Skip to main content

Table 2 Practices in relation to decision-making and indications for planned birth - % of respondents who agreed or strongly agreed with the statement

From: Inter-hospital and inter-disciplinary variation in planned birth practices and readiness for change: a survey study

 

% of all respondents

Hospital A, level 6

n = 78

Hospital B, level 6

n = 36

Hospital C, level 5

n = 37

Hospital D, level 4

n = 18

Hospital E, level 4

n = 36

Hospital F, level 4

n = 20

Hospital G, level 3

n = 20

p-value

Midwives

n = 191

Medical staff

n = 54

p-value

Women’s involvement in decision-making

 Women are informed about the benefits and risks of interventions such as IOL and CS

73

90

69

73

84

22

95

75

< 0.001*

68

93

.007*

 Women are supported to make decisions about their own care in relation to IOL

59

79

45

59

67

25

60

70

< 0.001*

51

89

< 0.001*

 Women are supported to make decisions about their own care in relation to CS

56a

64

38

78

62

22

70

60

< 0.001*

49

81

< 0.001*

 Consideration is given to the wishes and preferences of the woman in decisions about her care in relation to IOL and CS

67

84

49

77

73

36

80

70

< 0.001*

61

91

< 0.001*

Indications for planned birth

 In terms of the management of prolonged pregnancy, women from some ethnic groups, such as South Asian women, are induced at earlier gestations

34

15

23

97

28

14

90

10

< 0.001*

31

45

.110

 Women with uncomplicated DCDA twin pregnancies, where the presenting twin is cephalic, are supported to have a vaginal birth

75

87

80

89

95

66

50

35

< 0.001*

71

89

.011*

 Women with uncomplicated MCDA twin pregnancies, where the presenting twin is cephalic, are supported to have a vaginal birth

55a

67

61

64

78

43

25

30

< 0.001*

50

73

.003*

 Women who are afraid of childbirth are counselled and provided with information about the pros and cons of CS

68

78

67

65

78

55

65

60

.218

64

84

.004*

 Women who request a CS (without a medical reason) are counselled and supported to have a vaginal birth

73

75

72

79

67

69

90

55

.471

71

82

.182

 Women who had a previous CS are supported to have a vaginal birth

82

88

78

97

100

72

65

90

< 0.001*

89

93

.073

 Women with an uncomplicated breech (frank or complete breech, normal fetal size and welfare) are supported to have a vaginal birth, either in our unit or by referral to a unit which offers vaginal breech birth

50

90

25

51

28

14

35

35

< 0.001*

45

65

.019*

 Women who had a previous uterine rupture are routinely recommended a CS

82

88

72

92

89

64

75

85

.103

78

96

.001*

 Women with abnormal fetal lie (e.g. transverse lie), where ECV is declined, unsuccessful or not appropriate, are routinely recommended a CS

92

95

86

95

89

94

90

95

.477

91

98

.274

 Women with abnormal fetal lie (e.g. breech or transverse) are routinely offered a CS in preference to ECV

24

15

28

19

33

42

25

50

< 0.001*

28

22

< 0.001*

 Women with prior classical or inverted T uterine incision are recommended a repeat CS

90

95

86

100

77

86

80

80

.386

87

98

.033*

 Women with previous perineal trauma (e.g. 3rd or 4th degree tear/obstetric anal sphincter injury) are offered a CS

75

61

86

76

61

86

85

90

.037*

75

78

.913

 Women with previous severe pelvic floor damage (e.g. prolapse) are offered a CS

67a

62

72

76

50

80

75

75

.071

69

56

.097

 Women with a previous fetal death in utero are routinely offered a CS

12a

13

8

8

23

8

20

5

.579

12

9

.089

 Women with previous shoulder dystocia are routinely offered a CS

20a

5

34

27

11

25

25

40

.039*

19

27

.311

 Women who are colonised with Group B Strep are offered a CS

1

1

3

0

0

0

0

0

.486

1

0

.070

 In our unit, women with uncomplicated pregnancies are offered IOL before 41 + 0 weeks

14

5

31

8

11

25

5

25

.002*

18

2

.003*

 In our unit, planned CS for singleton pregnancy where there is no maternal or fetal indication for early birth, are offered before 39 + 0 weeks

18

6

34

10

11

37

5

26

.011*

11

6

.281

  1. ECV External cephalic version, CS Caesarean section, DCDA Dichorionic diamniotic, MCDA Monochorionic diamniotic
  2. *statistical significance at < 0.05
  3. a% of respondents who were undecided > 20% (range: 21 to 30%)