Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of clinical outcomes for different morphological scores of D5 and D6 blastocysts in the frozen-thawed cycle

Original Submission
23 Jun 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Oct 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
24 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Lei Jin
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Lei Jin
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Lei Jin
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Lei Jin
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Lei Jin
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
12 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Lei Jin
Resubmission - Version 7
12 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
19 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
30 Jan 2023 Editorially accepted
6 Feb 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12884-023-05415-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page