Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of placental characteristics in cases of sFGR with and without thick AAA

From: Comparison of pregnancy outcomes and placental characteristics between selective fetal growth restriction with and without thick arterio-arterial anastomosis in monochorionic diamniotic twins

 

Thick AA group

(n =70)

Non-thick AA group

(n =65)

P-value

Prevalence of AAA [cases (%)]

70(100.0)

51(78.5)

<0.001

Prevalence of thick AAA [cases (%)]

70(100.0)

0

<0.001

Total number of AAA(n)

1(1,3)

1(1,2)

0.125

Total diameter of AAA (mm)

3.4(2.0,7.1)

1.4(0.0,3.3)

<0.001

Prevalence of AVA [cases (%)]

65(92.9)

62(95.4)

0.720

Prevalence of thick AVA [cases (%)]

31(44.3)

10(15.4)

<0.001

Total number of AVA(n)

5(1,14)

3(1,15)

0.016

Total diameter of AVA (mm)

6.3(0.3,12.0)

2.5(0.3,17.8)

<0.001

Prevalence of VVA [cases (%)]

19(27.1)

7(10.8)

0.017

Prevalence of thick VVA [cases (%)]

17(24.3)

4(6.2)

0.004

Total number of VVA(n)

1(1, 2)

1(1, 2)

0.821

Total diameter of VVA (mm)

4.2±1.8

1.9±1.2

0.004

Total number of all the anastomoses(n)

6(1, 15)

5(1, 16)

0.022

Total diameter of all the anastomoses (mm)

10.7(3.2,22.4)

4.4(0.5,19.3)

<0.001

Placental territory discordance ratio

0.26±0.09

0.34±0.15

0.001

Marginal umbilical insertion of normal growth fetuses[cases (%)]

6(8.6)

7(10.8)

0.774

Marginal umbilical insertion of restricted growth fetuses[cases (%)]

56(80.0)

55(84.6)

0.509

Birthweight discordance

/ Placental territory discordance

0.48(0.15,24.07)

0.73(0.13,3.71)

0.001

Umbilical insertion ratio

0.58(0.09,1.00)

0.61(0.08,1.00)

0.167

  1. sFGR selective fetal growth restriction, AAA arterio-arterial anastomosis, AVA arterio-venous anastomosis, VVA veno-venous anastomosis