3 and S4, additional file 2) of BNC and resuscitation health system bottlenecks and proposed solutions are presented.
Table 1

Health system bottlenecks to basic newborn care and basic neonatal resuscitation in 12 countries: proposed solutions and evidence.

Health system Building blocks

Bottleneck Category

Number of countries

Proposed solution themes

Evidence for proposed solutions

  

BNC

NR

  

Leadership and Governance

Policy: lacking; not updated; poorly disseminated or implemented

6

5

• Update policy and disseminate to district level

Implementation of policies that improve maternal outcomes may improve neonatal outcomes [44]

 

Guidelines: unavailable; not updated; poorly disseminated or implemented

8

9

• Integrate facility and community care, improve public-private partnership and implement monitoring mechanisms at all levels/sectors

Improved private-public partnership increases access to institutional perinatal services [43, 69]

 

Weak enforcement of policy/guidelines on breastfeeding and breast milk substitutes

5

-

• Develop, regularly update and disseminate guidelines and standards

 
 

Most births occurring at home/attended by unskilled workforce

-

2

• Advocacy to leaders of health facilities on newborn health services

 
 

Poor public-private partnership and private sector compliance to national standards

2

2

  

Health financing

Inadequate funding and budget allocation; inadequate financial guidelines at district level

9

12

• Advocacy to increase budgetary allocation and scope of health insurance coverage

Improving insurance coverage increases utilisation of facility maternity services, evidence on quality of care and health outcomes is inconclusive [78]

 

High out-of pocket expenditures for maternal and newborn services

7

3

• Equity in budgetary allocation

• Disseminate financial guidelines to districts

Removal of user fees (out-of-pocket) does not significantly impact utilisation of services and may not be sustainable [41, 79]

 

Funding not specific/prioritised for resuscitation

-

3

• Widen scope of health insurance coverage for newborn services and reduce user fees

 
 

Low insurance coverage for newborn services

1

1

• Targeted funding for resuscitation equipment and re-training of providers

 

Health

Workforce

Inadequate knowledge and competency

11

9

• Update and harmonise curricula for training institutions; accreditation of training programs (pre- and in- service)

Competency-based training improves community health workers' effectiveness, positively impact community care-seeking behaviour and neonatal outcomes [80, 81]

 

Inadequate numbers and poor distribution

9

8

• Competency-based approach for training and learning. Refresher courses for resuscitation

In-service training improves knowledge and performance of facility-based workers but variable effect on health outcomes [45, 46, 82]

 

Poor quality of pre-service and in-service training/ refresher courses

8

8

• National workforce mapping; use data for training and mentoring programs

 
 

Poor supervision and mentorship

5

6

• Monitoring and supervisory system in line with job description and standards of practice

 
 

Lack of job description and job aids

4

4

• Equity in distribution; reduce reassignment of staff trained in newborn care

 

Essential Medical Products and Technologies

Lack of/inadequate supplies and equipment e.g. essential medicines, warmers, bag and mask equipment

5

9

• Implement policy on essential drugs and commodities especially chlorhexidine

Provision of quality equipment and supplies at point of use improves quality of care [83]

 

Inadequate procurement/logistics supply system

4

10

• Logistic and supply management system to improve commodities availability at district level

 
 

Poor standards/quality of supplied equipment

3

5

• Locally manufacture chlorhexidine, use public-private partnership

 
 

Chlorhexidine not in national drug lists or implemented at district level

8

-

• Adequate needs assessment and due process for procurement including bidding mechanisms

 

Health Service Delivery

Service unavailable; poor coverage/ geographic access

7

6

• Develop and implement referral and transportation mechanisms for newborns

Well-integrated health system improves health outcomes [84]

 

Ineffective referral mechanisms; poor linkages between community and health facility/ follow-up services

9

7

• Multi-sectorial collaboration to improve access, sanitation and infrastructure

Supportive supervision and quality perinatal audit and reviews improve adherence to standards and effectiveness of care [47, 48]

 

Poor quality of care (adherence to standards for hygiene and resuscitation, monitoring mechanisms, health worker attitudes)

7

5

• Continuous quality improvement at district level including supportive supervision and perinatal audit

Accreditation of facilities providing delivery services improves outcome for newborns [65, 66]

 

Inadequate postnatal care and follow-up / outreach services

8

-

• Accreditation of facilities using a standard process

 
 

Weak public private partnership/ poor collaboration

4

-

  

Health Management Information System (HMIS)

Newborn indicators not captured in national HMIS and reports

9

8

• Update HMIS and integrate clearly defined newborn indicators through consultative national meetings

Standardised indicators improve assessment, decision-making and quality of care [85]

 

Inadequate or complicated tools for information system and reporting; limited or poor quality of data

5

4

• Develop monitoring tools, set up surveillance system for important indicators

Effective perinatal audit programs improves health professionals' practices and neonatal outcomes [47, 74]

 

Poor documentation of clinical practice and implementation of perinatal/clinical audits and reviews

6

9

• Train and retrain HMIS personnel; disseminate protocols on perinatal audit to district level

• Use local data at district meetings, for quality improvement and decision-making

 

Community Ownership and Partnership

Poor community and male involvement to facilitate care seeking

6

6

• Multiple channels of information dissemination on importance of BNC and resuscitation

Adequate engagement and information to communities reduces major barriers to access and utilisation of facility-based services and improves health outcomes [86]

 

Limited community awareness and inadequate strategies to facilitate knowledge about newborn issues

6

6

• Advocacy and engagement of community leaders to sensitise the community

Community mobilisation and training of community health workers including traditional birth attendants reduces perinatal mortality, improves referrals and early initiation of breast feeding [14]

 

Socio-cultural and gender barriers / challenges faced by mothers

9

4

• Community representation at facility audit meetings

 
 

Access constraints (distance, cost of travel and care)

7

4

• Improve community and facility workforce linkages, provide context-appropriate IEC tools

 
 

Limited knowledge and communication skills of health providers and lack of IEC materials in appropriate local languages

2

5

• Train and retrain community workforce especially on communication skills

 

BNC: Basic Newborn Care; NR: Neonatal Resuscitation; IEC: Information Education and Communication

Leadership and governance bottlenecks and solutions

High neonatal mortality (NMR ≥30) burden settings graded leadership and governance barriers more severely (Figures 3 and 4). Overall, country teams described similar leadership bottlenecks in the qualitative data (Table 1). Developing, disseminating and implementing appropriate policies and guidelines for all levels and sectors of maternal-newborn services were the major perceived governance bottlenecks for countries. Workshop participants in Vietnam reported inadequate awareness among national leaders. Bangladesh workshop participants described the policy permitting only skilled birth attendants to perform resuscitation as a major barrier to scaling up the intervention given that two-thirds of national births are attended by non-skilled workers.

