Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Original Submission
7 Dec 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hend Saleh
9 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Feb 2021 Author responded Author comments - Nakeisha A Lodge-Tulloch
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Feb 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Feb 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 Mar 2021 Author responded Author comments - Nakeisha A Lodge-Tulloch
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Mar 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Mar 2021 Author responded Author comments - Nakeisha A Lodge-Tulloch
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Mar 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Mar 2021 Author responded Author comments - Nakeisha A Lodge-Tulloch
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Mar 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Mar 2021 Editorially accepted
22 Mar 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12884-021-03711-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page