Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Clinical efficacy and re-pregnancy outcomes of patients with previous cesarean scar pregnancy treated with either high-intensity focused ultrasound or uterine artery embolization before ultrasound-guided dilatation and curettage: a retrospective cohort study

Original Submission
8 Jun 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marwa Snosi
20 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Wenzhi Chen
21 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Wenzhi Chen
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Nov 2022 Author responded Author comments - Wenzhi Chen
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Nov 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marwa Snosi
20 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Wenzhi Chen
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Wenzhi Chen
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
6 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Wenzhi Chen
Resubmission - Version 6
6 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
11 Jan 2023 Editorially accepted
1 Feb 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12884-023-05376-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page