From: Group antenatal care (gANC) for Somali-speaking women in Sweden – a process evaluation
Key considerations prior to implementation | Intervention as intended | Intervention as delivered (fidelity) |
---|---|---|
Optimal group size (women) | 6–8 women | 4.2 women/session (range 1–8) |
Number and length of sessions | Seven 60-min sessions. | Six-seven 60-min sessions. |
Follow-up session after birth with babies? | Not “compulsory”, but suggested and discussed during implementation as optional. | Two groups (of seven) had a follow-up session after birth with their babies. |
Time of day for sessions | Weekdays AM | Sessions were scheduled on weekdays (AM), which was considered convenient by participants and midwives, but not optimal for those with daytime jobs or studying. |
Partners | To be invited to attend all sessions. However, women had the opportunity to decide otherwise. | Four men attended at least one session. Most groups (women and midwives together) decided not to invite men. |
Content of sessions | Selected topics to be presented (suggested in manual). After that, open for questions and discussion. Participants encouraged to raise any concerns and identify topics of interest. | Each session started with a presentation of a selected topic. Aids commonly used were pictures, anatomical models and displaying objects. Films on pregnancy and childbirth, some available online in Somali, shown in 1/3 of sessions Topics “pregnancy”, “birth” and “the newborn baby” were frequently discussed. “Parenthood” and “relationships” less frequent (in 4 of 50 sessions). |
Other professionals invited | Child health nurses, physiotherapists etc. optional. | None invited. |
Should clinical assessments be integrated in the sessions or not? | No | Clinical assessments were conducted in private adjacent to the sessions by women’s designated midwife, who was not necessarily one of the midwives leading the group. |
Interpreting | Interpreter/"cultural broker” assigned to all groups. | A bilingual female interpreter who also facilitated sessions was present in all but a few sessions. |
Sessions facilitated by midwives | Preferably two midwives—was believed optimal to facilitate dialogue and good group dynamics. | Half of sessions facilitated by one midwife only. Reasons provided were “few women attending” and a heavy workload. Some midwives (n = 3) preferred to facilitate sessions alone. |
Open or closed session groups (i.e. possibility to shift between groups and have fluid starting and end-dates)? | Closed groups, i.e. the same individuals in every session. | Only closed groups – women were assigned to a particular group to give them a better chance of getting to know each other and facilitated the administration for midwives. |
Tools to support person-centering in groups | Use of MI techniques in the groups (such as midwives asking open-ended questions and being “reflective in their listening and response”). | MI techniques were used to some extent. |