From: Association between food environments and fetal growth in pregnant Brazilian women
Food environments | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
in natura food density | Ultra-processed food density | |||
Variables | 2nd tertile (> = p33.3; = < p66.6) | 1st tertile (< p33.3) | 2nd tertile (> = p33.3; = < p66.6) | 3rd tertile (> p66.6) |
Adjusted OR (CI 95%) | Adjusted OR (CI 95%) | Adjusted OR (CI 95%) | Adjusted OR (CI 95%) | |
SGA | 1.06 (1.05–1.07) | 1.01 (1.01–1.03) | 0.99 (0.98–1.01) | 1.04 (1.02–1.06) |
LGA | 0.93 (0.92–0.94) | 0.97 (0.96–0.98) | 0.93 (0.92–0.94) | 0.87 (0.85–0.88) |
LBW | 1.11 (1.09–1.12) | 1.10 (1.08–1.12) | 1.11 (1.09–1.13) | 1.13 (1.11–1.16) |
SGA | ||||
White | 1.02 (0.99–1.04) | 0.98 (0.96–1.01) | 0.96 (0.93–0.99) | 0.97 (0.93–1.01) |
Black | 1.05 (0.99–1.11) | 1.01 (0.99–1.07) | 1.02(0.96–1.09) | 1.09 (1.01–1.18) |
Yellow | 0.95 (0.77–1.18) | 0.71 (0.57–0.89) | 0.91 (0.69–1.19) | 1.11 (0.81–1.51) |
Mixed-race | 1.07 (1.06–1.10) | 1.02 (1.01–1.03) | 0.98 (0.96–0.99) | 1.06 (1.04–1.09) |
Indigenous | 1.00 (0.89–1.12) | 0.89 (0.78–1.03) | 1.03 (0.86–1.23) | 0.94 (0.71–1.24) |
LGA | ||||
White | 0.99 (0.97–1.01) | 1.03 (0.98–1.05) | 0.94 (0.92–0.96) | 0.91 (0.89–0.93) |
Black | 0.89 (0.85–0.93) | 0.95 (0.91–0.98) | 0.94 (0.89–0.99) | 0.90 (0.85–0.95) |
Yellow | 0.87 (0.74–1.02) | 0.92 (0.78–1.08) | 1.04 (0.85–1.05) | 0.95 (0.75–1.20) |
Mixed-race | 0.89 (0.88–0.90) | 0.95 (0.94–0.96) | 0.94 (0.93–0.95) | 0.82 (0.81–0.84) |
Indigenous | 1.02 (0.93–1.12) | 0.91 (0.82–1.03) | 0.97 (0.84–1.11) | 1.20 (1.01–1.45) |
LBW | ||||
White | 1.04 (0.96–1.07) | 1.01 (0.99–1.05) | 0.99 (0.97–1.14) | 1.01 (1.00–1.14) |
Black | 1.14 (1.07–1.22) | 1.14 (1.08–1.22) | 1.01 (0.93–1.09) | 1.07 (0.98–1.17) |
Yellow | 1.19 (0.95–1.51) | 0.86 (0.66–1.11) | 0.83 (0.62–1.13) | 1.04 (0.74–1.47) |
Mixed-race | 1.13 (1.12–1.16) | 1.12 (1.10–1.14) | 1.09 (1.07–1.12) | 1.17 (1.14–1.20) |
Indigenous | 0.98 (0.86–1.13) | 1.17 (0.99–1.34) | 1.22 (0.99–1.48) | 0.99 (0.74–1.33) |