Peer Review reports
From: Antenatal cervical length measurement as a predictor of successful vaginal birth
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Dec 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Jan 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mohd Faizal Ahmad |
| 13 Jan 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sumaiya Adam |
| 14 Jan 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Torbjørn Moe Eggebø |
| 14 Jan 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gökhan Açmaz |
| 6 Feb 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Omima Tharwat Taha |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Feb 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Torbjørn Moe Eggebø |
| 9 Feb 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gökhan Açmaz |
| 10 Feb 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sumaiya Adam |
| 24 Feb 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Omima Tharwat Taha |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Mar 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gökhan Açmaz |
| 2 Mar 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Torbjørn Moe Eggebø |
| 10 Mar 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Omima Tharwat Taha |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 10 Mar 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Mar 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
| 30 Mar 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12884-020-02878-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.