From: Interventions to enhance medication adherence in pregnancy- a systematic review
Citation & Country | Sample and Condition | Design | Total N analysed | Intervention (I) | Control/ comparison (C) | Perinatal and maternal clinical outcomes assessed | Results Intervention (I) vs Control/comparison (C) | Adherence outcomes assessed | Results I vs C |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baarnes et al., 2016 Denmark (HIC) [40] | Pregnant women with asthma | Before and after | N = 114 | Verbal and written information about asthma treatment, importance of adherence with medication, at each appointment. Review every 4 weeks during pregnancy and 3 months after birth. | Pre-pregnancy or earlier gestation (at enrolment) | Control of asthma- per GINA guidelines Before measurement: enrolment; After measurement: last visit before birth. | Rated well controlled: I: 88% vs C: 66% (no inferential statistics reported). | Objective Adherence: MPR: pre-pregnancy to during pregnancy | All women: MPR: I: 46% (s.d. = 31) C: 28% (s.d. = 25; (p < .0001). Women who filled > 1 prescription: MPR pre-pregnancy 34% (s.d. = 24), pregnancy 56% (s.d. = 25), (p < .0001). |
Asthma control: (enrolment to last visit before birth). | Improvement in FEV1 (p < .05), Reduction in FeNO (p < .001) | SRA: rated by woman as good, moderate, low (enrolment to last visit). | ‘Good’ adherence; I: 73%, C: 52%, (p > .001) | ||||||
Carter et al., 2020 USA (HIC) [41] | Pregnant women with Type 2 (48.7%) and gestational diabetes (GDM) diagnosed < 32 weeks (51.3%) | Pilot RCT | N = 78 (I = 48;, C = 30) | 4 Group education sessions: Self-assessed + recorded blood pressure, weight blood glucose. Activities: snacks, self-reflection activities, crafts, pregnancy or behavioural health stations + group activities about diabetes, pregnancy, tailored behavioural health topics. Seen individually as needed. | Individual care: prenatal care in diabetes clinic every 2 weeks or more at provider discretion per national guideline. Included routine screening, review of blood sugar logs, medication titration. | Perinatal outcomes | IoL: I:52.5%, C:42.1%, p = 0.36; C-section: I: 50%, C: 52.6%, p = 0.82; GAB: I: 37.8 (s.d. = 3.1), C: 37.5 (s.d. = 2.2), p = 0.75; PTB I: 20%, C: 23.7, p = 0.69; BW: I:3256.1 g (s.d. = 817.5), C:3176.7 g (s.d. = 644.2), p = 0.64; SmGA: I:5.0%, C:2.6%, p > 0.99; LGA: I: 42.5%, C:28.9%, p = 0.21; DYS: I:12.5%, C:2.6%, p = 0.20; Neonatal polycythemia: I: 10%, C: 15.8%, p = 0.51; Hypoglycaemia: I: 27.5%, C: 26.3%, p = 0.91; Treatment for hypoglycaemia: I: 17.5%, C: 15.8%, p = 0.84; Respiratory distress syndrome: I: 12.5%, C: 21.1%, p = 0.37; NICU admission> 24 hrs: I: 27.5%, C: 26.3%, p = 0.91 | SRA: Summary of self-care diabetes activities(no. of days taking recommended medication in past week) | I = 6.4 days (s.d = 1.5); C: 5.7 days (s.d. = 2.4) p = 0.48 |
Maternal: HbA1c (type 2 group only), Hypertensive disorders (both groups). % and mmol/mol | HbA1c: I: 6.3% (s.d. = 0.7%) (44.9 mmol/mol; s.d. = 7.8 mmol/mo) l, C: 6.8% (s.d. = 0.9%) (50.7 mmol/mol, s.d. = 10.0 mmol/mol), P = 0.09 Hypertensive disorder: I: 40% C: 34.2%, p = 0.34; |  |  | ||||||
De Lima et al., 2016 Netherlands (HIC) [42] | Women planning pregnancy within 2 years and pregnant women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease | Comparative (non-randomised) | N = 317 (I = 155; C = 162) | Pre-conception counselling (PCC) in specialist clinic: discussed guidelines, letter with advice summarised. Followed up every 3 months until conception, 2 months during pregnancy (2-weekly if active disease). | Attending specialist clinic during pregnancy only. (Follow-up every 2 months during pregnancy only, 2 weekly if active disease) | Perinatal outcomes | LBW: I: I7.2% vs C: 12.6% (aOR 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01–0.48) p < .006 BW: I 3373 g(IQR295–3679), C: 3363 g (IQR 2829–3630) p=.52 SmGA: I: 31%, C: 9.4% (aOR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05–1.00), p=.05 GAB: I: 38.4wks (IQR 34.0–40.0), C: 38.0 wks (36.1–39.5), p = .50 LB: I: 75.2%, C: 78.4% (aOR 0.79; 95% CI 0.45–1.38), p=.40 PTB: I: 13.4%, C: 7.9% (aOR 1.74; 95% CI 0.73–4.6), p=.22 SA: I: 20.2%, C: 19.1% (aOR 1.10; 95%CI 0.61–2.00), p=.75 CA: I: 3.1%, C: 4.7% (aOR 1.74; 95% CI 0.73–4.6), p=.91 | SRA: ‘Correct adherence’- measure used not reported | Not adherent: I: 2.6%, C:13.6%; Adherent: I: 97.4%, C: 86.4% (aOR, 5.69; 95% CI 1.88–17.27, p < .002). |
