Skip to main content

Table 3 Multilevel logistic regression results on the determinants of desire for more children among childbearing women in sub-Saharan Africa

From: Drivers of desire for more children among childbearing women in sub-Saharan Africa: implications for fertility control

Variables

Null model

Model I

Model II

Model III

Fixed effects results

Age

 15–19

 

1

 

1

 20–24

 

1.31*** (1.18–1.45)

 

1.31*** (1.18–1.45)

 25–29

 

1.19*** (1.07–1.31)

 

1.19*** (1.07–1.31)

 30–34

 

0.70*** (0.63–0.78)

 

0.70*** (0.63–0.78)

 35–39

 

0.32*** (0.29–0.36)

 

0.32*** (0.29–0.36)

 40–44

 

0.12*** (0.11–0.13)

 

0.12*** (0.11–0.13)

 45–49

 

0.04*** (0.03–0.04)

 

0.04*** (0.03–0.05)

Highest educational level

 No education

 

1

 

1

 Primary

 

0.72*** (0.70–0.75)

 

0.72*** (0.70–0.75)

 Secondary

 

0.78*** (0.75–0.81)

 

0.78*** (0.75–0.81)

 Higher

 

0.80*** (0.74–0.87)

 

0.80*** (0.74–0.87)

Partner’s highest educational level

 No education

 

1

 

1

 Primary

 

0.67*** (0.65–0.69)

 

0.67*** (0.65–0.70)

 Secondary

 

0.76*** (0.74–0.79)

 

0.77*** (0.74–0.80)

 Higher

 

0.88*** (0.83–0.93)

 

0.88*** (0.83–0.94)

Parity

    

 One birth

 

1

  

 Two births

 

0.29*** (0.28–0.31)

 

0.29*** (0.28–0.31)

 Three births

 

0.12*** (0.11–0.13)

 

0.12*** (0.11–0.13)

 Four or more births

 

0.10*** (0.09–0.11)

 

0.10*** (0.09–0.11)

Current use of contraceptives

No

 

1

 

1

Yes

 

0.68*** (0.66–0.70)

 

0.68*** (0.66–0.70)

Exposure to mass media

 No

 

1

 

1

 Yes

 

1.01 (0.98–1.03)

 

1.01 (0.99–1.04)

Ideal number of children

 0–3

 

1

 

1

 4–5

 

4.35*** (4.20–4.51)

 

4.36*** (4.20–4.51)

 6+

 

16.77*** (16.09–17.48)

 

16.76*** (16.08–17.48)

Decision making autonomy

    

Respondent alone

 

1

 

1

Otherwise

 

1.58*** (1.51–1.65)

 

1.58*** (1.50–1.65)

Number of living children

    

0

 

1

 

1

1–3

 

0.26*** (0.20–0.34)

 

0.26*** (0.21–0.34)

4+

 

0.07*** (0.06–0.10)

 

0.07*** (0.06–0.10)

Type of place of residence

    

Urban

  

1

1

Rural

  

1.01 (0.99–1.04)

1.07*** (1.04–1.10)

Wealth index

    

Poorest

  

1

1

Poorer

  

0.91*** (0.88–0.93)

0.97 (0.93-1.00)

Middle

  

0.84*** (0.82–0.87)

0.96 (0.93-1.00)

Richer

  

0.82*** (0.80–0.85)

1.00 (0.96–1.04)

Richest

  

0.78*** (0.76–0.81)

1.03 (0.98–1.08)

Random effects result

    

PSU variance (95% CI)

0.034 (0.026–0.043)

0.016 (0.011–0.021)

0.03 (0.02–0.04)

0.016 (0.011–0.021)

ICC

0.010

0.005

0.008

0.005

LR Test

χ2 = 283.67***

χ2 = 90.32***

χ2 = 240.51***

χ2 = 91.36***

Wald chi-square

Reference

55040.74***

392.00***

55038.94***

Model fitness

    

Log-likelihood

-147612.87

-92583.856

-147416.23

-92570.407

AIC

295229.7

185215.7

294846.5

185198.8

N

232,784

232,784

232,784

232,784

  1. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
  2. 1 Reference category; PSU Primary Sampling Unit; ICC Intra-Class Correlation; LR Test Likelihood ratio Test; AIC Akaike’s Information Criterion
  3. Model I adjusted for individual level factors only
  4. Model II adjusted for contextual factors only
  5. Model II adjusted for individual and contextual factors