Skip to main content

Table 5 Scale descriptions and psychometric properties

From: A questionnaire to measure the quality of midwifery care in the postpartum period from women’s point of view: development and psychometric testing of MMAYpostpartum

Scale and Item

Item num-ber

Mean

SD

Item-Total correlation coefficient

Scale internal consistency Cronbach’s Alpha

Cronbach’s Alpha if item deleted from subscale

Factor Personal Control

 I couldn’t speak freely about my feelings/fears

10

3.89

(1.37)

.53

.80

.86

 Examinations were performed without consent

8

4.41

(1.20)

.69

 

.69

 I felt judged

4

4.42

(1.25)

.74

 

.62

Factor Trusting Relationship

 The midwife was friendly to significant others

1

4.73

(0.56)

.72

.87

.85

 Information was neutral/judgement free

2

4.25

(0.95)

.55

 

.87

 Lifestyle choices were respected

3

4.59

(0.68)

.66

 

.85

 Privacy was respected

5

4.62

(0.65)

.64

 

.86

 The midwife was organised

6

4.29

(0.89)

.67

 

.85

 I received the right information at the right time

7

4.27

(0.89)

.71

 

.85

 The midwife took time to listen

9

4.52

(0.77)

.71

 

.85

Factor Orientation and Secruity

 The midwife helped with physical complaints

12

4.39

(0.81)

.65

.78

.72

 The midwife helped me deal with strong emotions

17

3.87

(1.02)

.61

 

.72

 The midwife helped me understand what was happening to my body

13

4.25

(0.89)

.69

 

.71

 The midwife helped my partner adjust to his/her new role

14

3.67

(1.13)

.63

 

.71

 The midwife enabled me to connect with other women and families

11

2.52

(1.23)

.29

 

.81

 The midwife respected my religion/ culture

15

3.88

(0.98)

.38

 

.78