Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the randomized clinical trials (RCTs)

From: The effect of vitamin D supplementation on oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

First author, year

Design

Participants, n

Place

Health condition

Gestational age (wk)

Duration (wk)

Treatment

Control

Explored variables

Outcome

treatment

control

Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye, 2021 [35]

RCT

13

9

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Healthy

16.2 ± 2.4

 < 20 to 30–38 wk

fortified sachet with vitamin D (500 IU) and calcium (500 mg) twice a day

placebo sachet

25(OH)D, CRP

CRP levels had no significant differences between supplemented and placebo groups

Khatiwada, 2021 [9, 33]

RCT

110

107

South Carolina, USA

Healthy

10–14

 > 20

4400 IU vitamin D3/day

400 vitamin D3/day

25(OH)D, TGF-β, IFN-γ, CRP, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, VEGF,

Immune-mediators in the late pregnancy did not change in response to vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy

Gunasegaran, 2021 [36]

RCT

34

36

Tamil Nadu, India

GDM

24–28

6

vitamin D 1000 IU and calcium 1000 mg

itamin D 250 IU and calcium 500 mg

25(OH)D, GSH

Supplementation with 1000 IU vitamin D and 1000 mg Calcium, had a positive effect on oxidative stress in women with GDM

Motamed, 2020 [23]

RCT

37

37

Tehran, Iran

Healthy

8–12

28.7

2000 IU/d vitamin D3

 + current supplementation during pregnancy

1000 IU/d vitamin D3 + current supplementation during pregnancy

MDA, TAC in the serum of mothers and offsprings’ cord blood

No significant within & between group differences in serum and cord blood concentration of MDA and TAC

Motamed, 2019 [24, 37]

RCT

37

37

Tehran, Iran

Healthy

8–12

28.7

2000 IU/d vitamin D3

 + current supplementation during pregnancya

1000 IU/d vitamin D3 + current supplementation during pregnancy

25(OH)D, hs-CRP, and cell-culture supernatant concentrations of IL-1 beta, IL-6, and TNF-α in mothers and offsprings’ cord blood

A significant decrease of TNF-α in maternal PBMCs of 2000 IU/d vitamin D group & lower concentration of cord blood IL-6 in 2000 IU/d compared to 1000 IU/d vit D group

Jamilian, 2019 [10]

RCT

30

30

Kashan, Iran

Healthy

24–28

6

200 IU/d vitamin D3 + 100 mg/d magnesium + 4 mg/d zinc + 400 mg calcium/d

Placebo

25(OH)D, hs-CRP, MDA, TAC in the maternal serum

Intervention caused a significant decrease in serum hs-CRP & plasma MDA & an increment in TAC levels compared to placebo group

Braithwaite, 2019 [34, 39]

RCT

93

102

UK

Healthy

10–17

20.5

1000 IU/d vitamin D3

Placebo

25(OH)D, CRP in the maternal plasma

Vitamin D 3 supplementation had no effect on CRP status

Hornsby, 2018 [32]

RCT

26

25

Boston, USA

Healthy

10–18

25

4400 IU/d vitamin D3

400 IU/d vitamin D3

25(OH)D, IFN- γ, IL-1 β, IL-6, and IL-8 in the supernant of cultured CBMCs

The levels of IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 in CBMCs of 4400 IU/d vitamin D group increased

Razavi, 2017 [11, 38]

RCT

30

30

Tabriz, Iran

GDM

24–28

6

T1: 50,000 IU vitamin D3 every 2 week

T2: 50,000 IU vitamin D3 every 2 week

 + 1000 mg/d omega-3

Placebo

serum levels of 25(OH)D, hs_CRP and plasma concentration of MDA, TAC, GSH in mothers

vitamin D + Omega3 (T1) decreased the concentration of hs-CRP, MDA & increased TAC & GSH compared to other groups

Yazdchi, 2016 [25]

RCT

38

38

Tabriz, Iran

GDM

24–28

8

50,000 IU twice a month vitamin D3

Placebo

25(OH)D, hs-CRP in the maternal serum

A significant increment of hs-CRP in placebo group, but no significant change in intervention group

Akhtar, 2016 [30]

RCT

80

80

Bangladesh

Healthy

26–29

16.5

35,000 IU/wk vitamin D3

Placebo

25(OH)D, IL-10

TNF-alpha

IFN- γ in the cultured CBMCs

higher concentrations of IL-10 & TNF-α & IFN-γ in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo

Samimi, 2016 [12]

RCT

30

30

Kashan, Iran

at risk for pre-eclampsia

20–32

12

50 000 IU vitamin D3 every 2 weeks + 1000 mg/ d calcium

Placebo

GSH in the maternal plasma

Plasma concentrations of GSH increased compared to placebo

Zhang, 2016 [29]

RCT

38

38

37

20

Shanghai, China

GDM

24–28

From 24–28 wk of gestation until delivery

T1: 200 IU/d vitamin D3

T2: 2000 IU/d vitamin D3

T3: 4000 IU/d vitamin D3

Control

25(OH)D in the serum and TAC and GSH in the plasma of mothers

TAC & GSH levels increased in response to T3 (50,000 IU every 2 weeks (4,000 IU daily for 12.5 days)) compared to other groups

Zerofsky, 2016 [31, 40]

RCT

26

29

California, USA

Healthy

20

22

2000 IU/d vitamin D3

400 IU/d vitamin D3

25(OH)D, IL-10 in the maternal plasma

2000-IU/d resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of CD4 + IL-10 + T cells compared to 400-IU/d that showed a 12% decrease in the same biomarker from the first to third visit

Asemi, 2014 [26]

RCT

28

28

Kashan, Iran

GDM

24–28

6

1,000 mg/d Calcium + 50,000 IU vitamin D3 twice a month

Placebo

25(OH)D in the serum and hs-CRP, MDA, GSH, TAC, NO in the plasma of mothers

Intervention caused a significant increase in GSH and prevented the increase of MDA levels compared to the placebo

Asemi, 2013 (a) [27]

RCT

27

27

Kashan, Iran

GDM

24–28

6

50,000 IU vitamin D3 twice a month

Placebo

25(OH)D, hs-CRP in the maternal serum

hs-CRP had a significant decrease in vitamin D group compared to the placebo group

Asemi, 2013 (b) [28]

RCT

24

24

Kashan, Iran

Healthy

25

9

400 IU/d vitamin D3

Placebo

25(OH)D, calcium, hs-CRP in the serum MDA & GSH in the plasma of mothers

A significant decrease in serum hs-CRP in intervention group

  1. n Number, wk Week, GDM Gestational diabetes, 25(OH)D 25-​hydroxyvitamin D3, hs-CRP High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL Interleukin, TNF-α Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, MDA Malondialdehyde, TAC Total antioxidant capacity, IFN-γ Interferon Gamma, GSH Glutathione, NO Nitric oxide, CRP C-reactive protein, TGF-β Transforming growth factor-beta, CBMCs Cord blood mononuclear cells
  2. aCurrent supplementation during pregnancy: daily iron, folic acid and multivitamin supplementation
  3. Overall risk-of-bias judgment: Low risk of bias: The study is judged to be at low risk of bias for all domains for this result; Some concerns: The study is judged to raise some concerns in at least one domain for this result, but not to be at high risk of bias for any domain; High risk of bias: The study is judged to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain for this result, or the study is judged to have some concerns for multiple domains in a way that substantially lowers confidence in the result