Solutions proposed by country teams in Africa and Asia were largely similar (Table 1). The India team proposed establishment of a national newborn technical group linked to the Ministry of Health, to review and update existing policies and guidelines, harmonise related strategies and set national standards for BNC and resuscitation. The Kenya team proposed a national implementation committee to monitor implementation of national newborn action plans.

Health financing bottlenecks and solutions

Most country workshop teams perceived financing as a significant or very major barrier to provision of BNC (5 of 5 in Africa, 4 of 6 in Asia) and resuscitation (4 of 4 in Africa, 3 of 6 in Asia). India workshop participants did not perceive health financing as a barrier for BNC services (Figure 4a). The barrier posed by out-of-pocket expenditure was perceived as a greater challenge for BNC (4 of 6 in Africa, 3 of 6 in Asia) than for resuscitation (2 of 6 in Africa, 1 of 6 in Asia) (Table 1, Tables S1 and S2, additional file 2).

Nigeria was the only country that reported low health insurance coverage as barrier to scaling up newborn interventions. Nonetheless, six country teams recommended widening the scope of health insurance or other financial plans for maternal and newborn services including insurance coverage for specialised/intensive care services for newborns identified with complications during the first day assessment and post-resuscitation care (Table S3 and S4, additional file 2). Improvements in funding procedures at district level and targeted funding for regular in-services refresher training and replacement of supplies for neonatal resuscitation were some of the specific solutions proposed.

Health workforce bottlenecks and solutions

Bottlenecks within the workforce were graded as very major or significant for both BNC (8 countries) and resuscitation (9 countries) (Figure 4). All 12 country teams identified challenges within their workforce in the qualitative data. Specifically, skills, overall numbers, quality of training (pre-service and in-service), and supportive supervision were described as inadequate and available workforce were distributed inequitably (Table 1; Table S1 and S2, additional file 2). These bottlenecks were more critical for neonatal resuscitation services at district level. Lack of job aids and job description were barriers reported by participants in Asia (4 of 6 countries).

Proposed solutions to improve health workforce capacity were largely similar for Africa and Asia and include pre- and in- service training strategies, improved conditions of service for the workforce, and improved human resource management (Table 1). Provision of job descriptions and job aids and implementation of standards of practice were suggested measures to improve workforce productivity and effectiveness of care.

Essential medical products and technologies bottlenecks and solutions

Country workshop teams graded bottlenecks associated with commodities for resuscitation more severely (5 of 5 in Africa, 4 of 6 in Asia) than for BNC (Figure 4). Qualitative data show that bottlenecks within the procurement process and supply chain were particularly challenging for most countries (Table 1; Table S1 and S2, additional file 2). Specifically, teams described the procurement process as complex and ineffective, the consultation process with end users about specification of commodities to be purchased is not being implemented, and vital equipment for resuscitation including bag and mask equipment and basic supplies are not readily available at the point of use. Lack of chlorhexidine at the point of use was also perceived as a barrier to providing quality BNC (Table 1).

Although all 12 country teams reported bottlenecks with commodities for neonatal resuscitation in the qualitative analysis, only 5 country teams offered solutions to these bottlenecks (Tables S3 and S4, additional file 2). Proposed solutions include personnel training, especially program managers and procurement officers; improving supply management strategies; and policy implementation on essential equipment and drugs for newborn care particularly chlorhexidine digluconate. The teams recommended that procurement of commodities should be based on needs assessment and consultations with end users to ensure that appropriate products are provided (Table 1).

Health service delivery bottlenecks and solutions

All country teams that provided quantitative data except India and Bangladesh graded service delivery bottlenecks for both BNC and resuscitation as significant or very major (Figure 4). Poor linkages between health facilities and between the community and health facility, including referral-feedback systems, transportation, follow-up, and outreach programs were reported as barriers to effective health service delivery (Table 1; Table S1 and S2, additional file 2). There is limited coverage of neonatal resuscitation at district level in Cameroon and Vietnam because of inadequate workforce and infrastructure including equipment for providing the service. Most country teams described the quality of care in health facilities where delivery and newborn services are available as poor or inadequate due to low hygienic standards, poor health worker attitude, poor adherence to guidelines and protocols, and non-implementation of quality improvement activities.

Country teams proposed a holistic approach to overcoming these barriers including, extending government training programs to the private sector, health facility accreditation, strengthening capacity of health facilities through supportive supervision and monitoring, promoting in utero referral of fetuses at risk to higher level facilities, and effective systems for continuous quality improvement including clinical reviews and perinatal audit (Table 1; Table S3 and S4, additional file 2).

Health information system bottlenecks and solutions

The absence of newborn indicators in the national HMIS was reported by most country workshop teams (Table 1). National HMIS do not capture basic newborn care and resuscitation activities and the cause of newborn deaths. Documentation of newborn clinical services especially neonatal resuscitation is generally poor, clinical reviews and perinatal audit are poorly implemented and available data are inadequate for action and decision-making. Country workshop teams in Pakistan and Vietnam graded HMIS severely for neonatal resuscitation (Figure 4b). In Nepal and Vietnam, teams reported that the available data tools were overly complex for data management personnel at district level to effectively integrate newborn care activities into the HMIS. The solutions provided by other country teams for improving data quality suggest that the barriers highlighted by Nepal and Vietnam were also significant for other countries in this analysis.

Workshop participants emphasised the need for newborn indicators that can feasibly measure and accurately capture BNC and resuscitation activities at all levels and sectors that provide maternal and newborn health services. They suggested training platforms for national and district level HMIS personnel and cell phone-based mHealth systems to track home deliveries and link community health workers to health facilities (Table 1; Table S3 and S4, additional file 2).

Community ownership and partnership bottlenecks and solutions

All workshop teams in Africa (4 out of 4) and fewer in Asia (3 out of 6) graded community ownership and partnership as having significant or very major bottlenecks for BNC (Figure 4a). Inadequate involvement of communities with the health system and context-specific socio-cultural factors were the most common causes of perceived bottlenecks (Table 1; Table S1 and S2, additional file 2).

