Skip to main content

Table 1 An overview of the studies which were included in the review (n = 4)

From: Cost-effectiveness evidence for strategies to promote or support breastfeeding: a systematic search and narrative literature review

First author (year of publication)

Population

Country

Intervention

(studies reported usual or routine care as the comparator unless otherwise stated)

Desmond (2008) [27]

Pregnant women (sub-group by HIV status)

South Africa

Complex intervention including (full implementation): group education at antenatal clinics, up to 4 antenatal home visits by a lay breastfeeding counsellor, 14 postnatal home visits. Three levels of implementation considered: full, simplifieda, and basicb.

Additional comparisons made between levels of implementation of intervention

Rice (2010) [28]

Mothers of babies with low birth weight in neonatal units

United Kingdom

Enhanced staff contact to promote breastfeeding in a neonatal unit

Rubio-Rodríguez (2012) [29]

Mothers of babies with low birth weight in neonatal units

Spain

Intensive promotion of breastfeeding in low birth weight babies

Chola (2015) [30]

Pregnant women

Uganda

Community-based peer counselling conducted alongside breastfeeding promotion in facility-based maternal and child health services, including antenatal and postnatal services. Comparator was facility-based promotion only.

  1. aSimplified implementation: Less frequent pre-and post-natal visits, and more clinic based as opposed to home-based visits
  2. bBasic implementation: This scenario is entirely clinic-based
  3. HIV Human immunodeficiency virus