Skip to main content

Table 5 Bivariable and multivariable analysis of factors associated to key ENA practice among pregnant women in Worabe town, SNNPR, Ethiopia

From: The practice of key essential nutrition actions among pregnant women in southwest Ethiopia: implications for optimal pregnancy outcomes

Variables

Key ENA Practice

COR (95%CI)

AOR (95%CI)

P-value

Suboptimal

Optimal

Age of women in years

   

< 20

8(8.2%)

13(4.7%)

0.479(0.16,1.47)

2.08(0.76–11.1)

0.120

21–24

18(18.4%)

14(5.1%)

1.846(0.7,4.8)

1.67(0.49,5.7)

0.413

25–29

32(32.7%)

96(34.9%)

2.785(1.01,7.66)

3.17(0.79,12.69)

0.102

30–34

19(19.4%)

86(31.3%)

1.934(0.71,5.3)

1.81(0.44,7.45)

0.414

≥ 35

21(21.4%)

66(24%)

1

1

 

Monthly household income in ETB

  

< 2500

33(33.7%)

92(33.5%)

1.24(0.73–2.08)

2.22(1.12–4.35)

0.022

2500–5000

49(50%)

111(40.4%)

1.61(0.32–1.21)

1.43(0.56–3.23)

0.504

> 5000

16(16.3%)

72(26.2%)

1

1

 

Parity

     

Primipara

15(15.3%)

19(6.9%)

2.43(1.18,5.0)

1.10(0.36–3.33)

0.877

Multipara

83(84.7%)

256(93.1%)

1

1

 

Attitude of key ENA message

   

Poor

16(16.3%)

30(10.9%)

1.59(0.83,3.07)

1.83(0.82,4.1)

0.140

Good

82(83.7%)

245(89.1%)

1

1

 

Knowledge of key ENA message

   

Poor

47(48.0%)

56(20.4%)

3.6(2.2,5.9)

3.36(1.81,6.26)

< 0.0001

Good

51(52.0%)

219(79.6%)

1

1

 

Residence

     

Urban

47(48%)

173(62.9%)

1

1

 

Rural

51(52%)

102(37.1%)

1.84(1.16,2.93)

2.31(1.25,4.4)

0.011

Number of family member

   

< 4

32(32.7%)

46(16.7%)

2.07(1.14,3.74)

1.03(0.43,2.48

0.941

5–6

35(35.7%)

104(37.8)

2.50(1.37,4.59)

1.41(0.49,4.01)

0.525

7–8

30(30.6%)

108(39.3%)

11.8(1.5,93.4)

5.57(0.52,59)

0.155

> 9

1(1%)

17(6.2%)

1

1

 
  1. Note Hosmer and Lemeshow’s Test was 0.676 depicting model fitness