Proposed solutions include advocacy and communication strategies to reach various categories of leaders and community groups, and national and district level sensitisation and educational programs to improve population knowledge on perinatal services especially on neonatal emergencies (Table 1).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this article is the first systematic analysis of bottlenecks and solutions to BNC and resuscitation around the time of birth from 12 low and middle income countries which together account for around half of global maternal and newborn deaths. Consistent with previous analysis, we show that out of 9 maternal and newborn intervention packages, BNC has the least perceived bottlenecks to scale up [22, 30]. Nonetheless, inadequate financing, service delivery and workforce performance are important fundamental challenges hindering scale up of even very basic newborn care for most countries. The analysis underscores the common challenges countries encounter with BNC and resuscitation services and the importance of linking facility and community services.

The advantages and limitations of the methodology in this analysis have been addressed elsewhere [30]. Although resuscitation was graded more severely, the bottlenecks described for BNC and resuscitation were largely similar. Fewer solutions were proposed for resuscitation, but solutions proposed for BNC were rationally linked to resuscitation at the time of birth. The challenges with neonatal resuscitation services in low-resource settings are likely best appreciated by clinical practitioners; inadequate representation of such practitioners in some of the country workshops may account for the few solutions provided for resuscitation.

Consistent with previous studies, we show that resource constraints, including workforce, financing and commodities are barriers to optimal care in LMIC [22, 36]. We also confirm that gaps in the process of care hinder delivery of quality services [37, 38]. For example, poor workforce competency limits the application of technologies such as bag and mask ventilation and use of HMIS technologies at district level.

Health financing priority actions

Financing challenges and solutions identified by workshop teams were not specific for BNC and resuscitation, but rather part of the larger national infrastructural and development funding deficits that also affects health care services [30]. There is limited budget for renovating infrastructure for maternal and newborn services, in-service training, regular provision of equipment and supplies, and incentives for health workers. Efficient use of the proposed targeted funding for basic supplies and training the workforce, especially on neonatal resuscitation, may improve retention of clinical skills and health outcomes [39, 40].

High out-of-pocket expenditure was perceived as a barrier for BNC by more country teams (7 countries) than for resuscitation (3 countries) even though neonatal resuscitation requires more process inputs (Figure 2). This rather unexpected finding could be explained by aggregate costing of birth/delivery services. User fees (out-of-pocket) at point of care may not significantly reduce access to facility services, however, countries considering removal of user fees should provide alternative sustainable sources of funding for human resource and infrastructural needs that depend on user fees [41]. Advocacy and funding schemes to improve facility-based newborn services should be extended to specialised/intensive care services for post-resuscitation care and other newborn complications [42].

Health workforce priority actions

The performance of the workforce is the critical constraint in all health system building blocks for all 12 countries. Countries lack sufficient numbers of competent workers especially midwives and nurses to deliver quality care to newborns, particularly basic neonatal resuscitation at lower levels of health service delivery.

Health workforce performance

Advocacy for leaders of health facilities on the needs of newborns was proposed as a solution for overcoming health system barriers. This implies that improving leadership skills of facility administrators with a focus on the needs of mothers and newborns is an opportunity to overcome perceived barriers. Leadership training and higher level support with tools to institute organisational changes that create an environment for quality maternal and newborn services in public- and private- sector health facilities is essential, especially for high burden countries [23, 43].

The health workforce of countries in this analysis can institute change and meet the needs of mothers and newborns around the time of birth [44, 45]. Skills training, guidelines, support, opportunities for collective action and process improvement, commodities, motivation, and job descriptions are needed for the existing workforce to improve performance and impact health outcomes [43, 4648]. Redistribution of skilled birth attendants, especially midwives, to rural settings with adequate incentives, and shifting tasks to appropriate lower level workers with defined roles and adequate supervision may reduce inequities [21]. Inadequate numbers of skilled providers can be addressed by training more midwives and innovative context-based strategies to ensure retention of skilled workforce in challenging settings [23, 49]. Also, countries should consider rectifying shortages in higher level workforce (including specialist midwives, neonatal nurses, obstetricians, paediatricians and neonatologists) as this core group is essential for building capacity of a competent workforce for the medium and long term.

An estimated 50 million births (40% of the total number of births worldwide) occur outside health facilities [6]. In this analysis, Nigeria and Bangladesh report that most births neither occur in health facilities nor are attended by skilled birth attendants. In Asia, an estimated two thirds of home births are attended by a traditional birth attendant (TBA), however, in Africa, most births that occur outside facilities are at home alone (without any attendance) [6]. Given the potential to reduce inequities by extending care to underserved populations, the use of trained lay health workers, including TBAs, is often proposed as a solution. As circumstances vary by region, mortality context, local culture and existing health infrastructure, such an approach requires careful consideration of who is currently attending the births and how they are linked to the health system. Emphasis should primarily be placed on training in basic newborn care practices [17]. Whilst some studies have shown that training of lay health workers, including TBAs, on neonatal resuscitation can be done successfully [21, 47], there are cost, effectiveness and sustainability issues, especially where the attendants may not see sufficient volume of births to be able to maintain skills. Careful evaluation is needed and should be based on the specific implementation context. Given the synergies between maternal and newborn health, however, investments in health system strengthening should give priority to skilled care at birth from which both mother and child will benefit.

Competency-based training

Competency-based approach to pre-service and in-service education is critical for sustainable, wider scale implementation of BNC and resuscitation [46, 50]. Training programs should ideally incorporate monitoring and evaluation tools for assessing program cost-effectiveness and impact on health outcomes [51, 52]. The curriculum should address context-specific barriers and technical/procedural skills e.g. ability to perform neonatal resuscitation. It should also ensure that higher order skills including leadership, communication, clinical decision-making, data management, quality improvement, and ethical practices are addressed.

Many studies proclaim the success of stand-alone training programs, but these successes tend to be short-lived because of poor policy and leadership support and inappropriate educational approaches. Programme experience from The Western Pacific Region show that a systematic approach that incorporates in-depth quality situation analysis, wide consultation and inclusiveness of key stakeholders in updating clinical protocols and planning training programs have potential to create sustainable change [50]. Lessons can be learnt from approaches that incorporate evidence-based science and innovative educational methods to build competency and confidence in the workforce [53].

