Skip to main content

Table 1 For all livebirths included in the audit, estimated gestation before birth and assessment of gestation after birth

From: Identifying women giving birth preterm and care at the time of birth: a prospective audit of births at six hospitals in India, Kenya, Pakistan and Uganda

 

CMC

(n = 692)

Mulago

(n = 958)

Mbale

(n = 772)

Kenyatta

(n = 992)

FBH/LNH

(n = 273)

Total

(n = 3687)

Estimated before birth

691

(99%)

957

(99%)

770

(99%)

954

(96%)

272

(99%)

3644

(99%)

Method

  LMP and/or clinical assessment

191

(28%)

855

(89%)

742

(96%)

921

(93%)

169

(62%)

2878

(78%)

  Dating ultrasound scan alone

211

(30%)

55

(6%)

21

(3%)

31

(3%)

37

(14%)

355

(10%)

  Dating ultrasound scan + other

289

(42%)

47

(5%)

7

(1%)

2

(< 1%)

66

(24%)

411

(11%)

Gestation (weeks)

  < 28

11

(1%)

4

(1%)

10

(1%)

3

(1%)

28

(1%)

  28–33+ 6

14

(2%)

52

(5%)

26

(3%)

36

(4%)

17

(6%)

145

(4%)

  ≥ 34

677

(98%)

894

(93%)

740

(96%)

908

(92%)

252

(92%)

3471

(94%)

Assessed after birth

Gestation (weeks)

  < 28

3

(< 1%)

3

(< 1%)

2

(1%)

8

(< 1%)

  28–33+ 6

15

(2%)

67

(7%)

10

(1%)

29

(3%)

15

(5%)

136

(4%)

  ≥ 34

677

(98%)

888

(93%)

762

(99%)

960

(97%)

256

(94%)

3543

(96%)

Neonatal assessment donea

-b

81

32

45

23

181

  1. All data are N (%)
  2. LMP Last menstrual period
  3. aNeonatal Assessments were only done for births thought to be preterm, CMC (n = 39), Mulago (n = 82), Mbale (n = 32), Kenyatta (n = 49), FBH/LNH (n = 25), Total (n = 227)
  4. bNot reported as only done for the infants for whom the neonatologist thought there was a discrepancy between before and after birth assessments