Skip to main content

Table 2 Measures of global fit for all estimated single CFA-models (N = 150)

From: Midwives’ empathy and shared decision making from women’s perspective - sensitivity of an assessment to compare quality of care in prenatal and obstetric care

  χ2 df χ2/df p CFI TLI RMSEA [90%-CI] SRMR
Acceptable fit threshold    < 3   ≥ .95 ≥ .95 ≤ .08  
Good fit threshold    < 2 ≥.05 ≥. 97 ≥ .97 ≤ .05 ≤ .08
SDM-Q-9-M(idwifery)
 Pregnancy model 74.80 24 3.12 ≤ .001 .98 .97 .103 [.080; .130] .025
 Birth data (pregnancy model) 93.39 24 3.89 ≤ .001 .96 .95 .139 [.110; .170] .030
 Modified model for birth data 56.93 23 2.48 ≤ .001 .98 .97 .100 [.067; .132] .021
 Integrated SDM-Q-9-M Model (pregnancy | birth) 44.99 | 56.70 22 2.05 | 2.58 ≤ .001 .99 | .98 .98 | .97 .084 [.048; .119] | .103 [.070; .136] .018 | .021
 Overall model integrated SDM-Q-9-M-model for pregnancy and birth 265.51 115 2.31 ≤ .001 .96 .95 .094 [.079; .109] .045
 Zero-Model 351.41 140 2.51 ≤ .001 .94 .94 .100 [.087; .113] .050
 Response-Shift Model SDM-Q-9-M 283.95 130 2.19 ≤ .001 .96 .95 .089 [.075; .103] .046
CARE-8-M
 Pregnancy model 57.59 19 3.03 ≤ .001 .96 .95 .117 [.083; .152] .033
 Birth data (pregnancy model) 127.11 19 6.69 ≤ .001 .93 .89 .195 [.164; .228] .041
 Modified birth model 55.92 16 3.50 ≤ .001 .97 .95 .129 [.093; .167] .032
 Integrated CARE-8-M model (pregnancy | birth) 53.12 | 55.92 16 3.32 | 3.50 ≤ .001 .97 | .97 .94 | .95 .125 [.089; .163] | .129 [.093; 0.167] .034 | .032
 Overall model integrated CARE-8-M-model for pregnancy and birth 161.32 87 1.85 ≤ .001 .97 .96 .076 [.057; .094] .048
 Zero-Model 373.84 109 3.43 ≤ .001 .89 .88 .128 [.114; .142] .063
 Response-Shift Model CARE-8-M 186.61 100 1.87 ≤ .001 .97 .96 .076 [.059; .093] .051
  1. CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index, RMSEA Root Mean Square of Approximation, SRMR Standardized Root Mean Square Residual