Table 2 Summary of factors associated with local herb use during pregnancy and/or labor in Kigoma Region, 2014–2016
Characteristic | Full Model | Final Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI*) | Type III p-value | Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI*) | Type III p-value | |
Antenatal Care | ||||
Yes | Reference | 0.5461 | ||
No | 0.9 (0.7–1.2) | |||
Age group (yr) | ||||
< 25 | Reference | 0.5114 | ||
25–34 | 0.8 (0.5–1.2) | |||
35–49 | 0.8 (0.5–1.3) | |||
Wealth tercile | ||||
Low | 1.4 (1.1–1.9) | 0.0128 | 1.4 (1.0–1.9) | < 0.001 |
Middle | 0.9 (0.7–1.2) | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | ||
High | Reference | Reference | ||
Birth order | ||||
First | 1.5 (1.0–2.3) | 0.0290 | 1.8 (1.4–2.4) | 0.01 |
Second | 0.9 (0.7–1.3) | 1.0 (0.7–1.5) | ||
Third or More | Reference | Reference | ||
Place of delivery | ||||
Hospital, health center, dispensary | Reference | 0.0006 | Reference | < 0.001 |
Home | 1.5 (1.1–2.1) | 1.6 (1.1–2.2) | ||
Other/Unknown | 0.4 (0.1–1.0) | 0.4 (0.1–1.0) | ||