Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics and IVF cycle outcomes between the two groups after the propensity score matching of patients received GnRH-a trigger after GnRH antagonist-based stimulation protocols

From: Low LH level does not indicate poor IVF cycle outcomes with GnRh-a single trigger: a retrospective analysis

 

LH normal (control group)

LH low (experimental group)

P-value

n = 137

n = 47

Trigger day’ P

1.56(1.22–2.25)

1.93(1.58–2.32)

0.015

Trigger day’ E2

7154(5691–8279)

5931(5310–6816)

0.003

Trigger day’ LH

1.79(1.00-2.95)

1.42(0.78–2.63)

0.124

Trigger day’ FSH

11.03(9.34–13.94)

11.15(9.04–13.91)

0.951

Number of follicles greater than 14 mm in diameter on Trigger day

19(16–23)

20(16–26)

0.259

Number of eggs obtained

18(15–25)

20(14–27)

0.364

Number of mature eggs

17(13–22)

18(12–25)

0.667

Number of 2PN fertilization

13(10–17)

13(8–19)

0.786

Cleavage embryo

5(2–7)

4(2–7)

0.828

Number of blastocysts formed

8(5–12)

7(4–13)

0.610

Incidence of OHSS

0.7(1/137)

8.5(4/47)

0.016

live birth rate of first FET

54.9(73/133)

55.6(25/45)

1.00

live birth rate of second FET

58.3(21/36)

45.5(5/11)

0.505

live birth rate of third FET

40.0(2/5)

60.0(3/5)

0.500

  1. Data are presented as median (IQR) or % (n)
  2. Abbreviations: FSH follicular-stimulating hormone, LH luteinizing hormone, E2 estradiol, P progesterone, 2PN two pronuclei, OHSS ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, FET frozen thawed transplantation, IVF in vitro fertilization, IQR interquartile range