The national technical or implementation group proposed by India and Kenya could work with ministries of health and education to update and harmonise the curricula of training institutions, set standards for accreditation, provide guidance on innovative training approaches that address local gaps, and monitor implementation of national plans in training institutions and health facilities. These measures would ensure consistency in standards of care in the public and private sector not only for BNC and basic neonatal resuscitation but also for small and sick newborns [42].

Essential medical products and technologies priority actions

Commodities required for BNC and resuscitation should be available everywhere births occur; however, many LMIC health facilities lack these commodities and the prerequisites for hygienic practices such as clean water, soap, gloves and alcohol rub. Effective logistic information systems that monitor local and national uptake of commodities and transparent procurement procedures could address some of the perceived barriers [54].

Cleanliness and cord care

Perceived barriers to delivering quality care in this analysis include inadequate supplies for general cleanliness and clean birth procedures, and non-adherence to standards for cleanliness and procedures for use of available commodities by health workers [55]. Unhygienic practices in the use of technologies (including radiant warmers, bag and mask equipment, weighing scales and thermometers), and non-adherence to basic rules of hygiene such as removing jewellery and not using cell phones during patient care, could be addressed by training, supportive supervision and enforcement of infection control rules to change health providers' attitude [56, 57].

Clean delivery practices can be improved by effective supervision and provision of essential commodities for hand hygiene e.g. water and soap, and clean delivery kits [55]; but, behaviour change is key to sustainable clean delivery practices. Although evidence on the impact of clean delivery kits on neonatal mortality is inconsistent [58], analysis of data from Bangladesh, Nepal and India show that use of each additional content of the kit e.g. sterilised blade to cut the cord, was associated with reduction in neonatal mortality [59]. Chlorhexidine digluconate use for cord care effectively reduces infection-associated deaths in settings where most births are attended by unskilled workforce [15]. We suggest strategies to overcome challenges to scale-up use of chlorhexidine digluconate (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Implementing chlorhexidine use for cord care. NMR: Neonatal Mortality Rate. DRC: Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Essential commodities and provision of basic neonatal resuscitation services

Every country that participated in this analysis had challenges with providing resuscitation services at scale. These challenges were mostly related to workforce competency, availability and use of technologies, and health service delivery; but the availability and use of technology/commodities was the pivotal barrier. Birth attendants lack the requisite skills to provide effective intrapartum fetal monitoring and newborn resuscitation [55]. Context-specific schemes that address health worker beliefs and practices, facility policies that support incorrect practices, and other health system bottlenecks especially concerning the availability of bag and mask at point of use should be explored.

Birth attendants usually show significant improvement in knowledge after training on neonatal resuscitation but acquisition and retention of skills is still a major challenge globally [38, 60, 61]. Sustaining competency in rural settings with lower volume facilities, few deliveries, less exposure and practice poses greater challenge. We present an approach to address workforce competency and availability and use of basic commodities for newborn resuscitation (Figure 6). Global initiatives should not only focus on providing bag and mask equipment and other supplies for resuscitation; these initiatives should also address health service delivery challenges. Specifically, newborns requiring extra care after resuscitation need timely referral and transportation to specialised care centres where appropriate inpatient care can be provided; resources should be provided to make this happen [42].
Figure 6

Scaling up universal access to neonatal resuscitation. HBB: helping babies breathe. LMIC: low and middle income countries

Health service delivery priority actions

Implementing evidence-based and context-appropriate policies and guidelines at all levels of care and the private sector is the important leadership and governance challenge reported by country teams, especially those with high neonatal mortality burden. Specifically, policy on breastfeeding practices is not consistently implemented despite the evidence for benefits of early initiation and exclusivity of breastfeeding [14, 62]. We suggest strategies to improve breastfeeding practices (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Early and exclusive breastfeeding for every newborn. IYCF: infant and young child feeding. UNICEF: United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund. WHO: World Health Organization

Coverage targets for facility births in LMIC are gradually being achieved but the quality of care has been described as substandard. Implementing appropriate accountability mechanisms, job aids, and effective clinical audits and reviews may overcome some of the lapses identified in this analysis is recommended [63]. Skilled birth attendants are few and overworked but adherence to standards may not increase workload if care is well organised [64]. Creating centres of excellence and formulating standards for external evaluation and accreditation could improve the quality of health service delivery [65, 66].

Also, improving the organisation of antenatal-perinatal care and referral systems to enhance in utero referral of fetuses at risk to higher level facilities will improve health outcomes for mothers and newborns [67, 68]. Furthermore, improving public-private sector collaboration, engaging other sectors of government that influence access and quality of health care services, and community involvement especially in hard-to-reach areas, will improve access and minimise disparities in health service delivery [43, 69, 70].

Other priority actions

Leadership and governance: National governments' endorsement of the goals of Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed calls for concerted governmental involvement in the engagement and coordination of all stakeholders including development partners and communities to ensure quality care for mothers and children. Political, religious and traditional leaders can significantly influence community attitudes toward facility-based perinatal services and quality of care in health facilities if global and country-based evidence for policy is effectively communicated to them [71, 72], e.g. the long-term economic and health effects of promoting breastfeeding and reducing intrapartum-related disabilities. The role of leaders in all health system building blocks cannot be overemphasised.

Health management information systems: Lack of appropriate newborn indicators for monitoring BNC and resuscitation and inadequate capacity of HMIS personnel to use available tools hinder adequate evaluation of newborn services, appropriate planning, and decision-making [73]. These findings underscore the value of training and retraining HMIS personnel and emphasise the importance of evaluating the process of care with all cadres of the workforce through audit and feedback mechanisms [63, 74].

Community ownership and participation: Available evidence supports the multi-pronged approach proposed by workshop participants for engaging communities and includes: community mobilisation strategies; equipping community health workers with adequate skills and tools to effectively communicate the health needs of mothers and newborns; and improving linkages between health facilities and communities [21, 44, 75].