Maternal disease activity: (HBI; SCCAI; OR fecal calprotectin >200μg/g). | Disease activity: I: 18.1%, vs C:34.0%; No disease activity: I: 58.1%, C: 63.0% (aOR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28–0.95, p = .05) |  |  | ||||||
Flannagan et al., 2020 Australia (HIC) [43] | Pregnant women and women planning to conceive with IBD (50% pregnant; median gestation 12 weeks) | Before and after | N = 81 | Single-session gastroenterologist led in person/ telephone using pro-forma for evidence based advice, structured discussion relating to IBD and pregnancy + information tailored to patient concerns. | Before attending intervention (timepoint not stated) | Maternal disease activity: IBD questionnaire (bowel symptoms and systemic symptoms subscales) | Bowel symptoms I: 5.5 (IQR 4.9–6.1), C: 6 (IQR 5.5–6.5), P < .001 Systemic symptoms: I: 4.4 (IQR 3.4–5), C: 4.8 (IQR 4.2–5.6), p < .01 | SRA: medication adherence scale, (not reported). | 80% doses: I:93%, C: 89%; 50–80% doses: I: 5%, C:4%; 0–49% doses I: 7%, C: 1%; p = 0.18 |
Karunia et al., 2019 Indonesia (LMIC) [44] | Pregnant women with high risk for pre-eclampsia (PE) screened 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of pregnancy | Before and after | N = 12 | Educational booklet and verbal information given twice 28 days apart (visit 1 and 2): definitions, signs, symptoms and effects of PE, prevention with low dose aspirin, dosing and administration, info about benefits of aspirin for mother and foetus, importance of adherence. | After first intervention administration |  |  | Objective: Pill count (pills remaining from 30 given) at 28 days post second intervention administration | I: 95.8% (third visit), C: 89.8% (second visit), p = 0.011 |
Kim et al., 2019 Malawi (LIC) [45] | Pregnant women with HIV | Pilot RCT | N = 30 (I = 146 C = 160) | VITAL Start (VS): Video and counselling intervention, based on IMB Model: information about ART on body, managing side effects, adherence strategies. | Health care worker delivered 1 hr. group lecture based on Malawi National standard pre-ART counselling flipchart. |  |  | Objective adherence: Electronic pill count derived from pharmacy records at 1 month | Pill count > 90–100%: I: 65.1%, C: 59.4%, p = .31. |
SRA: missed dose | Missed dose last 7 days: I: 13.6%, C:26.8%, p < .02. Missed dose last 30 days: I: 29.9% C: 15.3%, p < .02. | ||||||||
Krishnakumar et al., 2020 India (LIC) [46] | Pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus using metformin or insulin (44 using metformin, 37 insulin) | Before and after | N = 81 | Patient education leaflet and verbal education for 30 minutes. Two sessions. Referred to as continuous. | Pre-intervention measurement (timepoint not stated) | Maternal: Glycaemic Control- Fasting and post-prandial glucose (mg/dL) pre-intervention to 2/3 months follow-up. | Fasting: Insulin group: I: 94.59 (s.d.5.77), C: 103.81 (s.d. = 7.98), p = .0001; Metformin group: I: 94.84 (s.d. = 6.18), C: 105.16 (s.d. = 15.16),, p < .0001; Postprandial blood glucose: Insulin group: I: 116.05 (s.d. = 6.01), C:128.30 (s.d. = 7.26), p < .0001; Metformin group: I: 117.86 (s.d. = 6.54), C: 130.23 (s.d. = 16.83), p < .0001 | SRA: Morisky medication adherence scale | MMAS (whole sample, n = 81) I: 6.38 (s.d. = 0.70 C: 5.6 (s.d. = 1.15), p < .0001; Metformin group: I 6.43 (s.d.0.36), C: 4.84 (s.d. = 1.14)p < .0001, Insulin (n = 37): I: 6.62 (s.d. = 0.53),C: 4.77 (s.d. = 1.17), p < .0001 |
Murphy et al., 2005 Australia (HIC) [47] | Pregnant women with asthma | Before and after | N = 177 | Asthma education programme +/− action plan, offered two visits, with additional visits where required. | First visit (approx. 20 weeks gestation). | Perinatal outcomes: (comparing women +/− action plan, n = 46). Before measurement: first visit or 20wks gestation. After measurement: 33 wks gestation. | Lower BW in women without additional action plan (no data reported; p < .005). | SRA: ICS adherence in the previous week at 20 vs 33 weeks. Severe asthma (n = 61) | All participants: Adherence > 80% doses. I: 40%, C: 21% (p < .006) Severe asthma: Decreased non-adherence between measurements points (exact values not reported; p = 0.014) |
