Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of studies measuring the secondary outcomes of breastfeeding initiation, duration, and rates (n = 5, with 3 papers reporting the same study)

From: Effects of breastfeeding training programmes for midwives on breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author (year); country

Study design; sample size and characteristics

Follow-up schedule

Intervention (breastfeeding training programme for midwives); control group

Outcome(s) and measure(s)

Results

Zakarija-Grkovic et al. (2012); Croatia [30]

Quasi-experimental design

Intervention group: 385 mothers

Control group: 388 mothers

Mother/infant pairs were followed over a 12-month period both before and after training of maternity staff

Baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months postpartum

Intervention group:

Programme: the UNICEF/WHO 20-h course

Content: breastfeeding promotion and support

Duration: 15.5 h of theory and 4.5 h of practice

Providers: a neonatologist, a gynaecologist, a paediatrician, an economist/representative of a voluntary parenting group, a psychologist, and a general practitioner who is also a board-certified lactation consultant, midwife, and community nurse

Materials: standard course materials including guidelines of course facilitators, outlines for course sessions, and PowerPoint slides for the course

Control group:

No training

Breastfeeding rate and initiation: self-designed questionnaires

• Compared with the control group, the proportion of newborns exclusively breastfed during the first 48 h after birth in the hospital was significantly higher in the intervention group (p < 0.01)

• The proportion of mothers who initiated breastfeeding in the hospital in the control group was higher than that in the intervention group (p < 0.05)

• No significant differences were seen in breastfeeding rates at 3, 6, or 12 months postpartum between the two groups

Ekström et al. (2012); Sweden [31]

RCT

Intervention group (IG): 206 mothers

Control group A (CGA; data were collected before the study period): 162 mothers

Control group B (CGB; data were collected simultaneously with the intervention group): 172 mothers

Baseline, 3 days, 3 months, and 9 months postpartum

Intervention group:

Programme: a process-oriented training programme

Format: lectures and discussion

Content: lectures on breastfeeding management and promotion, including discussions about counselling skills and attitudes, and reflection on personal breastfeeding experience

Duration: 7 days

Control group:

No training

Breastfeeding duration and introduction of breastmilk substitutes: self-designed questionnaires and birth records

• IG mothers had a significantly longer duration of exclusive breastfeeding than the CGA mothers (p < 0.05)

• Fewer IG infants received breast milk substitutes in the first week of life without medical reasons compared with CGA and CGB (p < 0.05)

• IG infants were significantly older (3.8 months) when breast milk substitutes were introduced after discharge from the hospital compared with CGA and CGB infants (CGA = 2.3 months, p < 0.05; CGB = 2.5 months, p < 0.05)

Blixt et al.(2014); Sweden [32]

Breastfeeding problems and counselling satisfaction: self-designed questionnaires

• Among mothers with an exclusive breastfeeding duration < 3 months, IG mothers were more satisfied with the breastfeeding counselling provided (p < 0.01) and felt that the breastfeeding counselling was more coherent (p < 0.01) compared with CGA and CGB mothers

• Fewer mothers with an exclusive breastfeeding duration < 3 months in the IG ended their breastfeeding due to insufficient breast milk supply compared with CGA and CGB (p < 0.05)

Ekström; et al.(2015); Sweden [33]

Breastfeeding initiation, duration, challenges, and introduction of breast-milk substitutes: self-designed questionnaires

• IG mothers reported earlier initiation (within 24 h), higher frequency (within 24 h), and longer duration of breastfeeding compared with CGA and CGB mothers (p < 0.05)

• Less use of breast-milk substitutes in the first week of life without medical reasons and later introduction of breast milk substitutes after discharge from the hospital were reported by IG mothers compared with CGA and CGB mothers (p < 0.05)

• IG mothers reported fewer breastfeeding challenges (e.g. insufficiency in breast-milk) than CGA and CGB mothers (p < 0.05)

Shamim et al. (2017); Bangladesh [34]

Pragmatic cluster RCT

Baseline (pre-test): Control group (CG; provided services by midwives with no training): 461 mothers

Intervention group (IG; provided services by midwives with breastfeeding training): 400 mothers

Supervised group (SG, provided services by midwives with breastfeeding training and supervision): 321mothers

Post-test:

CG: 437 mothers

IG: 358 mothers

SG: 353 mothers

A pragmatic cluster RCT (baseline and 6 months after training)

Intervention group:

Programme: breastfeeding training

Theories/models: 2 separate training modules were developed by modifying the existing WHO/United Nations Children’s Fund 5-day breastfeeding counselling training guidelines

Format: group facilitation, role plays, case studies, group work, demonstrations, field trips, and problem-solving discussions,

Content: breastfeeding support

Duration: 5 days

Control group:

No training

Self-designed questionnaires

• After training, the IG and SG had significantly higher proportions of mothers who reported early initiation of breastfeeding and avoidance of prelacteal feeds compared with the CG (p < 0.05)

• No significant differences were seen in outcomes between the IG and SG

• After training, exclusive breastfeeding rate was not significantly different among the groups