Peer Review reports
From: Why women do not ask for information on preconception health? A qualitative study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Jul 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 16 Apr 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - José F. Cordero |
| 30 Jun 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen New |
| 10 Aug 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Renata Bortolus |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Aug 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Sep 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - José F. Cordero |
| 6 Sep 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karen New |
| 7 Nov 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Renata Bortolus |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Nov 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 20 Nov 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Renata Bortolus |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Nov 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 6 Dec 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Renata Bortolus |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 Dec 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Jan 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12884-016-1198-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.