Table 2 Logistic regression models testing spatial accessibility to health facilities among pregnant women with and without IPV in Uganda, N = 986

Any IPV

 No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.2 (1.1, 1.5)

1.1 (0.8, 1.6)

1.6 (1.2, 2.3)

1.5 (1.1, 3.8)

Predisposing factors

Maternal age

1.1 (0.9, 1.2)

0.8 (0.7, 0.9)

Parity

1.4 (1.2, 1.8)

1.3 (1.1, 1.7)

Residence

 Urban

Ref

Ref

 Rural

2.5 (1.4, 4.5)

2.9 (1.5, 6.1)

Partner controlling behavior

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

0.9 (0.7, 1.1)

0.8 (0.5, 1.2)

Enabling factors

Household wealth index

 Richest

Ref

Ref

 Richer

1.7 (0.8, 3.4)

1.8 (0.8, 3.9)

 Middle

1.9 (0.9, 3.7)

1.5 (0.6, 3.4)

 Poorer

2.5 (1.3, 5.1)

2.6 (1.1, 5.8)

 Poorest

3.9 (1.9, 7.9)

3.2 (1.4, 7.6)

Occupation

 Agricultural

Ref

Ref

 Non-Agricultural

0.7 (0.5, 0.9)

1.1 (0.6, 1.6)

 Unemployed

0.9 (0.6, 1.4)

1.7 (0.9, 2.9)

Level of formal education

>Secondary

Ref

Ref

 Secondary

0.9 (0.4, 2.2)

0.5 (0.2, 1.3)

 Primary

1.5 (0.6, 3.4)

0.6 (0.2, 1.6)

 No education

2.2 (0.9, 5.2)

0.9 (0.3, 2.7)

Economic empowerment

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.5 (1.1, 1.9)

1.2 (0.8, 1.8)

Number of ANC visits

0.8 (0.6, 0.9)

0.6 (0.4, 0.8)

Need factors

Wanted current pregnancy

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

0.6 (0.3, 1.4)

0.9 (0.7, 1.4)

Difficulty getting treatment money

 No problem

Ref

Ref

 Problem

1.5 (1.2, 1.9)

1.3 (0.9, 1.9)

Afraid of partner

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.1 (0.9, 1.4)

1.1 (0.7, 1.5)

Accepted partner abuse

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.1 (0.9, 1.5)

1.3 (0.9, 1.9)