Skip to main content

Table 1 : Descriptive summary of studies utilising non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram for NIEA analysis

From: A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction

Year

Paper

Study population

Inclusion criteria

Definition of IUGR

Acquisition method

Signal acquisition

Signal processing

1981

Karinemi et al.

Case control study

N = 65 from normal pregnancies with no fetal acidosis at birth. n = 68 with IUGR. n = 84 with post dates pregnancies

BPD < 5%

NIFECG using HP 8030A Cardiotocograph

Recorded manually on magnetic tape and digitalized at a 1000 samples per second)a

R-R intervals detected no description provided)a. DI sampled over 5 min. Upper rejection limit of 5 bpm was utilised

1982

Brambati et al.

Case control study

N = 26 of fetuses suspected to be small for dates

Small for dates by ultrasound or clinical exam (no explanation given) BW < 10% postnatally.

NIFECG- system not specified

N/A

MECG subtraction method utilised. Signal delayed by 180 ms and 50 complexes averaged

1986

Pardi et al.

Prospective cohort study

25 to 41 weeks of gestation. n = 68. Fetuses with malformations excluded

AC < 5%

NIFECG- system not specified

N/A

MECG subtraction method utilised. Signal delayed by 180 ms and 50 complexes averaged

2012

Graatsma et al.

Prospective cohort study

20–42 weeks of gestation. Control (n = 90),IUGR (n = 30)

EFW ≤10% and BW ≤10% corrected for GA

NIFECG. Monica AN24. 5 electrodes utilised

Recorded with a sample frequency of 1000 Hz. Duration = 7 h

In depth analysis available from Pieri et al.b MECG subtraction method utilised. 50 FECG complexes averaged

2015

Stampalija et al.

Case control study

26–34 weeks. IUGR n = 22, Control n = 37. Singleton pregnancies

AC < 5%

NIFECG. Monica healthcare. 5 electrodes utilised transabdominally

40 min recording. Sample frequency of 900 Hz

MECG subtraction method as filter. FECG complexes averaged over a 2 s window.

PRSA applied to entire trace

STV measured using Dawes Redman criteria

2016

Stampalija et al.

Case control study

25–40 weeks. IUGR (n = 66). Control (n = 79) Singleton pregnancies

AC < 5%

NIFECG. Monica healthcare. 5 electrodes utilised transabdominally

37 min.

R-R wave pulse intervals were calculated with an accuracy of 1 ms. MECG subtraction method as filter. FECG complexes averaged over a 2 s window.

PRSA applied to entire trace

2016

Fuchs et al.

Prospective case control study

28–42 weeks. IUGR = 93, IUGR with brain sparing = 37 and 324 healthy pregnancies

EFW < 5% and only asymmetrical IUGR considered. BW was < 10% and ponderal index < 10% at birth

NIFECG. KOMPOREL system. 6 electrodes on maternal abdomen,

30 min recording. No further information provided

No information provided

2016

Fuchs et al.

Prospective case control study

28–40 weeks. IUGR with normal CPR (n = 110), IUGR with decreased CPR (n = 29) and normal pregnancies (n = 549)

EFW < 5% and only asymmetrical IUGR considered. BW was < 10% and ponderal index < 10% at birth

NIFECG. KOMPOREL system. 6 electrodes on maternal abdomen,

30 min recording. No further information provided

No information provided

2017

Velayo et al.

Human- case control study

20–34 weeks IUGR n = 15, Control n = 20. Singleton pregnancies

EFW and AC < 10%

NIFECG 14 electrodes transabdominally

20 min recordings Bipolar recording. Sampling every 1 ms at 1 kHz

1-100 Hz band pass filtering. FECG signal averaging carried out.

  1. AC abdominal circumference,BPD Bi parietal diameter, BW birth weight, CPR Cerebro placental ration, CTI cardiac time intervals, EFW estimated fetal weight, GA gestational age, FECG fetal electrocardiogram, HC head circumference, MECG maternal electrocardiogram, NIFECG non invasive fetal electrocardiogram, IUGR intra uterine growth restriction, PRSA phase rectified signal averaging, SD standard deviation, STV short term variability
  2. a.Yeh et al. [54].b. Pieri et al. [66]