Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect sizes and probabilities estimated by unadjusted and adjusted models for each outcome variable

From: Improving the readiness and clinical quality of antenatal care – findings from a quasi-experimental evaluation of a performance-based financing scheme in Burkina Faso

 

Adjusted DiD model *

 

Effect δ

(95%-CI)

Service Readiness a

0.10

(0.04; 0.18)

Screening Qualityb

 First Visit

-0.0

(-0.20; 0.15)

 Follow-up visit

-0.08

(-0.18; 0.03)

 Prevention Qualityb

 First Visit

-0.01

(-0.22; 0.17)

 Follow-up visit

-0.02

(-0.12; 0.09)

  1. ANC Antenatal care, CI Confidence interval, DiD Difference-in-differences, PBF Performance-based financing
  2. *Covariates (binary variables) used for model adjustment: provider qualification, length of the consultation time, clients’ literacy, age, parity, and socioeconomic status
  3. ascore computed at facility level
  4. bscore computed at case level
Back to article page

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us