Peer Review reports
From: Antenatal cervical length measurement as a predictor of successful vaginal birth
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Dec 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Jan 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mohd Faizal Ahmad |
13 Jan 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sumaiya Adam |
14 Jan 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Torbjørn Moe Eggebø |
14 Jan 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gökhan Açmaz |
6 Feb 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Omima Tharwat Taha |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Feb 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Torbjørn Moe Eggebø |
9 Feb 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gökhan Açmaz |
10 Feb 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sumaiya Adam |
24 Feb 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Omima Tharwat Taha |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 Feb 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Mar 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gökhan Açmaz |
2 Mar 2020 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Torbjørn Moe Eggebø |
10 Mar 2020 | Author responded | Author comments - Omima Tharwat Taha |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Mar 2020 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
17 Mar 2020 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Mar 2020 | Article published | 10.1186/s12884-020-02878-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.