Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Mar 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Oct 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Emma Sacks |
19 Dec 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Emma Sacks |
8 Jun 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Bailey |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Jun 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
22 Jun 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kent T. HayGlass |
23 Jun 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Emma Sacks |
11 Oct 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Bailey |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Oct 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
30 Oct 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kent T. HayGlass |
27 Nov 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Bailey |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Nov 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Nov 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Bailey |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Nov 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
13 Dec 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Dec 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12884-017-1627-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.