Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of mobility patterns during pregnancy and delivery location choice
Mobility pattern (AS = 0) | AR = 0 | Delivery locations | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS | MR | AR | MR | (SA = 0) | |||||||
OR | 95% C.I. | OR | 95% C.I. | OR | 95% C.I. | OR | 95% C.I. | OR | 95% C.I. | ||
Age (years) | continuous | 1.05 | 0.98, 1.12 | 1.06** | 1.02, 1.10 | 1.09** | 1.05, 1.13 | 0.98** | 0.96, 0.99 | 1.04** | 1.02, 1.06 |
Educational years | continuous | 0.94 | 0.72, 1.23 | 1.08 | 0.93, 1.24 | 1.01 | 0.88, 1.15 | 1.07 | 0.99, 1.15 | 0.96 | 0.90, 1.03 |
Engel Coefficient | continuous | 8.31** | 1.97, 35.01 | 1.23 | 0.62, 2.45 | 1.45 | 0.74, 2.83 | 0.84 | 0.58, 1.22 | 1.12 | 0.79, 1.59 |
Own housing in RA | NO = 0 | 2.96 | 0.91, 9.69 | 1.81 | 0.76, 4.29 | 5.66** | 2.45, 13.05 | 0.32** | 0.24, 0.43 | 3.47** | 2.60, 4.64 |
Urban Employees Insurance | NO = 0 | 1.23 | 0.65, 2.33 | 0.84 | 0.60, 1.19 | 0.71* | 0.55, 0.99 | 1.18 | 0.43, 1.98 | 0.79* | 0.66, 0.94 |
Rural household registration | NO = 0 | 1.04 | 0.47, 2.28 | 1.29 | 0.86, 1.94 | 1.06 | 0.71, 1.56 | 1.21 | 0.97, 1.50 | 0.83 | 0.68, 1.03 |
The first parity | NO = 0 | 1.25 | 0.65, 2.40 | 1.03 | 0.74, 1.42 | 1.02 | 0.75, 1.40 | 1.00 | 0.85, 1.19 | 0.99 | 0.85, 1.17 |
Range of migration | Cross-province | 0.99 | 0.36, 2.69 | 1.19 | 0.66, 2.13 | 0.83 | 0.48, 1.44 | 1.42* | 1.05, 1.91 | 0.73* | 0.55, 0.97 |
Cross-district = 0 | Cross-city | 0.70 | 0.23, 2.15 | 1.54 | 0.82, 2.89 | 0.70 | 0.39, 1.28 | 2.17** | 1.05, 1.91 | 0.46** | 0.34, 0.62 |
Migration time | continuous | 1.05 | 0.96, 1.15 | 1.10** | 1.05, 1.16 | 1.14** | 1.09, 1.20 | 0.96** | 0.94, 0.98 | 1.05** | 1.03, 1.07 |
Level of participation | continuous | 0.98 | 0.75, 1.28 | 1.01 | 0.88, 1.16 | 1.08 | 0.94, 1.24 | 0.93 | 0.87, 1.00 | 1.06 | 0.99, 1.14 |
Will to integrate | continuous | 1.89** | 1.43, 2.49 | 1.26** | 1.10, 1.45 | 1.32** | 1.15, 1.51 | 0.95 | 0.89, 1.03 | 1.14** | 1.06, 1.21 |