Table 2 Characteristics of included studies
From: Promoting the practice of exclusive breastfeeding: a philosophic scoping review
ID | Authors (Year) Country | Design Sample size | Philosophy/framework | Use of philosophy | EBF assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01 | Ahmadi et al. (2016) [75] Iran | RCT (n = 124) | -Hubley’s Belief, Attitudes, Subjective Norms and Enabling factors (BASNEF) model -GATHER steps | Program implementation | Yes |
02 | Ahmed (2008) [76] Egypt | RCT (n = 60) | -Bandura’s social cognitive theory -Green’s PRECEDE model | Program implementation | Yes |
03 | Alianmoghaddam et al. (2019) [77] New Zealand | Qualitative (n = 30) | -Granovetter’s strength of weak ties theory -Milligan and Wiles’ theory of landscapes of care | Description of findings from thematic analysis | No |
04 | Arbour et al. (2019) [78] USA | Quasi-experimental (n = 16) | -Institute of Healthcare Improvement’s Breakthrough Series (BTS) collaborative model | Program implementation | Yes |
05 | Baerug et al. (2016) [79] Norway | Quasi-experimental (n = 2032) | -Pragmatism -Baby-Friendly Initiative | -Study design -Program implementation | Yes |
06 | Bai et al. (2007) [80] USA | Qualitative (n = 25) | -Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour | Data collection | No |
07 | Bai et al. (2011) [81] USA | Cross-sectional survey (n = 236) | -Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour | Data collection | No |
08 | Bich et al. (2019) [82] Vietnam | Quasi-experimental (n = 802) | -Bandura’s social cognitive theory -Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour | -Program implementation | Yes |
09 | Blyth et al. (2002) [83] Australia | Prospective survey (n = 300) | -Bandura’s self-efficacy theory -Dennis’ breastfeeding self-efficacy theory | -Program content development -Program implementation -Program evaluation: selection of measurements | Yes |
10 | Brockman (2015) [84] USA | Grounded theory | -Titler’s IOWA model of evidence-based practice -Lewin’s change management model | -Program implementation -Breastfeeding transition monitoring | Yes |
11 | Bueno-Gutiérrez et al. (2021) [85] Mexico | RCT (n = 80) | -Socio-ecological framework | -Program content development -Program implementation | Yes |
12 | Cangol & Sahin (2017) [86] Turkey | RCT (n = 100) | -Pender's Health Promotion Model | -Program content development -Program implementation -Program evaluation: selection of measurements | Yes |
13 | Chan et al. (2016) [87] China | RCT (n = 71) | -Bandura’s self-efficacy theory -Dennis’ breastfeeding self-efficacy theory | -Program content development -Program implementation -Program evaluation: selection of measurements | Yes |
14 | Froehlich et al. (2020) [88] USA | Mixed methods (n = 11) | -Husserl’s Phenomenology -Nicholson’s transition cycle | -Data analysis -Explanation of findings | Yes |
15 | Ghaffari et al. (2019) [89] Iran | RCT (n = 101) | -Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour | Program implementation | Yes |
16 | Gijsbers et al. (2006) [90] Netherlands | RCT (n = 113) | -De Vries’ Attitude-social influence-self-efficacy-model (ASE model) | Program implementation | Yes |
17 | Gu et al. (2016) [91] China | Longitudinal RCT (n = 285) | -Ajzen’s Theory of planned behaviour | -Program content development -Program implementation | Yes |
18 | Henry et al. (2017) [92] USA | Mixed methods (n = not stated) | -Kotter’s theory of change -Baby-Friendly Initiative | -Initiation of culture change -Addressing knowledge-practice gap | Yes |
19 | Lestari et al. (2019) [93] Indonesia | Qualitative (n = 11) | -Husserl’s Phenomenology | Description of EBF promotion activities | No |
20 | Liu et al. (2017) [94] China | Quasi-experimental (n = 150) | -Bandura’s self-efficacy theory -Dennis’ breastfeeding self-efficacy theory | -Program content development -Program implementation -Program evaluation: selection of measurements | Yes |
21 | Mccarter-spaudling & Gore (2009) [95] USA | Descriptive longitudinal (n = 155) | -Bandura’s social cognitive theory -Dennis’ breastfeeding self-efficacy theory | Measurement breastfeeding self-efficacy | Yes |
