Table 4 Estimated effects of the conditional cash transfer programme on newborn early infant diagnosis (EID) testing
| Â | Â | Percent of babies getting an EID test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total number of babies in each group (N) | Number of babies tested (N) | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
Intent-to-treat (ITT) | ||||
 Offered CCT intervention | 263 | 69 | 26.2% | 26.0% |
 Standard care | 254 | 34 | 13.4% | 13.6% |
 Risk difference percentage points (95% CI) |  |  | 12.8 (6.1-19.6) | 12.4 (5.6-19.2) |
 Odds ratio (95% CI) |  |  | 2.30 (1.46-3.62) | 2.24 (1.42-3.53) |
Per protocol (PP) | ||||
 Enroled in CCT intervention | 195 | 63 | 32.3% | 32.1% |
 Standard care | 254 | 34 | 13.4% | 13.5% |
 Risk difference percentage points (95% CI) |  |  | 18.9 (11.1-26.7) | 18.7 (10.9-26.5) |
 Odds ratio (95% CI) |  |  | 3.09 (1.93-4.94) | 3.06 (1.90-4.91) |