Limitations

The data generated from country workshops came from the consensus views of workshop participants and are, therefore, subjective. Bottlenecks were reported as perceived bottlenecks relative to other health system building blocks. It is likely that some of the country participants may have been involved in the same training programs or supported by same non-governmental organisations, therefore, some responses may reflect "group thinking". The quality and amount of information extracted from the workshops varied depending on the capacity of the facilitator, and the knowledge and expertise of participants on health system issues and newborn care. Consequently, there may be instances where known health system challenges or deficits based on robust quantitative national data may be in conflict with the perceived bottleneck grading in this analysis. For example, weak referral systems and poor quality commodities were bottlenecks mostly identified by Asian country teams (Table S1 and S2, additional file 2). These bottlenecks occur in Africa, but African participants may have placed less subjective value on these factors than more severe bottlenecks in their health system. Also, workshop participants provided minimal data (lack of radiant warmers) on thermal care tracer intervention. While this limitation may be attributed to the tool and expertise of workshop participants, it underscores the invisibility of hypothermia as a cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Future agenda

ENAP offers governments and stakeholders a roadmap to rally behind a global plan to reduce neonatal mortality. The global research community has a major role to play. Innovative platforms such as mobile phones and video-guided web-based educational programs are being used to disseminate health messages and reinforce training even in the most remote regions [76]. The cost-effectiveness, sustainability and impact on health outcomes of these approaches need further consideration.

Of the 4 tracer interventions in this analysis, bottlenecks to thermal care were barely reported; implying the invisibility of the harmful effects of hypothermia. Providing a warm chain at birth by drying babies with warm linen in settings without grid power is a challenge. Technological innovation of affordable linen-materials that can provide warmth on contact during the process of drying, resuscitation, and covering the back of low birth weight babies during skin-to-skin contact with their mothers merit study.

Innovative designs in bag and mask equipment to reduce mask leak and provide real-life feedback on the effectiveness of ventilation offer potential to improve quality of training and clinical care. Also, affordable, portable and non-grid dependent technologies for monitoring newborns during resuscitation may improve the effectiveness of the intervention [77]. Advocacy to manufacturers and international organisations for standardisation to ensure that these commodities meet WHO standards is recommended.

Existing evidence linking quality improvement strategies to improved outcomes is limited. Future research would benefit from the inclusion of more appropriate BNC and resuscitation indicators and additional focus on non-facility determinants of health service quality such as community acceptability and equity of care.

Conclusions

Key inter-sectorial players in the provision of newborn care services in 12 countries with high neonatal mortality burden have provided profound insight into difficult to measure factors that hinder progress in the quality and coverage of BNC and resuscitation interventions. The major barriers identified in this analysis can be surmounted and the proposed solutions are implementable if all stakeholders commit to actions that ensure quality survival of newborns especially on the first day of life. Policies and guidelines need to be implemented effectively to ensure that standards are maintained at all levels of maternal and newborn services including the private sector. This will require effective leadership, targeted funding, improved human resource performance and placement, and well-organised client-centred health services that effectively mobilise communities to participate in national strategies to improve health outcome for mothers and newborns. The information provided in this paper should help to create awareness for countries to evaluate their health systems and develop strategies to reduce barriers to effective coverage of BNC and resuscitation (Figure 8).
Figure 8

Key messages and action points for basic newborn care and neonatal resuscitation. BNC: basic newborn care

List of abbreviations

BNC: 

Basic Newborn Care

DRC: 

Democratic Republic of Congo

ENAP: 

Every Newborn Action Plan

HMIS: 

Health Management Information Systems

IEC: 

Information, Education and Communication

LMIC: 

Low and Middle Income Countries

NGOs: 

Non-Governmental Organisations

NMR: 

Neonatal Mortality Rate

NR: 

Neonatal Resuscitation

UNICEF: 

United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund

WHO: 

World Health Organization.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work would not have been possible without the country technical working groups and country workshop organiser and participants who did the bottleneck analyses. We would like to thank Stephen Hodgins at Save the Children for his input on strategies for implementing chlorhexidine use for cord care. We would like to thank Helen Owen at LSHTM for her assistance with figures, and Fiorella Bianchi for her assistance with the submission process and the additional files. We would like to thank Wally Carlo and Bill Keenan for their helpful peer review of this paper

Declarations

Publication costs for this supplement was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through a grant to US Fund for UNICEF (Grant ID: OPP1094117), and support from Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives Programme. Additional funding for the bottleneck analysis was received from USAID (Grant ID: GHA-G-00-07-00007) through UNICEF.

This article has been published as part of BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Volume 15 Supplement 2, 2015: Every Woman, Every Newborn. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpregnancychildbirth/supplements/15/S2.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Child Health, School of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences University of Ghana
(2)
Health Section, Programme Division, UNICEF Headquarters
(3)
Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
(4)
Saving Newborn Lives, Save the Children
(5)
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
(6)
Ross University Medical School
(7)
Section of Neonatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine
(8)
IYCN, UNICEF Headquarters
(9)
Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, Division of NCD and Health through Life-Course, World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific
(10)
Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital
(11)
Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization

References

  1. UN-IGME: Levels and trends in child mortality: Report 2014. 2014, New York, USA: UN-Interagency group for child mortality estimationGoogle Scholar
  2. Wang H, Liddell CA, Coates MM, Mooney MD, Levitz CE, Schumacher AE, et al: Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014, 384 (9947): 957-979. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60497-9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. UNICEF: Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed. Progress Report 2014. 2014, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. WHO, UNICEF: Every Newborn: An action plan to end preventable newborn deaths. Geneva: World Health Organization 2014, Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/topics/newborn/every-newborn-action-plan-draft.pdf
  5. Save the Children. Surviving the First Day: State of the World's Mothers 2013. 2013, Westport, CT: Save the ChildrenGoogle Scholar
  6. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee AC, Waiswa P, et al: Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014, 384 (9938): 189-205. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, et al: Every Newborn: Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost?. Lancet. 2014, 384 (9940): 347-370. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. World Health Organization: Guidelines on Basic newborn resuscitation. 2012, [http://who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75157/1/9789241503693_eng.pdf]Google Scholar
  9. USAID-MCHIP: Better intrapartum practices to reduce newborn infections. 2011, [http://reprolineplus.org/system/files/resources/MCHIP_Brief_LaborCarePrevNBSepsis_En.pdf]Google Scholar
  10. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Mullany LC, Anne CC Lee ACC, Kerber K, et al: Clean birth and postnatal care practices to reduce neonatal deaths from sepsis and tetanus: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect. BMC Public Health. 2011, 11 (Suppl 3): S11-10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Moore ER, Anderson GC, Bergman N, Dowswell T: Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, CD003519-3Google Scholar
  12. Kumar V, Shearer JC, Kumar A, Darmstadt GL: Neonatal hypothermia in low resource settings: a review. J Perinatol. 2009, 29 (6): 401-412. 10.1038/jp.2008.233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Debes AK, Kohli A, Walker N, Edmond K, Mullany LC: Time to initiation of breastfeeding and neonatal mortality and morbidity: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13 (Suppl 3): S19-10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. WHO: WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. 2013, Geneva: World Health Organization, [http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/postnatal-care-recommendations/en/]Google Scholar
  15. Imdad A, Bautista RM, Senen KA, Uy ME, Mantaring JB, Bhutta ZA: Umbilical cord antiseptics for preventing sepsis and death among newborns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013, 5: CD008635-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. WHO/UNICEF: Joint Statement Home visits for the newborn: strategy to improve survival. 2009, Geneva: World Health Organization, WHO/FCH/CAH/09.02Google Scholar
  17. Wall SN, Lee AC, Niermeyer S, English M, Keenan WJ, Carlo W, et al: Neonatal resuscitation in low-resource settings: What, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up?. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009, 107 (Suppl 1): S47-S64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Page C, Prost A, Hossen M, Azad K, Kuddus A, Roy SS, et al: Is essential newborn care provided by institutions and after home births? Analysis of prospective data from community trials in rural South Asia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014, 14: 99-10.1186/1471-2393-14-99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. van den Broek NR, Graham WJ: Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda. BJOG. 2009, 116 (Suppl 1): 18-21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Spector JM, Agrawal P, Kodkany B, Lipsitz S, Lashoher A, Dziekan G, et al: Improving quality of care for maternal and newborn health: prospective pilot study of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (5): e35151-10.1371/journal.pone.0035151.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. WHO: World Health Organization recommendations: optimizing health worker roles to improve access to key maternal and newborn health interventions through task shifting. 2012, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  22. Dickson KE, Simen-Kapeu A, Kinney MV, Huicho L, Vesel L, Lackritz E, et al: Every Newborn: health-systems bottlenecks and strategies to accelerate scale-up in countries. Lancet. 2014, 384 (9941): 438-454. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60582-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, et al: Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014, 384 (9948): 1129-1145. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Adam T, Lim SS, Mehta S, Bhutta ZA, Fogstad H, Mathai M, et al: Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries. BMJ. 2005, 331 (7525): 1107-10.1136/bmj.331.7525.1107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Lawn JE, Kinney MV, Black RE, Pitt C, Cousens S, Kerber K, et al: Newborn survival: a multi-country analysis of a decade of change. Health Policy and Planning. 2012, 27 (Suppl 3): iii6-ii28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawn JE, Lee AC, Kinney M, Sibley L, Carlo WA, Paul VK, et al: Two million intrapartum-related stillbirths and neonatal deaths: where, why, and what can be done?. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009, 107 (Suppl 1): S5-18. S19View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. United Nations Commission on Life-Saving Commodities for Women and Children. 2012, [http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Final%20UN%20Commission%20Report_14sept2012.pdf]
  28. Lawn JE, Manandhar A, Haws RA, Darmstadt GL: Reducing one million child deaths from birth asphyxia--a survey of health systems gaps and priorities. Health Res Policy Syst. 2007, 5: 4-10.1186/1478-4505-5-4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Daly P, Taylor M, Tinker A: Integrating Essential Newborn Care Into Countries' Policies and Programs- Policy Perspectives on Newborn Health. 2003, [http://www.prb.org/pdf/integratessentcare_eng.pdf]Google Scholar
  30. Dickson Kim, Kinney Mary, Moxon Sarah, Ashton Joanne, Zaka Nabila, Simen-Kapeu Aline, Sharma Gaurav, Kerber Kate, Daelmans Bernadette, Gülmezoglu Metin A, Mathai Matthews, Nyange Christabel, Baye Martina, Lawn Joy: Scaling up quality care for mothers and newborns around the time of birth: an overview of methods and analyses of intervention-specific bottlenecks and solutions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015, 15 (Suppl 2): S1-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. The Partnership for Maternal Health, Newborn and Child Health: Essential Interventions, Commodities and Guidelines for Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health. 2011, [http://www.who.int/pmnch/knowledge/publications/201112_essential_interventions/en/]Google Scholar
  32. McCall EM, Alderdice F, Halliday HL, Jenkins JG, Vohra S: Interventions to prevent hypothermia at birth in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, CD004210-1Google Scholar
  33. Hanson LA: Session 1: Feeding and infant development breast-feeding and immune function. Proc Nutr Soc. 2007, 66 (3): 384-396. 10.1017/S0029665107005654.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Heinig M, Dewey K: Health effects of breastfeeding for mothers: A critical review. Nutr Res Rev. 1997, 10 (1): 35-56. 10.1079/NRR19970004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Duran R, Görker I, Küçükuğurluoğlu Y, Çiftdemir NA, Vatansever Özbek U, Acunaş B: Effect of neonatal resuscitation courses on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of newborn infants with perinatal asphyxia. Pediatr Int. 2012, 54 (1): 56-59. 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2011.03463.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mills A, Rasheed F, Tollman S: Strengthening Health Systems. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Edited by: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR. 2006, Washington (DC): World Bank, Chapter 3., [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11747/]2Google Scholar