Lung function: Measured 20 weeks gestation vs.33 weeks in women with mild (max n = 108), moderate (max n = 42) and severe asthma (max n = 61) | Mild and moderate asthma: No change between visits (p > .05 for all): FEV1L; FEV1 (% pred); FVC-L; FEC1:FVC; night symptoms; morning symptoms; activity limitation; RMU: d/w, t/d, t/w. Severe asthma: No change between visits (p < .05) for FEV1L; FEV1 (% pred); FVC-L; FEC1:FVC; morning symptoms; activity limitation.a Night symptoms: I: 0 (IQR0–3), C: 5 (IQR 2–7), p < .05 RMU-d/w: I: 7 (IQR 2–7) C: 7 (IQR 7–7), p < .05 RMU-t/d: I: 2 (IQR 1–3) C: 3 (IQR 2–5), p < .05 RMU-t/w: I: 7(IQR 3–14), C: 21 (IQR 7–35), p < .05 |  |  | ||||||
Pintye et al., 2020 Kenya (LMIC) [48] | Pregnant women with HIV | Comparative (non-randomised) | N = 356 (I = 190; C = 166) | 2-way SMS message communication (mWACH-PrEP); weekly automated messages informed by behaviour change theory + opportunity to communicate with a nurse via SMS | Women starting PrEP in preceding month before implementation of mWACH-PrEP |  |  | SRA: Self-reported adherence- number of missed doses in the past month in those returning, (high = < 1 missed pill/week) | High PrEP adherence I: 73% C: 55% (aRR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.28,1.41; p < .001). |
Objective: PrEP refills; PrEP continuation (attendance + PrEP Refill) | I: 43%, C: 22%; aRR = 1.75; 95% CI 1.21, 2.55; p = .003 | ||||||||
Potter et al., 2019 USA (HIC) [49] | Pregnant women with HIV | Comparative (non-randomised) | N = 117 (I = 14 C = 103) | Centering pregnancy; group sessions on ARVs in pregnancy, importance of adherence and impact, preventing transmission. (10 × 2 hours) | Standard care | Maternal viral load near birth (< 200 copies/mL). | I vs C: (aOR 7.0; 95% CI 0.6–81.51, p.13) |  |  |
Perinatal outcomes | BM [aOR 0.29; 95% CI 0.07–1.10], APGAR at 5 mins [p > .99; OR not reported], GAB [aOR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.07–1.10], BW [p = .51, OR not reported], Newborn HIV status: [p = .73, OR not reported]. |  |  | ||||||
Psaros et al., 2022 South Africa (UMIC) [50] | Pregnant women with HIV | RCT | N = 23 | Individual-targeted combined depression and adherence intervention: problem solving. Therapy and LifeSteps for PMTCT. | Usual care |  |  | SRA: Adherence composite score 1 month adherence, 3 month follow up. | No main effect or interaction between intervention and timepoint: BL: I: 85.3 (s.d. = 12.9), C: 79.0 (s.d. = 14.4), Post-test: I: 92.8 (s.d. = 8.7), C: 77.8 (s.d. = 15.4), 3 month follow up: I: 88.7 (s.d. = 9.3), C: 89.2 (s.d. = 5.9). |
Objective: Medication event monitoring system (bottle with digitised cap) | No main effect or interaction between intervention and time point. BL: I: 99.4 (s.d. = 2.2), C: 92.9 (s.d. = 14.3), Post test: I: 98.6 (s.d. = 3.0), C: 100 (s.d. = 0); 3 month follow upFollow up: I: 92.8 (s.d. = 6.4), C: 85.7 (s.d. = n/a) | ||||||||
Weiss et al. 2014 South Africa (UMIC) [51] | Pregnant women with HIV | Pilot RCT (cluster randomised trial) | N = 478 (I = 238, C = 240) | PartnerPlus: comprehensive couples-based PMTCT programme: 4, weekly sessions included CBT to improve adherence to treatment. Informed by IMB Model. | Enhanced standard care: standard antenatal care + PMTCT, health-related videos, without PartnerPlus intervention. | Perinatal outcomes: LB in subset (n = 82) | LB: I: 81.1%, vs C: 86.0% (p = .49) | Objective adherence: blood sample assessing ARV presence in mother (n = 24) and infant (n = 25) | No difference between groups for ARV presence in blood Mother I: 75%, C: 50% (p = .19) Infant I: 92%, C: 75% (p = .32) |
Yotebieng et al., 2016 D.R. Congo (LIC) [52] | Pregnant women diagnosed with HIV, seropositive. newly diagnosed, < 32 weeks pregnant | RCT | N = 326 (I = 171, Cl = 155) | Compensation ($5, plus $1 increment at each subsequent visit) conditional on attending scheduled clinic visits and accepting offered PMTCT services. | Standard care | Maternal viral load at 6 weeks postpartum (detection: 40 copies/mL) | Detectable I: 33.9% vs C: 30.3% [aRisk difference = −.01, 95% CI −0.10-.08). | Objective adherence: pill count assessed and classified as 100% adherent. | Intervention: adherent I: 69.9%, C: 68.1%; Not adherent I: 30.1%, C: 31.9% [aRisk difference = 0.03, 95%CI − 0.05- 0.12] |