22 | Mcqueen et al. (2011) [96] China | RCT (n = 150) | -Bandura’s self-efficacy theory -Dennis’ breastfeeding self-efficacy theory | -Program content development -Program implementation -Program evaluation: selection of measurements | Yes |
23 | Moussa Abba et al. (2010) [97] Niger | Exploratory qualitative (n = 31) | -Lutter’s model of infant feeding behaviour | Basis for observation of dimensions | No |
24 | Mestsers et al. (2018) [98] Netherlands | RCT (n = 113) | -Bartholomew’s Intervention mapping -Bandura’s social cognitive theory | -Program design, implementation, and evaluation -Practical application for inducing change | Yes |
25 | Nguyen et al. (2014) [99] Vietnam | RCT (n = 2045) | -Alive and Thrive Vietnam’s Social Franchise Model | Program implementation | Yes |
26 | Nguyen et al. (2016) [100] Vietnam | RCT (n = 2045) | -Fishbein’s Theory of Reasoned Action Approach | Program implementation | Yes |
27 | Nichols et al. (2009) [101] Australia | RCT (n = 90) | -Bandura’s self-efficacy theory -Dennis’ breastfeeding self-efficacy theory | -Program content development -Program implementation -Program evaluation: selection of measurements | Yes |
28 | Pollard (2011) [102] USA | RCT (n = 86) | -Bandura’s social cognitive theory | -Program implementation | Yes |
29 | Rahayu (2017) [103] Indonesia | Descriptive correlational (n = 30) | -Mercer’s Theory of Maternal Role Attainment | Explanation of findings | No |
30 | Rasoli et al. (2020) [104] Iran | Quasi-experimental (n = 168) | -Extended Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour | Program implementation | Yes |
31 | Sadeghi et al. (2021) [105] Iran | RCT (n = 52) | -Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour | -Program content development -Program implementation | Yes |
32 | Seran et al. (2020) [106] Indonesia | Cross-sectional (n = 26) | -Green’s Precede-Proceed Model | Explanation of findings | No |
33 | Tengku Ismail et al. (2016) [107] Malaysia | Prospective cohort (n = 200) | -Ajzen’ theory of planned behaviour | Data collection | Yes |
34 | Thepha et al. (2019) [108] Thailand | Mixed methods (n = 22) | -Novak’s concept mapping | -Study design -Data collection | No |
35 | Tseng et al. (2020) [109] Taiwan | RCT (n = 93) | -Bandura’s self-efficacy theory -Dennis’ breastfeeding self-efficacy theory | -Program content development -Program implementation -Program evaluation: selection of measurements | Yes |
36 | Tuthill et al. (2017) [110] USA | RCT (n = 68) | -Fisher and Fisher’s Information-Motivation-Behavioural-Skills model -Dennis’ breastfeeding self-efficacy theory | -Program implementation -Program evaluation: selection of measurements | Yes |
37 | Wambach et al. (2011) [111] USA | RCT (n = 287) | -Ajzen’s Theory of planned behaviour -Mann’s adolescent decision-making (ADM) competence theory | Treatment group received breastfeeding education intervention based on TPB and ADM | Yes |
38 | Wan et al. (2016) [112] China | Longitudinal RCT (n = 285) | -Ajzen’s Theory of planned behaviour | Program implementation | Yes |
39 | Wen et al. (2021) [113] China | RCT (n = 132) | -Ajzen’s Theory of planned behaviour | Program implementation | Yes |
40 | Wu et al. (2014) [114] China | RCT (n = 74) | -Bandura’s self-efficacy theory -Dennis’ Breastfeeding self-efficacy theory | Treatment group received breastfeeding self-efficacy intervention | Yes |
41 | You et al. (2020) [115] China | RCT (n = 226) | -Bandura’s self-efficacy theory -Dennis’ breastfeeding self-efficacy theory | -Program content development -Program implementation -Program evaluation: selection of measurements | Yes |
42 | Yunitasari et al. (2020) [116] Indonesia | Descriptive correlational (n = 221) | -Pender’s Health promotion model | Explanation of findings | No |
43 | Zhang et al. (2021) [117] China | RCT (n = 140) | -Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour | -Program content development -Program implementation | Yes |
44 | Zhu et al. (2017) [118] China | RCT (n = 285) | -Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour | -Program content development -Program implementation | Yes |