  37. Peabody JW, Taguiwalo MM, Robalino DA, Frenk J: Improving the Quality of Care in Developing Countries. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Edited by: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR. 2006, Washington (DC): World Bank, Chapter 70., [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11790/]2Google Scholar
  38. Malhotra S, Zodpey SP, Vidyasagaran AL, Sharma K, Raj SS, Neogi SB, et al: Assessment of essential newborn care services in secondary-level facilities from two districts of India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2014, 32 (1): 130-141.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Msemo G, Massawe A, Mmbando D, Rusibamayila N, Manji K, Kidanto HL, et al: Newborn mortality and fresh stillbirth rates in Tanzania after helping babies breathe training. Pediatrics. 2013, 131 (2): e353-e360. 10.1542/peds.2012-1795.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee AC, Cousens S, Darmstadt GL, Blencowe H, Pattinson R, Moran NF, et al: Care during labour and birth for the prevention of intrapartum-related neonatal deaths: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect. BMC Public Health. 2011, 11 (Suppl 3): S10-10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. McPake B, Witter S, Ensor T, Fustukian S, Newlands D, Martineau T, Chirwa Y: Removing financial barriers to access reproductive, maternal and newborn health services: the challenges and policy implications for human resources for health. Hum Resour Health. 2013, 11 (Suppl 3): 46-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Moxon Sarah, Lawn Joy, Dickson Kim, Simen-Kapeu Aline, Gupta Gagan, Deorari Ashok, Singhal Nalini, New Karen, Kenner Carole, Bhutani Vinod, Kumar Rakesh, Molyneux Elizabeth, Blencowe Hannah: Inpatient care of small and sick newborns: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015, 15 (Suppl 2): S7-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Bosch-Capblanch X, Liaqat S, Garner P: Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011, 7 (9): CD006413-Google Scholar
  44. Dettrick Z, Firth S, Jimenez Soto E: Do Strategies to Improve Quality of Maternal and Child Health Care in Lower and Middle Income Countries Lead to Improved Outcomes? A Review of the Evidence. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (12): e83070-10.1371/journal.pone.0083070.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Nair M, Yoshida S, Lambrechts T, Boschi-Pinto C, Bose K, Mason EM, Mathai M: Facilitators and barriers to quality of care in maternal, newborn and child health: a global situational analysis through metareview. BMJ Open. 2014, 4 (5): e004749-10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004749.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Bhutta ZA, Lassi ZS, Mansoor N: Systematic Review on Human Resources for Health Interventions to Improve Maternal Health Outcomes: Evidence from Developing Countries. [http://www.who.int/pmnch/activities/human_resources/hrh_maternal_health_2010.pdf]
  47. Carlo WA, Goudar SS, Jehan I, Chomba E, Tshefu A, Garces A, et al: Newborn Care Training and Perinatal Mortality in Communities in Developing Countries. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362 (7): 614-623. 10.1056/NEJMsa0806033.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, et al: Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, 6: CD000259-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Buchan J, Couper ID, Tangcharoensathien V, Thepannya K, Jaskiewicz W, Perfilieva G, Dolea C: Early implementation of WHO recommendations for the retention of health workers in remote and rural areas. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2013, 91 (11): 834-840. 10.2471/BLT.13.119008.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Obara H, Sobel H: Quality maternal and newborn care to ensure a healthy start for every newborn in the World Health Organization Western Pacific Region. BJOG. 2014, 121 (Suppl. 4): 154-159.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Fullerton JT, Leshabari S: Assessment of midwifery pre-service training activities of the ACCESS project. USAID. 2010, [http://www.jhpiego.org/files/ACCESS_Preservice_Assessment.pdf]Google Scholar
  52. van Lonkhuijzen L, Dijkman A, van Roosmalen J, Zeeman G, Scherpbier A: A systematic review of the effectiveness of training in emergency obstetric care in low-resource environments. BJOG. 2010, 117: 777-787. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02561.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Frank JR: The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. 2005, Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of CanadaGoogle Scholar
  54. Bornbusch A, Dickens T, Hart C, Wright C: A stewardship approach to shaping the future of public health supply chain systems. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014, 2 (4): 403-409. 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00123.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Sharma Gaurav, Mathai Matthews, Dickson Eva Kim, Weeks Andrew, Hofmeyr Justus G, Lavender Tina, Day Tina Louise, Mathews Elizabeth Jiji, Fawcus Sue, Kapeu Simen Aline, de Bernis Luc: Quality care during labour and birth: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015, 15 (Suppl 2): S2-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Zaidi AK, Huskins WC, Thaver D, Bhutta ZA, Abbas Z, Goldmann DA: Hospital-acquired neonatal infections in developing countries. Lancet. 2005, 365 (9465): 1175-1188. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71881-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hussein J, Mavalankar DV, Sharma S, D'Ambruoso L: A review of health system infection control measures in developing countries: what can be learned to reduce maternal mortality. Global Health. 2011, 7: 14-10.1186/1744-8603-7-14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Hundley VA, Avan BI, Braunholtz D, Graham WJ: Are birth kits a good idea? A systematic review of the evidence. Midwifery. 2012, 28 (2): 204-215. 10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Seward N, Osrin D, Li L, Costello A, Pulkki-Brännström A-M, Houweling TAJ, et al: Association between Clean Delivery Kit Use, Clean Delivery Practices, and Neonatal Survival: Pooled Analysis of Data from Three Sites in South Asia. PLoS Med. 2012, 9 (2): e1001180-10.1371/journal.pmed.1001180.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Patel J, Posencheg M, Ades A: Proficiency and retention of neonatal resuscitation skills by paediatric residents. Pediatrics. 2012, 130 (3): 515-521. 10.1542/peds.2012-0149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Ersdal HL, Vossius C, Bayo E, Mduma E, Perlman J, Lippert A, Søreide E: A one-day "Helping Babies Breathe" course improves simulated performance but not clinical management of neonates. Resuscitation. 2013, 84 (10): 1422-1427. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. UNICEF: Breastfeeding on the worldwide agenda. Findings from a landscape analysis on political commitment for programmes to protect, promote and support breastfeeding. 2013, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  63. Kerber Kate, Mathai Matthews, Lewis Gwyneth, Flenady Vicki, HM Erwich Jaap Jan, Segun Tunde, Aliganyira Patrick, Abdelmegeid Ali, Allanson Emma, Roos Nathalie, Rhoda Natasha, Lawn Joy, Pattinson Robert: Counting every stillbirth and neonatal death to improve quality of care for every pregnant woman and her baby. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015, 15 (S2): S9-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Das JK, Kumar R, Salam RA, Lassi ZS, Bhutta ZA: Evidence from facility level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findings. Reprod Health. 