Skip to main content

Table 2 Critical appraisal results for the quasi-experimental studies included in the review

From: The roles of multi-component interventions in reducing mistreatment of women and enhancing respectful maternity care: a systematic review

Studies

Critical appraisal questions

Score

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Q9

Abuya et al. [23]

Y

N

Y

N

N

NA

Y

Y

Y

6

Afulani et al. [33]

Y

N

Y

N

N

NA

Y

Y

Y

6

Asefa et al. [35]

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

N

N

5

Asefa et al. [34]

Y

Y

Y

N

N

NA

Y

Y

Y

7

Mihret et al. [37]

Y

N

Y

N

N

NA

Y

Y

N

5

Oosthuizen et al. [39]

Y

N

Y

Y

N

NA

Y

Y

Y

7

Ratcliffe et al. [40]

Y

Y

Y

N

N

NA

Y

N

N

5

Ratcliffe et al. [41]

Y

Y

Y

N

N

NA

Y

Y

N

6

Umbeli et al. [42]

Y

Y

Y

N

N

NA

Y

UC

N

5

Total % of positive scores

100

55

100

11

0

11

100

66

55

 
  1. JBI critical appraisal checklist for quasi-experimental studies (Y = Yes, N = No, UC = Unclear N/A = Not Applicable)
  2. Q1 = Is it clear in the study what is the 'cause' and what is the 'effect' (i.e. there is no confusion about which variable comes first)?
  3. Q2 = Were the participants included in any comparisons similar?
  4. Q3 = Were the participants included in any comparisons receiving similar treatment/care, other than the exposure or intervention of interest?
  5. Q4 = Was there a control group?
  6. Q5 = Were there multiple measurements of the outcome both pre and post the intervention/exposure?
  7. Q6 = Was follow up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow up adequately described and analyzed?
  8. Q7 = Were the outcomes of participants included in any comparisons measured in the same way?
  9. Q8 = Were outcomes measured in a reliable way?
  10. Q9 = Was appropriate statistical analysis used?