Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the outcome of COH in terms of oocytes and embryos among the three protocols

From: Analysis of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols in women over 35 years old with poor ovarian response: a real-world study

Protocols

GnRH agonist

(n = 2116)

GnRH antagonist (n = 1628)

Mild stimulation

(n = 512)

P value

Starting dosage of Gn used (IU)

262.41 ± 73.55

223.85 ± 62.52#

115.83 ± 58.29#*

< 0.001

Total dosage of Gn used (IU)

3952.59 ± 385.13

3251.85 ± 317.89#

2696.25 ± 291.81#*

< 0.001

Duration of Gn used (days)

14.04 ± 3.02

11.25 ± 2.96#

12.53 ± 2.74#

0.143

Oocyte number

4.02 ± 2.25

3.15 ± 1.52#

2.40 ± 1.26#*

< 0.001

MII number

3.25 ± 2.59

2.60 ± 1.84#

1.93 ± 1.03#*

< 0.001

Oocyte maturation rates (%)

80.84 ± 14.36

81.51 ± 19.85

80.46 ± 15.93

0.931

Transferable embryos

1.73 ± 1.02

1.35 ± 1.22#

1.10 ± 0.86#

0.016

Good-quality embryos

1.51 ± 0.97

1.04 ± 0.89#

0.97 ± 0.68#

0.042

Fertilization rates (%)

63.41 ± 32.52

59.43 ± 31.53

60.62 ± 36.11

0.825

OHSS rates

4.63(98/2116)

3.99(65/1628)

2.15(11/512)#

0.038

  1. MII, metaphase II; OHSS, ovarian hyperstimulate syndrome; #P < 0.05, vs. GnRH agonist
  2. *P < 0.05, vs. GnRH antagonist