Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of combined UAE treatment in patients with CSP of different surgical treatment

From: Analysis of pregnancy outcomes following surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

UAE treatment

Types of CSP

P

I(n = 595)

II(n = 415)

III(n = 116)

N

 Yes

33(5.55)

94 (22.65) ad

50(43.10)bcd

0.000*

 No

562(94.45)

321 (77.35)

66(56.90)

 

Hysteroscopic lesion excision

 Yes

26(4.86)

84 (22.76) ad

35(60.34)bcd

0.000*

 No

509(95.14)

285 (77.24)

23(29.66)

 

Ultrasound-monitored curettage

 Yes

7(14.89)

5 (55.56)

0

-

 No

40(85.11)

4 (44.44)

0

 

Laparoscopic lesion excision

 Yes

0

2 (22.22)

2(11.76)

0.050

 No

2(100.00)

7 (77.78)

15(88.24)

 

Transabdominal lesion excision

 Yes

0

2 (28.57)

4(25.00)

-

 No

0

5 (71.43)

12(75.00)

 

Transvaginal esion excision

 Yes

0

1 (4.76)

9(36.00)

0.002*

 No

11(100.00)

20 (95.24)

16(64.00)

 
  1. Data are n (%)
  2. CSP, cesarean scar pregnancy; UAE, uterine artery embolization
  3. “*” indicates a statistically significant difference
  4. agroup I vs. group II
  5. bgroup II vs. group III
  6. cgroup I vs. group III
  7. dP < .05