Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum suction compared with conventional dilatation and sharp curettage and electric vacuum aspiration in surgical treatment of miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial

Original Submission
8 Nov 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Mar 2020 Author responded Author comments - Toshiyuki Kakinuma
21 Jan 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 Jan 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Jan 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gökhan Açmaz
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Mar 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 May 2020 Author responded Author comments - Toshiyuki Kakinuma
5 Mar 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Mar 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
27 May 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Sep 2020 Author responded Author comments - Toshiyuki Kakinuma
28 Jun 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
5 Jul 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Sep 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Oct 2020 Author responded Author comments - Toshiyuki Kakinuma
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Oct 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Oct 2020 Author responded Author comments - Toshiyuki Kakinuma
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Oct 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 6
21 Oct 2020 Author responded Author comments - Toshiyuki Kakinuma
Resubmission - Version 7
21 Oct 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
27 Oct 2020 Editorially accepted
16 Nov 2020 Article published 10.1186/s12884-020-03362-4

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\