2014, 11 (Suppl 2): S4-10.1186/1742-4755-11-S2-S4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Dotta A, Portanova A, Bianchi N, Ciofi Degli Atti M, Zanini R, Raponi M: Accreditation of birth centres: advantages for newborns. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013, 26 (4): 417-418. 10.3109/14767058.2012.715461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Smits H, Supachutikul A, Mate KS: Hospital accreditation: lessons from low- and middle-income countries. Globalization and Health. 2014, 10 (1): 65-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Phibbs CS, Bronstein JM, Buxton E, Phibbs RH: The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality. JAMA. 1996, 276 (13): 1054-1059. 10.1001/jama.1996.03540130052029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Kozhimannil KB, Hung P, Prasad S, Casey M, McClellan M, Moscovice IS: Birth volume and the quality of obstetric care in rural hospitals. J Rural Health. 2014, 30 (4): 335-343. 10.1111/jrh.12061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Krupp K, Madhivanan P: Leveraging human capital to reduce maternal mortality in India: enhanced public health system or public-private partnership?. Human Resources for Health. 2009, 7: 18-10.1186/1478-4491-7-18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Salam RA, Lassi ZS, Das JK, Bhutta ZA: Evidence from district level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findings. Reprod Health. 2014, 11 (Suppl 2): S3-10.1186/1742-4755-11-S2-S3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J: A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014, 14: 2-10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  72. El-Jardali F, Lavis JN, Ataya N, Jamal D, Ammar W, Raouf S: Use of health systems evidence by policymakers in eastern Mediterranean countries: views, practices, and contextual influences. MC Health Serv Res. 2012, 12: 200-10.1186/1472-6963-12-200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Moxon Sarah, Ruysen Harriet, Kerber Kate, Amouzou Agbessi, Fournier Suzanne, Grove John, Moran Allisyn, Vaz Lara, Blencowe Hannah, Conroy Niall, Gülmezoglu Metin A, Vogel Joshua, Rawlins Barbara, Sayed Rubayet, Hill Kathleen, Vivio Donna, Qazi Shamim, Sitrin Deborah, Seale Anna, Wall Steve, Jacobs Troy, Ruiz Peláez Gabriel Juan, Guenther Tanya, Coffey Patricia, Dawson Penny, Marchant Tanya, Waiswa Peter, Deorari Ashok, Enweronu-Laryea Christabel, Arifeen El Shams, Lee Anne, Mathai Matthews, Lawn Joy: Count every newborn; a measurement improvement roadmap for coverage data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015, 15 (S2): S8-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Pattinson RC: Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health-care outcomes: RHL commentary. The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization, [http://apps.who.int/rhl/effective_practice_and_organizing_care/rpcom2/en/]
  75. Bucagu M, Kagubare JM, Basinga P, Ngabo F, Timmons BK, Lee AC: Impact of health systems strengthening on coverage of maternal health services in Rwanda, 2000-2010: a systematic review. Reprod Health Matters. 2012, 20 (39): 50-61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Joshi P, Thukral A, Joshi M, Deorari AK, Vatsa M: Comparing the Effectiveness of Webinars and Participatory learning on essential newborn care (ENBC) in the class room in terms of acquisition of knowledge and skills of student nurses: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2013, 80 (2): 168-170. 10.1007/s12098-012-0742-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K, Colby C, Fairchild K, Gallagher J, et al: Part 15: neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010, 122 (18 Suppl 3): S909-S919.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Comfort AB, Peterson LA, Hatt LE: Effect of health insurance on the use and provision of maternal health services and maternal and neonatal health outcomes: a systematic review. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013, 31 (4 Suppl 2): 81-105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Waiswa WP: The impact of user fees on access to health services in low- and middle-income countries: RHL commentary. 2012, The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization, [http://apps.who.int/rhl/effective_practice_and_organizing_care/cd009094_waiswaw_com/en/]Google Scholar
  80. Lassi Zohra S, Haider Batool A, Bhutta Zulfiqar A: Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, CD007754-11Google Scholar
  81. Bhutta ZA, Salam RA, Lassi ZS, Austin A, Langer A: Approaches to improve Quality of Care (QoC) for women and newborns: conclusions, evidence gaps and research priorities. Reproductive Health. 2014, 11 (Suppl 2): S5-10.1186/1742-4755-11-S2-S5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Opiyo N, English M: In-service training for health professionals to improve care of the seriously ill newborn or child in low and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, CD007071-4Google Scholar
  83. Soto EJ, La Vincente S, Clark A, Firth S, Morgan A, Dettrick Z, et al: Investment case for improving maternal and child health: results from four countries. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13: 601-10.1186/1471-2458-13-601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Bahl R, Qazi S, Darmstadt GL, Martines J: Why is continuum of care from home to health facilities essential to improve perinatal survival?. Semin Perinatol. 2010, 34 (6): 477-85. 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Gibberd R, Hancock S, Howley P, Richards K: Using indicators to quantify the potential to improve the quality of health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004, 16 (Suppl 1): i37-i43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Marston C, Renedo A, McGowan CR, Portela A: Effects of community participation on improving uptake of skilled care for maternal and newborn health: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (2): e55012-10.1371/journal.pone.0055012.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Ersdal HL, Singhal N: Resuscitation in resource-limited settings. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013, 18 (6): 373-378. 10.1016/j.siny.2013.07.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Singhal N, Lockyer J, Fidler H, Keenan W, Little G, Bucher S, et al: Helping Babies Breathe: global neonatal resuscitation program development and formative educational evaluation. Resuscitation. 2012, 83 (1): 90-96. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. UNICEF: Global Databases 2014, based on MICS, DHS, and other nationally representative household surveys, 2006 - 2012. [http://www.data.unicef.org]
  90. UNICEF Global Nutritional Database 2012, based on MICS, DHS and other national surveys, 2007 - 2011, except for India. [http://www.data.unicef.org]
  91. Taqi I: Global Breastfeeding Advocacy Initiative. Breastfeeding Medicine. 2014, 9 (7): 355-357. 10.1089/bfm.2014.0084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Kaikini KL, Hyrkas K: Mothers' Intentions to Breastfeed and Hospital Practices on Breastfeeding: A Longitudinal Study at 6 Months After Birth on Predictors of Breastfeeding in a Cohort of Mothers From a Large Northern New England Medical Center. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 2014, 43 (S1): S78-10.1111/1552-6909.12458.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Haroon S, Das JK, Salam RA, Imdad A, Bhutta ZA: Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13 (Suppl 3): S20-10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Labbok MH: Global baby-friendly hospital initiative monitoring data: update and discussion. Breastfeed Med. 2012, 7: 210-222. 10.1089/bfm.2012.0066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. UNICEF: Consolidated report of six-country review of breastfeeding programmes. 2010, New York: UNICEFGoogle Scholar
  96. Pérez-Escamilla R, Curry L, Minhas D, Taylor L, Bradley : Scaling up of breastfeeding promotion programs in low- and middle-income countries: the "breastfeeding gear" model. Adv Nutr. 2012, 3 (6): 790-800. 10.3945/an.112.002873.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Enweronu-Laryea et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.