Implications of perceived empathy from spouses during pregnancy for health-related quality of life among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study in Anhui, China

Table 5 Multivariate linear regression analysis of the factors associated with the MCS score among pregnant women (n = 311)

Model	Standardized coefficients	t	p	B(95% CI)	F	P
	Beta	t	p	B(95% CI)
(Constant)		2.238	0.03	1.170 ~ 18.200	12.228	< 0.01
Purpose-designed item 6	0.127	2.298	0.02	0.221 ~ 2.862
Occupational stress	0.220	4.155	< 0.01	1.518 ~ 4.248
Adherence to scientific dietary recommendations	0.127	2.421	0.03	0.561 ~ 5.432
Educational level	0.120	2.243	0.03	0.161 ~ 2.460
Maternal physical condition during pregnancy	0.167	3.085	< 0.01	1.050 ~ 4.750
Empathic concern	0.158	2.875	< 0.01	0.126 ~ 0.671
Planned pregnancy	0.105	2.061	0.04	0.106 ~ 4.591

R² = 0.220, Adj. R² = 0.202
Purpose-designed item 6 (1 = poor, 2 = ordinary, 3 = good and 4 = very good); occupational stress (1 = high, 2 = ordinary, 3 = low or none); adherence to scientific dietary recommendations (1 = no, 2 = yes); educational level (1 = junior high school or below, 2 = senior high school, 3 = college, 4 = undergraduate or above); maternal physical condition during pregnancy (1 = poor, 2 = ordinary, 3 = good); and planned pregnancy (1 = no, 2 = yes)
The direction is indicated by the sign of the standardized coefficient: positive coefficients ( +) indicate a positive relationship (better outcomes with higher scores)
Abbreviations: Purpose-designed item 6: “During pregnancy, my husband expresses his understanding to me through verbal or non‐verbal communication”, which reflects behavioural empathy, MCS mental component summary

ISSN: 1471-2393