Skip to main content

Table 3 The predictors of intention to participate as a group facilitator in CenteringPregnancy in their future practice, among U.S. Family Medicine (N = 212) and OB/GYN (N = 176) residents responding to a survey between 2017 to 2019, applying adjusted logistic regression models

From: National assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents’ experiences with CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care

 

FM

OB/GYN

 

Adjusted model

Adjusted model

 

O.R

95%CI

O.R

95%CI

Level of engagement

1.43

0.92, 2.23

1.40*

1.02, 1.94

Type of engagement

 Continuing education off-site

7.18

0.89, 57.82

1.04

0.36, 3.05

 Trainings held at residency

3.09*

1.26, 7.54

1.22

0.62, 2.42

 Trainings held at CHI

3.03

0.37, 24.56

2.65

0.65, 10.83

 Media attention

0.39

0.14, 1.07

1.45

0.68, 3.12

 Journal articles & scholarly literature

0.95

0.35, 2.63

1.43

0.67, 3.07

 Classroom study and formal coursework

1.25

0.47, 3.37

1.92

0.79, 4.67

 Others

1.01

0.26, 3.97

1.69

0.44, 6.58

Hours of exposure

  < 5 h (ref)

  5–15 h

1.68

0.56, 4.98

1.10

0.49, 2.44

   > 15 h

7.46**

1.87, 29.79

2.93*

1.13, 7.63

Familiarity

 Not familiar (ref)

 Somewhat familiar

0.97

0.24,3.84

1.12

0.33,3.83

  Familiar

4.17

0.79,21.99

1.53

0.45,5.20

  Very familiar

5.74*

1.08,30.60

2.63

0.74,9.31

Knowledge

 Haven't heard/ don’t know about it (ref)

  Support group/education class

1.80

0.18, 18.30

0.38

0.02, 6.52

  Group based comprehensive prenatal care

5.73

0.68, 48.29

1.15

0.09, 14.95

  Level of support

0.78**

0.66, 0.92

0.85**

0.76, 0.96

  Anticipated barrier

1.03

0.95, 1.12

1.01

0.95, 1.08

  1. Intention to participate as a group facilitator in CenteringPregnancy (CP) in their future practice was scored 0 (did not agree) or 1 (agreed). Types of exposure was scored 0 – 6 with higher score corresponding to a higher exposure to continuing education through conferences or in-service training off-site, trainings held at the residency center, trainings held at the CenteringHealthcare Institute (CHI), classroom study and formal coursework, media attention (newspapers, radio, tv, social media, etc.), journal article or scholarly literature, or other source. Covariates of the adjusted logistic regression models: year of participation, age, sex, year of residency training
  2. S.D Standard Deviation, O.R Odds Ratio, 95%CI 95% Confidence Interval
  3. Significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001