Skip to main content

Table 6 Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models of women’s utilization of dental care during pregnancy by practices of prenatal health providers, N = 515

From: The role of oral and prenatal healthcare providers in the promotion of oral health for pregnant women

Prenatal health provider’s practice

Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

p-Value

Adjusted OR (95% CI) a

p-Value

Looked in moutha

3.06 (2.32–4.03)

< 0.001

3.79 (2.47–5.82)

< 0.001

Referred to dental careb

4.19 (3.11–5.64)

< 0.001

4.29 (2.67–6.88)

< 0.001

Advised to visit dentist during pregnancyc

3.24 (2.43–4.33)

< 0.001

3.37 (2.16–5.27)

< 0.001

Asked about oral healthd

1.92 (1.50–2.47)

< 0.001

2.83 (1.90–4.22)

< 0.001

Talked about importance of oral health care during pregnancye

1.902 (1.47–2.45)

< 0.001

2.19 (1.48–3.24)

< 0.001

Explained ways to care for teeth and gumsf

2.44 (1.81–3.28)

< 0.001

2.49 (1.59–3.89)

< 0.001

Handed out oral health educational materialg

2.81 (1.94–4.09)

< 0.001

2.92 (1.70–5.03)

< 0.001

  1. All multivariate models were adjusted for age, education, family income, health insurance, nationality, and any dental problems
  2. a Hosmer & Lemeshow Chi-square = 4.70, p = 0.8; Pseudo R2 = 0.11; b Hosmer & Lemeshow Chi-square = 8.10, p = 0.4; Pseudo R2 = 0.11; c Hosmer & Lemeshow Chi-square = 5.12, p = 0.7; Pseudo R2 = 0.09; d Hosmer & Lemeshow Chi-square = 11.82, p = 0.1; Pseudo R2 = 0.08; e Hosmer & Lemeshow Chi-square = 4.48, p = 0.8; Pseudo R2 = 0.05; f Hosmer & Lemeshow Chi-square = 11.52, p = 0.2; Pseudo R2 = 0.06; g Hosmer & Lemeshow Chi-square = 2.68, p = 1.0; Pseudo R2 = 0.05