Peer Review reports
From: The effectiveness of double incision technique in uterus preserving surgery for placenta percreta
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 May 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Sep 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chet Wells |
| 15 Nov 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karin Anneliese Fox |
| 6 Dec 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Ibrahim Polat |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Dec 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Ibrahim Polat |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 13 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Ibrahim Polat |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 14 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Ibrahim Polat |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 14 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 Feb 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Ibrahim Polat |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 Feb 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Feb 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 Apr 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12884-017-1262-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.