Menacker F, Hamilton B: Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States NCHS data brief, no 35. 2010, Hyatttsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics
Google Scholar
Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S: Births: preliminary data for 2011. National vital statistics reports. In., vol. 61. 2012, National Center for Health Statistics.: Hyattsville, MD
Google Scholar
Healthy People 2020: Improving the health of Americans. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicid=26,
Getahun D, Strickland D, Lawrence JM, Fassett MJ, Koebnick C, Jacobsen SJ: Racial and ethnic disparities in the trends in primary cesarean delivery based on indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 201 (4): 421-427.
Google Scholar
Coonrod DV, Drachman D, Hobson P, Manriquez M: Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 198 (6): 694-
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lipkind HS, Duzyj C, Rosenberg TJ, Funai EF, Chavkin W, Chiasson MA: Disparities in Cesarean Delivery Rates and Associated Adverse Neonatal Outcomes in New York City Hospitals. Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 113 (6): 1239-1247.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Aron DC, Gordon HS, DiGiuseppe DL, Harper DL, Rosenthal GE: Variations in risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates according to race and health insurance. Med Care. 2000, 38 (1): 35-44. 10.1097/00005650-200001000-00005.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ford J, Grewal J, Mikolajczyk R, Meikle S, Zhang J: Primary cesarean delivery among parous women in the United States, 1990–2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 112 (6): 1235-1241. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818ce092.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Scott-Wright AO, Flanagan TM, Wrona RM: Predictors of cesarean section delivery among college-educated black and white women, Davidson County, Tennessee, 1990–1994. J Natl Med Assoc. 1999, 91 (5): 273-277.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Clark SL, Belfort MA, Hankins GDV, Meyers JA, Houser FM: Variation in the rates of operative delivery in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 196 (6): 526-e521-526.e525
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Declercq E, Menacker F, MacDorman M: Rise in "no indicated risk" primary caesareans in the United States, 1991–2001: cross sectional analysis. Br Med J. 2005, 330 (7482): 71-72. 10.1136/bmj.38279.705336.0B.
Article
Google Scholar
Declercq E, Menacker F, MacDorman M: Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991–2002. Am J Public Health. 2006, 96 (5): 867-872. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.052381.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Baicker K, Buckles KS, Chandra A: Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery. Health Affairs. 2006, 25 (5): w355-w367. 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w355.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gregory KD: Monitoring, risk adjustment and strategies to decrease cesarean rates. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000, 12 (6): 481-486. 10.1097/00001703-200012000-00004.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bailit J, Garrett J: Comparison of risk-adjustment methodologies for cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 102 (1): 45-51. 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00356-9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bailit JL: Measuring the quality of inpatient obstetrical care. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007, 62 (3): 207-213. 10.1097/01.ogx.0000256800.21193.ce. 210.1097/1001.ogx.0000256800.0000221193.ce
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: ACOG practice bulletin no. 12 intrauterine growth restriction. 2000, Washington, DC: ACOG
Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: ACOG practice bulletin, no. 22. Fetal macrosomia. 2000, Washington, DC: ACOG
Google Scholar
Oken E, Kleinman K, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman M: A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr. 2003, 3 (1): 6-10.1186/1471-2431-3-6.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Margerison Zilko CE, Rehkopf D, Abrams B: Association of maternal gestational weight gain with short- and long-term maternal and child health outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 202 (6): 571-574.
Article
Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc: SAS Version 9.2. 2008, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc
Google Scholar
IBM Corp: IBM SPSS statistics of MAC. 2012, Armonk, NY: IBN Corporation, 200
Google Scholar
Washington S, Caughey A, Cheng Y, Bryant A: Racial and ethnic differences in indications for primary cesarean delivery at term: experience of one institution. Birth. 2012, 39 (2): 128-134. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00530.x.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, Washington AE: Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 202 (4): 335-343. 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.864.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Constantine M, Saade G: The first cesarean: role of "fetal distress" diagnosis. Semin Perinatol. 2012, 36: 379-383. 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.023.
Article
Google Scholar
Dobie S, Baldwin L, Rosenblatt R, Fordyce M, Andrilla H, Hart L: How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? the Washington state experience with low-risk pregnancies. Matern Child Health J. 1998, 2 (3): 145-154. 10.1023/A:1021875026135.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
DiGiuseppe DL, Aron DC, Ranbom L, Harper DL, Rosenthal GE: Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Matern Child Health J. 2002, 6 (3): 169-179. 10.1023/A:1019726112597.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, Evans SR, Kotelchuck M, Simon C, Weiss J, Heffner L: Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 109 (3): 669-677. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255668.20639.40.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Koh HK, Graham G, Giled SA: Reducing racial and ethnic disparities: the action plan from the department of health and human services. Health Affairs. 2011, 30 (10): 1822-1829. 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0673.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Decleraq E: The causes and consequences of disparities by race/ethnicty in cesarean section rates. Final Report. 2010, 40: 08720-
Google Scholar
Chung JH, Garite TJ, Kirk AM, Hollard AL, Wing DA, Lagrew DC: Intrinsic racial differences in the risk of cesarean delivery are not explained by differences in caregivers or hospital site of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 194 (5): 1323-1328. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.043.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kabir AA, Pridjian G, Steinmann WC, Herrera EA, Khan MM: Racial differences in cesareans: an analysis of U.S.: national inpatient sample data. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005. 2001, 105 (4): 710-718.
Article
Google Scholar
Grivell R, Reilly A, Oakey H, Chan A, Dodd J: Maternal and neontal outcomes following induction of labor: a cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012, 91: 198-203. 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01298.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Laughon S, Zhang J, Grewal J, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Reddy U: Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 206 (6): 481-486.
Article
Google Scholar
JS B, Campbell DM, Graham WJ, Penney GC, Ryan M, MH H: Can obstetric complications explain the high levels of obstetric interventions and maternity service use among older women? a retrospective analysis of routinely collected data. BJOG. 2001, 108 (9): 910-918.
Google Scholar
Yogev Y, Hiersch L, Yariv O, Peled Y, Wiznitzer A, Melamed N: Association and risk factors between induction of labor and cesarean section. J Mater-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013, 0: 1-19.
Google Scholar
Ethrenthal D, Jiang X, Strobino DM: Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 116 (1): 35-42. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e10c5c.
Article
Google Scholar
Holland E, Moore Simas T, Doyle Curiale D, Liao X, Waring M: Self-reported pre-pregnancy versus weight measured at first prenatal visit: effects on categorization of pre-pregnancy body mass index. Matern Child Health J. 2012, 18:
Google Scholar
National Quality Forum: Perinatal and reproductive health endorsement maintenance: technical report. 2012, Washington, DC: National Quality Forum
Google Scholar